Legislature(2021 - 2022)GRUENBERG 120
03/09/2021 11:00 AM House FISHERIES
Note: the audio ![]()
and video ![]()
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB80 | |
| HB115 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 80 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 115 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
ALASKA STATE LEGISLATURE
HOUSE SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON FISHERIES
March 9, 2021
11:04 a.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT
Representative Geran Tarr, Chair
Representative Louise Stutes
Representative Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins
Representative Andi Story
Representative Dan Ortiz
Representative Sarah Vance
Representative Kevin McCabe
MEMBERS ABSENT
All members present.
COMMITTEE CALENDAR
HOUSE BILL NO. 80
"An Act establishing the sport fishing hatchery facilities
account; establishing the sport fishing facility surcharge; and
providing for an effective date."
- MOVED CSHB 80(FSH) OUT OF COMMITTEE
HOUSE BILL NO. 115
"An Act relating to aquatic farming and hatchery site leases;
and requiring the director of the division of lands to provide
the legislature with an annual report relating to aquatic
farming and hatchery site leases."
- MOVED HB 115 OUT OF COMMITTEE
PREVIOUS COMMITTEE ACTION
BILL: HB 80
SHORT TITLE: SPT FSH HATCHERY FACIL ACCT; SURCHARGE
SPONSOR(s): RULES BY REQUEST OF THE GOVERNOR
02/18/21 (H) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
02/18/21 (H) FSH, FIN
02/23/21 (H) FSH AT 10:00 AM GRUENBERG 120
02/23/21 (H) Heard & Held
02/23/21 (H) MINUTE(FSH)
02/25/21 (H) FSH AT 10:00 AM GRUENBERG 120
02/25/21 (H) -- MEETING CANCELED --
03/02/21 (H) FSH AT 10:00 AM GRUENBERG 120
03/02/21 (H) Heard & Held
03/02/21 (H) MINUTE(FSH)
03/04/21 (H) FSH AT 11:00 AM GRUENBERG 120
03/04/21 (H) Heard & Held
03/04/21 (H) MINUTE(FSH)
03/09/21 (H) FSH AT 11:00 AM GRUENBERG 120
BILL: HB 115
SHORT TITLE: AQUATIC FARMING & HATCHERY SITE LEASES
SPONSOR(s): STORY
02/24/21 (H) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
02/24/21 (H) FSH, RES
03/04/21 (H) FSH AT 11:00 AM GRUENBERG 120
03/04/21 (H) Heard & Held
03/04/21 (H) MINUTE(FSH)
03/09/21 (H) FSH AT 11:00 AM GRUENBERG 120
WITNESS REGISTER
DOUGLAS VINCENT-LANG, Commissioner
Alaska Department of Fish and Game
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Answered questions during the hearing on HB
80.
ACTION NARRATIVE
11:04:44 AM
CHAIR GERAN TARR called the House Special Committee on Fisheries
meeting to order at 11:04 a.m. Representatives Story, Ortiz,
Vance, McCabe, Stutes, Kreiss-Tompkins, and Tarr were present at
the call to order.
REPRESENTATIVE ORTIZ moved that Representative Stutes be elected
as vice chair of the House Special Committee on Fisheries.
There being no objection, it was so ordered.
HB 80-SPT FSH HATCHERY FACIL ACCT; SURCHARGE
11:06:42 AM
REPRESENTATIVE TARR announced that the first order of business
would be HOUSE BILL NO. 80, "An Act establishing the sport
fishing hatchery facilities account; establishing the sport
fishing facility surcharge; and providing for an effective
date."
[At the House Special Committee on Fisheries meeting on 3/4/21,
an amendment referred to as Amendment 1 was never offered; the
first amendment offered and adopted on 3/4/21 was Amendment 2.]
11:07:21 AM
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE moved Amendment 3, labeled 32-GH1609\A.6,
Bullard, 3/5/21, which read as follows:
Page 1, line 1:
Delete "hatchery facilities"
Insert "enhancement"
Page 1, line 2:
Delete "facility"
Insert "enhancement"
Page 1, line 5:
Delete "facility"
Insert "enhancement"
Page 1, line 7:
Delete "hatchery facilities"
Insert "enhancement"
Page 1, lines 7 - 10:
Delete "Money in the sport fishing hatchery
facilities account shall be allocated to ongoing
maintenance and operation of the department's sport
fish hatchery facilities and sport fishing stock
enhancement intended to directly benefit license
purchasers."
