02/09/2010 10:15 AM House FISHERIES
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SJR22 | |
| HB266 | |
| Adjourn |
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | SJR 22 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 266 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
ALASKA STATE LEGISLATURE
HOUSE SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON FISHERIES
February 9, 2010
10:18 a.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT
Representative Bryce Edgmon, Chair
Representative Wes Keller, Vice Chair
Representative Craig Johnson
Representative Charisse Millett
Representative Cathy Engstrom Munoz
Representative Robert L. "Bob" Buch
Representative Scott Kawasaki
MEMBERS ABSENT
All members present
COMMITTEE CALENDAR
CS FOR SENATE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 22(RES)
Opposing litigation that seeks to eliminate the Kenai, Kasilof,
and Chitina sockeye salmon personal use dip net fisheries.
- MOVED HCS CSSJR 22(FSH) OUT OF COMMITTEE
HOUSE BILL NO. 266
"An Act providing for a priority for a fishery that is
restricted to residents when fishing restrictions are
implemented to achieve an escapement goal."
- HEARD & HELD
PREVIOUS COMMITTEE ACTION
BILL: SJR 22
SHORT TITLE: FEDERAL PREEMPTION OF SALMON MANAGEMENT
SPONSOR(s): SENATOR(s) HUGGINS
04/09/09 (S) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
04/09/09 (S) RES, JUD
04/15/09 (S) RES AT 3:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
04/15/09 (S) Moved CSSJR 22(RES) Out of Committee
04/15/09 (S) MINUTE(RES)
04/16/09 (S) RES RPT CS 3DP 2NR NEW TITLE
04/16/09 (S) DP: MCGUIRE, WIELECHOWSKI, HUGGINS
04/16/09 (S) NR: STEVENS, WAGONER
04/16/09 (S) JUD REFERRAL WAIVED
04/17/09 (S) TRANSMITTED TO (H)
04/17/09 (S) VERSION: CSSJR 22(RES)
04/17/09 (H) RES AT 8:30 AM BARNES 124
04/17/09 (H) <Bill Hearing Canceled>
04/18/09 (H) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
04/18/09 (H) FSH, RES
02/09/10 (H) FSH AT 10:15 AM BARNES 124
BILL: HB 266
SHORT TITLE: PERSONAL USE FISHING PRIORITY
SPONSOR(s): REPRESENTATIVE(s) STOLTZE, KELLER, NEUMAN
01/08/10 (H) PREFILE RELEASED 1/8/10
01/19/10 (H) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
01/19/10 (H) FSH, RES
02/09/10 (H) FSH AT 10:15 AM BARNES 124
WITNESS REGISTER
SENATOR CHARLIE HUGGINS
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Presented CSSJR 22(RES), as prime sponsor.
REPRESENATIVE BILL STOLTZE
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Presented the HCS for CSSJR 22(RES), as co-
sponsor.
ROD ARNO, Executive Director
Alaska Outdoor Council (AOC)
Wasilla, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of SJR 22, and HB 266.
MELVIN GROVE, Member
Mat-Su Fish and Game Advisory Council
Board Member
Alaska Outdoor Access Alliance
Big Lake, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of SJR 22, and HB 266.
BYRON HALEY, President
Chitina Dip Netters Association
Board Member
Alaska Fish and Wildlife Conservation Fund
Fairbanks, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of SJR 22, and HB 266.
KEN LARSON, Representative
Prince William Sound Charter Boat Association
North Pole, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of SJR 22, and HB 266.
RICKY GEASE, Executive Director
Kenai River Sport Fishing Association
Kenai, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of SJR 22, and HB 266.
SHARON LONG, Staff
Senator Charlie Huggins
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Responded to questions, during the hearing
on SJR 22.
BRIAN KANE, Attorney
Legislative Legal Counsel
Legislative Affairs Agency
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Responded to questions during the hearing
on SJR 22.
BEN MULLIGAN, Staff
Representative Bill Stoltze
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Presented HB 266, on behalf of
Representative Stoltze, prime sponsor.
JENNIFER YUHAS, Public Communications Director
Legislative Liaison
Office of the Commissioner
Alaska Department of Fish & Game (ADF&G)
POSITION STATEMENT: Responded to questions, during the hearing
on HB 266.
