Legislature(2015 - 2016)ANCH LIO AUDITORIUM
08/03/2016 10:00 AM House LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL
Note: the audio ![]()
and video ![]()
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
ALASKA STATE LEGISLATURE
LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL
AUGUST 03, 2016
10:05 AM
MEMBERS PRESENT
Senator Gary Stevens, Chair
Senator Anna MacKinnon
Senator Cathy Giessel, alternate
Representative Craig Johnson
Representative Sam Kito
MEMBERS PRESENT ON TELECONFERENCE
Senator John Coghill
Senator Lyman Hoffman
Senator Charlie Huggins
Senator Kevin Meyer
Senator Peter Micciche
Representative Mike Chenault
Representative Charisse Millett
Representative Steve Thompson, alternate
MEMBERS ABSENT
Senator Liesel McGuire, alternate
Representative Bob Herron, Vice Chair
Representative Mike Hawker
Representative Mark Neuman
Representative Harriet Drummond, alternate
AGENDA
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
RATIFICATION OF CHARITY EVENTS
CONTRACT APPROVALS
OTHER COMMITTEE BUSINESS
SPEAKER REGISTER
Curtis Clothier, Information Services Manager, Legislative
Affairs Agency
Doug Gardner, Director of Legal Services, Legislative
Affairs Agency
Pam Varni, Executive Director, Legislative Affairs Agency
10:03:04 AM
I. CHAIR GARY STEVENS called the Legislative Council meeting
to order at 10:05 a.m. in the Anchorage Legislative
Information Office Auditorium. Present at the call were
Senators Stevens, MacKinnon, and Giessel, alternate member;
Representatives Johnson and Kito. Participating via
teleconference were Senators Hoffman, Huggins, Meyer,
Micciche; Representatives Chenault, Millett, Thompson,
alternate member. Senator McGuire, alternate member, and
Representatives Hawker and Neuman were absent.
II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
10:04:12 AM
SPEAKER CHENAULT moved that Legislative Council approve the
agenda.
The agenda was approved without objection.
III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
a. December 19, 2015
b. February 11, 2016
c. March 31, 2016
d. April 14, 2016
10:04:33 AM
SPEAKER CHENAULT moved that Legislative Council approve the
minutes of the December 19, 2015, February 11, 2016, March
31, 2016 and April 14, 2016 meetings as presented.
The minutes were approved without objection.
IV. RATIFICATION OF CHARITABLE EVENT
a. 24th Annual Coal Classic Golf Tournament
10:05:08 AM
SPEAKER CHENAULT moved that Legislative Council ratify the
Chair's sanctioning of the following charitable event per
AS 24.60.080(a)(2)(B): 24th Annual Coal Classic Golf
Tournament.
The event was ratified without objection.
V. CONTRACT APPROVALS
a. 2016 Annual IT Hardware Refresh
b. 2017 Microsoft Enterprise Agreement Renewal
c. Stoel Rives Contract Amendment
a. 2016 Annual IT Hardware Refresh
10:05:52 AM
SPEAKER CHENAULT moved that Legislative Council approve the
solicitation, award and expenditures not to exceed $132,000
for computer upgrades from Legislative Council capital
funds.
CHAIR STEVENS objected for the purposes of discussion.
CURTIS CLOTHIER, Information Services Manager for
Legislative Affairs Agency participating via
teleconference, said that the hardware refresh happens
annually in order to replace aging computers and printers
in legislative offices. This year's request will replace
computers purchased in 2010 and laptops that were purchased
in 2009, which exceeds generally acceptable refresh of
computer hardware. The IT Subcommittee met, discussed these
items and agreed to make this recommendation to Legislative
Council, based on the cost to upgrade, keep the equipment
going, and the performance, as well as meeting the
Legislature's 3-Year Technology Plan.
SENATOR GIESSEL asked why the Legislature was continuing to
invest in huge desktop computers when laptops were so
readily portable and wouldn't need to be shipped to Juneau
each session, staff and Legislators could simply carry
them.
MR. CLOTHIER said he personally agreed. The IT Subcommittee
ordinarily does a survey of all the offices to get their
preference for a replacement - either a laptop or a desktop
computer. Consistently, it has been approximately 66% in
favor of desktop computers over laptops. The laptops cost
more than the desktops, but he agreed that they are much
more portable; however, even for those offices that do
choose laptops, they prefer to ship them, so there wouldn't
be much savings on shipping. The IT Subcommittee does
encourage offices to use laptops, but the standing
preference has been for desktops.
