Legislature(2021 - 2022)GRUENBERG 120
03/04/2021 11:00 AM House FISHERIES
Note: the audio ![]()
and video ![]()
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB80 | |
| HB115 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| *+ | HB 115 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 80 | TELECONFERENCED | |
ALASKA STATE LEGISLATURE
HOUSE SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON FISHERIES
March 4, 2021
11:07 a.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT
Representative Geran Tarr, Chair
Representative Louise Stutes, Vice Chair
Representative Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins
Representative Andi Story
Representative Dan Ortiz
Representative Sarah Vance
Representative Kevin McCabe
MEMBERS ABSENT
All members present
COMMITTEE CALENDAR
HOUSE BILL NO. 80
"An Act establishing the sport fishing hatchery facilities
account; establishing the sport fishing facility surcharge; and
providing for an effective date."
- HEARD & HELD
HOUSE BILL NO. 115
"An Act relating to aquatic farming and hatchery site leases;
and requiring the director of the division of lands to provide
the legislature with an annual report relating to aquatic
farming and hatchery site leases."
- HEARD & HELD
PREVIOUS COMMITTEE ACTION
BILL: HB 80
SHORT TITLE: SPT FSH HATCHERY FACIL ACCT; SURCHARGE
SPONSOR(s): RULES BY REQUEST OF THE GOVERNOR
02/18/21 (H) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
02/18/21 (H) FSH, FIN
02/23/21 (H) FSH AT 10:00 AM GRUENBERG 120
02/23/21 (H) Heard & Held
02/23/21 (H) MINUTE(FSH)
02/25/21 (H) FSH AT 10:00 AM GRUENBERG 120
02/25/21 (H) -- MEETING CANCELED --
03/02/21 (H) FSH AT 10:00 AM GRUENBERG 120
03/02/21 (H) Heard & Held
03/02/21 (H) MINUTE(FSH)
03/04/21 (H) FSH AT 11:00 AM GRUENBERG 120
BILL: HB 115
SHORT TITLE: AQUATIC FARMING & HATCHERY SITE LEASES
SPONSOR(s): STORY
02/24/21 (H) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
02/24/21 (H) FSH, RES
03/04/21 (H) FSH AT 11:00 AM GRUENBERG 120
WITNESS REGISTER
DOUG VINCENT-LANG, Commissioner
Alaska Department of Fish and Game
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Answered questions during the hearing on HB
80.
REPRESENTATIVE ANDI STORY
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Presented HB 115 as prime sponsor.
GREG SMITH, Staff
Representative Andi Story
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Provided a sectional analysis of HB 115 on
behalf of Representative Story, prime sponsor.
HEATHER MCCARTY, Chair
Mariculture Task Force
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 115.
ERIC WYATT
Ketchikan, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 115.
TREVOR SANDE
Marble Seafoods
Ketchikan, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 115.
MARKOS SCHEER
Premium Aquatics
Shoreline, Washington
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 115
ACTION NARRATIVE
11:07:03 AM
CHAIR GERAN TARR called the House Special Committee on Fisheries
meeting to order at 11:07 a.m. Representatives Stutes, Kreiss-
Tompkins, Story, Ortiz, Vance, McCabe, and Tarr were present at
the call to order.
HB 80-SPT FSH HATCHERY FACIL ACCT; SURCHARGE
11:09:51 AM
CHAIR TARR announced that the first order of business would be
HOUSE BILL NO. 80, "An Act establishing the sport fishing
hatchery facilities account; establishing the sport fishing
facility surcharge; and providing for an effective date."
11:10:12 AM
REPRESENTATIVE KREISS-TOMKINS referred to Section 2 regarding
fishing license reciprocity between Yukon [Territory] and Alaska
allowing Yukon residents to obtain licensing at resident rates
and suggested that Yukon is getting the better deal. He asked
Commissioner Vincent-Lang if he had data reflecting the impact
of the discount and how many Alaskans take advantage of the
reciprocal resident licensing discount.
11:11:27 AM
DOUG VINCENT-LANG, Commissioner, Alaska Department of Fish and
Game, answered that he did not have the requested data readily
available. He offered that the topic had come up throughout the
years between the premier of Yukon and the governor of Alaska.
He stated that the matter had not been addressed by the current
administration, and the policy exists as a "good neighbor
policy." He offered to provide the requested data and agreed
with Representative Kreiss-Tompkins that access to Alaska's
saltwater fisheries [by Yukoners] was the more desirable benefit
of the policy.