LANCE NELSON, Senior Assistant Attorney General
Natural Resources Section
Department of Law
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Responded to questions, during the hearing
on HB 266.
MATTHEW DONOHOE
Sitka, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 266.
JOHN MURRAY
Sitka, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 266.
STEPHEN RUNYAN, Chairman
Susitna Valley Fish and Game Advisory Committee
Willow, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in Support of HB 266.
GERALD McCUNE, President
Cordova District Fishermen United
Cordova, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 266.
CHERYL SUTTON
Ninilchik, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified on HB 266.
ACTION NARRATIVE
10:18:27 AM
CHAIR BRYCE EDGMON called the House Special Committee on
Fisheries meeting to order at 10:18 a.m. Representatives
Edgmon, Keller, Kawasaki, and Buch, were present at the call to
order. Representatives Keller and Millett arrived while the
meeting was in progress.
SJR 22-FEDERAL PREEMPTION OF SALMON MANAGEMENT
10:18:38 AM
CHAIR EDGMON announced that the first order of business would be
SENATE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 22, "Opposing litigation that seeks
to eliminate the Kenai, Kasilof, and Chitina sockeye salmon
personal use dip net fisheries; and requesting the governor to
re-examine the disproportional influence of the commercial
fisheries industries on fisheries management in the state."
10:19:25 AM
SENATOR CHARLIE HUGGINS, Alaska State Legislature, presented SJR
22, and explained the importance, and necessity, of the dip
netting tradition in Alaska. The resolution seeks to maintain,
and restrict dip netting as a resident-only fishery. A suit is
being brought by the United Cook Inlet Drift Association
(UCIDA), and an individual, Herbert T. Jensen, to have the
federal government find this traditional use fishery
unconstitutional. He pointed out that other commercial fishing
associations have kept a distance from the issue. The areas
involved directly are Kenai, Kasilof, and Chitina, where the
nonresident commercial fishing permit holders insist on being
granted the right to dip net. There is not an argument to allow
other nonresidents to dip net, however. He stressed that as a
state's rights advocate, this fishery belongs under state
management and should not be placed under the purview of a
federal department. He deferred to the House co-sponsor for
further comment.
10:23:36 AM
REPRESENTATIVE KELLER moved to adopt the HCS for CSSJR 22,
Version 26-LS0866\S, Kane, 2/5/10.
10:23:41 AM
REPRESENTATIVE BUCH objected for discussion.
10:24:46 AM
REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON observed that the changes in the House
Committee Substitute (HCS) are nonsubstantive.
10:25:08 AM
REPRESENTATIVE BUCH removed his objection.
CHAIR EDGMON, hearing no further objection, announced that
Version S was before the committee.
10:25:23 AM
REPRESENATIVE BILL STOLTZE, Alaska State Legislature, presented
the HCS and said the lawsuit arose as an attempt to engage
federal courts for the purpose of overthrowing the establishment
of personal use fisheries, originated under the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management Act (MSFCMA). Although
defendants are seeking suit against the U.S. Secretary of
Commerce, he maintained this is a state's rights issue. If any
other Alaska fishery was being subverted in federal courts, he
opined that the state attorney general would become involved.
He stated his belief that the most important fish is the one
that feeds an Alaskan family, and residents should not be
restricted from the use of Alaskan salmon. Although it does not
affect fisheries in every part of the state, dip netting is an
important, duly established fishery.
10:28:30 AM
REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON declared a conflict of interest,
indicating that he is a permitted participant in the Chitina dip
netting fishery.
10:28:57 AM
SENATOR HUGGINS added that the tradition being challenged
extends back to the 1980's. In one area the volume of permits
issued ranges up to 2,300, which indicates that it is a popular
fishery.
REPRESENTATIVE STOLTZE interjected that he supports more people
everywhere eating wild Alaskan salmon.
10:30:08 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MILLETT stated a conflict of interest as a
permitted fishery participant, and stated support for the
resolution.
10:30:48 AM
CHAIR EDGMON opened public testimony.
10:31:23 AM
ROD ARNO, Executive Director, Alaska Outdoor Council (AOC),
stated support for SJR 22, and said the Alaska Outdoor Council
(AOC) is a strong advocate for state's rights. He opined that
there is no justification for these suits to be filed.
