Legislature(2019 - 2020)BARNES 124
04/15/2019 03:15 PM House LABOR & COMMERCE
Note: the audio ![]()
and video ![]()
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| Confirmation Hearing(s):|| Board of Nursing|| Board of Social Work Examiners | |
| HB102 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 102 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 97 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 29 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
ALASKA STATE LEGISLATURE
HOUSE LABOR AND COMMERCE STANDING COMMITTEE
April 15, 2019
3:20 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT
Representative Gabrielle LeDoux, Co-Chair
Representative Adam Wool, Co-Chair
Representative Zack Fields
Representative Sara Hannan
Representative Louise Stutes
Representative Josh Revak
Representative Dave Talerico
MEMBERS ABSENT
All members present
COMMITTEE CALENDAR
CONFIRMATION HEARING(S):
Board of Nursing
Marisha Dieters - Eagle River
Wendy Monrad - Anchorage
- CONFIRMATION(S) ADVANCED
Board of Social Work Examiners
Mindy Swisher - Fairbanks
- CONFIRMATION(S) ADVANCED
HOUSE BILL NO. 102
"An Act relating to rental vehicles; relating to vehicle rental
networks; relating to liability for vehicle rental taxes; and
providing for an effective date."
- HEARD & HELD
HOUSE BILL NO. 97
"An Act relating to the prescription of drugs by a physician
assistant without physical examination."
- SCHEDULED BUT NOT HEARD
HOUSE BILL NO. 29
"An Act relating to insurance coverage for benefits provided
through telehealth; and providing for an effective date."
- SCHEDULED BUT NOT HEARD
PREVIOUS COMMITTEE ACTION
BILL: HB 102
SHORT TITLE: RENTAL VEHICLE BY PRIVATE OWNER
SPONSOR(s): REPRESENTATIVE(s) WOOL
03/20/19 (H) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
03/20/19 (H) L&C, FIN
04/03/19 (H) L&C AT 3:15 PM BARNES 124
04/03/19 (H) Heard & Held
04/03/19 (H) MINUTE(L&C)
04/08/19 (H) L&C AT 3:15 PM BARNES 124
04/08/19 (H) Heard & Held
04/08/19 (H) MINUTE(L&C)
04/15/19 (H) L&C AT 3:15 PM BARNES 124
WITNESS REGISTER
NANCY SANDERS
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Answered questions from the committee
regarding the Board of Nursing.
BRIAN ROTHERY, Government and Public Affairs Vice President
Enterprise Holdings
Sacramento, California
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 102.
MICHELLE FANG, Chief Legal Officer
Turo
San Francisco, California
POSITION STATEMENT: Answered questions during the hearing on HB
102.
ACTION NARRATIVE
3:20:49 PM
CO-CHAIR ADAM WOOL called the House Labor and Commerce Standing
Committee meeting to order at 3:20 p.m. Representatives
Talerico, Fields, Revak, Stutes, Hannan, LeDoux, and Wool were
present at the call to order.
^CONFIRMATION HEARING(S):
^Board of Nursing
^Board of Social Work Examiners
CONFIRMATION HEARING(S):
Board of Nursing
Board of Social Work Examiners
3:22:02 PM
CO-CHAIR WOOL announced that the first order of business would
be confirmation hearings for appointees to the Board of Nursing
and the Board of Social Work Examiners.
3:22:16 PM
NANCY SANDERS, informed the committee that she was a former
board member, chair, and executive administrator to the Board of
Nursing.
CO-CHAIR WOOL questioned whether it is appropriate to have an
advanced practice registered nurse (APRN) serving in a
registered nurse (RN) seat on the Board of Nursing.
MS. SANDERS pointed out that the process of becoming an APRN
requires being a RN first. She noted that the statute [AS
08.68.010] states, "two members shall be registered nurses at
large who are currently engaged in registered nursing and have
practiced for at least four years immediately preceding
appointment." She said it will be up to the committee to decide
whether the appointee in question meets the statute's
requirements.
