Legislature(2025 - 2026)GRUENBERG 120
04/02/2025 01:00 PM House JUDICIARY
Note: the audio ![]()
and video ![]()
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB97 | |
| Presentation(s): Alaska Court System – Limits on Pretrial Delays | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 97 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
ALASKA STATE LEGISLATURE
HOUSE JUDICIARY STANDING COMMITTEE
April 2, 2025
1:01 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT
Representative Andrew Gray, Chair
Representative Ted Eischeid
Representative Genevieve Mina
Representative Sarah Vance
Representative Mia Costello
Representative Jubilee Underwood
MEMBERS ABSENT
Representative Chuck Kopp, Vice Chair
COMMITTEE CALENDAR
HOUSE BILL NO. 97
"An Act relating to theft; relating to organized retail theft;
relating to property crimes; relating to aggravating factors at
sentencing; establishing a statewide marketplace facilitator
sales tax; and establishing the organized retail theft fund in
the general fund."
- HEARD & HELD
PRESENTATION(S): ALASKA COURT SYSTEM LIMITS ON PRETRIAL
DELAYS
- HEARD
PREVIOUS COMMITTEE ACTION
BILL: HB 97
SHORT TITLE: ORG. RETAIL THEFT/FUND;MKTPLACE SALES TAX
SPONSOR(s): REPRESENTATIVE(s) FIELDS
02/12/25 (H) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
02/12/25 (H) JUD, FIN
02/26/25 (H) JUD AT 1:00 PM GRUENBERG 120
02/26/25 (H) Heard & Held
02/26/25 (H) MINUTE(JUD)
03/05/25 (H) JUD AT 1:00 PM GRUENBERG 120
03/05/25 (H) Heard & Held
03/05/25 (H) MINUTE(JUD)
03/17/25 (H) JUD AT 1:00 PM GRUENBERG 120
03/17/25 (H) <Bill Hearing Canceled>
03/26/25 (H) JUD AT 1:00 PM GRUENBERG 120
03/26/25 (H) Heard & Held
03/26/25 (H) MINUTE(JUD)
04/02/25 (H) JUD AT 1:00 PM GRUENBERG 120
WITNESS REGISTER
BRONSON FRYE, President
Building & Construction Trades Council of Southcentral Alaska
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Gave invited testimony during the hearing
on CSHB 97, Version T.
MICHAEL GOULD, Owner/President
Excel Construction
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Gave invited testimony during the hearing
on CSHB 97, Version T.
JESSE SUMNER, representing self
Wasilla, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Gave invited testimony during the hearing
on CSHB 97, Version T.
BILL DOSS, representing self
Wasilla, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Gave invited testimony during the hearing
on CSHB 97, Version T.
JEREMY APPLEGATE, Program Manager
Wage and Hour
Division of Labor Standards and Safety
Department of Labor & Workforce Development
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Gave invited testimony during the hearing
on CSHB 97, Version T.
CHRIS DIAMOND, Lead Representative
Western States Regional Council of Carpenters
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Gave invited testimony during the hearing
on CSHB 97, Version T.
JOHN SKIDMORE, Deputy Attorney General
Criminal Division,
Department of Law
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Answered question during the hearing on
CSHB 97, Version T.
PATRICK FITZGERALD, Political Coordinator
Teamsters 959
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of CSHB 97, Version T.
RYAN MCGOVERN, Union Representative
United Association Local Number 375
Fairbanks, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of CSHB 97, Version T.
NANCY MEADE, Chief Counsel
Alaska Court System
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Gave the Alaska Court System - Limits on
Pretrial Delays presentation.
ACTION NARRATIVE
1:01:34 PM
CHAIR ANDREW GRAY called the House Judiciary Standing Committee
meeting to order at 1:01 p.m. Representatives Eischeid,
Underwood, Costello, Vance, and Gray were present at the call to
order. Representative Mina arrived as the meeting was in
progress. Also present was Representative Zack Fields.
HB 97-ORG. RETAIL THEFT/FUND;MKTPLACE SALES TAX
1:02:30 PM
CHAIR GRAY announced that the first order of business would be
HOUSE BILL NO. 97, "An Act relating to theft; relating to
organized retail theft; relating to property crimes; relating to
aggravating factors at sentencing; establishing a statewide
marketplace facilitator sales tax; and establishing the
organized retail theft fund in the general fund." [Before the
committee, adopted as the working document on 3/26/25, was the
proposed committee substitute (CS) for HB 97, Version 34-
lS0109\T, C, Radford, 3/25/25 ("Version T").]