Insert "The department shall allocate money in
the enhancement account to programs intended to
directly benefit license purchasers as follows:
(1) $2.50 of each surcharge collected to
fisheries management, fisheries research, invasive
species suppression and eradication, habitat
restoration, and ongoing maintenance of the
department's sport fishing facilities and sport
fishing hatchery facilities; and
(2) the remainder of each surcharge
collected to sport fishing stock enhancement and
ongoing maintenance of the department's sport fishing
hatchery facilities."
Page 2, line 11:
Delete "facility"
Insert "enhancement"
Page 2, lines 12 - 13:
Delete "ongoing maintenance and operation of the
department's fish hatchery facilities and sport
fishing stock enhancement"
Insert "enhancement of sport fisheries"
Page 2, line 19:
Delete "facility"
Insert "enhancement"
CHAIR TARR objected for the purposes of discussion.
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE explained that the purpose of Amendment 3
would be to allow flexibility to both maintain the fishery and
the maintenance and operations of [hatchery] facilities.
11:08:30 AM
REPRESENTATIVE ORTIZ asked for an explanation on the impact of
the proposed amendment on how the resources have been used in
the past and how they may be used in the future, should this
amendment be adopted [and HB 80 pass as amended].
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE explained that, with the adoption of
Amendment 2 [adopted at the March 4, 2021, House Special
Committee on Fisheries meeting], the surcharge had been
increased to $6.50. She explained that under Amendment 3, $2.50
of each surcharge would be ["collected to fisheries management,
fisheries research, invasive species suppression and
eradication, habitat restoration, and ongoing maintenance of the
department's sport fishing facilities and sport fishing hatchery
facilities"]; the remaining $4.00 would be ["collected to sport
fishing stock enhancement and ongoing maintenance of the
department's sport fishing hatchery facilities"].
11:09:37 AM
REPRESENTATIVE ORTIZ sought to clarify that the proposed
Amendment (3) would ensure that funds would be used for hatchery
maintenance as well as other [program] areas.
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE confirmed this as correct and added that
funds would be used within the Sportfish Division of Alaska
Department of Fish & Game (ADF&G).
11:10:06 AM
REPRESENTATIVE ORTIZ asked whether the fee had been lowered, and
the lowering of the fee to $2.50 would result in lower
[available] resources overall.
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE answered that the entire proposed
assessment would be $6.50. Without the proposed amendment, the
full fee would be designated for [enhancement and hatchery]
maintenance; Amendment 3 would provide that $2.50 be designated
to the previously listed enhancements.
11:11:22 AM
REPRESENTATIVE ORTIZ asked whether the amendment had been at the
request of the department or any other [interested party].
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE answered no, Amendment 3 had been conceived
to include language that had been included in the bill the
previous year prior to COVID-19.
11:12:07 AM
REPRESENTATIVE STUTES offered additional explanation that a
previous version of the bill had proposed a total fee of $9.00
which had been reduced to $6.50, and the proposed amendment
provides for $2.50 of that fee to be designated for other
[sportfish division] activities. She added that the amendment
would provide flexibility for how the department may spend the
funds.
11:13:13 AM
REPRESENTATIVE ORTIZ sought to clarify that, under the proposed
amendment, the full fees would not be available for maintenance
and operations of hatcheries.
REPRESENTATIVE STUTES answered yes, and no. She explained that
the bonds [for which the fees had been previously collected] had
been paid off and the result of Amendment 3 would be that more
funds would be available for both the hatchery maintenance and
operations as well as other program activities, and she
characterized it as a "win-win".
11:14:29 AM
REPRESENTATIVE STORY stated that it was her intention to support
the original intent of the bill, which had included both the
maintenance and operations of hatcheries and enhancement of
fisheries. She stated her understanding that the fees had been
increased from the original bill as requested by the governor
and asked whether Amendment 3 would restore the full fee [as
proposed in previous versions of the bill].
11:15:19 AM
DOUGLAS VINCENT-LANG, Commissioner, Alaska Department of Fish
and Game, answered that, during the preparation of [HB 80], the
costs had been taken into consideration for both hatchery
maintenance and operations as well as enhancement of Southeast
fisheries. He stated his understanding that the increase
resulting the adoption of Amendment 2 would be used for
additional fisheries management activities that may be
requested. He stated that he had not had discussions with the
governor about the use of the additional funds.