CO-CHAIR WOOL offered his understanding of the 7-member board's
composition. He listed two registered nurses, one advanced
practice registered nurse, one registered nurse educator, two
public members, and one licensed practical nurse (LPN). He
asked if this was correct.
MS. SANDERS answered yes.
CO-CHAIR WOOL asked if Ms. Sanders had a background in nursing.
MS. SANDERS replied that she was on the board as the nurse
educator.
3:29:31 PM
CO-CHAIR LEDOUX sought to clarify Ms. Sanders' position on the
board as either the current chair or executive [administrator].
MS. SANDERS stated that she is no longer on the board and is no
longer the executive administrator, adding that there is
currently no one filling that position.
3:30:13 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HANNAN asked when Ms. Sanders left her position
as executive [administrator] to the board.
MS. SANDERS replied three and a half years ago.
REPRESENTATIVE HANNAN asked about the problems and opportunities
that could be created by having many new members on a board as
complex as the Board of Nursing.
MS. SANDERS acknowledged that it is a complex board. She opined
that it will take the six new members time to become
knowledgeable about the workings of the board and some of the
important topics. she reflected on her experience as chair of
the board when five of the seven members were replaced. She
said they had a long-serving executive administrator who helped
educate the new members and got them up to speed. She said it
will be difficult for the board to be effective right away.
3:32:04 PM
CO-CHAIR LEDOUX restated Representative Wool's question, asking
if it is appropriate to have an APRN serving in a RN board seat.
MS. SANDERS indicated that it would be more advantageous to
follow the statute and have a RN fill the RN seat.
3:33:10 PM
CO-CHAIR WOOL asked if RNs are the predominant category of
nurses.
MS. SANDERS replied yes, RNs makeup the largest category of
nurses. She noted that the board also oversees certified nurse
aids (CNAs) who are supervised by both RNs and the LPN.
CO-CHAIR WOOL offered his understanding that the board is not
supposed to be political.
MS. SANDERS acknowledged that. Nonetheless, she alluded to the
appointment process and that the board members are chosen by the
administration.
CO-CHAIR WOOL asked Ms. Sanders if she had any further comments.
MS. SANDERS offered her belief that the Board of Nursing should
not be issuing an opinion on abortion or any other divisive
topics. She remarked that the purpose of the board is for public
protection and to license qualified nurses and CNAs.
3:38:57 PM
CO-CHAIR WOOL closed public testimony.
3:39:21 PM
The committee took a brief at-ease.
3:40:18 PM
CO-CHAIR LEDOUX sought clarification on which appointee was
potentially overqualified to fill the RN seat on the Board of
Nursing.
CO-CHAIR WOOL answered, Marisha Dieters.
3:41:31 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HANNAN opined that because Ms. Dieters was still
working as a RN at the time of her testimony, she could support
her filling the RN seat right now; however, after three years,
as she gains more experience working as an APRN, it would not be
appropriate.
3:44:19 PM
CO-CHAIR LEDOUX reminded members that if Ms. Dieters is
confirmed she will fill the RN seat for 3 years while working as
an APRN, which doesn't fulfill the statutes intent.
CO-CHAIR WOOL agreed. He stated that the statute specifically
defines the composition of the board. He noted that it makes
sense to have two registered nurses on the board because they
makeup up the majority of nurses in the state.
3:46:11 PM
CO-CHAIR LEDOUX made a motion to advance the confirmation of
Marisha Dieters and Wendy Monrad, appointees to the Board of
Nursing, to the joint session for consideration. She reminded
the committee that signing the reports regarding appointments to
boards and commissions in no way reflects individual members'
approval or disapproval of the appointees, and the nominations
are merely forwarded to the full legislature for confirmation or
rejection. There being no objection, the confirmations were
advanced.
3:46:48 PM
CO-CHAIR LEDOUX made a motion to advance the confirmation of
Mindy Swisher, appointee to the Board of Social Work Examiners,
to the joint session for consideration. She reminded the
committee that signing the reports regarding appointments to
boards and commissions in no way reflects individual members'
approval or disapproval of the appointees, and the nominations
are merely forwarded to the full legislature for confirmation or
rejection. There being no objection, the confirmation was
advanced.
