Legislature(2021 - 2022)ADAMS 519
05/07/2021 01:30 PM House FINANCE
Note: the audio ![]()
and video ![]()
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB132 | |
| HB110 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 70 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 197 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 202 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 110 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 132 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HOUSE FINANCE COMMITTEE
May 7, 2021
1:35 p.m.
1:35:49 PM
CALL TO ORDER
Co-Chair Merrick called the House Finance Committee meeting
to order at 1:35 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT
Representative Neal Foster, Co-Chair
Representative Kelly Merrick, Co-Chair
Representative Dan Ortiz, Vice-Chair
Representative Ben Carpenter
Representative Bryce Edgmon
Representative DeLena Johnson
Representative Andy Josephson
Representative Bart LeBon
Representative Sara Rasmussen
Representative Steve Thompson
Representative Adam Wool
MEMBERS ABSENT
NONE
ALSO PRESENT
Representative Zack Fields, Co-Chair, Labor and Commerce
Committee; Representative Sara Hannan, Sponsor.
PRESENT VIA TELECONFERENCE
Deborah Riddle, Division Operation Manager, Division Of
Innovation And Education Excellence, Department of Labor
and Workforce Development; Nicole Reynolds, Deputy
Director, Tax Division, Department of Revenue; Joy
Hartlieb, Division of Labor Standards and Public Safety,
Department of Labor and Workforce Development; Greg Cashen,
Assistant Director, Employment Security, Department of
Labor and Workforce Development; Jason Jones, Self and
Owner, Legion Vapor, Anchorage; Alyssa Keill, Self,
Fairbanks; Royce Walston, Self, Ketchikan; Carrie Nyssen,
American Lung Association, Vancouver, Washington; Jay Oku,
Self, California; Terrance Robbins, Self, Ketchikan;
Charles Edge, Self, Fairbanks; Alex McDonald, Self,
Fairbanks; Patricia Patterson, Self, Soldotna; Robin
Minard, Matsu Health Foundation, Wasilla; Shaun D'Sylva,
Alaska Smoke Free Trade Association, Seattle; Jessi Walton,
Self, Fairbanks; Emily Nenon, Alaska Government Relations
Director, American Cancer Society, Anchorage; Don Enslow,
Self, Anchorage; Jamie Morgan, Government Relations
Regional Lead, American Heart Association, Sacramento,
California; Clint Farr, Operations Manager, Division of
Public Health, Department of Health and Social Services;
Sharon Walsh, Deputy Director, Division of Corporations,
Business and Professional Licensing, Department of
Commerce, Community and Economic Development.
SUMMARY
HB 110 AGE FOR NICOTINE/E-CIG; TAX E-CIG.
HB 110 was HEARD and HELD in committee for
further consideration.
HB 132 SCHOOL APPRENTICESHIP PROGS; TAX CREDITS
HB 132 was HEARD and HELD in committee for
further consideration.
Co-Chair Merrick reviewed the agenda for the day.
HOUSE BILL NO. 132
"An Act relating to technical education and
apprenticeships; relating to concurrent vocational
education, training, and on-the-job trade experience
programs for students enrolled in public secondary
schools; relating to child labor; and providing for an
effective date."
1:36:27 PM
Co-Chair Merrick indicated that the bill was first heard in
committee on May 6, 2021.
1:36:37 PM
REPRESENTATIVE ZACK FIELDS, CO-CHAIR, LABOR AND COMMERCE
COMMITTEE, introduced himself and declined to make any
additional opening comments regarding the legislation.
1:36:44 PM
Co-Chair Merrick OPENED public testimony.
1:36:52 PM
AT EASE
1:39:57 PM
RECONVENED
Co-Chair Merrick noted there were no testifiers.
Co-Chair Merrick CLOSED public testimony.
Co-Chair Merrick asked Ms. Reynold to review fiscal
note #5.
