Legislature(2021 - 2022)DAVIS 106
02/08/2022 03:00 PM House HEALTH & SOCIAL SERVICES
Note: the audio ![]()
and video ![]()
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| Executive Order 121: Dhss Reorganization | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
ALASKA STATE LEGISLATURE
HOUSE HEALTH AND SOCIAL SERVICES STANDING COMMITTEE
February 8, 2022
3:04 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT
Representative Liz Snyder, Co-Chair
Representative Tiffany Zulkosky, Co-Chair
Representative Ivy Spohnholz
Representative Ken McCarty
Representative Mike Prax
MEMBERS ABSENT
Representative Zack Fields
Representative Christopher Kurka
COMMITTEE CALENDAR
EXECUTIVE ORDER 121: DHSS REORGANIZATION
- HEARD AND HELD
PREVIOUS COMMITTEE ACTION
No previous action to record
WITNESS REGISTER
STACIE KRALY, Director
Civil Division
Department of Law
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Gave a presentation and answered questions
during the hearing on Executive Order 121.
ADAM CRUM, Commissioner
Department of Health and Social Services
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Gave a presentation and answered questions
during the hearing on Executive Order 121.
SYLVAN ROBB, Assistant Commissioner
Department of Health and Social Services
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Answered questions during the hearing on
Executive Order 121.
ACTION NARRATIVE
3:04:28 PM
CO-CHAIR LIZ SNYDER called the House Health and Social Services
Standing Committee meeting to order at 3:04 p.m.
Representatives Zulkosky, Spohnholz (via teleconference), and
Snyder were present at the call to order. Representatives Prax
and McCarty arrived as the meeting was in progress.
^EXECUTIVE ORDER 121: DHSS REORGANIZATION
EXECUTIVE ORDER 121: DHSS REORGANIZATION
3:05:23 PM
CO-CHAIR SNYDER announced that the only order of business would
be Executive Order 121: Department of Health and Social Services
Reorganization.
CO-CHAIR SNYDER explained that Executive Order 121 (EO 121)
would bifurcate the Department of Health and Social Services
into the Department of Health and the Department of Family and
Community services. Another version of this proposal, called EO
119, was introduced last session but was withdrawn by the
governor [on 3/11/21]. She went on to outline the documents her
staff distributed from the administration [available in the
committee packet].
3:07:10 PM
CO-CHAIR SNYDER introduced those presenting and those available
for questions.
3:08:11 PM
STACIE KRALY, Director, Civil Division, Department of Law, began
her presentation by explaining that the sectional analysis is "a
beast of a document," so she would summarize it using a three-
legged stool analogy. One leg creates the Department of Health
and the Department of Family and Community Services out of the
Department of Health and Social Services (DHSS). She explained
that EO 121 "takes everything out of Title 47 and Title 44 and
creates these two departments." The original department, DHSS,
was defined under AS 44.29. That chapter has now been used to
create the Department of Health, while another chapter has been
added to create the Department of Family and Community Services.
A similar bifurcation occurs under AS 47.30, which is the major
statutory framework for what is currently DHSS.
MS. KRALY explained that leg two takes all the boards and
advocacy groups currently under DHSS and moves them to their
respective departments under Title 44. She noted that the
Alaska Mental Health Trust Authority (AMHTA) and the Long-Term
Care Ombudsman are in the Department of Revenue and indicated
that EO 121 removes any reference to them from Title 47 and
moves them to Title 44. She named boards that are moved to the
new Department of Health: The Governor's Council on Disability
and Special Education; the Commission on Aging; the Alaska
Mental Health Board; and the Statewide Independent Living
Council. She said the Advisory Board on Alcoholism and Drug
Abuse and the Suicide Prevention Council are currently under
Title 44, so there were no changes made to them. She noted that
the Pioneer Home Advisory Board is also under Title 44, but it
is being moved to the Department of Family and Community
Services because "that's where ... the Pioneer Home will be
located." She explained that from an organizational standpoint
it made sense to take the boards that have unique roles and
obligations out of the day-to-day statutory obligations.
3:13:25 PM
MS. KRALY, continuing with the stool analogy, described the
final leg as being technical. She explained that it encompasses
all the necessary conforming amendments to address the statutory
provisions in which DHSS is involved, including audits,
centralized licensing, and background checks. She explained
that included in the final leg are the sections of statute that
have been repealed because of adoption elsewhere, as well as
instructions for the revisors of statutes for technical
amendments including transitional provisions.
