02/10/2015 01:00 PM House MILITARY & VETERANS' AFFAIRS
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HJR13 | |
| HB61 | |
| Adjourn |
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| *+ | HJR 13 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 61 | TELECONFERENCED | |
ALASKA STATE LEGISLATURE
HOUSE SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON MILITARY AND VETERANS' AFFAIRS
February 10, 2015
1:07 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT
Representative Bob Herron, Chair
Representative Jim Colver
Representative Shelley Hughes
Representative Gabrielle LeDoux
Representative Bob Lynn
Representative Max Gruenberg
Representative Chris Tuck
MEMBERS ABSENT
All members present
COMMITTEE CALENDAR
HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 13
Urging the United States Department of the Army to maintain the
current level of its combat-capable structure in the state and
not to take structural realignment actions with regard to Fort
Wainwright and Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson.
- MOVED CSHJR 13(MLV) OUT OF COMMITTEE
HOUSE BILL NO. 61
"An Act relating to special motor vehicle registration plates
for recipients of the Bronze Star, Silver Star, or other
meritorious service awards; and providing for an effective
date."
- HEARD & HELD
PREVIOUS COMMITTEE ACTION
BILL: HJR 13
SHORT TITLE: RETAIN ARMY FORCES IN ALASKA
SPONSOR(s): REPRESENTATIVE(s) REINBOLD
02/06/15 (H) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
02/06/15 (H) MLV
02/10/15 (H) MLV AT 1:00 PM CAPITOL 120
BILL: HB 61
SHORT TITLE: MILITARY MERITORIOUS AWARD LICENSE PLATES
SPONSOR(s): REPRESENTATIVE(s) GARA, GRUENBERG, VAZQUEZ, LYNN,
LEDOUX
01/21/15 (H) PREFILE RELEASED 1/16/15
01/21/15 (H) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
01/21/15 (H) MLV, STA, FIN
02/10/15 (H) MLV AT 1:00 PM CAPITOL 120
WITNESS REGISTER
REPRESENTATIVE LORA REINBOLD
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Speaking as the sponsor, introduced HJR 13.
ELIJAH VERHAGEN, Staff
Representative Lora Reinbold
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Commented on the conceptual amendments to
HJR 13 on behalf of Representative Reinbold, sponsor.
REPRESENTATIVE LES GARA
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Speaking as the sponsor, introduced HB 61.
AMY ERICKSON, Director
Division of Motor Vehicles
Department of Administration
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Answered questions during the hearing on HB
61.
LARRY GORDAOFF, Founder
Alaska Native Veterans Association
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 61.
ACTION NARRATIVE
1:07:23 PM
CHAIR BOB HERRON called the House Special Committee on Military
and Veterans' Affairs meeting to order at 1:07 p.m.
Representatives LeDoux, Colver, Gruenberg, and Herron were
present at the call to order. Representatives Hughes, Tuck, and
Lynn arrived as the meeting was in progress.
HJR 13-RETAIN ARMY FORCES IN ALASKA
1:08:08 PM
CHAIR HERRON announced that the first order of business would be
HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 13, Urging the United States
Department of the Army to maintain the current level of its
combat-capable structure in the state and not to take structural
realignment actions with regard to Fort Wainwright and Joint
Base Elmendorf-Richardson.