1:03:57 PM
The committee took a brief at-ease at 1:03 p.m.
1:04:06 PM
BRONSON FRYE, President, Building & Construction Trades Council
of Southcentral Alaska, stated that the Department of Labor &
Workforce Development (DLWD) only investigates wage claims if
they are brought forward by the bereaved employee themselves,
which means the state incentives unscrupulous contractors to
utilize workers who may not be willing to come forward with
those complaints. Consequently, undocumented workers won't ever
file a complaint with DLWD, and honest contractors who pay their
employees the proper prevailing wage and overtime cannot compete
against contractors who are using an underpaid workforce. He
applauded HB 97 for offering another resource, which would not
reward dishonest contractors and maintain parity and honesty in
the bidding process.
CHAIR GRAY sought to confirm that DLWD does not allow third-
party complaints.
MR. FRYE answered yes, that is correct.
1:08:20 PM
CHAIR GRAY asked how unfair bids impacts the union's ability to
secure jobs for its members.
MR. FRYE explained that all unions ensure members are paid
lawful wages and abide by all the laws of the state; however,
they are unable to compete with dishonest contractors because of
the construction bidding process, as labor costs are the only
real variable. This in turn, incentivizes unscrupulous
employers to cut labor costs far below the legal requirements
while knowing that workers won't complain and that third-party
complaints aren't allowed. Furthermore, there is no real
recourse, which is why the bill is so powerful.
1:11:11 PM
MICHAEL GOULD, Owner/President, Excel Construction, said a
number of contractors pay their employees as independent
contractors or off-book, and don't pay payroll taxes or workers'
compensation, for example, which significantly reduce their cost
per hour giving them a competitive advantage. He added that
jobs would be more competitive if this wasn't happening and
spoke to how this behavior is impacting the industry, as more
contractors in the commercial space engage in these practices.
CHAIR GRAY asked what types of wage theft are the most common.
MR. GOULD said the misclassification of employees as independent
contractors is one type, which allows them to be paid a
specified price for specified work despite how many hours they
work.
1:17:20 PM
JESSE SUMNER, representing self, conveyed that wage theft is
pervasive in residential construction, and spoke to the
misclassification of employees as independent contractors, as
well as off-the-books payments. He pointed out that this could
cause significant issues if someone were to get injured without
proper insurance coverage. He said he supports the bill and
would like to see it go further by addressing the failure to pay
payroll taxes.
CHAIR GRAY asked how this makes it unfair for employers who are
following the law.
MR. SUMNER explained that by complying with the law, employers
who are paying workers' compensation rates and payroll tax are
at an estimated 16-20 percent disadvantage for labor costs
compared to employers who do not follow the law.
1:21:30 PM
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE asked about the prevalence of these issues.
MR. SUMNER estimated that at least 25 percent of residential
construction labor are engaging in these practices; furthermore,
he suspected that human trafficking issues are at play as well.
CHAIR GRAY asked whether there are barriers to current
enforcement mechanisms and whether they are easily accessible.
MR. SUMNER shared his understanding that DLWD has said its not
their concern if undocumented immigrants are being paid under
the table with gift cards.
1:24:31 PM
BILL DOSS, representing self, stated that the bill would
implement measures to incentivize contractors to follow the
rules with stiffer penalties. He spoke to the bidding process
and how consistently low bids may illuminate companies that are
circumventing the Davis Bacon wage rate and overtime payments.
He said [wage theft] is far too prevalent. He asked whether
there is a statute of limitations for wage and hour complaints
in Alaska.
CHAIR GRAY deferred the question to Mr. Applegate.
1:28:21 PM
JEREMY APPLEGATE, Program Manager, Wage and Hour, Division of
Labor Standards and Safety, Department of Labor & Workforce
Development (DLWD), said yes, the statute of limitations is two
years for minimum wage and overtime claims.