11:16:44 AM
REPRESENTATIVE STORY asked what the implications would be should
a future committee reamend the bill and reduce the fee by $2.50.
COMMISSIONER VINCENT-LANG answered that the result of a
reduction would be a draw [from other sources] since the $4.00
fee alone would not be adequate to fund the maintenance costs
and proposed enhancement activities.
11:17:47 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE stated that another bill would be
considered pertaining to invasive species mitigation that had a
fiscal note. He asked whether the $2.50 proposed under
Amendment 3 would be sufficient to cover the fiscal note [with
the other bill]. He allowed that the question may be " a little
off topic" [of HB 80].
COMMISSIONER VINCENT-LANG stated that the bill to which
Representative McCabe had referred would establish an invasive
species council and he estimated the associate fiscal note for
that to be between $70,000 to $80,000. He suggested that it
could be possible to use the $2.50for the [proposed] council.
11:19:16 AM
REPRESENTATIVE KREISS-TOMKINS asked whether the $6.50 surcharge
would be adequate to cover costs of maintenance and operations
of hatcheries in addition to additional activities such as
invasive species management.
COMMISSIONER VINCENT-LANG answered that hatchery operations and
maintenance would be adequately funded with the proposed fee but
cautioned he could not state with certainty that the funds would
be adequate to fully fund all the programs, only that there
would be funds to initially address some needs. He suggested
the example of habitat restoration as a program that could fully
consume the additional available funding over the next five to
six years.
REPRESENTATIVE KREISS-TOMKINS stated his support for Amendment
3. He observed there were two versions of Amendment 3 in the
committee packet, one with the second and third line of page 2
of the amendment crossed out and the other with no lines crossed
out. He asked to confirm the correct version of the amendment
under consideration among the paperwork before him.
11:21:30 AM
REPRESENTATIVE TARR stated that Representative Vance would offer
a conceptual amendment to provide additional clarification of
the amendment being considered.
11:21:38 AM
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE stated that, immediately prior to the
meeting, it had been discovered there exists duplicative
language in the bill.
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE moved to adopt Conceptual Amendment 1 to
Amendment 3: on page 2, line 1 following "habitat restoration",
to delete the comma and insert a period, and to delete lines 2
and 3 [as numbered in Amendment 3].
11:22:10 AM
REPRESENTATIVE TARR objected for the purposes of discussion,
then removed her objection. There being no further objection,
Conceptual Amendment 1 to Amendment 3 was adopted.
11:22:44 AM
REPRESENTATIVE TARR offered Conceptual Amendment 2 to Amendment
3 [as amended] to delete the words "suppression and eradication"
on line 1 [as numbered in the amendment] and replace them with
the word "management" at the suggestion of the department
regarding invasive species.
11:23:15 AM
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE objected for the purposes of discussion.
She drew attention to page 1, line 23, of Amendment 3, as
amended, which read: "$2.50 of each surcharge collected to
fisheries management", to demonstrate the word "management" was
included.
11:23:28 AM
CHAIR TARR referenced the words "suppression" and "eradication"
specifically regarding invasive species management and expressed
that, according to the department, "management" would allow for
maximum flexibility in addressing invasive species.
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE removed her objection. There being no
further objection, Conceptual Amendment 2 to Amendment 3 was
adopted.
11:24:19 AM
REPRESENTATIVE STORY stated her support for the Amendment 3, as
amended, and stated her concern that, should the fee be reduced
by future potential amendments, the original intent of the bill
would be at risk. She asked members to keep that in mind [for
future consideration of the bill].
11:25:21 AM
REPRESENTATIVE TARR expressed her pleasure that the department
representatives were present for the discussion and that they
would be involved in future hearings of the bill and could
advocate that the original intent be maintained.
11:25:36 AM
REPRESENTATIVE STUTES stated that the proposed language had been
included in previous versions of the bill and that the amounts
had not changed during consideration of the bill. She expressed
her confidence that the full fee would remain intact, especially
considering the "hit" caused by the [COVID-19] pandemic, it
would further encourage [legislators] to maintain the amount as
proposed throughout future consideration of the bill.
11:26:33 AM
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE stated that she had been in contact with
Legislative Legal Services and was confident with their answer
suggesting that the language as proposed was adequate to ensure
that the $2.50 would remain, and for that language to be at
risk, the bill would have to be [rewritten to reverse it].