1:08:18 PM
REPRESENTATIVE LORA REINBOLD, Alaska State Legislature, speaking
as the sponsor of HJR 13, stated that the U.S. Army plays a role
important to Alaska, the nation, and the world. As co-chair of
the Joint Armed Services Committee, she sponsored HJR 13 because
30 military installations are being considered for reductions
nationwide. It is critical to maintain the number of Army
personnel in Alaska at its current level due to the fact that
Alaska is in a unique situation, and she highlighted three
important roles for Alaska. She directed attention to the bill
on page 2, lines 17-19, which read:
WHEREAS the geographic location of Alaska, including
its access to polar air routes, provides a vital
strategic advantage for current and future Department
of the Army missions, force mobilizations, offensive
operations, and defensive operations; and
REPRESENTATIVE REINBOLD said Alaska's geographic location is one
facet of its very unique role. Also, on page 2, lines [26-28],
which read:
WHEREAS, the six major military installations, more
than 23,000 active duty service members, and more than
37,000 family members of active duty service members
in Alaska make the military presence in the state
economically important to Alaska; and
REPRESENTATIVE REINBOLD directed attention to another point, on
page 3, lines [17-20] which read:
WHEREAS Alaska has demonstrated its strong commitment
to the United States Army by investing more than
$88,000,000 in transportation infrastructure to
provide the United States Army with access throughout
the year to training areas for maneuvers in the Joint
Pacific Alaska Range Complex; and
REPRESENTATIVE REINBOLD stated that Alaska is the only state
with direct access to the Arctic thus Alaskan military members
are experts in extreme cold weather operations. She concluded
that these three unique factors are very important. About 5,000
positions at Fort Wainwright and another 5,000 military
positions in Anchorage are at risk. She read a quote from Major
General Mitchell, and urged support for HJR 13, for national
security and for Alaska. In response to Chair Herron,
Representative Reinbold said she would be attending [listening
sessions on this matter scheduled for 2/23-24/15 in Anchorage].
1:12:36 PM
CHAIR HERRON noted that the committee and the House Judiciary
Standing Committee would also be represented in order to send a
clear message from the legislature in support of the resolution.
1:13:29 PM
REPRESENTATIVE LYNN said these are hazardous times in which to
live and expressed his surprise that there are proposed cuts to
the military. He expressed his support for the bill.
1:15:22 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG said he noted several minor grammatical
problems with the bill and directed attention to page 1, line 1,
and page 4, line 1, which read respectively in part:
Urging the United States Department of the Army to
maintain the current level of its
Department of the Army to maintain the current level
of its combat-capable structure in
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG then proposed a conceptual amendment
that after the word "maintain" in both sentences add "and
strengthen." He asked whether the chair wanted his conceptual
amendments to be numbered consecutively or to be included in one
conceptual amendment.
CHAIR HERRON said "we will take note of them and then we will
make a motion at the end ... so, just so the committee signs off
on each one as we go." He restated that the conceptual
amendment was to read "maintain and strengthen" to line 1, page
1, and to line 1, page 4, of the bill. In response to
Representative Gruenberg, Chair Herron said the proposed change
was approved by the bill's sponsor and asked the committee for
comments. [There were no comments made by committee members.]
[The committee treated the conceptual amendment as accepted by
the chair.]
[All of the following conceptual amendments that were accepted
by the chair were incorporated into Conceptual Amendment 1 moved
by Representative Gruenberg at the conclusion of the hearing of
HJR 13.]
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG turned to page 1, lines 1-3, which
read:
Urging the United States Department of the Army to
maintain the current level of its combat-capable
structure in the state and not to take structural
realignment actions with regard to Fort Wainwright and
Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson.
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG proposed a conceptual amendment to
specify "structural realignment actions that reduce" the force
and noted that this term appears elsewhere in the bill on page
1, line 7, and on page 4, line 4.
REPRESENTATIVE COLVER suggested that on page 1, line 3, the
conceptual amendment replace "with regard to" with "that
reduce."
CHAIR HERRON remarked:
This is a conceptual amendment, we'll just talk about
the potential of a full amendment at the end and I
understand, in those three places, it's: We don't
want it to reduce. Is that correct?"
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG said yes. He then proposed that on
page 1, line 3, the committee replace "with regard to" with
"at."
CHAIR HERRON said, "So we have "at" we're at ... page 1, line 3,
and then in those three other locations, there will be an
adjective that talks about reductions. ... You and my staff and
the sponsor, we will make sure that [legislative] legal
understands the intent."