3:47:17 PM
The committee took an at-ease from 3:47 to 3:50 p.m.
[Co-Chair Wool passed the gavel to Co-Chair LeDoux.]
HB 102-RENTAL VEHICLE BY PRIVATE OWNER
3:50:01 PM
CO-CHAIR LEDOUX announced that the final order of business would
be HOUSE BILL NO. 102, "An Act relating to rental vehicles;
relating to vehicle rental networks; relating to liability for
vehicle rental taxes; and providing for an effective date."
CO-CHAIR LEDOUX reminded committee members that public testimony
was left open from the bill's previous hearing.
The committee took a brief at-ease.
3:51:15 PM
BRIAN ROTHERY, Government and Public Affairs Vice President,
Enterprise Holdings, informed the committee that Enterprise
Holdings is a privately held, family owned company that operates
the Enterprise, National, and Alamo car rental brands. He gave
a brief background on Enterprise's history in Alaska, adding
that in 2018 they generated more than 5.8 million dollars in tax
revenue to the state of Alaska. He expressed support for HB
102, adding that enacting fair rules will result in greater
choice for consumers; more competition within the industry; and
allow private car owners the ability to make extra money. He
opined that rules should be clear and fair for customers and
service providers alike. He suggested that all for-profit
companies competing for the same demand using the same supply
should be treated the same under the law.
3:57:12 PM
REPRESENTATIVE FIELDS asked how many car rental companies
currently exist in Alaska.
MR. ROTHERY approximated more than a dozen.
REPRESENTATIVE FIELDS questioned whether larger car rental
companies are looking at digital platforms to rent their
vehicles.
MR. ROTHERY affirmed that. He said Enterprise Holdings views
this as a new source of supply in an existing market;
nonetheless, it is still car rental. He added that the digital
platform is an opportunity to get cars into the hands of
customers in an efficient way.
4:00:34 PM
CO-CHAIR WOOL touched on car rental competition, asking if there
is any research on the peer-to-peer market and their pricing
structure.
MR. ROTHERY noted that it would be inappropriate to answer in
specifics. Nonetheless, he indicated that the internet allows
companies the ability to monitor their competition in terms of
prices offered to customers. He stated that Enterprise Holdings
looks at all rental transactions regardless of service provider.
4:05:28 PM
REPRESENTATIVE FIELDS mentioned that he had received
approximately 40 letters of opposition to HB 102 that appeared
to be generated by an email blast. He asked who wrote the
letters and how they were generated.
4:06:03 PM
MICHELLE FANG, Chief Legal Officer, Turo, stated that Turo
notified their community about HB 102 and communicated the
company's opposition to the bill. They invited people to
"engage in the democratic process" by contacting their state
representative to let them know their opinion on HB 102. She
alleged that each person drafted their own email and were
offered "talking points" to include that were based on the
company's reaction to HB 102.
REPRESENTATIVE FIELDS read several of the "talking points" that
appeared in many of the emails. He asked Ms. Fang how she could
feel comfortable disseminating false talking points that
question the integrity of the legislature. He pointed out that
this is the third public hearing for HB 102, adding that it is
inaccurate to say this bill "is being pushed through with little
to no public hearings" - a statement that repeatedly appeared in
the emails.
MS. FANG contended that she was disconcerted with the
"mischaracterization" of what transpired. She said that she was
"very comfortable" advising their community about the company's
opinion towards the current bill, adding that it behooves them
to inform people of laws that will affect the peer-to-peer car
sharing communities - especially when the industry hasn't been
included in the conversation. She maintained that the [emails]
were not drafted by Turo and that each person chose what they
wanted to include in the message.
4:10:44 PM
CO-CHAIR WOOL asked how many people share their cars on Turo's
platform in Alaska.
MS. FANG replied that there are approximately 700 users that
have listed their cars in Alaska, which doesn't account for
those who have de-listed their cars. She estimated that the
actual number of active users in Alaska is most likely around
300-400.
CO-CHAIR WOOL said he finds it interesting that there is no
clear answer as to how many people rent their car out on Turo in
a month or a year. He sought clarification on the insurance
that Turo provides.
