02/26/2026 10:00 AM House FISHERIES
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB304 | |
| HB253 | |
| Adjourn |
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 304 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 253 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
NONALASKA STATE LEGISLATURE
HOUSE SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON FISHERIES
February 26, 2026
10:02 a.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT
Representative Louise Stutes, Chair
Representative Bryce Edgmon, Vice Chair
Representative Rebecca Himschoot
Representative Chuck Kopp
Representative Kevin McCabe
Representative Sarah Vance
Representative Bill Elam
MEMBERS ABSENT
All members present
COMMITTEE CALENDAR
HOUSE BILL NO. 304
"An Act relating to the duties of the commissioner of fish and
game; establishing the sport fishing angler access account;
establishing the sport fishing angler access surcharge; and
providing for an effective date."
- MOVED CSHB 304(FSH) OUT OF COMMITTEE
HOUSE BILL NO. 253
"An Act relating to the fisheries enhancement loan program; and
providing for an effective date."
- HEARD & HELD
PREVIOUS COMMITTEE ACTION
BILL: HB 304
SHORT TITLE: SPORT FISH SURCHARGE
SPONSOR(s): REPRESENTATIVE(s) MCCABE
02/13/26 (H) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
02/13/26 (H) FSH, FIN
02/19/26 (H) FSH AT 10:00 AM GRUENBERG 120
02/19/26 (H) Heard & Held
02/19/26 (H) MINUTE(FSH)
02/26/26 (H) FSH AT 10:00 AM GRUENBERG 120
BILL: HB 253
SHORT TITLE: FISHERIES ENHANCEMENT LOAN PROGRAM
SPONSOR(s): REPRESENTATIVE(s) BYNUM
01/20/26 (H) PREFILE RELEASED 1/16/26
01/20/26 (H) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
01/20/26 (H) FSH, FIN
02/26/26 (H) FSH AT 10:00 AM GRUENBERG 120
WITNESS REGISTER
JANE PIERSON, Staff
Representative Louise Stutes
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: On behalf of the House Special Committee on
Fisheries, presented the CS to HB 304.
DOUG VINCENT-LANG, Commissioner
Alaska Department of Fish & Game
POSITION STATEMENT: Responded to committee questions regarding
HB 304
JOE FELKL, Legislative Liaison
Alaska Department of Fish & Game
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Answered questions pertaining to HB 304.
REPRESENTATIVE JEREMY BYNUM
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: As prime sponsor, introduced HB 253 to the
House Special Committee on Fisheries.
TREVOR SHAW, Staff
Representative Jeremy Bynum
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: On behalf of prime sponsor, Representative
Jeremy Bynum, gave an overview of the Fisheries Enhancement Loan
Program and read the sectional analysis to HB 253.
DOUG VINCENT-LANG, Commissioner
Department of Fish & Game
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Answered committee questions pertaining to
HB 253.
ALBERT SMITH, Mayor
Metlakatla, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Answered questions and gave invited
testimony in support of HB 253.
ACTION NARRATIVE
10:02:45 AM
CHAIR LOUISE STUTES called the House Special Committee on
Fisheries meeting to order at 10:02 a.m. Representatives McCabe,
Vance, Elam, Himschoot, and Stutes were present at the call to
order. Representatives Edgemon and Kopp arrived as the meeting
was in progress.
HB 304-SPORT FISH SURCHARGE
10:04:02 AM
CHAIR STUTES announced that the first order of business would be
HOUSE BILL NO. 304,"An Act relating to the duties of the
commissioner of fish and game; establishing the sport fishing
angler access account; establishing the sport fishing angler
access surcharge; and providing for an effective date."
10:04:32 AM
REPRESENTATIVE HIMSCHOOT moved to adopt the proposed Committee
Substitute (CS) to HB 304, labeled 34-LS1375\G, Bullard,
2/24/26.
10:04:45 AM
CHAIR STUTES objected for the purpose of discussion.
10:05:06 AM
JANE PIERSON, Staff, Representative Louise Stutes, Alaska State
Legislature, on behalf of the House Special Committee on
Fisheries, presented the CS to HB 304. She explained that there
were a few changes from Version I to Version G. The changes can
be explained as follows [original punctuation provided]:
Sec. 2 - AS 16.05.050 (c) (Page 1, Lines 12-13) The
biennial report has been changed to a report every
four years.