SENATOR GIESSEL said she was concerned about continuing to
invest in something that wasn't affordable and not the best
long-term option for the budget.
CHAIR STEVENS noted for members that there is an IT
Subcommittee and refer this issue to them to study further.
REPRESENTATIVE KITO said his experience is that desktops
are less expensive per unit and the challenge the
Legislature has is moving them from location to location.
He said he had heard that it might be worth the investment
to have computers in both locations; although that meant
maintaining a much larger pool of computers. He offered to
sit down with the IT Subcommittee to figure out the most
efficient way to do the computer refresh.
REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON said it appeared that we get an
extra year out of the laptops and asked if the longevity of
the laptop was longer. He said he agreed with Senator
Giessel that it made more sense to make that move.
MR. CLOTHIER responded that he wasn't sure that laptops had
more longevity and might be more a factor that laptop users
always have their computers with them and resist replacing
them until absolutely necessary. He said we haven't had
more problems with laptops despite the fact that they are
used while traveling and probably get bumped more often,
left in cars, etc. He said there have been no issues that
laptops are more fragile. In response to Rep. Kito
mentioning having computers in many locations, it is not
economically feasible because of the licensing cost and
additional hardware to upkeep. Laptops do solve that
problem as they could travel with the Legislator or
staffer. He said the IT Subcommittee would be a great place
to address this issue, as suggested by Chair Stevens.
REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON said Legislative Council has had
this discussion over the last six years and every time it
was suggested to take it to the IT Subcommittee. He said
perhaps as Chairman, some direction from this committee
might be appropriate. He said Legislative Council has sent
it back to the IT Subcommittee two or three times.
CHAIR STEVENS asked Ms. Varni and Mr. Clothier to get the
IT Subcommittee together and fully vet this issue before
the end of his time as Chair, and it would be nice to have
it done before this calendar year.
SENATOR MICCICHE asked if Legislators would see any
operational difference on their monitors between a desktop
and a laptop.
MR. CLOTHIER confirmed that performance is quick and
responsive; and there's no difference to the users between
a laptop and a desktop computer. Monitors can be used with
laptops to give users a better screen size to work with.
SENATOR COGHILL noted that he joined the meeting.
SENATOR MACKINNON asked the Chair if he was planning to
advance this particular item for appropriation or set it
aside so that we have the urgency to the issue.
MR. CLOTHIER, in response to a question by Chair Stevens,
said that we'd like to move ahead with this as quickly as
possible. It will take another 30-45 days before the
equipment arrives after ordering and staff can begin
upgrades to legislative computers prior to the session. If
it is put off, it will put us behind schedule. Obviously,
with the Capitol under construction and legislative moves
going on, it will be another item. He said, if the
committee would like, we can modify this proposal to
increase the number of laptops as a stop-gap measure,
encourage people to go with them. Laptops are a little more
expensive, and we could decrease the number of desktop
computers and increase the price of the recommendation.
Short of that, he encouraged the committee to move forward
with this and look at getting more laptops during next
year's cycle.
SENATOR MACKINNON said that while she didn't know enough
about this issue, and addressing her comment to
Representative Johnson since he noted this has been an
ongoing issue that had not been resolved, she didn't want
to purchase more desktops that we would then have for the
next five or six years.
REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON said that he agreed this was the
ideal time to make the transition.
SENATOR MACKINNON asked how many computers the Legislature
owned, and if we were going to make this transition, did we
want to make sure we had at least one good working computer
in every legislative office so that the transition is
smooth in that regard. She asked about the cycle of
replacement; for instance if 75 was a third of the desktop
computers owned by the Legislature.
MR. CLOTHIER responded that they endeavor to replace one
quarter of the legislative computers ever year. It's a four
year cycle, give or take a few years, depending on whether
the computer is in a remote location. In response to a
follow-up question by Chair Stevens, Mr. Clothier said that
when the IT Subcommittee conducts surveys, there's about a
50 percent response rate and takes about two weeks. He said
that if Legislative Council wanted to push folks toward
using laptops, he'd advocate, as a compromise between speed
and accuracy, to make it a 50/50 split between desktops and
laptops, and encourage people to go the laptop route. He
said he knows a lot of offices are strongly in favor of
using desktops and some, in fact, don't use laptops at all.