REPRESENTATIVE KREISS-TOMKINS agreed with the sentiment of a
good neighbor policy due to the geography of Southeast Alaska
and residents' access to the rest of the state and asked the
commissioner to provide foregone revenues to understand the cost
benefits of the "good neighbor policy".
11:13:07 AM
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE recalled that the reciprocity language had
not been included in a previous version of the proposed bill and
questioned the value of including such reciprocity given her
belief that Alaska was not in a strong position for negotiation
and that Alaska was experiencing a lack of reciprocity in other
areas affecting communities in Alaska.
COMMISSIONER VINCENT-LANG suggested that a minor change in
language had clarified the intent of the bill to ensure that
resident rate licensing fees offered to Yukoners would include
the surcharge, which may not have been clear in a previous
version of the bill.
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE asked if there exist other areas of
negotiation, including treaties, that pose a strong need to
offer [Yukoners] a nonresident discount.
COMMISSIONER VINCENT-LANG offered his understanding that those
needs are a policy decision between the governor and Yukon, and
that he could speak only to the impacts of such decisions.
11:15:23 AM
REPRESENTATIVE ORTIZ asked whether a hypothetical conceptual
amendment to Section 1, on page 1, line 9 changing the words
"operation of the department's sport fish hatchery facilities
and sport fishing stock", by replacing "fishing stock" with the
word "fish" would change the intent of the bill.
COMMISSIONER VINCENT-LANG suggested that there may exist
confusion about what a sport fish hatchery does. He exemplified
that a sportfish hatchery in Fairbanks produces fish primarily
for lakes. He stated that the Jack Hernandez Hatchery in
Southcentral produces fish for both lakes and saltwater
releases. He stated that Douglas Island Pink and Chum (DIPAC)
in Southeast Alaska produces both fresh water and salt water
fish. He stated his opinion that including the word "stock"
would not affect the intent of the surcharge for the maintenance
and operations of hatcheries.
REPRESENTATIVE ORTIZ clarified his question, which he was asking
on behalf of a constituent, whether changing the words "sport
fishing stock enhancement" to "sport fish enhancement" [would
change the intent of the bill].
COMMISSIONER VINCENT-LANG stated that he had no problem with the
suggested change to the language in the bill.
11:18:10 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE referred to Section 2, which read: "If the
commissioner determines that residents of the state are entitled
to obtain licenses for sport fishing, including sport fishing
for anadromous king salmon, in Yukon, Canada". He stated that
currently one may not drive there; therefore, the [reciprocated
licensing benefit to Alaskans] would be zero.
COMMISSIONER VINCENT-LANG stated that the determination is
vested at his discretion; however, he would request a
conversation with the governor regarding policy with our
neighbors and that decisions predicated on this policy may have
broader implications on other policies.
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE asked whether the commissioner would have
an estimate between 500 to 10,000 Yukon residents [benefitting
from the policy].
11:19:28 AM
COMMISSIONER VINCENT-LANG estimated the number to be in the
hundreds, not tens of thousands.
11:19:54 AM
CHAIR TARR noted that in the committee packet were two
amendments. The first was Amendment 1, labeled 32-GH1609\A.4,
Bullard, 2/24/21, which read as follows:
Page 1, lines 8 - 9:
Delete "to ongoing maintenance and operation of"
Insert "equally between"
Page 1, line 10:
Delete "intended to directly benefit license
purchasers"
Insert "projects for ongoing maintenance and
operation and for the direct benefit of sport fishing
license holders"
CHAIR TARR noted that Amendment 1 had been submitted by
Representative Ortiz.
11:20:06 AM
REPRESENTATIVE ORTIZ stated his intention to revise the
amendment after consultation with the department and offer it at
a later time.
11:20:44 AM
CHAIR TARR moved on to Amendment 2.
11:20:54 AM
REPRESENTATIVE STUTES moved to adopt Amendment 2, labeled 32-
GH1609\A.5, Bullard, 3/3/21, which read as follows:
Page 2, line 21:
Delete "4"
Insert "6.50"
Page 2, line 22:
Delete "4"
Insert "6.50"
Page 2, line 23:
Delete "4"
Insert "6.50"
Page 2, line 24:
Delete "25"
Insert "27.50"
Page 2, line 25:
Delete "20"
Insert "22.50"'
Page 2, line 26:
Delete "10"
Insert "12.50"
Page 2, line 27:
Delete "5"
Insert "7.50"
Page 2, line 28:
Delete "40"
Insert "42.50"
Page 2, lines 29 - 30:
Delete all material.