10:32:08 AM
MELVIN GROVE, Member, Mat-Su Fish and Game Advisory Council,
Board Member, Alaska Outdoor Access Alliance, stated support for
SJR 22, and reminded committee members that fish resources are
held under the public trust doctrine. Further, he said:
The citizens are entitled to catch their own, and cook
it fresh. I would have thought that it was common
practice to manage our fish resources to favor the
citizens of the state. ... I have nothing against
[the] commercial fishing industry; they should be
allowed to take the harvestable surplus after the
citizens have harvested their own.
10:33:54 AM
BYRON HALEY, President, Chitina Dip Netters Association, Board
Member, Alaska Fish and Wildlife Conservation Fund, stated
support for SJR 22. He then related that the recent board
meeting voted unanimously in favor of the resolution.
10:34:24 AM
KEN LARSON, Representative, Prince William Sound Charter Boat
Association, stated support for SJR 22, and said:
We have been living through the disenfranchisement of
the Alaska sports fishermen, subsistence fishermen,
and the halibut arena, for the last many years. We've
seen the results of federal takeover of the [halibut]
fishery, and we would not like to see the same thing
happen to the dip netting and salmon industry. The
passage of this joint resolution, and the house bill,
will certainly set a precedent on other fisheries.
10:36:12 AM
RICKY GEASE, Executive Director, Kenai River Sport Fishing
Association, stated support for SJR 22, and said:
We think it's important ... when issues of fisheries
management [arise] between the federal government and
the state government who's managing the salmon
fisheries, and a case goes to federal court, ... that
the State of Alaska be represented ... through the
[Office of the] Attorney General.
10:37:03 AM
REPRESENTATIVE BUCH inquired about departmental direction, or
administrative support, for the resolution.
10:37:45 AM
REPRESENTATIVE STOLTZE reported that the point of the resolution
is to bring attention and involvement. The attorney general has
been made aware of the situation through the resolution process.
Officials at ADF&G are aware of the situation and the
commissioner has had legal papers filed in conjunction with the
issue.
REPRESENTATIVE BUCH maintained interest in hearing comment from
ADF&G.
10:39:01 AM
CHAIR EDGMON closed public testimony.
10:39:09 AM
REPRESENTATIVE KAWASAKI asked about the title of the bill, and
why it is restricted specifically to sockeye salmon.
SHARON LONG, Staff, Senator Charlie Huggins, Alaska State
Legislature, deferred.
10:39:54 AM
BRIAN KANE, Attorney, Legislative Legal Counsel, Legislative
Affairs Agency, indicated that there is no specific reason for
stipulating sockeye. He noted that the BE IT RESOLVED
statement, page 3, line 25, does not reflect similar language,
which is unusual.
CHAIR EDGMON surmised that sockeye salmon are specified as the
species targeted by dip netters.
MS. LONG confirmed the chairman's understanding.
10:40:47 AM
REPRESENTATIVE KAWASAKI offered that dip netting in the Chitina
has included king salmon. He then asked why this species is not
included in the resolution.
MS. LONG refrained from commenting on the king salmon question.
She said:
Remarkably the UCIDA are able to keep, for their
personal use, an unlimited number of fish from their
commercial catch .... The case is viable. The
parties have been very active, filing motions and
briefs. Just last week the plaintiffs moved to go
forward to oral arguments. So this is a live wire.
MS LONG directed attention to a response letter from the United
States Department of Commerce, National Marine Fisheries Service
[not dated], and paraphrased from page 11, paragraph 4, which
read:
Therefore, NMFS lacks authority to regulate the
State's personal use fishery conducted within State
waters and the requirements of the Magnuson-Stevens
Act do not apply to the personal use fishery.
10:43:22 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MUNOZ asked if the case involves more than one
species of salmon.
MS. LONG responded that it speaks to the fishery in general.
She deferred to Legislative Legal Services for further comment,
adding that there is some difficulty getting documents from the
court.
MR. KANE agreed that documents have been spare, and lacking the
briefs he could not speak to the question. He said he would
provide the committee with the information when the paperwork
becomes available from the courts.
10:44:32 AM
REPRESENTATIVE STOLTZE said the basis of the suit is contained
in one statement, which he read:
Members of UCIDA consist of resident/nonresident
commercial fishermen who rely predominately upon the
harvest of sockeye salmon to earn their livelihood.