The 50/50 split would begin the transition of moving
offices to laptops, even those that may not want them; and
Information Services would still have the opportunity to
get most of the new equipment set up and installed before
session starts.
In response to a question by Representative Thompson, Mr.
Clothier said laptops can support dual monitors.
10:25:01 AM
REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON moved to amend the motion such that
in the acquisition of computers, that we divide the laptops
and the tower computers 50/50; in that it would be 50
laptops and 50 tower computers.
There was a roll call vote on the amendment.
YEAS: Meyer, Coghill, Huggins, MacKinnon, Micciche,
Giessel, Chenault, Johnson, Kito, Millett, Thompson,
Stevens
NAYS: None
The amendment passed 12-0. NOTE: There was no response from
Senator Hoffman.
CHAIR STEVENS asked if the amendment decision would impact
that cost noted in the original motion.
MR. CLOTHIER confirmed that was the case. As he mentioned
previously, laptops are more expensive than desktops;
approximately $300 more per unit. He recommended modifying
the total estimated cost to $140,000. The Chair requested a
second amendment to change the requested amount.
10:27:22 AM
REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON moved that Legislative Council
increase from $131,207 for the computer refresh to $140,000
to accommodate the transition to laptops.
There was a roll call vote on the second amendment.
YEAS: Meyer, Coghill, Huggins, MacKinnon, Micciche,
Giessel, Chenault, Johnson, Kito, Millett, Thompson,
Stevens
NAYS: None
The amendment passed 12-0. NOTE: There was no response from
Senator Hoffman.
CHAIR STEVENS reiterated for members that there were two
amendments approved for the original motion: (1) to
purchase 50 desktops and 50 laptops; and (2) to increase
the requested amount to $140,000.
SENATOR MACKINNON asked if fax machines were included in
this request.
MR. CLOTHIER said that the specific items in the request
were listed in the memo to Council members and did not
include fax machines. While fax machines fall under the
purview of the Supply section, he said that the Agency is
well aware that many offices simply don't use fax machines
anymore. The Executive Branch has been considering an
initiative to have faxes come through via email and, in
working with that group, he said he has been encouraging
them to move forward with that proposal. Many offices want
to completely abandon fax machines and Information Services
is supportive of that move.
SENATOR MACKINNON wanted to put on the record that she
hoped that in the legislative branch there wasn't going to
be any money invested in purchasing fax machines as they
are an obsolete piece of equipment. If there continues to
be a need, she recommended one fax machine per floor of the
Capitol.
10:30:38 AM
A roll call vote was taken on the motion as amended.
YEAS: Meyer, Coghill, Huggins, MacKinnon, Micciche,
Giessel, Chenault, Johnson, Kito, Millett, Thompson,
Stevens
NAYS: None
The amendment passed 12-0.
b. 2017 Microsoft Enterprise Agreement Renewal
10:31:24 AM
SPEAKER CHENAULT moved that Legislative Council approve the
expenditure of $123,301.49 to Software House International
for the Legislature's portion of the annual Microsoft
Enterprise Agreement.
CHAIR STEVENS objected for purpose of discussion.
MR. CLOTHIER said this was an annual agreement that the
State of Alaska has entered into with Microsoft. The State
has negotiated with Microsoft for an Enterprise Agreement
to provide Microsoft products to all State employees,
including Windows 7, operating systems, and the office
suite of Word, Excel and Outlook. It also covers the
network software - the exchange for email; the SQL
databases, which is the information behind BASIS; websites;
N drives; basically all the computer resources we use. This
agreement provides reduced pricing, enhanced technical
support, and the ability to do upgrades. For instance, one
of the upgrades we envision in the next 24 months is
transitioning to Windows 10. That will be a free upgrade
under this agreement. Another benefit is the Home Use
Program - which provides practically free pricing for State
employees to use these products at home. The State, and the
Legislature, has been a member of this agreement for the
past eight years and this year's portion is the same amount
as last year.
There being no questions on this motion, a roll call vote
was taken.
YEAS: Meyer, Coghill, Huggins, MacKinnon, Micciche,
Giessel, Johnson, Kito, Millett, Thompson, Stevens,
Hoffman
NAYS: None
The motion passed 12-0.
Council took a brief at ease.
CHAIR STEVENS said that the "at ease" was to address the
issue of alternate members and votes. He said Council
needed to re-vote because the Senate had a full membership
present with Senator Hoffman on teleconference; therefore
Senator Giessel would not be voting on this item.
