Legislature(2025 - 2026)ADAMS 519
03/12/2025 01:30 PM House FINANCE
Note: the audio ![]()
and video ![]()
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB53 || HB55 | |
| HB10 | |
| HB31 | |
| HB36 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 53 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 55 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 10 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 31 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 36 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HOUSE FINANCE COMMITTEE
March 12, 2025
2:39 p.m.
2:39:54 PM
CALL TO ORDER
Co-Chair Foster called the House Finance Committee meeting
to order at 2:39 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT
Representative Neal Foster, Co-Chair
Representative Andy Josephson, Co-Chair
Representative Calvin Schrage, Co-Chair
Representative Jamie Allard
Representative Jeremy Bynum
Representative Alyse Galvin
Representative Sara Hannan
Representative Nellie Unangiq Jimmie
Representative DeLena Johnson
Representative Will Stapp
Representative Frank Tomaszewski
MEMBERS ABSENT
None
ALSO PRESENT
Alexander Schroeder, Staff, Representative Andy Josephson;
Alexei Painter, Director, Legislative Finance Division;
Stuart Relay, Staff, Representative Ashley Carrick; Cadence
Conner, Intern, Representative Ashley Carrick;
Representative Ashley Carrick, Sponsor; Representative
Louise Stutes, Sponsor; Matt Gruening, Staff,
Representative Louise Stutes; Glenn Haight, Commissioner,
Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission, Department of Fish
and Game; Representative Andrew Gray, Sponsor; Kyle
Johansen, Staff, Representative Andrew Gray; Nancy Meade,
General Counsel, Alaska Court System.
PRESENT VIA TELECONFERENCE
Chad Hutchison, Director, State Relations, University of
Alaska; Kathleen Wallace, Acting Director, Division of
Motor Vehicles, Department of Administration; Sally Cox,
Local Government Specialist, Division of Community and
Regional Affairs, Department of Commerce, Community and
Economic Development; Arron Timian, Natural Resource
Specialist, Department of Natural Resources; Kim Swisher,
Deputy Director, Office of Children's Services, Department
of Family and Community Services.
SUMMARY
HB 10 ADD FACULTY MEMBER UNIV BOARD OF REGENTS
HB 10 was HEARD and HELD in committee for further
consideration.
HB 31 VESSELS: REGISTRATION/DERELICT FUND
HB 31 was REPORTED out of committee with eight
"do pass" recommendations and three "no
recommendation" recommendations and with one new
zero impact fiscal note from the Department of
Commerce, Community and Economic Development; two
previously published zero fiscal notes: FN1 (DFG)
and FN3 (DNR); and one previously published
fiscal impact note: FN2 (ADM).
HB 36 FOSTER CHILDREN PSYCHIATRIC TREATMENT
HB 36 was HEARD and HELD in committee for further
consideration.
HB 53 APPROP: OPERATING BUDGET; CAP; SUPP
HB 53 was HEARD and HELD in committee for further
consideration.
HB 55 APPROP: MENTAL HEALTH BUDGET
HB 55 was HEARD and HELD in committee for further
consideration.
Co-Chair Josephson reviewed the meeting agenda. He wished
Mr. Painter happy birthday.
HOUSE BILL NO. 53
"An Act making appropriations for the operating and
loan program expenses of state government and for
certain programs; capitalizing funds; amending
appropriations; making supplemental appropriations;
making reappropriations; making appropriations under
art. IX, sec. 17(c), Constitution of the State of
Alaska, from the constitutional budget reserve fund;
and providing for an effective date."
HOUSE BILL NO. 55
"An Act making appropriations for the operating and
capital expenses of the state's integrated
comprehensive mental health program; and providing for
an effective date."
2:42:07 PM
Co-Chair Foster MOVED to ADOPT the proposed committee
substitute for HB 53, Work Draft 34-GH1462\I (Marx,
3/11/25).
Co-Chair Josephson OBJECTED for discussion.
Co-Chair Josephson asked his staff to review the changes in
the CS.
2:43:58 PM
ALEXANDER SCHROEDER, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE ANDY JOSEPHSON,
reviewed the changes. He reviewed the additional
spreadsheets in members' packets from the Legislative
Finance Division (LFD) (copy on file). He reviewed the
changes in the numbers section of the bill.