REPRESENTATIVE STOLTZE said the point made, regarding king
salmon, is valid. Kings are not allowed in many of the dip net
fisheries, although it is a big part of the Fairbanks culture.
The litigants have referred specifically to sockeye in the law
suit.
10:46:26 AM
REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON recalled the statement that a commercial
fisherman can keep an unlimited amount of their catch for
personal use, and asked if that is correct.
REPRESENTATIVE STOLTZE deferred to the department.
MS. LONG responded affirmatively.
10:47:18 AM
REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON asked if it would be appropriate to refer
to dip net salmon, rather than specifying sockeye salmon.
MR. KANE answered that the goal of SJR is to directly impact a
particular lawsuit, which specifies sockeye salmon. He opined
that it would not be of benefit.
10:48:44 AM
REPRESENTATIVE KELLER moved to report HCS for CSSJR 22(RES), out
of committee with individual recommendations and the
accompanying fiscal notes.
There being no objection, HCS CSSJR 22(FSH) was moved from the
House Special Committee on Fisheries.
The committee took an at-ease from 10:49 a.m. to 10:52 a.m.
HB 266-PERSONAL USE FISHING PRIORITY
10:51:57 AM
CHAIR EDGMON announced that the final order of business would be
HOUSE BILL NO. 266 "An Act providing for a priority for a
fishery that is restricted to residents when fishing
restrictions are implemented to achieve an escapement goal."
10:52:14 AM
BEN MULLIGAN, Staff, Representative Bill Stoltze, Alaska State
Legislature, speaking on behalf of the sponsor, Representative
Stoltze, paraphrased from the sponsor statement, which read:
Insuring that residents have access to Alaska's
fisheries resources is vitally important as we
continue to grow as a state. Right now, user groups
are growing both in size and number, splitting the
allocation of our resources into smaller and smaller
percentages. However, one thing all Alaskans can
agree on is that we should have a priority over people
coming from elsewhere in the country and the world to
utilize and harvest our fisheries resources.
Fisheries that are restricted to residents only are
meant to enable Alaskans to access their fisheries
resources for their personal use and consumption.
Currently, there are many personal use fisheries
throughout the state. Excluding the priority that is
already contained within statute for subsistence, HB
266 directs the Board of Fisheries to place
restrictions on sport and commercial fisheries before
putting restrictions on personal use fisheries when
the harvest of a stock or species is limited to
achieve an escapement goal.
I ask for your consideration and support of HB 266 so
Alaskans can be assured that they will continue to
have access to their fisheries resources to the
benefit of themselves and their families.
10:53:23 AM
REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON referred to the sponsor statement, and
asked which fisheries the term personal use includes.
MR. MULLIGAN said he would defer to Alaska Department of Fish &
Game (ADF&G) for a definitive answer, but it would include dip
netting, crab pots, shrimp pots, but not hook and line
fisheries.
10:54:43 AM
REPRESENTATIVE KELLER moved to adopt CSHB 266, 26-LS1199\S,
Kane, 2/22/10, as the working document.
CHAIR EDGMON, hearing no objection, announced that Version S was
before the committee.
10:55:28 AM
JENNIFER YUHAS, Public Communications Director, Legislative
Liaison, Office of the Commissioner, stated that the department
does not take official positions on allocative issues.
10:56:13 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MUNOZ asked how personal use is determined.
10:56:22 AM
MS. YUHAS said that a proposal is brought to the Board of
Fisheries (BOF), followed by public testimony, and eight
specific criteria are taken into account. Board action may then
result in the naming of an area for personal use. She deferred
to legal counsel for further comment.
10:57:24 AM
LANCE NELSON, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Natural
Resources Section, Department of Law, pointed out that personal
use only applies to fishing and said there is not a statutory
standard that the board considers prior to declaring a personal
use fishery. The BOF makes the determination without
consideration for tradition, culture, or other findings.
Historically, however, the board has created personal use
fisheries in areas designated as nonsubsistence. There have
been occasion when an area has not met the criteria to be named
for subsistence use, and the board has designated it for
personal use.
10:59:09 AM
CHAIR EDGMON opened public testimony.
10:59:19 AM
MATTHEW DONOHOE stated opposition to HB 266 and expressed
concern that the bill may represent a reallocation of, or a grab
for, a resource. He questioned the necessity for the
legislation.