3:15:27 PM
CO-CHAIR ZULKOSKY asked which sections are different in EO 121
versus EO 119 that was introduced last session.
MS. KRALY explained that EO 121 has a more detailed review. She
elaborated that the major difference is the division of mental
health services between the two departments is addressed and how
both departments will work with AMHTA to address the integrated
mental health services required under current AS 47.30. On
reconsideration, the administration made EO 121 more compact
with less confusing interactions.
CO-CHAIR ZULKOSKY asked to see those changes in writing.
MS. KRALY replied that DHSS can provide that, and she mentioned
that one of the things that came up in review with Legislative
Legal Services is that there were two commissioners on some of
the boards, which is a substantial change to state law.
3:18:19 PM
CO-CHAIR SNYDER echoed Representative Zulkosky's request. She
noted that the National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI) had a
similar request in a 1/6/22 communication and asked for a
specific and clearly laid out breakdown in the technical changes
between the two EOs. She also asked Ms. Kraly if the effect of
EO 121, with exception of the board positions, was basically
unchanged.
MS. KRALY confirmed that the effect of EO 121 was largely
unchanged.
3:20:13 PM
ADAM CRUM, Commissioner, Department of Health and Social
Services, gave a PowerPoint presentation on EO 121 [hard copy
included in the committee packet]. He directed attention to
slide 3, a "hundred-thousand-foot view of the Department of
Health and Social Services." He described DHSS as a "mega
agency" and cited South Dakota as having four departments that
share an equivalent workload to DHSS. He emphasized that with a
budget of $3.5 billion and 3,000 employees, DHSS is a large
department. He opined that the resulting complexity from the
number of programs offered, the "multifaceted" services, and the
vulnerability of the primary beneficiaries make bifurcation
necessary. He explained that the presentation would include the
challenges DHSS faces, the proposed solution, and why an
executive order is the appropriate vehicle for the change. He
presented a list of some of the programs offered by DHSS and
asked the committee which one they would have the commissioner
prioritize to highlight that the programs DHSS offers and the
communities it serves are all high priority. He went on to
opine that the concerns of stakeholders cannot be properly
addressed under the current structure.
COMMISSIONER CRUM explained that the current structure comprised
119 different federal funding sources for DHSS, all with their
own regulations and overseers, that limit what can be delegated.
He explained that many program funding requests require the
signature of the commissioner or deputy commissioner. He
explained that the due diligence of these responsibilities
creates a bottleneck in the department. Commissioner Crum
opined that the creation of more deputy positions is not enough
to fix the problem. He explained that the bottleneck has been
an ongoing problem and will continue to be a problem unless DHSS
is bifurcated. He pointed out the diverse array of agencies
that work with and receive funding from the department and
pointed out the tough decision-making when deciding what to
prioritize. He acknowledged that time management and hard
decision-making encumber leadership roles nationwide but
emphasized the pain of working within a structure that inhibits
an appropriate response.
3:26:17 PM
COMMISSIONER CRUM moved to the number of employees at the DHSS.
He explained the challenge of juggling such a large and spread-
out department. He explained that DHSS has as many employees as
five other state departments, the legislature, and the
governor's office combined, and emphasized that the entire
department answers to one commissioner's office. The
commissioner pointed out that DHSS accounted for nearly 30
percent of the state budget in fiscal year 2023 (FY 23).
Because of its scale, the department interacts with every other
department in the state, and improving service delivery will
help other departments provide better service. He explained
there are more subtle interactions between DHSS and other
departments, such as working with the Alaska Department of Fish
and Game (ADF&G) to get special eligibility areas to use
Sustainable Natural Alternative Power (SNAP) benefits to
purchase hunting and fishing equipment. He spoke about the
cross collaboration between DHSS and the Department of Natural
Resources (DNR) that started the "Kids Don't Float" campaign.
COMMISSIONER CRUM moved to the proposed solution. He explained
that DHSS has two key functions that could be better served by
two departments with narrower scopes. The first key function is
providing direct care to patients and clients that would be
covered by the Department of Family and Community Services, and
the second key function is managing the payment process and
programs that would be covered by the Department of Health. He
explained that by aligning these functions, the Office of the
Commissioner and policy staff would be able to focus on staff
support, improvement of services, and broader bandwidth for
stakeholder engagement.