1:30:45 PM
CHRIS DIAMOND, Lead Representative, Western States Regional
Council of Carpenters, said [the construction industry]
experiences a lot of human trafficking, which hasn't been seen
in Alaska until recent years. Generally, the workers'
identification is taken from them, and they are paid
sporadically on a card while being transported back and forth
from hotel to job site. He explained that "coyotes" will show
up with a crew of 50-100 undocumented immigrants who don't know
who they work for and are being paid pennies on a dollar
compared to American workers via 1099s. Often, they are paid
far less than promised, if at all, and their illegal status used
as leverage to discourage them from making complaints. He
described a job on Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson (JBER)
involving wire fraud, worker misclassification, and wage theft.
which is stealing from everyone. He reiterated that this is a
prevalent issue in the construction industry and commended the
legislature for addressing it in the bill. In 2023, The Century
Foundation estimated that 15 percent of Alaska carpenters are
misclassified. He pointed out that there are no worker
protections for filing a complaint, which involves filling out
paperwork and getting it notarized, and suggested that an
anonymous tip line and enforcement mechanisms would be helpful.
CHAIR GRAY asked how members are being educated on reporting
wage theft.
MR. DIAMOND said the first step would be determining whether the
employee is being miscategorized as an independent contractor.
After that, he would help the individual fill out the paperwork
and get it notarized.
CHAIR GRAY asked whether he had seen this problem resolved.
MR. DIAMOND recalled a project in Sitka, in which the workers
received backpay after only making $15 per hour on a prevailing
wage job.
1:41:54 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EISCHEID referenced the volunteer labor
compliance officer program and asked how it would help the
enforcement of wage theft.
MR. DIAMOND said any construction worker with 5 years of
experience and Occupational Safety and Health Administration
(OSHA) 10 training could volunteer to assist the DLWD with wage
checks and help gather information.
1:44:51 PM
CHAIR GRAY asked whether DOL would investigate an allegation of
criminal wage theft.
JOHN SKIDMORE, Deputy Attorney General, Criminal Division,
Department of Law (DOL), said DOL does not conduct criminal
investigations into any area except Medicaid fraud. Currently,
DLWD has its own investigators for wage theft issues and have
the ability to refer criminal cases to DOL.
CHAIR GRAY asked what would happen if the bill were to pass.
MR. SKIDMORE declined to comment on behalf of DLWD in terms of
their needs. Nonetheless, he referred to AS 23.10.140, which
states that failure to pay overtime or minimum wage is
punishable by a $100-$2,000 fine and 10-90 days in jail for
every day of conduct. Conversely, the structure in the bill
would change the law from the number of days to the amount of
violations.
CHAIR GRAY asked how many employers had been sent to jail for
2.4 years for 10 days of wage violations.
MR. SKIDMORE did not know the answer, adding that he is unaware
of any criminal prosecution under these particular statutes
during his time at DOL.
1:51:22 PM
REPRESENTATIVE COSTELLO asked whether this could be addressed
through the human trafficking angle.
MR. SKIDMORE acknowledged that some cases could be used in that
way, but not the vast majority.
1:56:58 PM
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE referred to page 5, line 7, which talks
about the value of unpaid wages within "the preceding 10 years."
Based on the previous comments about the statute of limitations
being 2-3 years, she asked how this language would align with
that.
MR. SKIDMORE acknowledged that it would be broader than anything
allowed under current law under Title 23 or Title 11.
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE asked whether this would help or hinder the
prosecutor.
MR. SKIDMORE said it wouldn't hinder or help the prosecution; it
would change the scope.
CHAIR GRAY pointed out that "the preceding 10 years" language
only refers to repeat offenders with three or more convictions
or sentences.
1:59:47 PM
REPRESENTATIVE COSTELLO asked about the volunteer labor
compliance officer program and whether it would be viable.
MR. SKIDMORE said he was not in the position to offer comments
on this program, as he did not have enough available
information.
2:00:59 PM
MR. APPLEGATE directed attention to a PowerPoint presentation
titled, "Wage and Hour: Unpaid Wage Processes," [hard copy
included in the committee packet]. He began on slide 2, "Scope
of Wage Investigations," which read as follows [original
punctuation provided]:
Title 23
Wage and Hour Act
Right to Return Transportation
Title 36
Alaska's Prevailing Wage
2:02:29 PM
MR. APPLEGATE continued to slide 3, "Alaska's Wage and Hour
Act," which read as follows [original punctuation provided]:
Alaska's Wage and Hour
Minimum Wage
Overtime
2:04:00 PM
MR. APPLEGATE continued to slide 4, "Return Transportation,"
which read as follows [original punctuation provided]:
If an employer furnishes, finances, or agrees to
furnish or finance transportation of the employee, the
employer must pay to return the employee to the place
of hire.