Sec. 3 AS 16.05.130 (i) (Page 1, Line 14 Page 2,
Lines 1-10) Changes how monies in the sports fishing
angler access account shall be disseminated. First to
produce the report, with the remainder to be allocated
to programs intended to directly benefit license
purchasers by developing, improving, and maintaining
access, facilities and other infrastructure, and
services for nonmotorized sports fishing.
Sec. 5 in version I AS 16.05.340(i) is removed,
because version G no longer has a sunset date and the
subsection is therefore no longer necessary.
Sec 5 AS 16.05.340 (Page 2, Line 22- Page 3, Line
11) Changes the angler access surcharge from $1 for
sportfish licenses to a specified amount for each
sports fishing license type (the new scale can be
found on page 3). This section still maintains that
residents who are eligible for a low-income resident
license or a free military license are exempt from
paying a surcharge.
Sec 7 & Sec 10 in version I Are eliminated since
version G no longer includes a sunset date. These two
sections were in version I and were deleted from
version G. Sec. 7 were the repealers for January 1,
2032, sunset date found in section 10 in version I.
Sec 7 & 8 (Page 3, Lines 18-19) are conforming
amendments to the effective dates in version G
of HB 304.
10:07:26 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE commented that he appreciates the help
putting the Committee Substitute together and felt that it helps
the original bill. He appreciated the sunset date being removed
and felt that every four years there was a reasonable timeline
for generating a report. Additionally, he felt that supporting
the Sportfishing Angler Access Account was good.
10:09:01 AM
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE asked about the original report in 2007
known as the "Economic Impacts and Contributions of Sportfishing
in Alaska." She appreciated that a new report could be prepared
every 4 years. She said that no sunset date is a little bit
concerning since sunset dates give the legislature an
opportunity to review processes. She asked that in 2007,
whether the state still had freshwater logs to help ascertain
how many fish were removed from rivers and whether this
information was tied into the original report.
CHAIR STUTES noted that the Department of Fish & Game (ADF&G)
Commissioner, Doug Vincent-Lang, and ADF&G Legislative Liaison,
Joe Felkl, were available to address these types of questions.
10:10:38 AM
DOUG VINCENT-LANG, Commissioner, responded that he was not sure
whether freshwater fishing logs were around in 2007. However,
he noted that there was statewide harvest survey information
that went into the study. He was not sure whether the saltwater
logbook program was operational as well.
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE said that the reason she asked is that a
great report is built with great data. She said that there had
been provisions in place to have data based on the sportfishing
industry and currently there was no freshwater logbook program
in place. She inquired how the state would build the economic
report moving forward. She noted that support for the proposed
legislation included future efforts to acquire data rather than
rely on surveys and perceptions. She said that a dollar value
needs to be tied into the fish to allow for better Board of
Fisheries (BOF) decision making.
COMMISSIONER VINCENT-LANG responded that he could follow up with
information from 2007 [when the previous economic study was
conducted]. He said that for the new survey, there would be
statewide saltwater logbook data available. He said that while
freshwater logbook data was not available, there are other ways
of ascertaining information from freshwater sportfishing
operations. He noted that ADF&G is in the process of updating
surveys to allow for better in-season reporting.
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE asked whether the freshwater sportfish
charters were required to send surveys out like personal use
fishery participants are required to fill out.
COMMISSIONER VINCENT-LANG responded it depends where you operate
in the state. He noted that in some places in the Kenai River,
there are still some in-season assessments, whereas other areas
there are no logbook requirements. He said that there used to
be a requirement for freshwater logbooks, but it was ended by
the legislature.
10:15:00 AM
JOE FELKL, Legislative Liaison, Alaska Department of Fish &
Game, said that there was an evaluation of the CS and ADF&G
anticipates the generated revenue at approximately $900,000
annually. He said that this would provide the department with
sufficient funds for the current Sportfishing Angler Access
Program. He said that projects associated with the program
include the construction of trails, fish cleaning stations, land
acquisition, camping facilities, restrooms, and a variety of
other amenities.
CHAIR STUTES noted that the report would take priority.
MR. FELKL confirmed that the economic report would take priority
over these types of projects.
CHAIR STUTES asked whether there was any impact on funds
generated from the Dingell-Johnson Act.