2:48:43 PM
Co-Chair Foster requested a slower review.
Co-Chair Josephson returned to page 2, line 5 through 8. He
asked Mr. Schroeder to summarize.
Mr. Schroeder summarized the change, which was an
effectively weakening the legislative intent.
Co-Chair Josephson stated there had been concern that $5
million, and felt that next change was related to the
Department of Agriculture, and it was a placeholder.
Representative Galvin stated they were leaving the
Department of Agriculture as a placeholder.
Co-Chair Josephson believed she was correct.
Mr. Schroeder answered that the idea was if it was not
included in the CS the positions would be gone, so they
were included to accurately reflect the totals.
Representative Hannan asked if the dollar amount had been a
decrement in the budget.
Co-Chair Josephson was confident it was true.
2:52:59 PM
Representative Hannan requested the page numbers when
reviewed.
Mr. Schroeder relayed that the language section in the new
CS began on page 55.
Mr. Schroeder continued to outline the changes.
Co-Chair Josephson remarked that there were some marked
items that were "in flux."
Mr. Schroeder moved to page 55, lines 10 through 15 for
supplemental Department of Fish and Game which amended the
prior year's fishery disaster fund.
Representative Bynum noted there were two documents. One
was a clean document and one was a redline draft.
Co-Chair Josephson was using the clean version.
Representative Johnson stated the section should be the
same.
Co-Chair Josephson noted Mr. Schroeder was talking about
section 5.
Mr. Schroeder moved to portion related to employees of the
executive branch.
Co-Chair Josephson believed they were like collective
bargaining agreements that would be adopted and the
legislature wanted to know what was going on.
Representative Hannan asked if the legislature was notified
in order to adjust the budget.
2:59:20 PM
Co-Chair Josephson also received the notice. He asked Mr.
Painter to address the committee.
ALEXEI PAINTER, DIRECTOR, LEGISLATIVE FINANCE DIVISION,
answered there was nothing in the current language that
would require it.
Representative Hannan asked if it would be helpful or would
muddy the waters.
Co-Chair Josephson thought Mr. Painter would say it was a
policy call.
Mr. Painter agreed.
3:00:42 PM
Mr. Schroeder looked at page 60, Section 13, which included
intent language related to full actuarial rate without
relying on lapsing funding.
Co-Chair Josephson noted there were perhaps 12 more of the
items.
3:02:24 PM
Mr. Schroeder remarked on the section related to the fix to
the Power Cost Equalization (PCE)
Representative Bynum asked why there was a proposed change.
Mr. Schroeder deferred to Mr. Painter.
Mr. Painter stated that the governor's language stated that
it not exceed another amount, so it was not a valid
appropriation because it gave too many guidelines. He
stated that the draft included a formula.
Representative Bynum surmised it was creating the 40
percent value.
Mr. Painter agreed.
3:04:43 PM
Mr. Schroeder remarked that the next section amended from
$40,000 to $80,000 in the arts license plates. He turned to
page 65, which modified to specify the calculation should
be 60 percent and not to exceed $3 million. The next item
was in the red line version.
Co-Chair Josephson stated it pertained to abandoned cars.
Mr. Schroeder agreed.
3:08:35 PM
Mr. Schroeder turned to Section 27, subsection (q) which
was intended to accurately reflect the portion of the
restorative justice fund.
Co-Chair Josephson WITHDREW the OBJECTION.
There being NO further OBJECTION, Work Draft 34-GH1462\I
was ADOPTED.
Co-Chair Foster MOVED to ADOPT the proposed committee
substitute for HB 55, Work Draft 34-GH1459\I (Marx,
3/11/25).
Co-Chair Josephson OBJECTED for discussion.
Co-Chair Josephson asked his staff to review the changes in
the CS.
Mr. Schroeder reviewed the changes to HB 55. There were no
changes to the language section. He reviewed the changes to
the numbers section.
Co-Chair Josephson WITHDREW the OBJECTION.
There being NO OBJECTION, Work Draft 34-GH1459\I was
ADOPTED.
HB 53 was HEARD and HELD in committee for further
consideration.
HB 55 was HEARD and HELD in committee for further
consideration.