1:40:44 PM
DEBORAH RIDDLE, DIVISION OPERATION MANAGER, DIVISION OF
INNOVATION AND EDUCATION EXCELLENCE, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT (via teleconference), spoke to
published zero fiscal note 5 [FN 5 (EED)] for the
Department of Education and Early Development (DEED). She
related that DEED currently worked in collaboration with
school districts to increase career, technical, and
culturally relevant education to meet student and workforce
needs. The bill was not expected to have a fiscal impact
1:41:30 PM
Representative Carpenter stated that the sectional analysis
in section 2 added duties for DEED, to collaborate with
Department of Labor and Workforce Development (DLWD). He
suggested that adding duties cost something and implied
that extra work was required to fulfill the mandate. He did
not understand how the extra duties did not incur a fiscal
impact to DEED.
1:42:36 PM
Representative Fields replied that DEED currently provided
financial support to the school districts through the
Perkins grants. The intent of the language was to provide
supporting statutory language to allow DEED and the
Department of Labor and Workforce Development (DLWD) to
collaborate on ways to use the forthcoming federal grants
to support school apprenticeship programs. He confirmed
that the relationships were already established, and the
language ensured that the agencies could capitalize on the
grant opportunities.
Ms. Riddle relayed that DEED had a state plan with the
United States Department of Education to work with DLWD to
help facilitate work based learning which fell under the
apprenticeship bill.
1:43:50 PM
Representative Carpenter thought the phrases like work
with or additional duties was incredibly vague. He
asked what the additional duties were being added to DEED.
Ms. Riddle reported that further work with the sponsor
would better define the details. She reiterated that DEED
would partner with DOL to facilitate the grants and were
currently working with them to match districts with
apprenticeship activities.
Representative Carpenter wanted the specific list of the
added duties and better understanding of what the added
duties were before he approved of a program that could
potentially need future funding.
Representative Fields replied that the commissioner of DEED
had done a good job of figuring out how to support work
based learning and collaborate across departments. He
characterized the fiscal note request as providing
statutory support for something the department already
carried out. He thought the outcomes of work based programs
made the statutory support important but because of
departmental leadership the engagement already existed.
1:46:56 PM
NICOLE REYNOLDS, DEPUTY DIRECTOR, TAX DIVISION, DEPARTMENT
OF REVENUE (via teleconference), indicated that published
fiscal note 3 [FN 3 (REV)] from the Department of Revenue
(DOR) was indeterminate because the revenue impact of the
bill could not be determined because the department lacked
sufficient information to estimate the number of registered
apprentices a taxpayer may hire or the number of corporate
income tax taxpayers who may hire registered apprentices.
She offered that the additional cost to the department to
administer the credit was minimal and could be absorbed by
the department. All the required tasks like updating tax
forms on the Tax Revenue Management System (TRMS), and
updating Revenue Online the public taxpayer portal,
could be administered with the resources currently in
place.
JOY HARTLIEB, DIVISION OF LABOR STANDARDS AND PUBLIC
SAFETY, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT (via
teleconference), reported that the published zero fiscal
note [FN 2 ((LWF)] showed there were zero costs related to
the bill.
1:49:55 PM
GREG CASHEN, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, EMPLOYMENT SECURITY,
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT (via
teleconference), commented that the published fiscal note
was zero. The department collaborated with DEED regularly.
He added that DLWD and the University of Alaska created the
CTE plan in 2010, updated it in 2018, included school to
apprenticeship pathways from career and technical education
to post-secondary education and registered apprenticeship
programs that DLWD administered.
Representative Carpenter cited page 4, line 2 of the bill
and read using funds available for that purpose He
wondered what funds the bill referred to. Representative
Fields responded that there were ongoing federal funding
streams through DLWD. Some of the streams were grants to
organizations such as the American Apprenticeship
Initiative. He noted that other funding streams like
Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) went to
individuals to support training [through local programs
providing youth services] in partnership with American Job
Centers. He expected more funding would be available in the
future and reiterated that the primary funding stream
currently was the Perkins grants.