MR. FELKL noted that the current Sportfishing Angler Access
Program uses some Dingell Johnson funds and the proposed bill
would provide a dedicated revenue stream for angler access
projects, allowing Dingell Johnson funds to be utilized in other
areas as well.
10:17:19 AM
COMMISSIONER VINCENT-LANG added that there is a federal mandate
that 15 percent of these funds need to go into boating access
projects. He said that ADF&G has struggled over the last
several years regarding how the state can pay for non-boating
access projects. He said that this directly competes with other
Dingell Johnson funds and the proposed bill would facilitate the
completion of other projects.
10:18:24 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE said that he was interested to find out
that in 2022 non-resident licenses amounted to 376,022 and the
resident licenses amount to 259,517. He said that if someone
was involved in tourism, this is the kind of data that could be
sought. He noted that Representative Vance and him recently
were meeting and there was a discussion of "bare boats." He
said that bare boats are where there is a lodge that has dozens
of boats, with no guides, therefore no logbooks. He discussed
the process that someone would use a bareboat. He said that it
is important that the survey covers this kind of activity, and
how many bare boats were in operation. He noted that bare boat
operations have irritated many Alaskans.
10:20:36 AM
REPRESENTATIVE HIMSCHOOT asked for Commissioner Vincent-Lang's
perspective on bare boats.
COMMISSIONER VINCENT-LANG said that the issue of bare boat
charters is a growing issue. He said that there are two points
that the department would like to evaluate. One, how many bare
boats are in operation and being rented. Two, what the harvest
totals are coming from bare boat operations. He said that
harvest totals are more difficult to ascertain since on a
charter vessel, a guide is responsible for logging a catch. He
said that when redesigning the harvest survey, the question
would be whether someone participated in a fishery while using a
bare boat.
10:21:44 AM
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE asked what the intent was regarding
distribution of the report. She asked about what type of format
the report might take and what the intent might be.
COMMISSIONER VINCENT-LANG responded that he would hope that
ADF&G would get a report back from whatever consultant would get
hired and the report would be used to develop both a paper and
electronic report. He did not envision printing hundreds of
copies of a large report.
10:23:12 AM
The committee took an at-ease from 10:23 a.m. to 10:27 a.m.
10:27:09 AM
CHAIR STUTES opened public testimony on HB 304. After
ascertaining that nobody wished to testify, closed public
testimony.
10:27:55 AM
REPRESENTATIVE HIMSCHOOT moved to report HB 301 out of committee
with individual recommendations and the accompanying fiscal
notes. There being no objection, CSBH 301 (FSH), Version 34-
LS1375\G, Bullard, 2/24/26 was moved from the House Special
Committee on Fisheries.
10:28:41 AM
The committee took a brief at-ease.
HB 253-FISHERIES ENHANCEMENT LOAN PROGRAM
10:32:23 AM
CHAIR STUTES announced that the next order of business would be
HOUSE BILL NO. 253, "An Act relating to the fisheries
enhancement loan program; and providing for an effective date."
10:32:53 AM
REPRESENTATIVE JEREMY BYNUM, Alaska State Legislature, as prime
sponsor, introduced HB 253 to the House Special Committee on
Fisheries. He noted that HB 253 pertains to the Fisheries
Enhancement Loan Program and it has long played a vital role in
sustaining commercial, sport, and subsistence related fisheries
in Alaska by providing critical access to capital. He noted
that this capital supports infrastructure improvements that
strengthen both fish stocks and coastal economies. He explained
that under current law, loan eligibility is limited to qualified
regional associations and approved nonprofit corporations. He
said that HB 253 would extend eligibility to include federally
recognized tribal organizations that operate fish hatcheries.
He said that the proposed legislation would make a few
conforming changes to the authority of the commissioner to
include the eligibility for tribal organizations and maintain
the existing loan caps. He noted that by incorporating
federally recognized tribal organizations in the Fisheries
Enhancement Loan Program, it would strengthen collaboration and
reinforce the long-term sustainability of fisheries in Alaska.