MS. FANG stated that Liberty Mutual provides third-party
liability insurance, which covers all trips that take place in
Alaska. She explained that car owner hosts who share their
vehicles automatically receive one million dollars in third-
party liability coverage, while the guests who book cars receive
the state-mandated minimum with the choice to upgrade their
protection package.
CO-CHAIR WOOL asked if that is comparable to renting a car from
Enterprise.
MS. FANG countered that it's "slightly dissimilar." She offered
her understanding that rental car companies don't always
automatically provide insurance in many states.
CO-CHAIR WOOL questioned whether Turo should be obligated to pay
municipal or state taxes like Airbnb does in Alaska.
MS. FANG offered that Turo does not oppose a fair and balanced
tax structure for peer-to-peer car sharing companies that is on
par with what the transportation network companies (TNCs).
4:18:28 PM
CO-CHAIR WOOL pointed out that the ride-sharing bill [HB 132]
implemented a tax-structure for TNCs to pay local sales taxes.
He noted that this is comparable to what HB 102 attempts to
establish for peer-to-peer car companies, except they would be
paying the state car rental tax.
MS. FANG reiterated that Turo is committed to working with the
legislature to create regulations for the peer-to-peer car
sharing industry in Alaska. She argued that by treating TNCs
differently than Taxis, and Airbnb differently than hotels there
is an acknowledgment that each unique industry should have their
own tax model, regulations, and insurance requirements in this
state. She reiterated that they oppose HB 102 because it
regulates peer-to-peer car sharing as if it were the car rental
industry.
4:20:50 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HANNAN asked for the tax rate on peer-to-peer car
Sharing in the state of Maryland.
MS. FANG offered her understanding that it is approximately 8.5
percent for peer-to-peer car sharing and 11 percent for car
rental companies, adding that the two industries are regulated
differently.
REPRESENTATIVE HANNAN asked if there is a verification process
for [hosts] to prove that their cars are legally compliant with
state law at the time the car is shared.
MS. FANG related that they have a general set of rules not
specific to any one state that say all cars must be registered
and licensed to drive. She maintained that they would be happy
to have a conversation about the correct safety requirements to
regulate peer-to-peer car sharing in Alaska.
REPRESENTATIVE HANNAN questioned whether Turo has a limit on the
amount of days a vehicle can be shared.
MS. FANG replied that they do not create a limit for their
customers, adding that 96 percent of hosts in Alaska share two
or fewer cars and most customers are not listing them 365 days a
year.
REPRESENTATIVE HANNAN asked for the average number of days a
host shares their vehicle in Alaska.
MS. FANG answered, "significantly less than 180 days." She
further noted that the average trip in Alaska is 5.5 days.
4:27:45 PM
CO-CHAIR LEDOUX sought clarification on whether Turo's one
million dollars of liability insurance offered by Liberty Mutual
covers the [car owner] or the driver.
MS. FANG explained that during the reservation period, Liberty
Mutual provides insurance for three people: one million dollars
for the car owner in third-party liability coverage; state
minimums up to one million dollars for the driver and an option
to upgrade the protection package; and one million dollars to
Turo in case they are sued.
CO-CHAIR LEDOUX surmised that Turo is providing liability
coverage of 50,000 to 100,000 dollars for the driver, which is
the state mandated amount, unless the driver has his or her own
policy. She asked if that was correct.
MS. FANG answered, "only sometimes." She continued by saying
that the state's mandated insurance amount is automatically
included for the driver, adding that he or she can choose to
upgrade the protection package to the million-dollar option.
4:34:15 PM
CO-CHAIR WOOL asked why a driver should be exempt from paying
the 10 percent rental tax to the state of Alaska regardless of
whether they rented from a bricks-and-mortar facility or they
used a car sharing app. He asked why Turo should be treated
differently than other car rental companies.
MS. FANG restated that they are not opposed to taxation on peer-
to-peer car sharing.
CO-CHAIR WOOL interjected, asking why [peer-to-peer companies]
should get a special rate.