Upon Request of the employee withing 45 days
Upon Termination
Upon the end of the contract
Subsistence: $100 per day, for ten days
2:05:19 PM
MR. APPLEGATE turned to slide 5, "Alaska's Prevailing Wage,"
which read as follows [original punctuation provided]:
Public Construction
"Public Construction" or "public works" means the on-
site field surveying, erection, rehabilitation,
alteration, extension or repair, including painting or
redecorating of buildings, highways or other
improvements to real property under contract for the
state, a political subdivision of the state, or a
regional school board.
REPRESENTATIVE COSTELLO questioned the definition of "prevailing
wage" and how it's identified.
MR. APPLEGATE explained that a survey is sent out every six
months to look for market penetration in each industry to
determine the prevailing wage rate for each classification.
Once the DLWD commissioner reviews the findings, they are
published in a pamphlet and workers must be paid according to
the identified wage.
2:07:34 PM
MR. APPLEGATE resumed the presentation on slide 6, "Prevailing
Wage (continued)," which read as follows [original punctuation
provided]:
Prevailing Wage (continued) Covered projects subject
to the prevailing wage require: • Weekly payment •
Payment based on the classification within which the
work was performed • Submission of Certified Payroll
to the Department Employers who do not comply to the
requirements of Title 36 are subject to debarment for
3 years.
2:08:37 PM
MR. APPLEGATE described the wage claim and public construction
claim processes on slides 7-8.
2:10:16 PM
CHAIR GRAY asked who investigates the misclassification of
employees as independent contractors.
MR. APPLEGATE said each agency has their own definition of
independent contractor. Wage and Hour does some investigation
into the proper payment of employees using the Jeffcoat Decision
by the Alaska Supreme Court to determine who has control of the
employment relationship and whether the independent contractor
is truly independent.
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE asked whether there is a tip line for
people to report their concerns or complaints.
MR. APPLEGATE said they are looking at setting up an anonymous
tip line, but currently, there is an investigator who answers
calls coming into the main line.
2:14:03 PM
CHAIR GRAY sought to confirm that third-party complaints are not
acceptable.
MR. APPLEGATE asserted that third-party complaints are
investigated; however, to pursue a claim, it must be filed by
the claimant.
2:16:26 PM
MR. APPLEGATE continued the presentation on slides 7-8 by
continuing his explanation of wage claim and public construction
claim processes.
2:22:11 PM
MR. APPLEGATE summarized slides 9-12, which showed the number of
wage claims per fiscal year and the outcomes by percentage.
CHAIR GRAY asked why 180 cases were cleared in 2020 and only
were cleared in 2024.
MR. APPELGATE pointed out that COVID-19 was a significant factor
in 2020. He offered to follow up with a more thorough answer in
writing.
2:23:46 PM
MR. APPLEGATE concluded on slide 12, which showed the number of
months to resolution.
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE asked how people being paid under the table
are investigated without a paper trail.
MR. APPLEGATE said those cases are typically reassigned because
there's no way to pursue them.
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE asked what happens when the case is
reassigned.
MR. APPLEGATE said without evidence to establish that the law
was violated, Wage and Hour cannot proceed with the case.
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE pointed out that people who are here
illegally are less likely to make a complaint. She asked
whether Wage and Hour investigators are law enforcement
officers, and whether they are required to report someone who is
undocumented.
MR. APPLEGATE answered no, they are not criminal enforcers;
further, the Wage and Hour office is not tasked under statute
with investigating human trafficking. However, if they uncover
employees being leverage based on their immigration status by
force, fraud, or coercion, the case would be referred to law
enforcement.
2:27:56 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EISCHEID suggested making the Wage and Hour
office phone number more visible on the website.
CHAIR GRAY asked why so few people are making complaints.
MR. APPLEGATE did not know the answer.
2:30:00 PM
CHAIR GRAY opened public testimony on CSHB 97, Version T.