10:35:42 AM
TREVOR SHAW, Staff, Representative Jeremy Bynum, Alaska State
Legislature, on behalf of prime sponsor, Representative Jeremy
Bynum, gave an overview of the Fisheries Enhancement Loan
Program and read the sectional analysis to HB 253. He explained
that the program was established in 1976 and prior to 1981,
loans were presold to the Department of Revenue for funding. He
said that in 1981, the fisheries revolving loan fund became an
official fund. He said that loans are available for planning,
construction, and operations of a fish hatchery facility. He
said that loans can also support pre-construction operations
necessary to obtain a permit. He explained that the maximum
loan amount is $10 million with a maximum loan term of 30 years;
the first 6-10 years of the loan do not accrue interest. Noted
that in recent fiscal years (FYs), from FY21 to FY25 there was a
total of $22,108,000 in loans issued He said that in FY21, the
fund was the largest of the five years with loan totals at $10.8
million and FY22 was the smallest with only $1.6 million in
loans issued. He said that of the 13 loans over the last fiscal
years, the average amount was $1.7 million dollars.
MR. SHAW noted that HB 253 would amend AS 16.10.500 which
relates to the declaration of policy for the Fisheries
Enhancement Loan Program.
MR. SHAW proceeded to read the sectional analysis to HB 253
[original punctuation provided]:
Section 1. Amends AS 16.10.500 relating to the
declaration of policy for the fisheries enhancement
loan program. This section updates and clarifies the
state's policy governing the fisheries enhancement
loan program. The section expands loan eligibility to
include federally recognized tribal organizations that
operate fish hatcheries on an Indian reservation or
under a federal permit, in addition to qualified
regional associations.
Section 2. Amends AS 16.10.510 relating to the powers
and duties of the commissioner. This section updates
the commissioner's authority under the fisheries
enhancement loan program to explicitly include
eligible tribal organizations alongside qualified
regional associations and approved local nonprofit
corporations. Conforming changes ensure tribal
organizations are treated consistently throughout the
statute, while retaining existing provisions.
Section 3. Amends AS 16.10.520(a) relating to loan
limits. This section updates the loan limit provisions
of the fisheries enhancement loan program to reflect
the inclusion of eligible tribal organizations as
borrowers. The section further clarifies that loans
for other nonprofit hatchery corporation or tribal
organization projects remain capped at $1,000,000.
Section 4. Establishes an effective date of July 1,
2026.
10:38:45 AM
REPRESENTATIVE BYNUM thanked the committee, staff, and
department for addressing some of the prior concerns with the
bill and the opportunity to collaborate on it. He said that
there were initial concerns bringing the idea forward but noted
that work has been done to address some of the concerns.
Specifically, one concern had to do with loans issued to tribal
organizations that there may not be a requirement that they
would participate in fish tracking requirements like others. He
said that working with his districts communities and after
consultation, they are willing and wanting to work alongside
other industry partners. He said that there would be a
committee substitute (CS) that would address this concern in
law. He noted that another concern was collateral on a loan.
He noted that legislative legal services and others were
consulted and there were already guardrails in place.
10:41:37 AM
REPRESENTATIVE KOPP believed there may have been litigation
between the Metlakatla Tribe and the State of Alaska (SOA) that
went to federal court. He said that this pertained to
jurisdiction of fisheries and the waters off the reservation,
and whether fish stocks were tribal or were publicly accessible
state fish. He said that he was unsure of the outcome of the
court case. He wanted to ensure that using state money for a
tribal hatchery operation would allow the public to access those
fish stocks in state waters. He noted that there was
significant litigation in the courts regarding this issue.
REPRESENTATIVE BYNUM responded that he did not believe that this
issue was specifically related to the proposed bill, but he
would follow up with the committee. He understood that there is
a permitting program with the tribe that allows fishing
accessibility.
10:44:17 AM
DOUG VINCENT-LANG, Commissioner, Department of Fish & Game,
answered committee questions pertaining to HB 253. Commented
that there is an ongoing lawsuit with the Metlakatla Tribe
centered around whether the tribe has traditional fishing rights
outside of their reservation. He noted that they were asking to
fish a few districts around the reserve without needing a
Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission (CFEC) permit. He said
that the litigation was heard once at a Federal District Court
and was elevated to an Appellate Court with later return to a
District Court where the case continues deliberations. He said
that his understanding with the proposed bill is that if the
tribe received state money, the fish would become common
property resources outside of the reservation. Furthermore, any
funds used to produce fish would be done under the state
permitting system. He said that the state needs to ascertain
how many fish go out and what the composition would be, as this
ties into treaty agreements. He noted that certain procedures
would need to be followed.