1:52:32 PM
Representative Carpenter asked if any of the funding went
directly to school districts. Representative Fields
answered that the Perkins funds went directly to school
districts. Most of the DLWD funds historically, had not
gone directly to the school districts with limited
exceptions.
1:53:16 PM
Representative Carpenter felt that he had to protest what
he was hearing. He voiced that tasks like develop, create
and, expand cost money and he found the zero fiscal notes
unbelievable. Representative Fields provided background
history on DLWD involvement in supporting apprenticeships.
He shared that the Commissioner at the time [Click Bishop,
former commissioner, DLWD] trained department employees to
become apprenticeship specialists. He elaborated that the
specialists worked closely with the federal Department of
Labor that regulated and oversaw apprenticeships. The state
specialists started apprenticeship programs and supported
employers. The infrastructure continued across many
administrations. When additional federal grant
opportunities became available, the department utilized the
federal apprenticeship grant money and distributed it. He
shared that he had worked for DLWD and administered the
grants at a time when DLWD experienced significant budget
reductions. He deduced that by looking back, it was
possible to see that the department could expand support
for apprenticeships when federal funds became available
even with reduced Undesignated General Funds (UGF). There
had been proposals put forward by the administration to
further expand federal grant dollars and the bill was
targeting the opportunity for when additional grant dollars
were received.
1:55:27 PM
Representative Carpenter asked if the school districts
could absorb the burden of creating additional programs.
Representative Fields replied that he asked the same
question to school districts when crafting the bill. He had
discussions with the career and technical education
directors at several school districts who wanted to expand
school apprenticeship programs. He had inquired about what
could be done to support the districts to strengthen the
programs thus, creating more opportunities for the
students. He relayed that the answer was they needed school
apprenticeship coordinators who worked under the schools
CTE directors. The coordinators would strengthen the
programs and create more apprenticeship placement
opportunities for students. He referred to prior testimony
from Trish Zugg, Information Technology Instructor/Grants
Administration, Matanuska-Susitna Borough School District,
who hoped the state would secure more of the federal grant
funding and fund the positions in the school districts. He
ascertained that the school districts needed more capacity
and he hoped that through the collaboration with DEED, some
of the funds could be used for the positions.
1:57:11 PM
Representative Thompson referred to page 5 lines 6 through
11 and read the following:
(f) In this section, "veteran" means an individual who
was honorably discharged from service in the (1) armed
forces of the United States, including a reserve unit
of the armed forces of the United States; or (2)
Alaska Territorial Guard, the Alaska Army National
Guard, the Alaska Air National Guard, or the Alaska
Naval Militia.
Representative Thompson asked whether the Coast Guard
should be included on the list. Representative Fields
answered in the affirmative.
Co-Chair Merrick noted amendments for HB 132 were due by
6:00 p.m. on Monday, May 10, 2021.
1:58:17 PM
Representative Rasmussen believed that high school seniors
should have more options upon completing high school. She
related that a college degree was not required for her
career as a residential appraiser. She did not have the
kind of college debt that others had making the same level
of income. She thought that the districts were already
anticipating the shift toward career or vocational
programs. She did not view the bill as a means of forcing
an unfunded mandate. She thought that there was broad
consensus in the legislature to support career and
vocational opportunities. The state had a higher need for a
skilled labor workforce. She suggested that even if the
bill did have a cost to it, the state would benefit in the
long term. She supported the legislation and relayed that
school districts embraced the concept of career and
vocational education.
Representative Carpenter took offense to the prior
comments. He believed that Representative Rasmussens
comments were addressed to him, and he felt lectured to.
2:01:04 PM
AT EASE
2:01:51 PM
RECONVENNED
Representative Johnson referred to page 4, lines 22 to 24
which she read the following:
To qualify as a registered apprentice for the purposes
of the credit under this section, a person must
participate in a registered apprenticeship program
recognized by the Department of Labor and Workforce
Development.