Renumber the following paragraph accordingly.
Page 2, line 31:
Delete "4"
Insert "6.50"
CHAIR TARR objected for the purposes of discussion.
REPRESENTATIVE STUTES offered a summary description of the
proposed amendment as follows:
Amendment 2 meets the department's proposal halfway.
Instead of reinstating the surcharge with a reduction
of $ 5.00, this amendment proposes a reduction of only
$ 2.50. This amount is what the committee passed last
year, and it remained in the bill until it died in its
final committee of referral in the other body. I
believe this amendment reflects a delicate balance of
reducing the surcharge, as the bonding has been paid
for the Ruth Burnett and the ... William Jack
Hernandez hatcheries, while still retaining the
necessary revenue for enhancement projects. The
addition of the $ 2.50 back into this bill will raise
over a million dollars in additional revenue that is
badly needed to support the activities of sports
anglers. I would note that the deletion of the
special nonresident military small game and sport
fishing license on page 2, lines 10 and 11 of the
amendment is a housekeeping measure at the request of
the department. They no longer offer this license and
request that it be removed from the bill. I would
also remind members ... and the public ... that 82
percent of the surcharge revenue is derived from
nonresidents.
11:22:32 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE stated his interest in Amendment 2,
provided that Amendment 1 should not pass. He asked whether
Amendment 1 would be revised, stating his view that amendment 1
would blatantly push money to a Southeast hatchery when it is
not needed, and that the two larger hatcheries are the
facilities most in need due to the larger populations served.
11:23:21 AM
The committee took an at-ease from 11:23 a.m. to 11:29 a.m.
11:29:07 AM
CHAIR TARR called the meeting back to order and clarified that
the committee was still considering Amendment 2, which would
"split the difference" in the proposed restoration of the
surcharge.
11:29:43 AM
REPRESENTATIVE ORTIZ stated that 82 percent of the revenues are
[derived] from nonresident fees, and his anecdotal interactions
with charter operators and lodges in his region revealed that
[nonresident anglers] have no concern whether the surcharge is
$2.50 or $5.00, and the guests of operators have traveled great
distances to take advantage of Alaska's resources. He asked why
the $5.00 should not be maintained when those affected have
expressed no concern over the increase.
11:30:52 AM
COMMISSIONER VINCENT-LANG stated that he had participated in the
original plan for the bond reimbursement through the surcharge,
and it was his view that there existed a commitment to eliminate
the surcharge once the bonds had been repaid. He stated that,
while he is in a different role currently and now responsible
for the maintenance of the hatcheries, he maintained his
commitment to the agreement that the surcharge would be
eliminated, or that it would not be charged indefinitely. He
suggested his agreement with Representative Ortiz' statement
that nonresidents would likely not take issue with the surcharge
and that a balance of those priorities should be sought. He
referenced the ruling in Carlson v. State in which it was ruled
that it was unconstitutional to have a full surcharge for
nonresidents and a partial surcharge for residents. He
expressed his appreciation that the need for funding the
programs was one recognized by the maker of the amendment as
needing support and cautioned that increasingly restrictive
language would result in difficulties in meeting needs in
different areas of the state. He suggested that the governor,
[as sponsor of the bill through House Rules] should be consulted
to arrive at a compromised language to balance the needs.
11:32:38 AM
REPRESENTATIVE ORTIZ allowed that there exist complexities in
arriving at the best language for the bill and he stated that
the department had experienced at least a 32 percent reduction
in unrestricted general funds (UGF); however, it had been asked
to do the same crucial mandate of managing the resource to the
maximum sustained yield. He stated that the funding reduction
was a hindrance to that mandate.
11:34:06 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE asked why there exists a difference in the
bill proposed last year which included a list of programs not
included in this version.
11:34:40 AM
COMMISSIONER VINCENT-LANG stated his understanding that this
version of the bill contained the same programs as last year,
and the legislative process of developing the language had led
to what is currently before the committee.
11:34:52 AM
REPRESENTATIVE STUTES suggested that the list of programs that
Representative McCabe had referred to had been left out of the
version currently under consideration to allow the department to
function with fewer restrictions and to allow the commissioner
more discretion in the use of limited funds. She added that the
reduction from $5.00 to $2.50 was a compromise to allow for some
funds to be collected, while the reduction could be perceived as
an act of good faith on the part of the commissioner having
reduced the surcharge overall.