MS. FANG said in the state of Alaska rental cars are taxed at 10
percent, RVs are taxed at 3 percent, and TNCs are taxed locally
at different percentage rates. She remarked that there are
different taxes for different industries, and they would like to
discuss the appropriate tax for the [peer-to-peer car sharing]
industry. She further alleged that rental car companies are
charging customers in Alaska for their own vehicle licensing
fees (VLFs) and after recouping those costs continue to charge
the same fees and pocket the difference. She added that when
cars are shared there are fewer cars manufactured, less
greenhouse gases, and lower oil consumption, which is a "net
good" for Alaska.
4:40:09 PM
REPRESENTATIVE STUTES sought clarification on whether the
[guest] pays Turo or the individual sharing the car.
MS. FANG replied that Turo processes the payment and takes out
their own fees while remitting the bulk, typically 70 percent,
to the host.
MS. FANG, in a follow-up question from Representative Stutes,
addressed her assertion that the rental car companies are taking
advantage of Alaskans by charging them to pay for their VLFs and
then, once recouped, profiting off it.
4:45:02 PM
REPRESENTATIVE FIELDS asked Mr. Rothery to speak on the VLF
allegation.
4:45:18 PM
MR. ROTHERY acknowledged that Enterprise is permitted by Alaska
law to charge a VLF, which is 1.13 dollars per day, in attempt
to recover costs that incur each year. He rejected the notion
that car rental companies are using that fee as a profit center,
adding that he would be happy to substantiate that through
numbers. He stated that the entire amount of all fees are
disclosed to their customers upfront and the suggestion that
they are recovering their money the first third of the year and
then profiting the second two-thirds of the year is "blatantly
false and frankly, inappropriate for a chief legal officer of a
company to suggest on a sort of hypothetical basis that this is
occurring without any evidence."
4:47:43 PM
CO-CHAIR LEDOUX asked how much the state of Alaska charges for
vehicle licensing.
MR. ROTHERY explained that 1.13 dollars per day was arrived at
by taking the total costs incurred in getting a vehicle road
ready that are paid to a state agency or entity. He said they
spread the total cost over the anticipated number of rental days
for that particular vehicle.
CO-CHAIR LEDOUX sought clarification on whether the intent of
the fee is to reimburse the amount that it costs to license each
vehicle. She asked if maintenance fees are included.
MR. ROTHERY answered no. He said the litmus test for applicable
fees for this type of recovery are limited to those fees paid to
a state agency that relate to the operation of the vehicle. He
asserted that under no circumstance is this a profit center for
Enterprise Rent-A-Car.
CO-CHAIR LEDOUX asked how much Alaska charges in licensing fees.
MR. ROTHERY replied that he was not prepared to answer that
question; however, he would follow up with the answer by the
following day.
4:51:09 PM
REPRESENTATIVE STUTES questioned whether 1.13 dollars per day is
a standard rate or if it changes for each vehicle.
MR. ROTHERY stated that it is an average of all vehicle classes
across the entire fleet. He added that the rate is periodically
revisited throughout the year to ensure that the anticipated
number of rental days remains accurate and that they are not
over collecting.
4:54:50 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HANNAN asked what earnings Turo is obligated to
report to the federal government.
MS. FANG said a 1099-K.
MS. FANG, in a follow-up question from Representative Hannan,
stated that Turo complies with all the requirements of the 1099-
K under federal law.
4:57:43 PM
CO-CHAIR WOOL asked if Alaskans can share their RVs on Turo.
MS. FANG answered no.
CO-CHAIR WOOL said he is interested in finding out how many cars
have been rented through Turo in Alaska over the past year and
how many drivers there are. He mentioned a woman in Fairbanks
who bought her third car to share on Turo, none of which is the
car she drives regularly for personal use. He asked Mr. Rothery
how many rental cars Enterprise has in Alaska.
4:59:46 PM
MR. ROTHERY said 1900.
4:59:57 PM
REPRESENTATIVE FIELDS reiterated his request for information
from Mr. Wilson who testified on behalf of Turo at the previous
bill hearing for HB 102.