Representative Johnson asked if there was a list available
of registered participants in the committee members
packets. Representative Fields answered in the negative. He
indicated that there were several hundred registered
apprenticeship programs in the state sponsored by hundreds
of employers. He offered to follow up with the full list.
Representative Johnson thanked the sponsor.
HB 132 was HEARD and HELD in committee for further
consideration.
2:03:13 PM
AT EASE
2:09:05 PM
RECONVENED
HOUSE BILL NO. 110
"An Act raising the minimum age to purchase, sell,
exchange, or possess tobacco, a product containing
nicotine, or an electronic smoking product; relating
to transporting tobacco, a product containing
nicotine, or an electronic smoking product; relating
to the taxation of electronic smoking products; and
providing for an effective date."
2:09:15 PM
Co-Chair Merrick OPENED public testimony.
2:09:48 PM
JASON JONES, SELF AND OWNER, LEGION VAPOR, ANCHORAGE (via
teleconference), opposed HB 110 as it would negatively
affect his business. He believed that vaping changed his
life because it helped him quit smoking. He stated that he
vigilantly enforced the 21 year old age limit in his shop.
The Anchorage municipal tax had impacted his business. He
felt that the tax would harm adults 21 and over that vape
instead of smoke. He believed that tax would ruin his
business.
2:12:56 PM
ALYSSA KEILL, SELF, FAIRBANKS (via teleconference),
spoke in favor of HB 110. She was a part-time swimming
coach for teens. She relayed that when she asked the team
about vaping many admit to having tried vaping and raised
doubts about the health risks. She deduced that the doubt
sprang from the assertion that vaping was safer than
smoking. She asserted that safer did not mean safe.
Nicotine addiction was an addiction regardless of how it
was ingested. She thought the legislation showed that vapor
products were nicotine products and should be treated as
any other product containing nicotine. She felt that the
bill was a step in the right direction.
2:14:55 PM
ROYCE WALSTON, SELF, KETCHIKAN (via teleconference),
spoke in support of HB 110. He was a sophomore at Ketchikan
High School. He related that he saw fellow students using
Jule pods and vaping in school and out of school. It caused
the schools bathrooms to be shut down. He shared that he
worked for the Ketchikan Youth Alliance that was combined
with the Ketchikan Wellness Coalition and was working to
build a safer community. He thought the issue was important
because nicotine was a very addictive drug. He shared from
personal experience the way nicotine addiction had affected
people close to him who lost scholarships or their lives.
He spoke of his cousin being plagued with asthma that had
tried vaping and it caused his lung to collapse. His cousin
currently, better understood that vaping was dangerous. He
emphasized his support for taxing vaping products and
thought that it created equity amongst all nicotine
products. He asserted that individuals that vape influence
others to vape.
2:18:03 PM
Vice-Chair Ortiz asked if it was Mr. Walston's first time
testifying before a legislative committee. Mr. Walston
responded in the affirmative. Representative Ortiz praised
and appreciated his involvement.
Representative Rasmussen appreciated Mr. Walstons
testimony. She asked how his friends under 19 years of age
had been influenced and how they obtained the vaping
products. Mr. Walston stated that his peers were influenced
by older peers. He thought that those engaged in vaping who
were underage obtained the products through older peers,
or randomly found the products. He was uncertain about the
details.
Co-Chair Merrick commended Mr. Walston for his
participation and testimony.
2:19:43 PM
CARRIE NYSSEN, AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION, VANCOUVER,
WASHINGTON (via teleconference), strongly supported HB 110.