11:27:53 AM
REPRESENTATIVE KREISS-TOMKINS echoed the concern raised by
Representative Story and stated that his support for the bill
would be on the condition that the underlying intent remain.
11:28:27 AM
REPRESENTATIVE ORTIZ echoed comments made by Representative
Story and asked whether the sponsor of Amendment 3, as amended,
would consider an additional conceptual amendment to include
some assurance to maintain the intent of the bill.
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE agreed to follow the will of the committee
to consider such a conceptual amendment.
REPRESENTATIVE ORTIZ stated that his individual viewpoint may or
may not reflect the will of the committee.
11:29:24 AM
The committee took a brief at-ease.
11:30:20 AM
REPRESENTATIVE TARR stated that during the at-ease, it had been
discussed that the language, since it remained intact in
previous versions of the bill, would likely go forth with the
original intent of the bill intact. She encouraged the
department to follow the legislation closely and monitor that
the original intent should remain.
11:30:48 AM
REPRESENTATIVE TARR asked if the commissioner had a comment to
add to the discussion.
COMMISSIONER VINCENT-LANG stated his understanding that, should
[Amendment 2, adopted on 3/4/21] remain [unchanged] during
future consideration of the bill, the original intent would
remain.
11:31:26 AM
REPRESENTATIVE TARR removed her objection to the motion to adopt
Amendment 3, as amended. There being no further objection,
Amendment 3, as amended, was adopted.
11:31:51 AM
REPRESENTATIVE KREISS-TOMKINS moved to adopt Amendment 4,
labeled as GH-1609\A.8, Bullard, 3/8/21, which read as follows:
Page 1, line 2, following "surcharge;":
Insert "relating to the power of the commissioner
of fish and game to adopt certain regulations;"
Page 1, line 11, through page 2, line 7:
Delete all material.
Renumber the following bill sections accordingly.
Page 2, following line 31:
Insert a new bill section to read:
"* Sec. 3. AS 16.05.340(i) is repealed."
Renumber the following bill section accordingly.
REPRESENTATIVE TARR objected for the purposes of discussion.
REPRESENTATIVE KREISS-TOMKINS stated that the proposed amendment
pertained to the discretion of the commissioner related to the
relationship between Alaska and Yukon [Territory] for
reciprocity of resident license fees. He asked if the
commissioner could provide cost benefit data.
11:33:07 AM
COMMISSIONER VINCENT-LANG answered that between 2017 and 2019
the average number of licenses was estimated to be 2,300 and
$65,000 in revenue. He added that, in 2020, the license number
totaled eight. He stated that he had learned of considerable
public opposition [to the proposed Amendment 4], especially from
the community of Haines, which experienced economic benefit from
the reciprocity and its resulting tourism.
REPRESENTATIVE KREISS-TOMKINS withdrew his motion to adopt
Amendment 4.
11:34:26 AM
REPRESENTATIVE TARR added that the department had submitted
information specific to Representative Kreiss-Tomkins line of
questioning and it had been included in the committee packet.
11:34:36 AM
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE stated that she had initially had concerns
with lost revenue from the reciprocity agreement and, after
discussions with Representative Hannan, the apparent "lost
revenue" in fact resulted in an economic benefit with a
multiplier effect in the economies of the communities of Haines
and Skagway. She asked whether the department could share its
understanding of the economic impact and return on investment in
those communities.
COMMISSIONER VINCENT-LANG stated that, while no economic
analysis had been conducted on the matter, he was confident that
the $67,000 in apparent losses was "more than made up for" in
economic benefits.
11:36:13 AM
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE asked what benefit might exist for Alaskans
on the Yukon side of the state-to-state agreement and added that
there existed some "heartburn" due to recent travel
restrictions.
COMMISSIONER VINCENT-LANG answered that Alaskans benefit from
resident hunting and fishing license fees in Yukon. He recalled
that the inception of the program had occurred under [former
Governor Frank] Murkowski and had been proposed by Alaska to
Yukon Territory as a way to establish a good-neighbor policy.
He allowed that there exist some difficulties with travel under
COVID-19 imposed restrictions, although he suggested that the
longer-term viewpoint was more of a diplomatic one than an
economic one, considering the long border shared between Yukon
and Alaska.