11:01:04 AM
JOHN MURRAY stated opposition to HB 266 and reported that the
BOF prioritizes personal use fisheries in the Southeast area,
when it's deemed necessary. He speculated that the issue may
represent localized conflicts, which should be addressed through
the board process. Legislation does not appear to be necessary,
he said.
11:02:35 AM
ROD ARNO, Executive Director, Alaska Outdoor Council (AOC),
stated support for HB 266. He informed the committee that the
AOC is currently in litigation with the BOF because of the
board's inability to comply with Article 8, Section 3, regarding
common use, of the Alaska State Constitution. He pointed out
that the bill will affect nonsubsistence areas as well.
11:03:36 AM
MELVIN GROVE, Member, Mat-Su Fish and Game Advisory Council,
Board Member, Alaska Outdoor Access Alliance, stated support for
HB 266 and said residents should have a prioritized opportunity
to catch fish. Under the Public Trust Doctrine, fish are not a
commercial resource. "The public should have every right to
catch their own over having to buy it at the store," he said.
11:05:01 AM
STEPHEN RUNYAN, Chairman, Susitna Valley Fish and Game Advisory
Committee, stated support for HB 266, reporting that personal
use fisheries are important in the Mat-Su Valley. He opined
that there should be fishing priority given to residents over
nonresidents and nonconsumptive uses.
11:07:17 AM
BYRON HALEY, President, Chitina Dip Netters Association, Board
Member, Alaska Fish and Wildlife Conservation Fund, stated
support for HB 266 and said that recently the Conservation Fund
Board voted unanimously in favor of the bill.
11:07:32 AM
KEN LARSON, Representative, Prince William Sound Charter Boat
Association, stated support for HB 266. He said, "The king
salmon fishery and the halibut fishery are treaty fish and [are]
federally managed." Referring to previous testimony, he opined
that Alaska has already experienced a resource grab with the
commercial fishery controlling 85 percent of the annual halibut
harvest, including the by-catch. Suggesting that HB 266 should
include a prioritization on fishing restrictions, from first to
last, he stated:
When the resource dictates that restrictions be
imposed, that we first restrict commercial fishery
access, then sport guide fishing secondly, then we
restrict nonguided sport fishing thirdly, personal use
fourthly, and subsistence would be the last priority.
11:09:08 AM
RICKY GEASE, Executive Director, Kenai River Sport Fishing
Association, stated support for HB 266 and said it is consistent
with other state policies regarding subsistence. Subsistence is
open to all state residents, and priority does exist for
designated subsistence areas. The bill follows the current
policy for prioritization based on conservation needs. There
are personal use fisheries for crab and shrimp as well, which
would benefit from this bill. He reported that over 95 percent
of all harvested fish are for commercial purposes.
11:11:55 AM
GERALD McCUNE, President, Cordova District Fishermen United,
stated opposition to HB 266 and reported that there are 350
resident commercial fishermen permitted for the Copper River.
The Copper River hosts personal use, commercial, subsistence,
and sport fisheries. [He held up a hand drawn map and indicated
the user areas.] He read from HB 266, page 1: "...to achieve
escapement goals, the BOF shall place restrictions on all other
fisheries before restricting personal use fisheries." Although
there is not currently a priority for personal use, he said the
first fishery shut down is the commercial fishery. He continued
to report on how the fishery is conducted, the run, run timing,
and allocations. Last year was a poor king return, for the
Copper River, and commercial fishing was limited to the ocean
area outside of a barrier at the mouth of the river. The
personal use fishery was not closed last year, despite the weak
run. He said there have been few restrictions on personal use.
11:16:05 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MILLETT asked whether this legislation might have
affected the Copper River had it been previously instituted.
MR. McCUNE responded yes it may have, particularly during the
low runs of the 1970's.
11:18:44 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MILLETT asked for a description of how the
escapement goals are established, and whether the Copper River
commercial fleet is confident with the numbers produced.
MR. McCUNE said the fleet is comfortable with how the fishery
management is handled. The Copper River is not very wide, hence
two sonar stations are utilized, and the escapement goal is
established following the initial two, twelve hour commercial
fishing periods, and extrapolating the number based on the 20
year history of the run.