She voiced that increasing prices decreased consumption,
discouraged, and delayed use of the dangerous products. She
offered that 95 percent of adult tobacco users began before
the age of 21. A delay in age for the first use of vaping
and tobacco products reduced the risk of addition. Youth
exposure to nicotine during critical years of brain
development could cause lasting adverse consequences. She
indicated that nicotine addition could occur after minimal
exposure to tobacco products. Lung development continued
into the teen years and exposure to toxins impaired healthy
lung development. She advocated for a comprehensive
approach to decrease the youth use of electronic
cigarettes. Raising the age and the cost were evidence
based policies that would protect youth. The American Lung
Association supported removing the penalty provisions in
the bill.
2:21:54 PM
Representative Josephson asked Ms. Nyssen to repeat her
last sentence. Ms. Nyssen replied that she referred to the
penalty for possession of tobacco use. She elaborated that
the penalty had no evidence that it worked and harmed
youth.
2:22:26 PM
JAY OKU, SELF, CALIFORNIA (via teleconference), spoke in
strong opposition to HB 110 primarily due to the dangers
posed by black-market activity. He believed that vaping
helped offset the leading cause of preventable death. He
alleged that the negative effects of vaping were
hyperbole. He claimed that no one was dying from vaping.
He listed some statistics on the topic of children and
vaping and stated that less than one percent of current
young vapors had not first experienced nicotine by smoking.
He argued that by attributing harmful affects to vaping it
discouraged some smokers from using vaping products to quit
smoking. He indicated that the current federal age for
vaping was 21 and should be strictly enforced, and that
enforcement efforts should be increased. He felt that
specialty vape shops were compliant and not the problem. He
believed that the black-market was the problem.
2:25:23 PM
TERRANCE ROBBINS, SELF, KETCHIKAN (via teleconference),
spoke in support HB 110. He believed that raising taxes on
nicotine products resulted in a reduction in the use of
smoking products, especially among the most vulnerable
populations that included youth. He relayed that 90 percent
of all adult tobacco users became addicted to nicotine
before the age of 18. On January 1, 2017, the City of
Ketchikan enacted an excise tax on tobacco products that
included vape devices. He shared that results were
positive, and a survey showed a reduction in adults smoking
rates declined by 24 percent in 2017. He cited limited data
that concluded the Ketchikan Gateway Borough School
District experienced a 63 percent decrease in cigarette use
from 2015 to 2019 and youth vaping increased by 51 percent.
He found data that did not favor fines or punitive measures
for youth as a deterrent to tobacco use.
2:28:43 PM
CHARLES EDGE, SELF, FAIRBANKS (via teleconference), spoke
to HB 110. He shared that he was 20 when he enlisted in the
armed forces and felt the bill needed a military exemption
clause and did not favor the age increase to 21. He noted
that he was always carded when purchasing vape products in
Fairbanks stores. He believed that underage children would
obtain vaping products regardless of the law. It would take
away the choice of legal law-abiding adults. He noted that
the bill allowed adults to purchase e-cigarettes for their
children and felt that the bill sent mixed signals.
2:31:43 PM
Representative Rasmussen thanked Mr. Edge. She encouraged
him to continue to call-in and testify.
2:32:10 PM
ALEX MCDONALD, SELF, FAIRBANKS (via teleconference),
opposed HB 110. He pointed out that the subject of taxing
vaping products had been brought up during the Walker
Administration and did not pass at the time. He suggested
that a tax under the present pandemic situation was not
favored. He also noted that the Fairbanks North Star
Borough and Fairbanks City Council had recently voted down
a similar tax. He cited a study that concluded that the
combustible delivery system of nicotine posed the danger
and that non-combustible methods posed less risk and cost
that state less in healthcare costs. He urged members to
oppose the bill.
2:35:01 PM
PATRICIA PATTERSON, SELF, SOLDOTNA (via teleconference),
opposed the bill because she wanted it amended. She shared
that she owned a tobacco store and a marijuana store. She
voiced that many of electronic devices sold in tobacco and
marijuana stores were empty. She believed that the bill
would cause confusion and possibly apply the 75 percent tax
in the marijuana store. She advised only taxing nicotine
and to omit the provisions taxing the electronic
components.