COMMISSIONER CRUM directed attention to a slide showing the
current structure of DHSS and explained that the Department of
Health will consist of the Medicaid Divisions of Healthcare
Services, Behavioral Health, and Senior and Disability Services,
and it is being aligned with Public Assistance and Public
Health. He explained that the Department of Family and
Community Services will consist of the facility-based divisions,
including the Alaska Psychiatric Institute, the Division of
Juvenile Justice, the Pioneer Homes, and the Office of
Children's Services. He explained that the reorganization keeps
the public-facing organizations and leadership intact. He
explained that in order to keep services aligned, designated
evaluation and treatment (DET) services will be moved from the
Division of Behavioral Health to the Department of Family and
Community Services in order to stay closely aligned with the
Alaska Psychiatric Institute (API) and the coordination of Title
47 involuntary commitment patient movement between facilities.
He pointed out that the primary changes in the reorganization
are around financial and management services and commissioner
staff.
3:33:13 PM
CO-CHAIR SNYDER asked Commissioner Crum how many new positions
are included in the reorganization and whether the current
structure of the Department of Health would remain largely
unchanged.
COMMISSIONER CRUM answered 11 new position control numbers
(PCNs) and 10 reclassified PCNs. He confirmed that the overall
structure will remain with the addition of a new commissioner
position, along with the addition of another project
coordinator, a department reorganization liaison, and a tribal
liaison. He said he was unsure whether the new positions will
require a designated person.
3:35:01 PM
CO-CHAIR ZULKOSKY asked Commissioner Crum about the policy
considerations as they relate to API being in the Department of
Family and Community Services and the stakeholder engagement
around the separation from behavioral health.
COMMISSIONER CRUM explained that API is an acute inpatient
psychiatric hospital and bills accordingly. He explained that
there has always been a question of conflict of interest created
by the surveying group responsible for licensing hospitals being
in the same department as the hospital it oversees. He also
mentioned that the department worked with the Division of
Behavioral Health when deciding where to put API in the
reorganization. He mentioned that being in separate departments
will require a formal memorandum of agreement between the
Division of Behavioral Health and API to ensure that the
formalized data process and sharing continues.
CO-CHAIR ZULKOSKY asked about the new positions and the
delegation of the liaison roles.
COMMISSIONER CRUM explained the liaison roles are not covered at
this time.
CO-CHAIR ZULKOSKY asked what the scope of the reorganization
liaison's responsibilities will be.
COMMISSIONER CRUM responded that the idea behind the
reorganization liaison is to provide a single point of contact
that stakeholders can reach out to if there are issues that need
to be addressed once the implementation begins. He explained
that the tribal liaison role is not taking over another role,
and in talks with tribal partners, a tribal liaison role will be
critical for stakeholder engagement.
CO-CHAIR ZULKOSKY summarized her understanding of Commissioner
Crum's response.
COMMISSIONER CRUM confirmed that Representative Zulkosky's
understanding was correct.
CO-CHAIR ZULKOSKY asked if there is a timeline for when DHSS
will decide on the delegation of roles.
COMMISSIONER CRUM explained that after 60 days, EO 121 becomes
law, and at that time many of those decisions will be made. As
the deadline draws nearer, DHSS plans on holding meetings with
key stakeholders to make sure the people responsible for the
liaison roles are named.
3:43:55 PM
CO-CHAIR SNYDER asked Commissioner Crum how the positions will
be divided between the two departments.
COMMISSIONER CRUM deferred the question to Sylvan Robb.
3:44:29 PM
SYLVAN ROBB, Assistant Commissioner, Department of Health and
Social Services, explained that the Department of Family and
Community Services will have six of the new positions and nine
reclassified.
3:45:15 PM
COMMISSIONER CRUM resumed his presentation by highlighting that
the reorganization was designed to not disrupt payment or
service delivery, and financial management and the Office of the
Commissioner are the most affected.
3:46:00 PM
CO-CHAIR SNYDER asked whether the organization has remained
unchanged from the original EO 119 except for public assistance
now being under the deputy commissioner.
COMMISSIONER CRUM confirmed that Representative Snyder was
correct and explained that the goal is to expedite authority and
oversight.
