Legislature(1993 - 1994)
02/02/1994 08:30 AM House FSH
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HOUSE SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON FISHERIES
February 2, 1994
8:30 a.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT
Representative Carl E. Moses, Chairman
Representative Harley Olberg, Vice Chairman
Representative Gail Phillips
MEMBERS ABSENT
Representative Irene Nicholia
Representative Cliff Davidson
COMMITTEE CALENDAR
HJR 50: Relating to the North Pacific Fishery
Management Council comprehensive
rationalization plan."
MOVED OUT OF COMMITTEE
WITNESS REGISTER
RICHARD B. LAUBER, Lobbyist
Pacific Seafood Processors Association
321 Highland
Juneau, AK 99801
Position Statement: Supported HJR 50
PREVIOUS ACTION
BILL: HJR 50
SHORT TITLE: NPFMC COMPREHENSIVE RATIONALIZATION PLAN
SPONSOR(S): REPRESENTATIVE(S) MOSES
JRN-DATE JRN-PG ACTION
01/18/94 2097 (H) READ THE FIRST TIME/REFERRAL(S)
01/18/94 2097 (H) SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON FISHERIES,
RES
01/26/94 (H) FSH AT 08:30 AM CAPITOL 17
02/02/94 (H) FSH AT 08:30 AM CAPITOL 17
ACTION NARRATIVE
TAPE 94-5, SIDE A
Number 000
CHAIRMAN CARL MOSES called the meeting to order at 8:37 a.m.
He noted three members present and the excused family
emergency absence of Representative Nicholia. He noted that
HJR 50 was on the agenda for the committee.
RICHARD B. LAUBER, LOBBYIST, PACIFIC SEAFOOD PROCESSORS
ASSOCIATION, chairman of the North Pacific Fisheries
Management Council (NPFMC), updated the committee on the
January 1994 meeting of the NPFMC, which had comprehensive
rationalization ranging from the status quo to various other
alternatives, including an individual transferrable quota
system. The NPFMC also considered vessel licensing and some
alternatives for a reward system for clean fisheries. The
reward system might include giving a person the opportunity
to fish earlier, longer or some other reward for lower waste
of bycatch.
MR. LAUBER stated the NPFMC, while retaining all of its
options to study, directed the staff to place its major
emphasis on vessel licensing. This places the individual
transferable option on a "slower track" because of staff
constraints, time and available resources.
MR. LAUBER stated the NPFMC was following the recommendation
of its advisory panel, which voted 17-2 recommending the
NPFMC to follow this action. It was not an Alaska versus
Washington vote. There was overwhelming support. The
advisory panel was concerned about a number of things. They
felt the Individual Transferable Quota (ITQ) system was
moving much too rapidly, and that it may be put in place
well before they would have the opportunity to assess the
ITQ system for halibut and sablefish adopted by the NPFMC
some time ago and being implemented some time next year.
While the halibut and sablefish fisheries are not mirror
fisheries of the groundfish and crab fisheries, the program
would give some idea of how effectively it is tracked and
enforced.
MR. LAUBER stated that the groundfish and crab ITQ system
will be the most complicated, significant individual quota
system that will be implemented in the world. It will be
most significant in volumes and value of fish, as well as
numbers of individuals it will affect - processors,
fishermen, processing workers, coastal communities, the
various states involved and the nation.
MR. LAUBER stated the NPFMC was informed by the National
Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) that the time lines involved
were not realistic and the earliest the groundfish and crab
ITQ system could be enacted would be 1997 or even by the
year 2000. It was going to be longer than the NPFMC
originally thought and they wanted to move forward with a
vessel licensing system more rapidly.
MR. LAUBER stated that a vessel licensing system is what is
currently in place in the state of Alaska for salmon
fisheries and some other species. The individuals are
licensed and a limited number of people are engaged in the
fishery.
MR. LAUBER supports the resolution. The NPFMC has not voted
down the ITQ system. It is still on their plate of options.
Votes could be reversed at some future meeting and ITQs
could be placed back on the "fast track" or on a dual track
as proposed by NMFS.
MR. LAUBER stated the resolution is important. The impact
of an ITQ system on Alaska would be significant.
Number 187
REPRESENTATIVE GAIL PHILLIPS MOVED TO PASS HJR 50 out of
committee with individual recommendations.
CHAIRMAN MOSES hearing no objections so ordered.
ADJOURNMENT
CHAIRMAN MOSES informed members there would be no meeting of
the House Special Committee on Fisheries on Friday, February
4. He adjourned the meeting at 8:50 a.m.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|