11:20:55 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MILLETT surmised that some areas have developed
fisheries, appropriate technology, and historic data to make
confident projections. She asked how sophisticated the system
is in the Mat-Su area.
MR. NELSON suggested the fisheries managers may need to be
questioned on how this is handled. Index streams are used, and
sonar has been questionable regarding what type is most
effective. Many areas of the state do not have the capacity for
sophisticated monitoring, he said, and deferred to the
department for further comment.
MR. MULLIGAN reported that ADF&G has indicated that the sonar
system does not work well in the Mat-Su, and thus weir systems
have been utilized to provide a check.
11:26:04 AM
CHAIR EDGMON indicated that the department would be invited to
respond to these specific questions.
11:26:27 AM
CHERYL SUTTON reported on the management of the Cook Inlet
harvest, where she fishes. The commercial fishery must provide
enough escapement for personal and subsistence usage, not just
for spawning purposes. Additionally, personal use fishery
enforcement is an issue, due to the lack of manpower. She said
the commercial fishermen support the personal use fishery as a
resident fishery.
11:30:22 AM
MR. NELSON indicated that the sponsor's intent is to have
personal use be the second priority behind subsistence fishing.
However, the language of the available bill version does not
carry out that purpose, but rather creates a super priority for
personal use above all other uses, including subsistence.
Additionally, he said that the priority kicks in based on
escapement goals. There are many state fisheries that have
guideline harvest levels and other management policies, but not
escapement goals. Thus, the sponsor may choose to consider
different language and include species other than salmon. He
confirmed that the BOF currently has the authority to prefer
personal use over all uses, save subsistence. To the extent
that HB 266 would create a priority over sport, guided sport,
and commercial fishing, he said it would be helpful to have
legislative findings as to why that would be appropriate and
necessary. The bill does not contain reasons and justifications
for preferring the personal use fishery, which would be helpful
if the law needed to be defended in a constitutional challenge.
11:33:37 AM
CHAIR EDGMON stated that HB 266 would be held over and public
testimony would remain open.
11:34:11 AM
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the committee, the House
Special Committee on Fisheries meeting was adjourned at 11:34
a.m.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB266--Sponsor Statement.PDF |
HFSH 2/9/2010 10:15:00 AM |
HB 266 |
| HB266--Personal Use Fishery Data.PDF |
HFSH 2/9/2010 10:15:00 AM |
HB 266 |
| SJR 22 Sponsor Statement.PDF |
HFSH 2/9/2010 10:15:00 AM |
SJR 22 |
| SJR 22 Press Release.PDF |
HFSH 2/9/2010 10:15:00 AM |
SJR 22 |
| CS for CSSJR22.PDF |
HFSH 2/9/2010 10:15:00 AM |
SJR 22 |
| CS for HB266 with Accompanying Materials.PDF |
HFSH 2/9/2010 10:15:00 AM |
HB 266 |
| Sweetheart Creek and Juneau Area Personal Use Data--ADF&G.PDF |
HFSH 2/9/2010 10:15:00 AM |
HB 266 |
| HB266 CDFU Opposition.pdf |
HFSH 2/9/2010 10:15:00 AM |
HB 266 |
| SJR 22 NMFS Response to UCIDA Petition.PDF |
HFSH 2/9/2010 10:15:00 AM |
SJR 22 |
| Matt Donohoe LIO Testimony.PDF |
HFSH 2/9/2010 10:15:00 AM |
SJR 22 |
| SJR 22 SCADA Support.PDF |
HFSH 2/9/2010 10:15:00 AM |
SJR 22 |
| HB266--SCADA Support.PDF |
HFSH 2/9/2010 10:15:00 AM |
HB 266 |
| HB266-DFG-BDS-02-09-10 Fiscal Note.pdf |
HFSH 2/9/2010 10:15:00 AM |
HB 266 |
| SJR 22 2010 Fiscal Note.PDF |
HFSH 2/9/2010 10:15:00 AM |
SJR 22 SJR 22 Fiscal Note 2010 |
| HB 266--Bonnie Borba Email.PDF |
HFSH 2/9/2010 10:15:00 AM |
HB 266 |
| HB 266--Gary Miller Email.PDF |
HFSH 2/9/2010 10:15:00 AM |
HB 266 |
| HB 266--Ricky Gease Email.PDF |
HFSH 2/9/2010 10:15:00 AM |
HB 266 |