3:47:29 PM
COMMISSIONER CRUM moved to slide 17, likening the issues that
work their way up to the Office of the Commissioner to fires and
emphasizing that an additional Office of the Commissioner will
prevent this from happening. He talked about the crises the
administration has faced and the ways DHSS has responded. He
discussed the new funding from the COVID-19 pandemic and the
"herculean effort" to manage it. He explained that unless an
issue is a crisis it will not be given proper attention. He
opined that under the current structure, DHSS "can only run from
crisis to crisis." He talked about the need to innovate for the
future and that bifurcation will mean more bandwidth for
engaging with interest groups and stakeholders. He spoke about
the improvement to the working environment of DHSS and benefits
of bifurcation for employees. He moved on to talking about the
mechanisms of an executive order.
3:54:02 PM
CO-CHAIR ZULKOSKY asked whether the department considered
potential delays to the implementation of EO 121 and planned for
them. She commented on the cyber-attack and asked whether the
department has made any plans for a worst-case scenario.
COMMISSIONER CRUM explained that the reorganization was started
by staff. He explained that this is the third iteration and
that the Office of the Commissioner considered many options
including three or four departments but focused on the most
pragmatic choices. He explained that because of the cyber-
attack and because DHSS is covered by the Health Insurance
Portability and Privacy Act (HIPAA), the department's "cyber
security office" will stay whole through the reorganization and
cover both departments. He deferred to Sylvan Robb for further
comment.
3:58:30 PM
MS. ROBB noted that the state has not created a new department
since the Department of Corrections (DOC) was created in the
mid-1980s, which meant there was little to guide the process.
She talked about working with other divisions in the state and
planning for the implementation, and she emphasized that a
priority of the plan is to ensure a smooth public transition.
CO-CHAIR ZULKOSKY talked about the cyber-attack and the impact
it had during the COVID-19 pandemic, and she asked whether DHSS
has "mapped out" similar potential scenarios.
COMMISSIONER CRUM replied that the department has worked on it
as hard as it can and is continually updating security
procedures.
CO-CHAIR ZULKOSKY asked Commissioner Crum to describe the
metrics of success and anticipated results related to EO 121.
COMMISSIONER CRUM confirmed the department has metrics of
success that he could provide at a later date. He gave the
example of improving the recruitment and retention of finance
and budget staff.
CO-CHAIR SNYDER pointed to DHSS's discussions with NAMI and
stated that the primary immediate goals are that with the
addition of the 11 new positions, the department will have more
"bandwidth." She asked if her understanding is correct that the
issues facing DHSS won't be quickly solved but that the
bifurcation will allow the state to be "in a better position."
COMMISSIONER CRUM confirmed that's correct and emphasized that
these are long-standing issues that need a lot of time and
focus.
4:09:10 PM
REPRESENTATIVE MCCARTY asked about the evaluation of efficacy
and the baseline used in evaluation. He asked whether his
understanding is correct that service will become better as a
change to the public-facing side of the department.
COMMISSIONER CRUM explained that the changes will be
incremental.
REPRESENTATIVE MCCARTY talked about the cyber-attack and the
efficacy of the Office of Children's Services (OCS) and asked
what DHSS is looking at for efficacy of security.
COMMISSIONER CRUM explained that OCS has been a long-standing
issue that the department is still addressing.
4:14:01 PM
COMMISSIONER CRUM, returning to the presentation, explained why
a bill is not the appropriate avenue to bifurcate the
department. He explained that executive orders are "well
defined," and the process is described as not [creating]
substantive law change, meaning programs and services won't be
changed by EO 121. He pointed out that the timeline laid out in
Article 3, Section 23 of the Alaska State Constitution is more
rigid than the legislative process. He noted that DOC was
formed by an executive order. He acknowledged that future
legislation will be needed to help fill gaps in the EO.
Commissioner Crum presented the timeline for the implementation
of EO 121 and the revisal process the Office of the Commissioner
went through to rewrite EO 119. He noted that due to the size
of DHSS, it was impossible to reach every stakeholder; however,
he has provided an e-mail address at every meeting.
4:18:50 PM
COMMISSIONER CRUM continued the presentation by talking about
the groups involved in creating EO 121.