1:19:15 PM
ELIJAH VERHAGEN, Staff, Representative Lora Reinbold, Alaska
State Legislature, expressed concurrence with the first change
to add "and strengthen." However, he said the sponsor would not
accept the deletion of "with regard to," or an amendment to page
1, line 2; even though these are minor changes, the intent of
the resolution is clear that a reduction in the number of troops
is unwanted.
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG questioned whether the sponsor did not
wish to say "reduce or decrease."
MR. VERHAGEN responded that the intent is clear as the bill is
written.
REPRESENTATIVE REINBOLD remarked:
It's always the will of the committee. So if you guys
believe that this is ... what needs to be done in the
title, then we obviously are yielding to the
committee, so, in regards to that.
CHAIR HERRON noted that the sponsor does not want to use the
word "reduce."
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG asked whether the sponsor did not want
to make the foregoing change just in the title, or anywhere in
the bill.
REPRESENTATIVE REINBOLD pointed out the term is written
throughout the bill, and she was "open to the option;" however,
she also wanted to ensure there is time to advance the
resolution to the other body.
CHAIR HERRON recommended that the committee not add a "reduce
adjective" because the intent of attending the listening
sessions is to speak against reductions. In response to
Representative LeDoux, he said the committee can approve a
committee substitute (CS) with conceptual amendments, and "we're
not going to hold it up."
CHAIR HERRON, in response to Representative Gruenberg's proposed
change on page 1, line 3, to "at", said, "The chair will make a
ruling on that ... sometimes we disagree with [legislative]
legal, but it survived their review, so ... Representative
Gruenberg, I'm fine with it staying that way."
[The committee treated the foregoing conceptual amendment as not
accepted by the chair.]
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG turned to page 2, line 3, and proposed
a conceptual amendment replacing "chairman" with "Chair;" and on
page 2, lines 8-9, change "members of an affected community" to
"members of affected communities;."
CHAIR HERRON said he accepted the foregoing technical changes
made by the conceptual amendment.
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG continued to page 2, line 11, and
proposed a conceptual amendment replacing "WHEREAS Anchorage"
with "WHEREAS Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson."
REPRESENTATIVE COLVER said the conceptual amendment is
redundant.
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG clarified the proposed change.
MR. VERHAGEN stated the sponsor's wish to retain the original
language on this point.
[The committee treated the foregoing conceptual amendment as not
accepted by the chair.]
1:26:17 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG continued to page 2, line 18, and
proposed a conceptual amendment replacing "Department of the"
with "United States."
CHAIR HERRON said he accepted the foregoing technical change
made by the conceptual amendment.
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG continued to page 2, line 24, and
proposed a conceptual amendment adding ", Asia," preceding "and
Europe."
CHAIR HERRON stated there was no objection and said he accepted
the foregoing addition made by the conceptual amendment.
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG continued to page 2, line 28, and
proposed a conceptual amendment replacing "important" with
"vital."
CHAIR HERRON stated there was no objection and said he accepted
the foregoing conceptual amendment.
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG continued to page 3, line 3, and
proposed a conceptual amendment replacing "distance delivery"
with "off campus communications."
CHAIR HERRON noted there was an objection, and said he did not
accept the aforementioned conceptual amendment.
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG continued to page 3, line 14, and
proposed a conceptual amendment replacing "the United States
Army and the United States Air Force" with "United States Army
and United States Air Force facilities."
CHAIR HERRON stated there was no objection, and said he accepted
the foregoing conceptual amendment.
There followed discussion about the use of the term "co-located"
or "located together."
CHAIR HERRON ruled to retain "located together" as currently
found in the bill.
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG continued to page 3, line 15, and
proposed a conceptual amendment replacing "providing a unique
and efficient" with "providing an ideal."
REPRESENTATIVE REINBOLD indicated her objection.
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG withdrew the foregoing conceptual
amendment.
1:30:47 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG proposed a conceptual amendment
replacing "with regard to both" with "at" on line 4, page 4.
REPRESENTATIVE REINBOLD said this conceptual amendment had
already been discussed earlier in the meeting and was not
acceptable to the sponsor.
{The committee treated the foregoing conceptual amendment as not
accepted by the chair.]