MS. FANG replied that Turo is a private company and is not at
liberty to disclose the answers to all the questions that were
posed to Mr. Wilson. Nonetheless, she offered the following: 96
percent of Alaska hosts share two or fewer vehicles; there have
been just over 27,000 sharing days in Alaska; last month, nearly
70 percent of the trips were in-state; and the average Alaska
host earns about 300 dollars per month.
5:01:53 PM
REPRESENTATIVE FIELDS asked how much Turo's market
capitalization is and how much the company is worth.
MS. FANG pointed out that a market cap doesn't exist for private
companies.
5:02:49 PM
CO-CHAIR LEDOUX closed public testimony.
[HB 102 was held over.]
5:03:27 PM
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the committee, the House
Labor and Commerce Standing Committee meeting was adjourned at
[5:03] p.m.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| Wendy Monrad_Redacted.pdf |
HL&C 4/5/2019 3:15:00 PM HL&C 4/15/2019 3:15:00 PM |
|
| HLC Letters of Support Wendy Monrad.pdf |
HL&C 4/5/2019 3:15:00 PM HL&C 4/15/2019 3:15:00 PM |
|
| Marisha Dieters_Redacted.pdf |
HL&C 4/5/2019 3:15:00 PM HL&C 4/15/2019 3:15:00 PM |
|
| HLC Letters of Opposition Marisha Deiters.pdf |
HL&C 4/5/2019 3:15:00 PM HL&C 4/15/2019 3:15:00 PM |
|
| HLC.Mindy Swisher Resume.pdf |
HL&C 4/15/2019 3:15:00 PM |
|
| 2019.HB102.Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HL&C 4/3/2019 3:15:00 PM HL&C 4/15/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 102 |
| HB 102.Bill Version U.pdf |
HL&C 4/8/2019 3:15:00 PM HL&C 4/15/2019 3:15:00 PM HL&C 4/22/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 102 |
| 2019.HB102.Sectional.docx |
HL&C 4/15/2019 3:15:00 PM HL&C 4/22/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 102 |
| HB 102.Fiscal Note DOR.pdf |
HL&C 4/3/2019 3:15:00 PM HL&C 4/8/2019 3:15:00 PM HL&C 4/15/2019 3:15:00 PM HL&C 4/22/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 102 |
| HB 102.Fiscal Note DOL.pdf |
HL&C 4/3/2019 3:15:00 PM HL&C 4/8/2019 3:15:00 PM HL&C 4/15/2019 3:15:00 PM HL&C 4/22/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 102 |
| HB 102.Backup Letter of Opposition Drift.docx |
HL&C 4/15/2019 3:15:00 PM HL&C 4/22/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 102 |
| HB 102.Backup Opposition Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers.pdf |
HL&C 4/3/2019 3:15:00 PM HL&C 4/8/2019 3:15:00 PM HL&C 4/15/2019 3:15:00 PM HL&C 4/22/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 102 |
| HB 102.Backup Support Letter Enterprise.pdf |
HL&C 4/3/2019 3:15:00 PM HL&C 4/8/2019 3:15:00 PM HL&C 4/15/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 102 |
| HB 102 Articles of Opposition.pdf |
HL&C 4/3/2019 3:15:00 PM HL&C 4/15/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 102 |
| HB 102 Additional Letters of Opposition.pdf |
HL&C 4/3/2019 3:15:00 PM HL&C 4/15/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 102 |
| HB 102.Backup Internet Association Opposition.pdf |
HL&C 4/8/2019 3:15:00 PM HL&C 4/15/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 102 |
| HB 97.Sponsor.pdf |
HL&C 4/15/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 97 |
| HB 97.Bill Version U.PDF |
HL&C 4/15/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 97 |
| HB 97.Fiscal DCCED.pdf |
HL&C 4/15/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 97 |
| HB 97.Sectional.pdf |
HL&C 4/15/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 97 |
| HB 97.Summary of Changes Version A to Version U.pdf |
HL&C 4/15/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 97 |
| HB0097 Supporting Document AK State Medical Bd Roster.pdf |