4:21:24 PM
CO-CHAIR SNYDER summarized her understanding that most of the
stakeholder interaction so far has been presentations on the
plan followed by question-and-answer sessions, and she asked the
commissioner to provide examples specific to transition and
implementation that the department has gleaned from stakeholder
engagement.
COMMISSIONER CRUM explained that one example is the post 90-day
consideration, which consists of meetings set up in late March,
April, and May to ensure all stakeholders have had the
opportunity to address their concerns. He described the recent
outreach the office has done to ensure stakeholders are ready to
engage in feedback.
4:24:08 PM
COMMISSIONER CRUM continued the presentation on Slide 29,
outlining the new positions, and emphasized that this is not a
cost-cutting or job-cutting initiative.
4:25:01 PM
CO-CHAIR ZULKOSKY asked whether the department has done any
assessment of possible absorption of some of the new roles by
existing staff. She clarified that she was asking about the
additional roles necessary for the transition as well as the
additional roles post transition. She indicated she wanted to
know what percent of day-to-day function will be impacted by the
transition.
MS. ROBB explained that the department is not concerned about
its ability to manage the transition while still attending to
its regular responsibilities. She further explained that the
function on Finance and Management Services is necessary to keep
the entire department running. She said that after the
reorganization there will be a huge impact because the breadth
of the burden on her staff will be greatly decreased.
4:29:13 PM
COMMISSIONER CRUM, in response to a follow-up question from Co-
Chair Zulkosky, explained that one of the primary goals of DHSS
is to ensure that the public interface with the department is
unaffected.
4:29:49 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SPOHNHOLZ asked how the continuum of care could
be affected by adding a new department and what would ensure
"smooth" cross-department communication.
COMMISSIONER CRUM pointed to the in-house Medicaid eligibility
unit within OCS and explained that because of a memorandum of
understanding (MOA), that group will be directly tied into the
Division of Public Assistance, and similar programs will be used
in cross-department lines. He explained that through the
requirement of formal communication agreements, the commissioner
expects some inter-division communication to improve.
REPRESENTATIVE SPOHNHOLZ commended Commissioner Crum on his use
of "plain language" and observed that a lot of work has gone
into the reorganization since it was introduced the year before.
4:34:02 PM
CO-CHAIR SNYDER asked about the math related to 3,266 full-time
positions. Currently at 3,259 positions, that would mean 7 new
positions; therefore, she asked why the department was asking
for 11.
MS. ROBB responded that the department added 11 but took 4 away
after transferring them to shared services.
4:35:15 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SPOHNHOLZ inquired whether the PCNs are
Information Technology personnel.
SYLVAN ROBB explained that they are accounting positions.
4:35:46 PM
COMMISSIONER CRUM resumed the presentation by talking about the
effective date for the reorganization at the start of FY 23. He
talked about the difference in function of the Offices of the
Commissioners and the slow effects of that going forward. He
broke down the timeline beginning with dividing the budget into
two departments. He moved on to what will happen once EO 121
becomes law, including notifying federal partners and ongoing
work with the legislature. He talked about things that cannot
be done until the transition is ready to become law, including
transferring employees to the new departments, redirecting
charts of account, and incurring expenses on behalf of the new
departments. He explained that staff in both departments will
help close DHSS's books for the last time.
4:39:30 PM
CO-CHAIR ZULKOSKY asked what kind of notification DHSS has had
as it relates to program recipients.
COMMISSIONER CRUM said there has not been formal communication
but that DHSS has reached out to advocacy groups and would begin
reaching out to recipients around April or May.
CO-CHAIR ZULKOSKY asked what Alaskans might expect to hear from
the department.
COMMISSIONER CRUM offered to follow up with the committee
regarding programs the department has to contact, and he
reemphasized DHSS's goal of minimal disruption to services.
REPRESENTATIVE SPOHNHOLZ asked whether there were any federal
approvals that need to be submitted in advance of the
reorganization.
4:42:01 PM
MS. ROBB answered no but stated there are notifications that
need to be made.
4:43:06 PM
CO-CHAIR ZULKOSKY asked whether DHSS expects both commissioner
offices will be fully staffed by July 1.
COMMISSIONER CRUM answered that the administration is trying to
determine whether the governor can name commissioners before the
departments are split, but he said posting and recruitment will
be done before July 1.
4:44:17 PM
CO-CHAIR SNYDER asked whether DHSS is archiving the work done on
the process of bifurcation and if there has been a budget
prepared for the rebranding of the new departments.