Co-Chair Josephson handed the gavel to Co-Chair Foster.
3:14:39 PM
Co-Chair Foster reviewed the remainder of the meeting
agenda.
HOUSE BILL NO. 10
"An Act relating to the Board of Regents of the
University of Alaska."
3:15:49 PM
STUART RELAY, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE ASHLEY CARRICK, noted
that Representative Carrick had been called to another
meeting.
CADENCE CONNER, INTERN, REPRESENTATIVE ASHLEY CARRICK,
provided an overview of the bill. She read from prepared
remarks.
Mr. Stuart offered to review the sectional analysis.
Representative Hannan noted that the seat was a two-year
seat. She asked if full appointments were six-year terms.
Mr. Stuart answered that the Board of Regents had an eight-
year term.
Representative Hannan asked if there was a reason the
sponsor had chosen a two-year term.
Mr. Stuart answered that previous versions of the bill had
included a faculty member as a four-year seat.
3:20:17 PM
Representative Johnson asked if there would be other
hearings on the bill.
Co-Chair Foster stated it was an introductory hearing and
the bill would be held.
Representative Johnson stated there were currently 11
members and the bill would increase the board to 12. She
asked about the even or odd numbers in relation to voting .
She asked if the member would be voting member.
REPRESENTATIVE ASHLEY CARRICK, SPONSOR, answered that the
bill would require 7 members for a quorum and would require
a majority of the membership to pass a motion.
Mr. Relay replied that the bill would require 7 members for
a quorum and would require a majority of the membership to
pass a motion.
Co-Chair Foster asked for verification that none of the
seats were currently designated.
Representative Carrick answered in the affirmative, besides
the student seat, which was also designated in the
provision.
3:24:00 PM
Representative Galvin wondered whether there were 11 full
time faculty members. She also asked whether there was
support of other faculty and students for the addition.
Ms. Conner replied that there was a letter of support from
student leaders.
Representative Galvin asked if the student was a voting
member.
Representative Carrick answered that there were six
university systems with a faculty regent in other states,
and she stated that the student regent was a fully voting
member.
Representative Johnson stated she had some concern about
executive sessions.
Representative Carrick believed it was a valid concern that
had arisen in prior hearings on the legislation.
3:27:44 PM
Representative Hannan served as a student regent in the UA
system.
Representative Tomaszewski could see why the student regent
would be a two-year term. He asked about the requirements
for the other 10 existing regent positions.
Mr. Relay responded that they would follow up with the
information.
Representative Carrick replied that she did not believe
there were any other requirements. The regents were
appointed by the governor. She would follow up.
Representative Allard asked if there was currently an
honorarium member.
Representative Carrick replied in the negative.
Representative Allard asked about support from the faculty.
Ms. Conner answered that they were currently waiting on the
letter of support.
Representative Allard thought there was a problem having an
even number of board members. She asked why adding a
faculty member would be beneficial.
3:30:52 PM
Representative Carrick replied there were several impetuses
for having a faculty regent. She clarified that it was not
meant to indicate a student regent was not doing a good
job.
Representative Allard thought the student perspective was
the best. She asked if having a faculty member would be in
conflict of interest with union contracts. She thought it
was problematic and the regents needed neutral members.
Representative Carrick answered that the legislature
approved the funding for union contracts.
Representative Allard stated there would still be conflict
of interest.
Representative Carrick stated it went back to the ability
to recuse themselves from voting on motions related to
salaries and contracts.
3:33:46 PM
Representative Carrick noted that the invited testifier was
no longer online.
Representative Allard stated that faculty alliance already
existed. She asked if there was already a board advocating
for the faculty.
Representative Carrick answered that it was the advocacy
group.
Representative Allard stated there was a faculty alliance
that already existed. She did not think it was necessary to
add another regent.
Representative Tomaszewski asked who made up the list of
nominees forwarded to the governor.
Representative Carrick answered that the student regent had
to fill out an application and had to have support from
their student government.
3:36:57 PM
Representative Stapp asked about the equal number of
members.
Representative Carrick noted they could talk offline.
Co-Chair Foster asked for a review of the fiscal note.