2:30:20 PM
PATRICK FITZGERALD, Political Coordinator, Teamsters 959,
testified in support of Version T and spoke to wage theft in
terms of consecutive, incorrect payments to an employee's
paycheck. He opined that the habitual practice of making pay
corrections on a case-by-case basis rather than correcting the
payroll error itself is wage theft. He urged passage of Version
T with wage theft penalties included to ensure that Alaskans
receive the wages they have earned.
2:32:56 PM
RYAN MCGOVERN, Union Representative, United Association Local
Number 375, testified in support of Version T and shared his
personal experience with wage theft, particularly related to
overtime issues and the misclassification of employees as
independent contractors. He expressed his hope that the bill
would help manage and correct these issues.
2:39:34 PM
CHAIR GRAY closed public testimony. He announced that CSHB 97,
Version T, was held over.
^PRESENTATION(S): Alaska Court System Limits on Pretrial
Delays
PRESENTATION(S): Alaska Court System Limits on Pretrial
Delays
2:39:44 PM
CHAIR GRAY announced that the next order of business would be
the Alaska Court System Limits on Pretrial Delays
presentation.
2:40:40 PM
NANCY MEADE, Chief Counsel, Alaska Court System (ACS), spoke to
the Alaska Supreme Court Order No. 2038 [hard copy included in
the committee packet], which was one of the recommendations from
a 2023 interim court committee that was tasked with figuring how
to decrease the time it takes criminal cases to get to
disposition. Court Order No. 2038 expands upon the exclusionary
periods to Criminal Rule 45, which states that cases should be
resolved within 120 days. She walked the committee through the
provisions of the court order as follows:
1. Beginning with the effective date of this order, no
more than a total of 90 days may be excluded for
continuances granted at the request of the defense
under Criminal Rule 45(d)(2), regardless of the number
of continuances requested;
2. No more than a total of 90 days may be excluded for
continuances granted at the request of the prosecution
under Criminal Rule 45(d)(3), regardless of the number
of continuances requested;
3. No more than a total of 90 days may be excluded for
other periods of delay for good cause under Criminal
Rule 45(d)(7), regardless of the number of other
periods of delay;
Supreme Court Order No. 2038 Page 2 of 3
Effective Date: May 12, 2025
4. The court may make further exclusions under the
above-named provisions only upon a showing that
extraordinary circumstances exist and that the delay
is indispensable to the interest of justice;
5. The limited exclusions provided in this order are
in addition to exclusions for continuances previously
granted; and
6. If a continuance has previously been granted for
failure to comply with a discovery rule or order, then
the court should consider other sanctions under
Criminal Rule 16(e)(1), including dismissing the
affected charges or precluding the delinquent party
from using the involved evidence at trial.
CHAIR GRAY asked how many cases would qualify for this court
order.
MS. MEADE answered approximately 1,100; 800 felonies and 300
misdemeanors. In response to a follow up question about how
this would work in practice, she referred to paragraph 5 of the
court order and explained that starting May 12, 2025, 90 more
days of continuances would be allowed.
CHAIR GRAY reasoned that all 1,100 cases would need to be
dispensed by the end of summer.
MS. MEADE pointed out that defense attorneys and the prosecutors
can each get up to 90 days, as well as another 90 for good
cause, so if everyone were to seek the maximums, it could go
longer.
2:48:20 PM
REPRESENTATIVE MINA asked what percentage of delays are due to
continuances versus delays for good cause.
MS. MEADE stated that "continuance" is another word for
postponement and requires good cause to be granted. So, all
postponements should have good cause as a basis for the request
for continuance.
REPRESENTATIVE MINA asked how long continuances were taking on
average.
MS. MEADE said it depends on the situation, as there are a
variety of continuances.
REPRESENTATIVE MINA asked whether there were limits on
continuances prior to this order.
MS. MEADE said there were no hard limits on continuances because
everything is case specific, so this would be a big change.
2:50:41 PM
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the committee, the House
Judiciary Standing Committee meeting was adjourned at 2:50 p.m.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| Supreme Court Order 2038.pdf |
HJUD 4/2/2025 1:00:00 PM |
Pretrial Delays - Supreme Court Order 2038 |
| HB 97 Supporting doc Underground Economy Wage Theft.pdf |
HJUD 4/2/2025 1:00:00 PM |
HB 97 |
| Wage Hour Presentation to (H) Judiciary 4-2-25.pdf |
HJUD 4/2/2025 1:00:00 PM |
Wage Theft |