10:45:55 AM
REPRESENTATIVE KOPP asked how far from the shoreline does the
reservation go into navigable waters.
COMMISSIONER VINCENT-LANG responded that he read the lawsuit
about two weeks ago and he could not recall. He thought it was
around one or two miles.
10:46:33 AM
REPRESENTATIVE HIMSCHOOT said that the memo talks about not
being able to collateralize unless tribal immunity is waived,
she asked whether this was addressed in the proposed bill.
REPRESENATIVE BYNUM responded that initially it was thought that
the bill needed an amendment to address this issue. However, he
said that there is no amendment necessary to ensure that this
legal requirement occurs. He said that the memo points directly
to statute with what requirements are in place for the loan.
The memo also highlights specific information on the Metlakatla
requirements when accepting a loan regarding immunity.
REPRESENTATIVE HIMSCHOOT asked whether this could be done in
regulation rather than being a part of the proposed regulation.
REPRESENATIVE BYNUM responded that this is correct.
10:48:07 AM
CHAIR STUTES announced that the committee would hear invited
testimony.
10:48:28 AM
ALBERT SMITH, Mayor, answered questions and gave invited
testimony in support of HB 253. He asked whether there were
questions in which he could answer.
REPRESENTATIVE KOPP asked Mr. Smith how far from the shoreline
the reservation extends and how it pertains to tribal control of
the fisheries.
MR. SMITH noted that the reservation had its own Metlakatla
Indian Community Fish & Wildlife Department and it was a
hardworking and outstanding group. He said that the reserve
shares a lot of their information with the state, including
tagging reports and marking fish. He said that the community
currently has 25 million chum salmon fry that are 100 percent
marked.
MR. SMITH responded that tribal waters extend 3000 feet from the
low water mark, which equates to just over a half mile.
10:50:47 AM
MR. SMITH proceeded with his invited testimony and noted that he
was excited about the proposed bill. He said that it is
something that the tribe has been working on for some time. He
said that four years ago the tribe worked with Jim Anderson and
details had been "ironed out" regarding collateral, payments,
and other mechanisms. He said that the tribal hatchery was
built around the same timeframe that the loan program had
started and currently much of the hatchery infrastructure on the
reservation is aging. He noted that Metlakatla was part of the
only reserve in Alaska and contained a federally recognized
fishery and hatchery. He said that in the last ten years, the
tribe has worked on modernizing and expanding. He understood
that the fish that get released migrate like all salmon. He
said that what is good for Metlakatla is good for the region,
and what is good for the region is good for the state. He
understood that many coho salmon that originate from Metlakatla
are caught in coastal waters, including near Sitka before they
return inland. He said that the tribe is all for being good
partners to the region and would love to Southeast and the rest
of Alaska thrive. He said that the proposed bill could help
with this.
MR. SMITH had also noted that he heard Commissioner Vincent-Lang
discussed needing a hatchery permit. He said that the bill to
his knowledge would help with this process. He said that this
was a hangup with previous discussions. He said that Metlakatla
is a federally recognized and sovereign nation. He noted that
Metlakatla was currently doing coded wire tags for Chinook, and
coho at the same level as the state. He noted that chum salmon
were marked slightly differently than other salmon varieties and
was done by changing water temperatures to create otolith marks.
He said that the bottom line is that in the last years, the
tribe has appropriately marked fish and follows the same
regulations as the state. He said that the tribe also
participates in the Pacific Salmon Treaty meetings and were
following Chinook salmon procedures.
10:56:41 AM
REPRESENTATIVE HIMSCHOOT asked whether other tribes in Southeast
Alaska support the proposed legislation.
MR. SMITH responded that he recommends that she check with the
other tribes since he cannot speak for them and has not asked.
10:57:21 AM
REPRESENTATIVE BYNUM said that his office did some research and
outreach with other tribes and he has not received any negative
feedback regarding the proposed legislation. He noted that he
would continue outreach efforts and share any insights with the
committee.
10:57:48 AM
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE asked for clarification regarding a sponsor
substitute or any changes to the proposed bill.