2:37:55 PM
ROBIN MINARD, MATSU HEALTH FOUNDATION, WASILLA (via
teleconference), spoke in favor of the legislation. The
bill aligned state law to federal statute by raising the
minimum age from 19 to 21 for all tobacco products and
taxed e-cigarettes at the same rate as other tobacco
products. She was already aware of the effectiveness of
tobacco taxes, which fostered non-use of tobacco among
youth, encouraged smokers to quit, and reduced the overall
consumption of tobacco. Increased taxes also had a positive
effect on non-smokers with less exposure to secondhand
smoke. She furthered that e-cigarette vapor had been found
to contain flavors, propylene glycol, glycerin, heavy
metals, carcinogens, and metal nano particles and could not
be regarded as harmless. She indicated that inconsistent
research had been attributed to much of the vape research
proponents touting its safe use. She encouraged the
committee to move HB 110 forward.
2:40:24 PM
SHAUN D'SYLVA, ALASKA SMOKE FREE TRADE ASSOCIATION, SEATTLE
(via teleconference), owned stores in Fairbanks, Wasilla,
and Anchorage. He opposed the bill. He stated that research
suggested that vaping was clearly better than smoking. He
asserted that in Minnesota and Massachusetts increased e-
cigarette taxes encouraged people to smoke tobacco over
vaping. He noted that in some places in Alaska there was a
55 percent tax on e-cigarettes. He stated that the industry
did not advertise any longer. He noted another study that
claimed the air inside of a vape store was cleaner than
outside air. He urged members to look at studies
encouraging vaping as a method to stop smoking.
2:44:17 PM
JESSI WALTON, SELF, FAIRBANKS (via teleconference), opposed
HB 110. She considered vaping a consumer created
alternative. She believed that a 75 percent tax would
force her to turn to the black market. She thought that
people would return to smoking combustible cigarettes and
that the bill was bad policy. She urged members to oppose
HB 110
2:45:34 PM
EMILY NENON, ALASKA GOVERNMENT RELATIONS DIRECTOR, AMERICAN
CANCER SOCIETY, ANCHORAGE (via teleconference), had worked
on cancer prevention policy for 20 years. She shared that
she worked on the tobacco tax legislative effort in 2004.
She noted that tax statutes had not changed since that
time, but the markets had with the introduction of e-
cigarettes in 2007. She thanked the bill sponsor and staff
for bringing the bill forward. She indicated that it was
noteworthy that e-cigarettes were not considered a
cessation product nor had any company applied to the FDA
for them to be classified as such. Combustible cigarettes
had over 3000 chemical compounds of which 70 were known
human carcinogens. She reasoned that it was not difficult
for a vape product to be less harmful than combustible
cigarettes. Tobacco use cost the state $438 million in
healthcare costs. She was available for questions.
2:47:49 PM
DON ENSLOW, SELF, ANCHORAGE (via teleconference), spoke in
strong support of HB 110. He was a safety professional for
43 years and had to measure air contaminants for exposure
limits on job sites. He indicated that chemical products in
e-cigarettes included propylene glycol, which when heated
turned into formaldehyde and acetaldehyde that were both
carcinogens. In the workplace, the OSHA exposure limits for
propylene glycol was .05 parts per million and for
formaldehyde it was .5 parts per million. Very small
amounts of the chemicals could be detrimental to human
health. He furthered that even though the FDA had not begun
its review of e-cigarettes, researchers know that vaping
devices contained propylene glycol and related carcinogens,
diacetone, diethylene glycol, metals, and benzene. He
believed that increasing taxes would be a monetary
deterrent to the use of vaping products.
2:50:55 PM
JAMIE MORGAN, GOVERNMENT RELATIONS REGIONAL LEAD, AMERICAN
HEART ASSOCIATION, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA (via
teleconference), indicated that the American Heart
Association fully supported HB 110. She believed that there
was an epidemic in the use of vaping products among youth.