HHSS 3/26/2019 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/28/2019 3:00:00 PM HL&C 4/15/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 97 |
| HB0097 Supporting Document AAPA general overview.pdf |
HHSS 3/26/2019 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/28/2019 3:00:00 PM HL&C 4/15/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 97 |
| HB0097 Supporting Document AK State Medical Bd PA scope of practice.pdf |
HHSS 3/26/2019 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/28/2019 3:00:00 PM HL&C 4/15/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 97 |
| HB0097 Supporting Document DEA Drug Schedules.pdf |
HHSS 3/26/2019 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/28/2019 3:00:00 PM HL&C 4/15/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 97 |
| HB0097 Supporting Document HRSA -HPSA Underserved Primary Care Areas.pdf |
HHSS 3/26/2019 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/28/2019 3:00:00 PM HL&C 4/15/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 97 |
| HB0097 Supporting Document Medically Underserved Areas HRSA.pdf |
HHSS 3/26/2019 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/28/2019 3:00:00 PM HL&C 4/15/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 97 |
| HB0097 Supporting Document PA guidelines AK State Medical Bd.pdf |
HHSS 3/26/2019 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/28/2019 3:00:00 PM HL&C 4/15/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 97 |
| HB0097 Supporting Document PA Prescriptive Authority (AAC).pdf |
HHSS 3/26/2019 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/28/2019 3:00:00 PM HL&C 4/15/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 97 |
| HB097 Supporting Document Letters of Support for companion legislation SB44.pdf |
HHSS 3/26/2019 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/28/2019 3:00:00 PM HL&C 4/15/2019 3:15:00 PM SFIN 4/9/2019 9:00:00 AM |
HB 97 SB 44 |
| HB0097 Support Document--Orion BH Emails of Support.pdf |
HHSS 3/28/2019 3:00:00 PM HL&C 4/15/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 97 |
| HB0097 Supporting Document Letter of support from ACOA 3.27.2019.pdf |
HHSS 3/28/2019 3:00:00 PM HL&C 4/15/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 97 |
| HB0097 Supporting Document Letter of support from AK Policy Forum 3.27.2019.pdf |
HHSS 3/28/2019 3:00:00 PM HL&C 4/15/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 97 |
| HB0097 Supporting Document Letter of support from Dietrich (OBHS) 3.27.2019.pdf |
HHSS 3/28/2019 3:00:00 PM HL&C 4/15/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 97 |
| HB 97.Backup Support Letter ASHNHA.pdf |
HL&C 4/15/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 97 |
| HB 29.Sponsor.pdf |
HL&C 4/15/2019 3:15:00 PM SHSS 2/14/2020 1:30:00 PM SHSS 2/19/2020 1:30:00 PM |
HB 29 |
| HB 29.Bill Version A.PDF |
HL&C 4/15/2019 3:15:00 PM SHSS 2/14/2020 1:30:00 PM SHSS 2/19/2020 1:30:00 PM |
HB 29 |
| HB 29.Sectional.pdf |
HL&C 4/15/2019 3:15:00 PM SHSS 2/14/2020 1:30:00 PM SHSS 2/19/2020 1:30:00 PM |
HB 29 |
| HB 29.Fiscal Note.pdf |
HL&C 4/15/2019 3:15:00 PM SHSS 2/14/2020 1:30:00 PM SHSS 2/19/2020 1:30:00 PM |
HB 29 |
| HB 29.Backup Letters of Support.pdf |
HL&C 4/15/2019 3:15:00 PM SHSS 2/14/2020 1:30:00 PM SHSS 2/19/2020 1:30:00 PM |
HB 29 |
| HB 29.Backup ADN Article.pdf |
HL&C 4/15/2019 3:15:00 PM SHSS 2/14/2020 1:30:00 PM SHSS 2/19/2020 1:30:00 PM |
HB 29 |
| HB 29.Presentation.pdf |
HL&C 4/15/2019 3:15:00 PM SHSS 2/14/2020 1:30:00 PM SHSS 2/19/2020 1:30:00 PM |
HB 29 |
| HB 102 Index with Letters of Opposition 4.11.19.pdf |
HL&C 4/15/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 102 |