11:35:59 AM
CHAIR TARR suggested that the bill could be amended further to
allow for another sunset on the surcharge, and that could be
decided in the bill's next committee of referral.
11:36:20 AM
CHAIR TARR removed her objection to the motion to adopt
Amendment 2. There being no further objection, Amendment 2 was
adopted.
11:36:33 AM
CHAIR TARR announced that HB 80, as amended, was held over.
11:36:51 AM
The committee took an at-ease from 11:36 a.m. to 11:38 a.m.
HB 115-AQUATIC FARMING & HATCHERY SITE LEASES
11:38:04 AM
CHAIR TARR announced that the final order of business would be
HOUSE BILL NO. 115,
"An Act relating to aquatic farming and hatchery site leases;
and requiring the director of the division of lands to provide
the legislature with an annual report relating to aquatic
farming and hatchery site leases."
11:38:18 AM
REPRESENTATIVE ANDI STORY, Alaska State Legislature, provided
introductory remarks on HB 115 as prime sponsor. She
paraphrased the sponsor's statement [included in the committee
packet], which read as follows [original punctuation provided]:
House Bill 115 simplifies the Department of Natural
Resources (DNR) lease renewal process for aquatic
farms to support Alaska's aquaculture sector while
reducing administrative overhead. Examples of aquatic
farm products include oysters, kelp, and other
shellfish. HB115 makes the aquatic farm lease renewal
process consistent with the renewal process for other
DNR leases such as agricultural grazing, cabins and
lodges, fish processing docks, and hydroelectric
facilities. HB 115 does not affect salmon hatchery
leases.
If enacted, HB115 would expedite the lease renewal
process lowering the risk for businesses investment
and reducing the workload of an overstretched state
agency.
Current statute requires DNR to approve both initial
and renewal aquatic farm leases using the same
process, called a "945 authorization" (referring to
the adjudication process found in AS 38.05.945), which
takes around 200 days. HB115 would allow aquatic farm
or hatchery renewals to be renewed in the same manner
as most DNR leases like those listed above. This
optional process allows the Director of the Division
of Mining, Land and Water to renew a lease for a
business in good standing and takes around 90 days.
Applied to aquatic businesses, this option
significantly shortens the renewal process while
continuing appropriate regulatory oversight and public
engagement.
HB115 also requires DNR to submit an initial report on
the backlog of pending aquatic farm and hatchery site
lease applications, estimate economic impacts of
pending leases, and provide recommendations for
streamlining the lease approval process. Subsequent
annual reports would detail the application backlog
and list the number of leases renewals that underwent
the time-intensive lease renewal process.
This bill makes clear ecotourism and educational use
of sites is allowed, and explicitly prohibits DNR from
charging additional fees for persons using, or
traversing, land leased for aquatic farms and hatchery
sites.
I respectfully ask for your support in the passage of
HB115.
11:42:34 AM
GREG SMITH, Staff, Representative Andi Story, Alaska State
Legislature, on behalf of Representative Story, prime sponsor
provided a sectional analysis of HB 115 as provided in the
committee packet, which read as follows [original punctuation
provided]:
Section 1: Amends AS 38.05.035(a) to require the
Director of the Division of Mining, Land, and Water to
submit an annual report to the legislature, primarily
detailing aquatic farm and hatchery site leases
pending with the department.
Section 2: Amends AS 38.05.070(e) by adding AS
38.05.083 (aquatic farm leasing statute) to the
general leasing renewal section of law. This change
allows the director to renew an aquatic farm lease
under general lease renewal procedure. ? A technical
amendment on lines 20-21 specifies which types of
leases may be renewed under this procedure.
Section 3: Amends AS 38.050.083(a) by deleting the
term "or renew" from this section of statute. This
removes the requirement that the renewal procedure for
an aquatic farm or hatchery undergo the more detailed
AS 38.05.945 adjudication process.
Section 4: Amends AS 38.050.083(b) by deleting the
term "or renewal" from this section of statute. This
removes the renewal procedure from the aquatic farm
leasing statute.
Section 5: Adds new subsections to AS 38.050.083,
including:
? (g): stating the Commissioner of the Department of
Natural Resources may renew an aquatic farm lease
under the general leasing renewal;
? (h): explicitly states ecotourism and educational
purposes are allowable uses for aquatic farming and
hatchery sites; and
? (i): explicitly prohibits the charging of an
additional fee to aquatic farming and hatchery sites
for the use or, or passage, across these sites.