11:38:01 AM
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE stated that the last page of the bill
contained an effective date of July 1, 2020 and asked whether
the committee wished to consider a more immediate effective date
upon passage of the bill.
11:38:43 AM
REPRESENTATIVE TARR asked the commissioner to confirm the
expiration date [of the program] as January 1, 2021, and whether
there would be a resulting "void" between [the effective date]
July 1, 2020, and January 1, 2021.
COMMISSIONER VINCENT-LANG stated that the implementation of the
surcharge would most likely occur at the beginning of the next
calendar year to align with the license year. He allowed that
the result would include a year of [lost revenue] but that the
enhancement payment had already taken place for that year.
11:39:41 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE expressed his concern that Southeast
Alaska enhancement had been discussed twice [during the hearing
of HB 80] and asked whether the fee would be used to cover
anything in addition to fixing the cement raceway at the Crystal
Lake facility.
11:40:19 AM
COMMISSIONER VINCENT-LANG stated that the surcharge as it
existed had funded repayment of bonds, and approximately a half
million dollars had been designated to Southeast Alaska. He
added that a portion of the fees were paid by Southeast
fishermen and expressed his hope to use some of the funds for
deferred maintenance on the Crystal Lake facility, which the
state owns.
11:41:18 AM
The committee took an at-ease from 11:41 a.m. to 11:45 a.m.
11:45:20 AM
REPRESENTATIVE STUTES moved to report HB 80, as amended, out of
committee with individual recommendations and the accompanying
fiscal notes. There being no objection, CSHB 80(FSH) was
reported out of the House Special Committee on Fisheries.
CHAIR TARR stated that the House Special Committee on Fisheries
would grant Legislative Legal and Research Services the
authority to make technical and conforming changes to CSHB
80(FSH).
HB 115-AQUATIC FARMING & HATCHERY SITE LEASES
11:46:09 AM
CHAIR TARR announced that the final order of business would be
HOUSE BILL NO. 115, "An Act relating to aquatic farming and
hatchery site leases; and requiring the director of the division
of lands to provide the legislature with an annual report
relating to aquatic farming and hatchery site leases."
11:46:26 AM
REPRESENTATIVE STORY stated that the bill pertains to expediting
the leasing process. She stated that, should HB 115 pass and
become law, the expedited lease process would remain optional;
the commissioner could still require an applicant to undergo the
full lengthy process; the public would continue to have an
opportunity to contact the Department of Natural Resources (DNR)
with any complaints at any time; and the department would still
be required to issue public notice of an approved renewal which
includes a 30-day appeal window.
11:47:56 AM
CHAIR TARR opened public testimony on HB 115. After
ascertaining that there was no one who wished to testify, she
closed public testimony.
11:50:15 AM
The committee took an at-ease from 11:50 a.m. to 11:51 a.m.
11:51:40 AM
REPRESENTATIVE STUTES moved to report HB 115 out of committee
with individual recommendations and the accompanying fiscal
note. There being no objection, HB 115 was reported out of
House Special Committee on Fisheries.
11:53:39 AM
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the committee, the House
Special Committee on Fisheries meeting was adjourned at 11:53
a.m.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 80 Transmittal Letter 1.28.21.pdf |
HFSH 2/23/2021 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/4/2021 11:00:00 AM HFSH 3/9/2021 11:00:00 AM |
HB 80 |
| HB 80 v A 2.18.21.PDF |
HFSH 2/23/2021 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/4/2021 11:00:00 AM HFSH 3/9/2021 11:00:00 AM |
HB 80 |