A second roll call vote was taken.
YEAS: Meyer, Coghill, Hoffman, Huggins, MacKinnon,
Micciche, Chenault, Johnson, Kito, Millett, Stevens
NAYS: None
The motion passed 11-0. Representative Thompson did not
respond to the second roll call vote.
c. Stoel Rives Contract Amendment
10:36:42 AM
SPEAKER CHENAULT moved that Legislative Council approve an
amendment to the legal services contract with Stoel Rives
LLP, in the amount of $260,000 to represent the Legislature
with any matters related to 716 W. 4th Avenue and 1500 W.
Benson Boulevard.
CHAIR STEVENS objected for purpose of discussion.
DOUG GARDNER, Director of Legal Services, said that the
last time he came before Council regarding the Stoel Rives
contract was in April. Legislative Council approved some
additional funding for Stoel to do work for the
Legislature. At the time, what was pending was the
Gottstein matter, we were in the process of discussing with
the Legislature the possible purchase of 716 W 4th Avenue.
During that intervening period of time, the Gottstein
matter came to a final ruling on a summary judgment motion
declaring the lease void. At one point, Legal Services and
Stoel Rives were working on a purchase and sale agreement
for 716 W 4th Avenue; and then Legislative Council made the
decision to purchase the Benson building, and Legal
Services and Stoel Rives shifted gears and begin the
process of negotiating with Wells Fargo for the purchase
and sale agreement to buy the Benson building. It was a
complicated transaction in the sense that Wells Fargo was
going from being a landlord to a tenant; so a purchase and
sale agreement and a simultaneous lease are being
negotiated. The last item that has come in is a procurement
claim that 716 W 4th Avenue has filed, pending before
Senator Stevens, who is the Procurement Officer for
Legislative Council as Chair. He said that matter is being
evaluated and Senator Stevens will be advised in the next
couple of weeks on options on how to proceed. Stoel Rives
has been involved and will continue to be involved unless
Legislative Council directs otherwise on all of those
matters.
Mr. Gardner said he wanted to note that much of this work
happened in April, May and June while the Legislature was
in session. There were times when Legal Services was able
to do a lot of work on specialty items where they have
expertise for the Legislature, constitutional matters,
etc., and then there were large pieces where Legal Services
had no expertise. For instance, the Legislature has never
purchased a large office building, and Legal Services has
certainly never done the kind of commercial lease that
involved with the Wells Fargo lease. He said we have quite
a number of months of accumulated services and that's the
bill.
CHAIR STEVENS said that during the negotiations for the
Benson building, he found Stoel Rives just crucial and
invaluable; assisting and understanding negotiating with a
major corporation like Wells Fargo is big time and we
needed that advice and that support from Stoel Rives. He
said he can't speak highly enough of the attorneys from
Stoel Rives that worked with us on these issues.
MR. GARDNER said, in response to the Chair's comments, that
we did have Stoel Rives most experienced real estate lawyer
take over for Serena Carlsen and handled the vast amount of
the work with an associate from Anchorage where
appropriate. We have, in this transaction, taken the
approach after having talked with Council members some
months ago in Juneau, to eliminate any risk of issues with
this transaction, whether it's the lease, whether it's the
purchase, whether it's seismic studies, whether it's mold
in the walls, we have literally squeezed this project to
try and wring out of it any risk to the Legislature.
Obviously, this building has been a complicated
transaction, has been in the media a lot, and they are
trying to make sure that they do all the due diligence
that's necessary for a public entity to buy a larger
building from a big corporation. The amount of negotiation
that was required was unbelievable and it was a daily
project for Stoel Rives and, at times, for Legal Services.
CHAIR STEVENS noted for members that after the action
items, there will be updates on the Wells Fargo building,
updates on the 4th Avenue building, and updates on the
Patterson v. Walker litigation.
10:43:20 AM
A roll call vote was taken.
YEAS: Meyer, Coghill, Hoffman, Huggins, MacKinnon,
Micciche, Chenault, Johnson, Kito, Millett,
Thompson, Stevens
NAYS: None
The amendment passed 12-0.