CHAD HUTCHISON, DIRECTOR, STATE RELATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF
ALASKA (via teleconference), reviewed the OMB component 730
fiscal note that travel costs averaged about $1,000 per
member.
Representative Tomaszewski assumed the Board of Regents
currently had a $44,000 appropriation for travel.
Mr. Hutchison replied that the current amount was
approximately $36,000, and that typically only nine members
traveled.
Co-Chair Foster asked Representative Carrick for any
closing comments.
Representative Carrick thanked the committee.
HB 10 was HEARD and HELD in committee for further
consideration.
HOUSE BILL NO. 31
"An Act relating to the registration of commercial
vessels; and relating to the derelict vessel
prevention program fund."
3:40:24 PM
REPRESENTATIVE LOUISE STUTES, SPONSOR, reviewed the bill
with prepared remarks:
Before you is House Bill 31 "An Act relating to the
registration of commercial vessels; and relating to
the derelict vessel prevention program fund."
Most of you are likely familiar with this bill, as it
passed both bodies last session but was subsequently
vetoed due to constitutional concerns of it passing
after midnight on the final night of session. We are
back and hoping for some better timing this year. This
legislation contains the same language that the House
concurred with last session.
House Bill 31 would remove duplicative registration
requirements created by the passage of SB 92, "the
derelict vessel bill," in 2018. Specifically, HB 31
would remove the requirement for U.S. Coast Guard
documented vessels with a current Commercial Fisheries
Entry Commission license to register every three years
with the Division of Motor Vehicles. Prior to the
passage of SB 92 in 2018, documented vessels were
exempt from DMV registration; however, that exemption
was repealed in the bill and as a result, larger
vessels fell under the DMV's purview.
The rationale behind SB 92 was to provide the State
and local municipalities with a state database on who
owns and operates vessels in Alaskan waters, as well
as how to contact those individuals; overlooked,
however, was the Commercial Fisheries Entry
Commission's database, or CFEC as I will refer to it
from here on out. Vessel licensure with the CFEC
already requires annual renewal and provides the
necessary ownership information in a publicly
accessible, state-maintained database. It is our
intent that active commercial vessels should not be
required to register every three years with the DMV
only to provide information that the State already has
through the vessel's annual license renewal process.
Additionally, in its current form, HB 31 repeals the
Derelict Vessel Prevention Program Fund, created in
SB92, and transfers the balance of the fund to the
general fund. It also repeals duties and powers of the
department related to expenditures out of the fund and
establishing the program.
3:44:16 PM
Representative Tomaszewski asked if it was essentially the
same bill as was passed the previous year.
Representative Stutes agreed it was exactly the same.
MATT GRUENING, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE LOUISE STUTES, noted
there were individuals online to address the fiscal note.
GLENN HAIGHT, COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL FISHERIES ENTRY
COMMISSION, DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME, stated there was a
zero fiscal note, OMB component 471.
KATHLEEN WALLACE, ACTING DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF MOTOR
VEHICLES, DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION (via
teleconference), reviewed fiscal note 2348.
SALLY COX, LOCAL GOVERNMENT SPECIALIST, DIVISION OF
COMMUNITY AND REGIONAL AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE,
COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (via teleconference),
noted there were zero fiscal notes.
3:48:00 PM
ARRON TIMIAN, NATURAL RESOURCE SPECIALIST, DEPARTMENT OF
NATURAL RESOURCES (via teleconference), reviewed the DNR
fiscal note OMB component 3002.
Representative Johnson thought they should move the bill.
3:50:22 PM
AT EASE
3:52:13 PM
RECONVENED
Representative Bynum MOVED to REPORT HB 31 out of committee
with individual recommendations and the accompanying fiscal
notes.
There being NO OBJECTION, HB 31 was REPORTED out of
committee with eight "do pass" recommendations and three
"no recommendation" recommendations and with one new zero
impact fiscal note from the Department of Commerce,
Community and Economic Development; two previously
published zero fiscal notes: FN1 (DFG) and FN3 (DNR); and
one previously published fiscal impact note: FN2 (ADM).
Representative Stutes thanked the committee.
HOUSE BILL NO. 36
"An Act relating to the placement of foster children
in psychiatric hospitals; relating to the care of
children in state custody placed in residential
facilities outside the state; and amending Rule
12.1(b), Alaska Child in Need of Aid Rules of
Procedure."