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG then proposed a conceptual amendment
that the resolution should be sent to General Dempsey, Chairman
of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and to the Army Chief of Staff.
CHAIR HERRON stated there was no objection, said he accepted the
conceptual amendment, and directed staff and [legislative] legal
to add the foregoing names.
REPRESENTATIVE REINBOLD returned attention to page 2, line 11,
and proposed a conceptual amendment adding "and vicinity"
following "Anchorage."
CHAIR HERRON stated there was no objection and said he accepted
the foregoing conceptual amendment.
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX [proposed a conceptual amendment]
expanding the distribution list to include the President and
Vice-President of the U.S.
REPRESENTATIVE REINBOLD agreed.
CHAIR HERRON said he accepted the conceptual amendment to the
distribution list.
1:33:14 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG moved to adopt [Conceptual Amendment
1]. [The committee treated Conceptual Amendment 1 as
incorporating all of the conceptual amendments that Chair Herron
stated were accepted.] There being no objection, Conceptual
Amendment 1 was adopted. Before the committee was HJR 13, as
amended.
1:33:56 PM
CHAIR HERRON [opened public testimony on HJR 13. After
ascertaining that no one wished to testify, Chair Herron closed
public testimony.]
1:34:22 PM
REPRESENTATIVE COLVER moved to report HJR 13, as amended, with
individual recommendations and [zero] fiscal note. There being
no objection, CSHJR 13(MLV) was reported from the House Special
Committee on Military and Veterans' Affairs.
1:34:49 PM
The committee took an at ease from 1:34 p.m. to 1:37 p.m.
HB 61-MILITARY MERITORIOUS AWARD LICENSE PLATES
1:37:24 PM
CHAIR HERRON announced that the final order of business would be
HOUSE BILL NO. 61, "An Act relating to special motor vehicle
registration plates for recipients of the Bronze Star, Silver
Star, or other meritorious service awards; and providing for an
effective date."
1:37:40 PM
REPRESENTATIVE LES GARA, Alaska State Legislature, speaking as
the sponsor, informed the committee HB 61 adds the honor of
license plates for those who have demonstrated bravery while
serving the U.S. Armed Forces in combat. There are a number of
military license plates - for example, recipients of the Medal
of Honor are recognized - but two that are missing are for those
who receive honors for fighting in the armed forces in
operations that involve hostile or enemy forces, and receive the
Silver Star Medal or the Bronze Star Medal. Representative Gara
said he was contacted by a veteran in this regard, and observed
that there are few ways for the public to appreciate veterans
who have served in the military. For those who want to have a
license plate, it is a dignified and state-sanctioned
recognition of a veteran's sacrifice. The bill adds two
categories of license plates issued by the Division of Motor
Vehicles (DMV), Department of Administration (DOA). The first
category is the Silver and Bronze Star, which would be designed
by DMV and sold for $35; the bill has a fiscal note [Identifier:
HB061-DOA-DMV-02-06-15] of $8,000 to pay for the initial design
and press of the license plate. Also, the bill eliminates the
need for repeated appeals for license plate recognition; the
committee substitute gives DMV the authority to add other
recognition license plates for medals that demonstrate both
bravery and merit. For example, a Bronze Star V Medal can be
received for valor in combat, and the Bronze Star M Medal can be
received for merit in military operations. He described a
situation in which a Bronze Star M Medal may be awarded.
1:42:28 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GARA pointed out that currently license plates
are unavailable for those who have received the second highest
ranking awards, the Distinguished Service Cross, the Navy Cross,
and the Air Force Cross, and he urged that these designations
should also be added by DMV. He characterized the present
relevant legislation as a "patchwork," and opined DMV should
have the authority to add appropriate license plates without
further legislative involvement. Referring to the committee
substitute, he said a change was made to correct a mistake in
the original bill by replacing "shall" with "may" regarding the
issuing of lower ranking awards.