Section 6: Adds a new section to uncodified law to
require Director of the Division of Mining, Land, and
Water to submit an initial report to the legislature
detailing aquatic farm and hatchery site leases
pending with the department, estimates of economic
impact if all the leases were granted, and
recommendations by DNR and other state agencies to
streamline the lease approval process.
11:45:12 AM
HEATHER MCCARTY, Chair, Mariculture Task Force, provided
background on the Mariculture Task Force, established in 2016,
including its goal of creating a $ 100 million industry over 20
years by developing the new industry in Alaska. She added that
this process included identifying regulatory, statutory,
economic, educational, and environmental as some of the
industry's barriers and hurdles, among others. She stated that
the task force developed a strategic plan and, in 2019, it began
implementation plans to establish priorities among the barriers
identified. She stated that one of the barriers identified by
the task force was the primary permitting and renewals, for
which there existed a large backlog. She added that the task
force in cooperation with the Alaska executive branch helped to
identify areas in statute that could improve the processes and
work towards eliminating the backlogs. She lauded HB 115 as a
step in the direction of better rules and better laws, and she
said it would remove barriers to new and current participants in
the industry. She added that the task force also supports the
inclusion of ecotourism in the bill.
11:48:08 AM
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE asked Ms. McCarty to speak in more detail
about the hurdles identified by the task force in the renewal
process that included public testimony, and the reason for
removing public testimony in the renewal process.
MS. MCCARTY answered that the biggest hurdle is the time
[required for renewal] consisting of a year-and-a-half,
compounded by the increases in new and renewed [leases]. She
added that the public [input] process had occurred during the
initial permitting and added that it is her understanding that
there does not exist any intent to remove the public from the
process.
11:49:56 AM
ERIC WYATT shared that he is a third-generation fisherman from
Southeast and had diversified into aquatic farming 16 to 17
years ago, now with a focus on oyster farming. He stated his
reasons for choosing to participate in the aquaculture industry
were economic and environmental. He stated that his investment
in aquaculture is substantial, and he attributed higher revenues
as a [contributing factor to the cost of doing business]. He
recalled his experience in renewal and the uncertainty of
remaining in business for a period of over 18 months. He added
that a farmer in good standing may experience an abbreviated
process; however, the renewal processing is intimidating, as is
the process for transferring permitting. He stated his hope for
continued growth despite the barriers. He added that he viewed
ecotourism as a positive addition to the bill and that there
exists consumer interest in the "green" industry.
11:54:56 AM
CHAIR TARR opened public testimony on HB 115.
11:55:02 AM
TREVOR SANDE, Marble Seafoods, stated that he had been following
legislation pertaining to aquaculture closely and had applied
for his business permit in 2010. He suggested that the
committee consider extending the period between renewals from 10
to as much as 20 years due to the length of time required to
establish and develop his business. He added that some of the
financing he had obtained had been granted over a 20-year term,
and a lease renewal timeline could more closely align with
available funding vehicles to result in more surety on the part
of investors. He added that the public has avenues to voice
displeasure or claims of negligent behavior on the part of
farmers through Alaska Department of Fish & Game and suggested
that he was ambivalent to the public comment component of the
renewal process. He added that he is currently due for renewal.
He added that he had amended [his lease permit] three times
since starting his business, and that each one had taken in
excess of 24 months to complete, which he characterized as
onerous. He supported adding ecotourism and education in the
language of the bill since he had been required to hold two
leases to both farm and bring visitors to the farm.
CHAIR TARR commended the value of Mr. Sande's testimony to the
committee to aid in its understanding of the experience of the
farmers.
12:00:25 PM
MARKOS SCHEER, President, Premium Aquatics, testified in support
of HB 115 in his role as a kelp farmer in Ketchikan. He
explained that he has spent approximately six years engaged in
the development of the business. He stated that creditors are
quick to ask for the term of the lease, which may not align with
the length credit note available.
[HB 115 was held over.]