REPRESENATIVE BYNUM responded that there would be a change made
to specifically address bill language to align with requirements
for marking fish and ensuring compliance. He said that the
current bill currently does not have this conforming language.
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE said that the bill looks prescriptive to
Metlakatla, she asked what potential is for other federally
recognized tribes. She asked why it was prescriptive rather
than permissive.
REPRESENATIVE BYNUM responded that the bill should be
identifying an Indian reservation and/or a Federally Recognized
Tribe.
10:59:30 AM
MR. SHAW added that the wording in the bill talks about an
Indian reservation or operating with a federal permit. He said
that any additional tribal organizations in the future that
obtain a federal or state permit. He said that a future
Committee Substitute could provide a provision that any tribal
organization could meet criteria for an Alaska Department of
Fish & Game (ADF&G) under state statute. He said that the bill
was written this way because there are provisions in federal law
that allow Metlakatla to operate their own hatchery without even
technically needing a federal permit. He said that the proposed
bill was written to be broad.
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE said that this is about the loan program,
and she knows that with it being a tribe, they can access loans
that other Alaska organizations cannot since they are a
federally recognized tribe. She asked if he could describe the
need for why the bill was brought forward.
11:01:35 AM
REPRESENATIVE BYNUM responded that the proposed bill was brought
forward was so that it could be ensured that the Metlakatla
Indian Community has the same equal access that other Alaskans
have.
11:02:36 AM
CHAIR STUTES noted that an amendment deadline would be set once
a Committee Substitute was heard.
11:02:57 AM
The committee took a brief at ease.
11:03:14 AM
CHAIR STUTES closed invited testimony to HB 253.
11:03:53 AM
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the committee, the House
Special Committee on Fisheries meeting was adjourned at 11:04
a.m.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 304.Ver I Sponsor Statement.2.13.26.pdf |
HFSH 2/26/2026 10:00:00 AM |
|
| HB304 Ver I.2.13.26.pdf |
HFSH 2/19/2026 10:00:00 AM HFSH 2/26/2026 10:00:00 AM |
HB 304 |
| HB304 Ver I Sectional Analysis.2.13.26.pdf |
HFSH 2/26/2026 10:00:00 AM |
HB 304 |
| HB304 Ver I.Supporting Docs Jan 2026 FG Closures.2.13.26.pdf |
HFSH 2/19/2026 10:00:00 AM HFSH 2/26/2026 10:00:00 AM |
HB 304 |
| HB304 Ver I. 2007 Economic_impacts_of_fishing Report.2.13.26.pdf |
HFSH 2/19/2026 10:00:00 AM HFSH 2/26/2026 10:00:00 AM |
HB 304 |
| HB 304 ver I FN DF&G.pdf |
HFSH 2/19/2026 10:00:00 AM HFSH 2/26/2026 10:00:00 AM |
HB 304 |
| HB 304 ver. I letter of opposition.pdf |
HFSH 2/26/2026 10:00:00 AM |
HB 304 |
| HB 304 HFSH CS ver. G.pdf |
HFSH 2/26/2026 10:00:00 AM |
HB 304 |
| HB 304 Explanation of Changes ver. I to ver. G.pdf |
HFSH 2/26/2026 10:00:00 AM |
HB 304 |
| HB 304 Support State of Alaska 2025 License and Tags Issued 1.22.26.pdf |
HFSH 2/26/2026 10:00:00 AM |
HB 304 |
| HB 253 Sponsor Statement - Version N 02.20.2026 (1).pdf |
HFSH 2/26/2026 10:00:00 AM |
HB 253 |
| HB 253 Bill ver. N (2).pdf |
HFSH 2/26/2026 10:00:00 AM |
HB 253 |
| HB 253 Sectional Analysis - Version N 02.20.2026 (3).pdf |
HFSH 2/26/2026 10:00:00 AM |
HB 253 |
| HB 253 FN DCCED 2.20.26 (4).pdf |
HFSH 2/26/2026 10:00:00 AM |
HB 253 |
| HB 253 FN DF&G 2.20.26 (5).pdf |
HFSH 2/26/2026 10:00:00 AM |
HB 253 |
| HB 253 Version N Legal Memo on Collateralization 02.24.2026.pdf |
HFSH 2/26/2026 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/3/2026 10:30:00 AM |
HB 253 |