1:44:49 PM
REPRESENTATIVE COLVER moved to adopt the proposed committee
substitute (CS) for HB 61, labeled 29-LS0287\H, Martin, 2/6/15,
as the working document.
[There being no objection, Version H was before the committee.]
REPRESENTATIVE LYNN declared a conflict of interest as he is a
Bronze Star Medal recipient.
REPRESENTATIVE TUCK asked whether U.S. Marines are eligible for
the Navy Cross or a separate medal.
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG inquired as to the current regulations
regarding a license plate for a recipient of the Medal of Honor.
1:46:46 PM
AMY ERICKSON, Director, Division of Motor Vehicles (DMV),
Department of Administration (DOA), verified that a Medal of
Honor license plate is authorized by statute; however, one has
never been requested, and thus has never been designed. In
further response to Representative Gruenberg, she provided the
following citation: AS 28.10.181(l).
REPRESENTATIVE LYNN urged that the Medal of Honor license plate
be provided at no cost to the recipient.
CHAIR HERRON suggested that the committee ask the director to
design the license plate, possibly under a subsequent fiscal
note. He surmised fiscal note [Identifier: HB061-DOA-DMV-02-06-
15] does not apply to Version H.
1:49:04 PM
MS. ERICKSON said correct. In further response to Chair Herron,
she clarified that the bill would now limit DMV to issuing
license plates for the Bronze Star, Silver Star, and meritorious
crosses.
CHAIR HERRON assured Ms. Erickson that the sponsor and committee
staff will work with her to ensure "that the numbers to push out
a fiscal note are accurate." He noted the large deficit the
state is facing, and suggested finding a private sector sponsor
to pay the expense identified in the fiscal note.
REPRESENTATIVE GARA pointed out this was a one-time $8,000 cost,
followed by fees that make the program self-sustaining.
Although the state is in fiscal dire straits, "at $8,000 this
didn't seem to be the kind of amount of money that's ... really
concerning us in this building," he said.
CHAIR HERRON offered to ask his Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW)
post for a contribution.
REPRESENTATIVE GARA expressed concern that contributors may seek
changes to the bill.
1:51:43 PM
MS. ERICKSON, in response to Chair Herron, expressed her belief
that DMV cannot accept private sector funds for the design of
license plates.
REPRESENTATIVE LYNN observed there are many varieties of awards
for meritorious service; he asked for clarification on DMV's
authorization of license plates issued in recognition of awards
or decorations.
CHAIR HERRON expressed his intent to hold the bill over and
attempt to obtain a zero fiscal note.
REPRESENTATIVE GARA, in response to Representative Tuck's
earlier question, said members of the Marine Corps qualify for
the Navy Cross.
1:53:34 PM
CHAIR HERRON opened public testimony on HB 61.
1:53:46 PM
LARRY GORDAOFF, Founder, Alaska Native Veterans Association,
informed the committee he is not a recipient of a Bronze Star,
but is representing a member of the Alaska Native Veterans
Association who is a Bronze Star recipient from service in
Afghanistan. In answer to the earlier question about soliciting
private donations for the license plate program, he cautioned
that according to the American Legion, Department of Alaska,
national approval is required to request funds and takes "a long
drawn-out process." Mr. Gordaoff said the mission statement of
the Alaska Native Veterans Association is: To give a helping
hand up - not a handout - to Alaska Native veterans; to answer
concerns of the veterans and their needs; to help the community
give respect to all veterans and stay non-political. He relayed
the story of a veteran named Christopher Thomas who requested a
Bronze Star license plate from DMV and was told the license
plates are not available in Alaska. After research showed that
many other states have the plates available, Mr. Gordaoff
contacted Representative Gara for assistance in getting the
special plates for Alaska Bronze Star recipients. He explained
the heroic circumstances that led to the Bronze Star award, and
pointed out the great honor of having a Bronze Star license
plate to show the respect that recipients deserve. Mr. Gordaoff
concluded that the Bronze Star license plate should be afforded
to all Bronze Star recipients who live in Alaska, and Mr. Thomas
should receive the first one issued. He expressed his support
for the bill.