12:02:42 PM
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the committee, the House
Special Committee on Fisheries meeting was adjourned at 12:02
p.m.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 80 Transmittal Letter 1.28.21.pdf |
HFSH 2/23/2021 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/4/2021 11:00:00 AM HFSH 3/9/2021 11:00:00 AM |
HB 80 |
| HB 80 v A 2.18.21.PDF |
HFSH 2/23/2021 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/4/2021 11:00:00 AM HFSH 3/9/2021 11:00:00 AM |
HB 80 |
| HB 80 Sectional Analysis - ver. A 2.18.21.pdf |
HFSH 2/23/2021 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/4/2021 11:00:00 AM HFSH 3/9/2021 11:00:00 AM |
HB 80 |
| HB 80 Fiscal Note #1 ADF&G 2.18.21.pdf |
HFSH 2/23/2021 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/4/2021 11:00:00 AM HFSH 3/9/2021 11:00:00 AM |
HB 80 |
| HB 80 Support Doc - Surcharge Revenue Breakdown 1.27.21.pdf |
HFSH 2/23/2021 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/4/2021 11:00:00 AM HFSH 3/9/2021 11:00:00 AM |
HB 80 |
| HB 80 Support Document ADF&G Stocking FAQ 2.22.21.pdf |
HFSH 3/4/2021 11:00:00 AM |
HB 80 |
| HB 80 Amendment One (A.4) - Ortiz 2.24.21.pdf |
HFSH 3/4/2021 11:00:00 AM |
HB 80 |
| HB 80 Amendment Two (A.5) - Stutes 3.3.21.pdf |
HFSH 3/4/2021 11:00:00 AM |
HB 80 |
| HB 80 Support Letter ATA 2.23.21.pdf |
HFSH 2/23/2021 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/4/2021 11:00:00 AM HFSH 3/9/2021 11:00:00 AM |
HB 80 |
| HB 80 Support Letter-UFA 2.22.21.pdf |
HFSH 2/23/2021 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/4/2021 11:00:00 AM HFSH 3/9/2021 11:00:00 AM |
HB 80 |
| HB 80 Support Letter-SEAFA 2.22.21.pdf |
HFSH 2/23/2021 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/4/2021 11:00:00 AM HFSH 3/9/2021 11:00:00 AM |
HB 80 |
| HB 80 Support Letter-Alaska Salmon Hatchery Operators 2.21.21.pdf |
HFSH 2/23/2021 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/4/2021 11:00:00 AM HFSH 3/9/2021 11:00:00 AM |
HB 80 |
| HB 80 Email of Opposition - Derrick 3.2.21.pdf |
HFSH 3/4/2021 11:00:00 AM HFSH 3/9/2021 11:00:00 AM |
HB 80 |
| HB 115 ver W 02.24.21.PDF |
HFSH 3/4/2021 11:00:00 AM HFSH 3/9/2021 11:00:00 AM |
HB 115 |
| HB 115 Fiscal Note - DNR-MLW 02.26.21.pdf |
HFSH 3/4/2021 11:00:00 AM HFSH 3/9/2021 11:00:00 AM |
HB 115 |
| HB 115 Seagrove letter of support 03.02.21.pdf |
HFSH 3/4/2021 11:00:00 AM HFSH 3/9/2021 11:00:00 AM HRES 3/19/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 115 |
| HB 115 MTF Letter of Support 03.01.21.pdf |
HFSH 3/4/2021 11:00:00 AM HFSH 3/9/2021 11:00:00 AM HRES 3/19/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 115 |
| HB 115 Marble Seafoods Hump Island letter of support 03.02.21.pdf |
HFSH 3/4/2021 11:00:00 AM HFSH 3/9/2021 11:00:00 AM HRES 3/19/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 115 |
| HB 115 Global Seas letter of support 03.02.21.pdf |
HFSH 3/4/2021 11:00:00 AM HFSH 3/9/2021 11:00:00 AM HRES 3/19/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 115 |
| HB 115 AFDF Letter of Support 03.01.21.pdf |
HFSH 3/4/2021 11:00:00 AM HFSH 3/9/2021 11:00:00 AM HRES 3/19/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 115 |
| HB 115 Southeast Conference Letter of Support 3.3.21.pdf |
HFSH 3/4/2021 11:00:00 AM HFSH 3/9/2021 11:00:00 AM HRES 3/19/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 115 |
| HB 115 Sponsor Statement 02.24.21.pdf |
HFSH 3/4/2021 11:00:00 AM HFSH 3/9/2021 11:00:00 AM HRES 3/19/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 115 |
| HB 115 ver W Sectional Analysis 02.24.21.pdf |
HFSH 3/4/2021 11:00:00 AM |
HB 115 |