3:53:41 PM
REPRESENTATIVE ANDREW GRAY, SPONSOR, provided an
explanation of the bill. He read from prepared remarks:
Due process is a basic constitutional right of every
person in Alaska. Due process is a legal process that
protects people from arbitrary government actions and
guarantees fair treatment. It's a fundamental
principle of both the United States and Alaska
Constitutions. Due process requires the government
follow certain procedures before taking away a
person's rights. HB 36 guarantees due process for the
most vulnerable people in Alaska, our foster children.
What the bill does is require that children who are in
the custody of the office of children's services,
otherwise known as foster children, receive a hearing
in front of a judge in a timely manner to determine
that they meet criteria to be held in an acute
psychiatric hospital.
The Alaska Supreme Court case of The Native Village of
Kwinhagak v. State of Alaska Office of Children's
Services, published on February 9, 2024, states the
following:
"There is no doubt that children in OCS custody
are at substantial risk of being hospitalized for
longer than they need, or when they do not need
to be hospitalized at all." "Clarifying the legal
protections for a vulnerable population of
children in state custody is of utmost
importance."
The 14-year-old child at the center of that case was
hospitalized for 46 days before the court held a
hearing to determine if her hospitalization was
justified. The Alaska Supreme Court determined that
the 46-day wait was far too long to satisfy her right
to due process. According to a previous superior court
injunction, she should have had a hearing within 30
days, but the Supreme Court further ruled that 30 days
was too long.
This finding is consistent with what happens in other
states:
One former employee of an acute psychiatric hospital
in Anchorage stated, "I come from the lower 48. Most
hospitals, a stay would be a 72-hour hold. Maybe
they'd be there for a week or 10 days. Thirty days
just blew my mind."
Another Nurse from that same facility stated: "you're
not go to see any other acute crisis stabilization
unit that does a 30 day stay."
When a young person is hospitalized in a psychiatric
institution, that child has limitations placed on
their rights and freedoms. In the case of foster
children, the chance that their rights can be
unnecessarily restricted are much higher than with the
general population. It is incumbent upon the
legislature to take up the cause spelled out in
Kwinhagak to determine the minimum amount of time
between an admission and a court hearing.
Many foster youths have suffered trauma and neglect
and experience mental health challenges as a result.
All foster youth have experienced the trauma of being
removed from their biological family and this is in
and of itself often the very greatest trauma of all.
3:57:03 PM
Representative Gray continued to provide prepared remarks
on the bill:
We do not have enough foster placements in Alaska
lack of foster placements can create pressure to keep
a child in a facility longer than absolutely necessary
that is not the fault of the facility.
But it's also not the fault of the child. We know that
kids have suffered from admissions that were too long
and sometimes unnecessary that's what HB 36 is
seeking to fix.
In November I toured the OCS offices in Anchorage and
it was an offhand remark of a nurse that provided the
timeline in this bill. She said that it can take up to
seven days to properly assess a foster child admitted
to a psychiatric facility. This bill requires a
hearing within 7 days. I believe this satisfies what
the Supreme Court is asking in the Kwinhagak decision
& provides foster kids with the due process that all
Alaskans are entitled to.
Representative Gray asked his staff to review the sectional
analysis.
3:58:10 PM
KYLE JOHANSEN, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE ANDREW GRAY, reviewed
the sectional analysis (copy on file)
4:02:27 PM
Co-Chair Foster noted that there had been two people for
invited testimony who were no longer available.
Representative Tomaszewski looked at section 2 related to
acute psychiatric hospitals. He asked how many there were
in Alaska.
Representative Gray replied that the bill was about any
hospital.
Representative Tomaszewski asked if there was a number of
children placed inside the state.
Mr. Johansen replied that he believed the information was
reported. In the past several years it was about 100
children, and that it was around 90 children currently.
Representative Gray added that any child in a facility in
Alaska had OCS as their guardian.
4:04:59 PM
Representative Hannan asked about the court rule amendment
and the appointment of a Child in Need of Aid (CINA)
guardian.
NANCY MEADE, GENERAL COUNSEL, ALASKA COURT SYSTEM, replied
that under the court rule, children in CINA was actually
done almost always in the circumstances already merited it.