1:57:12 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG discussed various levels of medals
awarded for valor in combat; he asked whether the sponsor would
support including other awards in the bill.
REPRESENTATIVE GARA said the intention of the bill was to grant
DMV the authority to allow someone to apply for additional
license plates. He opined others who have served in combat
would quality for valor and merit, and - if they desired - could
apply to DMV.
MR. GORDAOFF expressed his belief that currently available is a
license plate from DMV that indicates a branch of service.
MS. ERICKSON confirmed that DMV offers license plates with unit
designators, but not specifically for bravery or honor.
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG supported giving "an added measure for
these people who've been in hostile combat and have actually
been under fire."
REPRESENTATIVE LYNN asked what happens to the license plate when
one sells the car.
MS. ERICKSON responded that registration plates stay with a
vehicle except for special plates that go with the applicant.
REPRESENTATIVE TUCK asked for the sponsor's intent regarding the
Distinguished Cross awards.
REPRESENTATIVE GARA expressed his belief that the Distinguished
Cross, the Navy Cross, and the Air Force Cross should be part of
the bill.
2:02:50 PM
CHAIR HERRON supported directing DMV to design the Medal of
Honor license plate in anticipation of an application from a
recipient.
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG surmised an amendment was required to
make the Medal of Honor license plate available at no cost.
MS. ERICKSON stated AS 28.10.421 (11) directs that the Medal of
Honor license plate was to be issued at no cost.
REPRESENTATIVE TUCK questioned whether the license plates
created by the bill would not be designed unless requested by an
applicant.
MS. ERICKSON said that is correct.
CHAIR HERRON said:
It is a key question, so if one is not requested, then
it should, in theory, then we could have literally,
zero fiscal note, because none have been requested
yet.
REPRESENTATIVE TUCK expressed his understanding that the
committee was discussing adding to the bill's fiscal note the
cost of designing the Medal of Honor license plate.
CHAIR HERRON said additional research is needed before voting on
the bill.
REPRESENTATIVE TUCK surmised that unless one requests one of the
license plates in the bill, "a design is not necessary."
CHAIR HERRON stated his desire to see the Medal of Honor license
plate designed and "ready to go, when the first Medal of Honor
winner shows up to apply for one."
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX questioned whether, if no one applies, the
fiscal note would be indeterminate, rather than a zero fiscal
note.
REPRESENTATIVE GARA advised that at the time of the Medal of
Honor legislation, there must have been a fiscal note because
the state was picking up the cost of the license plates. He
noted that unit awards already qualify for a special designated
license plate, and asked for clarification on which unit awards
are currently covered by statute.
MS. ERICKSON offered to provide a list.
HB 61 was held over.
2:08:12 PM
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the committee, the House
Special Committee on Military and Veterans' Affairs meeting was
adjourned at 2:08 p.m.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB61 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HMLV 2/10/2015 1:00:00 PM |
HB 61 |
| HB 61 Supporting Document What the state currently offers.pdf |
HMLV 2/10/2015 1:00:00 PM |
HB 61 |
| HB 61 Supporting Documents Medals and their meaning.pdf |
HMLV 2/10/2015 1:00:00 PM |
HB 61 |
| HB 61 Supporting Documents Medals in order of rank.pdf |
HMLV 2/10/2015 1:00:00 PM |
HB 61 |
| HJR 13 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HMLV 2/10/2015 1:00:00 PM |
HJR 13 |
| HJR013A.PDF |
HMLV 2/10/2015 1:00:00 PM |
HJR 13 |
| HB 61 Fiscal Note - HB061-DOA-DMV-02-06-15.pdf |
HMLV 2/10/2015 1:00:00 PM |
HB 61 |
| HJR13 Fiscal Note - HJR13-LEG-SESS-02-09-2015.pdf |
HMLV 2/10/2015 1:00:00 PM |
|
| HB 61 Draft Committee Substitute Ver H.pdf |
HMLV 2/10/2015 1:00:00 PM |
HB 61 |