She relayed that current or prior cigarette smokers were
more prone to becoming ill with Covid-19. She declared that
e-cigarettes were not safe and increased the risk of
stroke, heart attack, and coronary heart disease. Young
adults using e-cigarettes experienced arterial stiffness
and blood vessel damage similar to smokers. The AHA
supported public policy that regulated and taxed e-
cigarettes similarly to all other tobacco products and
favored raising the legal age to 21. Studies showed that
youth were price sensitive to increased tobacco taxes and
costs. She advised removing the language regarding
possession and punishment from the bill.
2:53:45 PM
Representative LeBon deduced that marijuana vaping products
were not taxed. He asked if AHA had a position on the
implications of marijuana use. Ms. Morgan relayed that the
AHA did not have a position on marijuana use. However, AHA
held the position that wherever smoking tobacco is
prohibited, smoking marijuana should also be prohibited to
be consistent with smoke free air.
2:54:53 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SARA HANNAN, SPONSOR, spoke to
Representative LeBon's question. She informed
Representative LeBon that cannabis vaping was taxed.
Cannabis taxation happened at the grow level and was taxed
at the same rate regardless of the method of ingestion.
2:55:29 PM
Co-Chair Merrick CLOSED public testimony.
2:55:55 PM
NICOLE REYNOLDS, DEPUTY DIRECTOR, TAX DIVISION OF THE
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE (via teleconference), reviewed the
published zero fiscal note [FN 3 (REV)] for the Department
of Revenue. She indicated that the department did not
anticipate a revenue impact from the age change, as most
sellers have already adjusted selling practices to reflect
federal law. She explained that DOR did not have statewide
data regarding the sales of vaping products therefore the
division used data from the Matanuska-Susitna Borough's tax
on e-cigarette sales and updated population data to develop
an estimated tax base for Alaska. In the absence of
statewide data on electronic cigarette sales, there was a
wide range of uncertainty around the revenue estimates. The
division estimated that the tax would generate an
additional $1 million in revenue in FY 2022 and $2.4
million in FY 2023, rising with inflation to $2.7 million
in FY 2027. The reason for the lower revenue estimate in FY
2022 was twofold; revenue would only be collected for half
of the fiscal year because the bill would take effect
halfway through FY 2022, and it's assumed that distributors
would stockpile inventory before the tax takes effect. The
entirety of the revenue would be deposited into the General
Fund (GF).
2:58:47 PM
CLINT FARR, OPERATIONS MANAGER, DIVISION OF PUBLIC HEALTH,
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL SERVICES (via
teleconference), discussed the publish zero fiscal note [FN
2 (DHS)] for the Department of Health and Social Services.
He indicated that there would be no fiscal impacts to the
Division of Public Health or expected to experience an
increased workload. He was available for questions.
2:59:44 PM
SHARON WALSH, DEPUTY DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS,
BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL LICENSING, DEPARTMENT OF
COMMERCE, COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (via
teleconference), spoke to the published zero fiscal note
[FN 1 (CED)] He commented that there would be no fiscal
impacts on the division.
3:00:22 PM
Representative Thompson shared a concern. He indicated
there were about 2 dozen convenience-type stores inside of
gas stations in Fairbanks where individuals that were 19
years of age worked. He worried that they would lose their
income if the bill was adopted.
Co-Chair Merrick voiced that amendments were due for HB 110
by 6:00 pm on Tuesday, May 11, 2021. She also set a
deadline for HB 85 on May 11, 2021, at 6 pm.
HB 110 was HEARD and HELD in committee for further
consideration.
ADJOURNMENT
3:02:19 PM
The meeting was adjourned at 3:02 p.m.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 110 Public Testimony by 051021.pdf |
HFIN 5/7/2021 1:30:00 PM |
HB 110 |
| HB 132 Amendments 1-3 051121.pdf |
HFIN 5/7/2021 1:30:00 PM |
HB 132 |