| HB 80 Sectional Analysis - ver. A 2.18.21.pdf |
HFSH 2/23/2021 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/4/2021 11:00:00 AM HFSH 3/9/2021 11:00:00 AM |
HB 80 |
| HB 80 Fiscal Note #1 ADF&G 2.18.21.pdf |
HFSH 2/23/2021 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/4/2021 11:00:00 AM HFSH 3/9/2021 11:00:00 AM |
HB 80 |
| HB 80 Support Doc - Surcharge Revenue Breakdown 1.27.21.pdf |
HFSH 2/23/2021 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/4/2021 11:00:00 AM HFSH 3/9/2021 11:00:00 AM |
HB 80 |
| HB80 Support Doc - Stocking FAQ Revised 2.24.21.pdf |
HFSH 3/2/2021 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/9/2021 11:00:00 AM |
HB 80 |
| HB 80 Support Letter-Alaska Salmon Hatchery Operators 2.21.21.pdf |
HFSH 2/23/2021 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/4/2021 11:00:00 AM HFSH 3/9/2021 11:00:00 AM |
HB 80 |
| HB 80 Support Letter-SEAFA 2.22.21.pdf |
HFSH 2/23/2021 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/4/2021 11:00:00 AM HFSH 3/9/2021 11:00:00 AM |
HB 80 |
| HB 80 Support Letter-UFA 2.22.21.pdf |
HFSH 2/23/2021 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/4/2021 11:00:00 AM HFSH 3/9/2021 11:00:00 AM |
HB 80 |
| HB 80 Support Letter ATA 2.23.21.pdf |
HFSH 2/23/2021 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/4/2021 11:00:00 AM HFSH 3/9/2021 11:00:00 AM |
HB 80 |
| HB 80 Letter of Support - SSRAA 3.4.21.pdf |
HFSH 3/9/2021 11:00:00 AM |
HB 80 |
| HB 80 Letter of Support - Petersburg Economic Development Council 3.4.21.pdf |
HFSH 3/9/2021 11:00:00 AM |
HB 80 |
| HB 80 Email of Opposition - Derrick 3.2.21.pdf |
HFSH 3/4/2021 11:00:00 AM HFSH 3/9/2021 11:00:00 AM |
HB 80 |
| HB 115 Sponsor Statement 02.24.21.pdf |
HFSH 3/4/2021 11:00:00 AM HFSH 3/9/2021 11:00:00 AM HRES 3/19/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 115 |
| HB 115 ver W 02.24.21.PDF |
HFSH 3/4/2021 11:00:00 AM HFSH 3/9/2021 11:00:00 AM |
HB 115 |
| HB 115 ver W Sectional Analysis 02.24.21.pdf |
HFSH 3/9/2021 11:00:00 AM HRES 3/19/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 115 |
| HB 115 Fiscal Note - DNR-MLW 02.26.21.pdf |
HFSH 3/4/2021 11:00:00 AM HFSH 3/9/2021 11:00:00 AM |
HB 115 |
| HB 115 Seagrove letter of support 03.02.21.pdf |
HFSH 3/4/2021 11:00:00 AM HFSH 3/9/2021 11:00:00 AM HRES 3/19/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 115 |
| HB 115 MTF Letter of Support 03.01.21.pdf |
HFSH 3/4/2021 11:00:00 AM HFSH 3/9/2021 11:00:00 AM HRES 3/19/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 115 |
| HB 115 Marble Seafoods Hump Island letter of support 03.02.21.pdf |
HFSH 3/4/2021 11:00:00 AM HFSH 3/9/2021 11:00:00 AM HRES 3/19/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 115 |
| HB 115 Global Seas letter of support 03.02.21.pdf |
HFSH 3/4/2021 11:00:00 AM HFSH 3/9/2021 11:00:00 AM HRES 3/19/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 115 |
| HB 115 AFDF Letter of Support 03.01.21.pdf |
HFSH 3/4/2021 11:00:00 AM HFSH 3/9/2021 11:00:00 AM HRES 3/19/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 115 |
| HB 115 Southeast Conference Letter of Support 3.3.21.pdf |
HFSH 3/4/2021 11:00:00 AM HFSH 3/9/2021 11:00:00 AM HRES 3/19/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 115 |
| HB 115 Letter of Support - Simpson Bay Oyster Company 3.3.21.pdf |
HFSH 3/9/2021 11:00:00 AM HRES 3/19/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 115 |
| HB 80 Amendment Two (A.5) - Stutes - ADOPTED 3.3.21.pdf |
HFSH 3/9/2021 11:00:00 AM |
HB 80 |
| HB 80 Amendment Three (A.6) - Vance 3.8.21.pdf |
HFSH 3/9/2021 11:00:00 AM |
HB 80 |
| HB 80 Amendment Four (A.8) - Kreiss-Tomkins 3.8.21.pdf |
HFSH 3/9/2021 11:00:00 AM |
HB 80 |
| HB 80 Supporting Document - Yukon License Fees 3.8.21.pdf |
HFSH 3/9/2021 11:00:00 AM |
HB 80 |
| HB 115 Resolution of Support - JEDC 3.9.21.pdf |
HFSH 3/9/2021 11:00:00 AM |
HB 115 |