MS. ROBB replied that the department was pleased to find that
most of its facilities do not use the department's name and will
not have to be changed, but it anticipates a cost of around
$50,000 on signage that does need to be changed.
CO-CHAIR SNYDER asked whether there will be an expense of a
similar magnitude for similar materials.
MS. ROBB explained that because of the use of digital media,
there is not much hard letter head that will need to be
rebranded.
4:47:17 PM
COMMISSIONER CRUM noted that the administration does not yet
have logos and suggested that the state could reach out for
ideas for new logos.
4:47:49 PM
REPRESENTATIVE PRAX asked if his understanding is correct that
positions "down the ladder" will remain largely unaffected.
COMMISSIONER CRUM confirmed that is correct.
REPRESENTATIVE PRAX asked whether the commissioner has thought
about communication of the change to providers and the media.
COMMISSIONER CRUM explained that the department has held
employee townhall meetings and has more scheduled to address
additional concerns. In response to a follow-up question, he
explained that the department has not had any conversations with
media outlets on the transition; it is keeping communication
limited until EO 121 becomes law.
4:51:32 PM
COMMISSIONER CRUM resumed his presentation by explaining how the
two departments will be addressing known issues once the
transition is done. He finished the presentation by giving the
committee contact information.
4:54:07 PM
CO-CHAIR ZULKOSKY asked what systems are still impacted by the
aforementioned cyber-attack.
COMMISSIONER CRUM explained that some systems are still down,
but most have been restored. He deferred to Ms. Robb for
further details.
4:55:10 PM
MS. ROBB stated that the department is "making good progress"
but that it hasn't gone as quickly as desired; the department
hired a multi-national contractor that identified 19 systems
that need to be taken offline. She confirmed 9 systems are
still going through recovery. She talked about the need to
rebuild the system and go through penetration testing to see if
"they can get in," which is the last test before bringing a
system back online. In response to a follow-up question from
Representative Zulkosky, she explained that there haven't been
any impediments to the reorganization in response to the attack,
and the department has resources requested in the budget.
CO-CHAIR ZULKOSKY asked a question regarding the expense of the
transition.
MS. ROBB explained that the budget is for the new positions and
the reclassifications.
4:59:26 PM
REPRESENTATIVE PRAX stated his concern about the Office of Child
Services, and he asked what the focus would be a year after
reorganization and how it would help the families involved.
5:00:00 PM
COMMISSIONER CRUM explained [the two bifurcated departments]
will be focusing on recruitment and retention initially and then
how to put more prevention into communities.
REPRESENTATIVE PRAX predicted that the reorganization will be a
success.
5:01:24 PM
CO-CHAIR SNYDER thanked everyone for a productive meeting.
5:02:07 PM
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the committee, the House
Health and Social Services Standing Committee meeting was
adjourned at 5:02 p.m.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| EO 121.pdf |
HHSS 2/8/2022 3:00:00 PM |
EO 121 |
| HHSS EO 121 Letter (2-7-21).pdf |
HHSS 2/8/2022 3:00:00 PM |
EO 121 |
| Attachment A- DHSS EO Reorg Presentation HHSS 2.8.22.pdf |
HHSS 2/8/2022 3:00:00 PM |
EO 121 |
| Attachment B- EO 121 Sectional Analysis (2-7-22).pdf |
HHSS 2/8/2022 3:00:00 PM SHSS 2/10/2022 1:30:00 PM |
EO 121 |
| Attachment C- EO 121 Stakeholder Engagment FINAL.pdf |
HHSS 2/8/2022 3:00:00 PM SHSS 2/10/2022 1:30:00 PM |
EO 121 |
| Attachment D- EO 121 Transition Plan (2-6-22).pdf |
HHSS 2/8/2022 3:00:00 PM SHSS 2/10/2022 1:30:00 PM |
EO 121 |
| Attachment E- EO 121 Summary of New and Reclassified Positions (2-7-22).pdf |
HHSS 2/8/2022 3:00:00 PM SHSS 2/10/2022 1:30:00 PM |
EO 121 |
| Attachment F- EO 121 DHSS response to House Leadership Chart (2-7-22).pdf |
HHSS 2/8/2022 3:00:00 PM SHSS 2/10/2022 1:30:00 PM |
EO 121 |