VI. OTHER COMMITTEE BUSINESS
a. Update on Wells Fargo Building
b. Update on 716 W 4th Avenue Building
c. Update on Patterson vs. Walker Litigation
a. Update on Wells Fargo Building
PAM VARNI, Executive Director of the Legislative Affairs
Agency, said that an attractive purchase price of
$11,850,000 was negotiated versus the listing price of
$12,500,000; $650,000 below the listing price. The
Legislature appropriated $12.5 million. The purchase
agreement was signed on July 19, 2016, and the lease will
be signed with business terms before closing. There is a 45
day due diligence period and $125,000 earnest money was
deposited. Closing date is estimated to be September 15,
2016. There is also personal property including office
furniture, fixtures, and certain artwork that will come
with the purchase of the building, included in the
$11,850,000 purchase price. There is a 10-year lease with
Wells Fargo, renting a little less than half of the first
floor space for their branch operations. It will be over
$2.4 million over the initial terms of the lease and an
additional $623,000 for office space on the third floor for
18 months, giving them time to relocate.
In FY 17, we estimate that there will be more revenue than
expenses (operating and maintenance) and the price per
square foot will be $-0.16, and it would probably be even
lower under net present value. In FY 18, there will be
revenue of approximately $125,000, and about $-0.31/square
foot; and in FY 19, operating expenses will be about
$0.37/square foot. She said that at the Atwood Building,
the lease cost for office and parking was going to be
$1.84/square foot, so the Wells Fargo building represents a
substantial savings. Also, under the 10 year lease, there
are two five-year renewals for the branch space. There are
190 parking spaces and recent upgrades in the building:
roof replaced in 2013; the HVAC system upgraded in 2014;
two elevators upgraded in 2015; and boiler upgrades in
2014. The plan is for the Agency to slowly do renovations,
we will move in as-is, and look at remodeling the third
floor after the 18 month rental period by Wells Fargo.
Also, the plan is to have a property manager like we did at
716 W 4th Avenue.
In response to questions by Senator MacKinnon, Ms. Varni
said that notice was given to the 716 W 4th Avenue landlord
for a move-out date of October 16, 2016; also, moving costs
are estimated to be in the $20,000 range. It will be
temporary quarters initially; cubicles for staff and some
private offices that Senator Stevens' office will be
assigning to the Anchorage Legislators. Renovations will
occur slowly and generally during session when members are
in Juneau.
CHAIR STEVENS said he wanted to mention the comparison
between the Atwood Building and the Wells Fargo building.
At one time, we were seriously talking about moving into
the Atwood Building and there were many objections to and
concerns about that proposal. He wanted to go step-by-step
through those issues so that members would understand and
be able to defend the choice.
Chair Stevens, referring to a one page comparison sheet
before members, said that the Atwood Building offered
34,102 square feet of space at a cost of $1.84/square foot.
Our full service lease with Department of Administration
would be $752,972/year. The Governor's Office, Tanci Mintz,
the Commissioner of Administration have all been very good
to work with and he said he appreciated that. In the end,
it was a better decision to move to the Wells Fargo
building. He said, additionally, the Atwood Building was
not move-in ready. Tenant improvements would have to be
completed before we could move into the building in 2018;
some space would be available prior to that, but not all
that was needed. Tenant improvements were estimated to be
$3.5 million. It would have involved relocation to
temporary space until Atwood was ready; and we'd be sharing
space with the Executive Branch and parking as well as with
the public (although some underground parking would be
reserved for the Legislature).
In the Wells Fargo building, there is 52,214 square feet of
rentable space; of which we'll be leasing to Wells Fargo
5,889 square feet for their bank space on the ground floor
for 10 years. We'll also be leasing to Wells Fargo 13,075
square feet of office space on the third floor for 18
months. We've negotiated a purchase price lower than the
original offering. We estimate that our maintenance and
operating costs are about $575,000 annually. To offset the
operating and maintenance costs, we'll receive over
$214,000 a year ($3.035/sq ft) for the bank space, with a
2.5% increase annually, as well as $623,677 for the next 18
months that Wells Fargo will be leasing the third floor.
Additionally, we'll receive over $18,000 a year from GCI
for the rooftop antennas and there are built-in increases
in that agreement as well. Once Wells Fargo vacates the
third floor and once renovations are completed, it's been
discussed that Eagle River Legislators could be moved into
the Benson building, for a savings of over $75,000 a year.
Legislative Audit Anchorage employees could also be moved
into the Benson building for further savings of over
$53,000 a year.
Chair Stevens said the building is ready to move-in as is,
with some minimal tenant improvements and costs; with long-
term improvements being completed in phases over time and
if and as we want to. Wells Fargo would be our own
building, it would be autonomous, not shared with the
Governor's Office; there are 190 parking spaces, much more
than we have today.