4:06:33 PM
Representative Hannan recollected details from the prior
year Department of Administration subcommittee.
Co-Chair Josephson assumed that if Alaska children were in
Utah that Utah law would apply.
Mr. Johansen did not believe so.
Ms. Meade answered that if they were in state custody the
Alaska law would apply.
4:08:58 PM
Co-Chair Josephson meant if Alaska sent children to Utah.
He stated his understanding that Utah law overrode Alaska
law.
Ms. Meade answered it was correct if it was a CINA.
4:09:32 PM
Representative Galvin was surprised to see there was any
cost in the fiscal note after hearing that too many
children had been in long term intensive care
hospitalization for too many days.
Representative Gray deferred the concern to Ms. Meade.
Co-Chair Foster noted there were also two individuals who
would speak to the fiscal notes.
Ms. Meade could not comment on the other agency's fiscal
impact.
Representative Galvin would wait on her other question. She
wondered whether too many children were in the intensive
hospitals for too long how it would have a fiscal impact.
Representative Gray replied that Medicaid was paying $908
per night per child.
4:13:22 PM
KIM SWISHER, DEPUTY DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF CHILDREN'S
SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES (via
teleconference), agreed.
Representative Allard asked if it could be achieved within
the timeframe.
Ms. Meade replied that the timeframe was seven to ten days.
4:19:18 PM
Representative Johnson would take her question offline.
Representative Gray appreciated the question. He would talk
with some interested parties about the issue.
Ms. Meade added that the attorneys were appointed at OPA.
4:20:39 PM
Representative Bynum stated his understanding there was not
currently statutory guidance.
Representative Gray relayed that he had been working on the
bill a long time, and wanted to determine the correct
timeframe.
Representative Bynum noted that the bill was using a
definition from one of the cases related to an acute
psychiatric hospital. He asked if the definition
constrained the bill, and wondered whether there could be a
facility not defined as a hospital.
Representative Gray replied that there were currently
statutes related to residential psychiatric facilities.
Representative Bynum asked about the scope of the issue.
4:25:34 PM
Representative Gray deferred the question to Ms. Swisher.
Ms. Swisher answered it was how the department currently
processed the paperwork.
Representative Tomaszewski asked about the parties included
in the notice.
Ms. Meade answered that it could vary.
Co-Chair Foster noted that there was another hearing. He
asked for a review of the fiscal notes.
Ms. Meade reviewed the fiscal note.
4:29:23 PM
Ms. Swisher reviewed the fiscal note.
Representative Gray thanked the committee.
HB 36 was HEARD and HELD in committee for further
consideration.
Co-Chair Foster reviewed the schedule for the following
meeting.
ADJOURNMENT
4:31:38 PM
The meeting was adjourned at 4:31 p.m.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 53 CS v.I HCS1 Agency Summary.pdf |
HFIN 3/12/2025 1:30:00 PM |
HB 53 |
| HB 53 CS v.I HCS1 Agency Summary - UGF 031225.pdf |
HFIN 3/12/2025 1:30:00 PM |
HB 53 |
| HB 53 CS Workdraft v.I 031125.pdf |
HFIN 3/12/2025 1:30:00 PM |
HB 53 |
| HB 53 v. I HCS1 Sup Transaction Detail.pdf |
HFIN 3/12/2025 1:30:00 PM |
HB 53 |
| HB 53 v. I HCS1 Transaction Compare GovAmd+ to HCS1.pdf |
HFIN 3/12/2025 1:30:00 PM |
HB 53 |
| HB 53 v.I HCS1 MH Capital Project Detail.pdf |
HFIN 3/12/2025 1:30:00 PM |
HB 53 |
| HB 55 CS WorkDraft 1 v.I 031125.pdf |
HFIN 3/12/2025 1:30:00 PM |
HB 55 |
| HB 55 HCS0MH to HCS1MH (Version N to Version I) Doc Compare - Redline.pdf |
HFIN 3/12/2025 1:30:00 PM |
HB 55 |
| HB 53 HCS0 to HCS1 (Verison N to I) Doc Compare - Redline.pdf |
HFIN 3/12/2025 1:30:00 PM |
HB 53 |