REPRESENTATIVE KITO said one of the things that needs to be
considered as we're already moving down this path, is that
if we did not purchase the Wells Fargo building, we'd be
moving into the Atwood Building. The Atwood Building is not
estimated to cost us $11.8 million to move in, so the $11.8
million should actually be incorporated into some of that
calculation as an amortized cost as opposed to something
that is not costing the State. We are spending $11.8
million to realize this savings, so it's not an apples-to-
apples comparison.
There was no action needed on this item.
b. Update on 716 W 4th Avenue Building
10:56:11 AM
DOUG GARDNER, Director of Legal Services, said that during
the course of this conversation, we've actually touched on
the points of discussion: the notice that was given; the
timeline to move out of the building; and that the lease
was declared void, which was old news. He said he didn't
have more to add, but if Council wanted to get in a
discussion about legal issues, he'd be happy to do so in an
executive session.
There was no discussion and no action needed on this item.
c. Update on Patterson v. Walker Litigation
MR. GARDNER remained on record and said that it has been
his practice to let Council know when Legal Services has
been authorized to litigate on behalf of Legislative
Council, the Legislature, or a former Legislator. He said
the outcome on this issue is in the packet, and that it was
a good decision, a well-written decision by Judge Menendez.
Basically, the decision stands for the proposition that
when Legislators as elected officials are involved in the
passage of bills or the consideration of matters at the
committee level, that they have absolute immunity. Mr.
Patterson was upset about his conviction and the passage of
some criminal laws that he felt affected him unfairly. The
reality is that while some people may agree with laws and
some people may not, but when Legislators are passing laws,
we will vigorously defend them. Understanding the immunity
issue, the case was dismissed. As you all know, if you are
sued after you leave office for a matter that you undertook
in your official duties as a Legislator, we will continue
to defend you just as we have over the years for other
members that are no longer active.
In response to a question by Chair Stevens, Mr. Gardner
said that the Legislature and former Senator Hollis French
were dismissed from the case. He went on to say that named
in the lawsuit were others, such as the governor and
possibly other officials. The case continues to go forward,
but the Legislature and former Senator French were
dismissed out of it. In essence, Mr. Patterson was
convicted of a sex offense and he felt that the laws that
had been passed affected him unfairly. The salient point is
that, regardless of the merits of the law, someone has to
make the decision and when a person is in that mode, like
you are here in this committee meeting, you have absolute
immunity for the decisions you make. The theory is that if
you didn't have that, how could you ever go forward and
take the steps that you need to, so that's the policy
underlying it and it's a constitutional power.
CHAIR STEVENS summed it up to say that the point for
Council was that legislative immunity has been upheld, the
former Legislator has been dismissed from that case, and
while there are others still involved in that case, the
Legislature is no longer a part of it.
There being no further business before the committee, the
Legislative Council meeting was adjourned at 11:00 a.m.
11:01:12 AM
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| 8.3.16 Leg. Council Agenda.docx |
JLEC 8/3/2016 10:00:00 AM |
8.3.16 Leg. Council Packet |
| 12.19.15 LC Meeting Minutes.pdf |
JLEC 8/3/2016 10:00:00 AM |
8.3.16 Leg. Council Packet |
| 2.11.16 LC Meeting Minutes.pdf |
JLEC 8/3/2016 10:00:00 AM |
8.3.16 Leg. Council Packet |
| 3.31.16 LC Meeting Minutes.pdf |
JLEC 8/3/2016 10:00:00 AM |
8.3.16 Leg. Council Packet |
| 4.14.16 LC Meeting Minutes.pdf |
JLEC 8/3/2016 10:00:00 AM |
8.3.16 Leg. Council Packet |
| 24th Annual Coal Classic Golf Tournament.pdf |
JLEC 8/3/2016 10:00:00 AM |
8.3.16 Leg. Council Packet |
| 2016 Annual IT Hardware Refresh.pdf |
JLEC 8/3/2016 10:00:00 AM |
8.3.16 Leg. Council Packet |
| 2017 Microsoft Enterprise Agreement Renewal.pdf |
JLEC 8/3/2016 10:00:00 AM |
8.3.16 Leg. Council Packet |
| Patterson vs. Walker.pdf |
JLEC 8/3/2016 10:00:00 AM |
8.3.16 Leg. Council Packet |