Legislature(2019 - 2020)ADAMS ROOM 519
03/25/2019 01:30 PM House FINANCE
Note: the audio ![]()
and video ![]()
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB39 || HB40 | |
| Fy 20 Budget Subcommittee Reports | |
| Department of Transportation and Public Facilities | |
| Office of Governor | |
| Legislature | |
| Department of Commerce, Community and Economic Development | |
| Department of Corrections | |
| Department of Education and Early Development | |
| Department of Environmental Conservation | |
| Department of Fish and Game | |
| Department of Natural Resources | |
| Department of Labor and Workforce Development | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 39 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 40 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HOUSE FINANCE COMMITTEE
March 25, 2019
1:35 p.m.
1:35:53 PM
CALL TO ORDER
Co-Chair Foster called the House Finance Committee meeting
to order at 1:35 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT
Representative Neal Foster, Co-Chair
Representative Tammie Wilson, Co-Chair
Representative Jennifer Johnston, Vice-Chair
Representative Dan Ortiz, Vice-Chair
Representative Ben Carpenter
Representative Andy Josephson
Representative Gary Knopp
Representative Bart LeBon
Representative Kelly Merrick
Representative Colleen Sullivan-Leonard
Representative Cathy Tilton
MEMBERS ABSENT
None
ALSO PRESENT
Paul Labolle, Staff, Representative Neal Foster; Rob
Carpenter, Analyst, Legislative Finance Division; Ryan
Johnson, Staff, Representative Neal Foster; David Teal,
Director, Legislative Finance Division; Caroline Hamp,
Staff, Representative Dan Ortiz; Liz Harpold, Staff,
Representative Dan Ortiz; Morgan Foss, Analyst, Legislative
Finance Division; Shay Siegert, Staff, Representative Gary
Knopp; Alexei Painter, Analyst, Legislative Finance
Division.
SUMMARY
HB 39 APPROP: OPERATING BUDGET/LOANS/FUNDS
HB 39 was HEARD and HELD in committee for further
consideration.
HB 40 APPROP: MENTAL HEALTH BUDGET
HB 40 was HEARD and HELD in committee for further
consideration.
FY 20 BUDGET SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS:
GOVERNOR
LEGISLATURE
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC FACILITIES
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND EARLY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT
Co-Chair Foster reviewed the meeting agenda.
HOUSE BILL NO. 39
"An Act making appropriations for the operating and
loan program expenses of state government and for
certain programs; capitalizing funds; amending
appropriations; making appropriations under art. IX,
sec. 17(c), Constitution of the State of Alaska, from
the constitutional budget reserve fund; and providing
for an effective date."
HOUSE BILL NO. 40
"An Act making appropriations for the operating and
capital expenses of the state's integrated
comprehensive mental health program, including
supplemental appropriations; and providing for an
effective date."
1:36:41 PM
^FY 20 BUDGET SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS
1:37:18 PM
Co-Chair Foster provided information about the meeting
process. He intended to spend approximately 10 minutes on
each department.
^DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC FACILITIES
1:37:18 PM
PAUL LABOLLE, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE NEAL FOSTER, provided a
subcommittee report for the Department of Transportation
and Public Facilities (DOT) FY 20 budget with a prepared
narrative (copy on file). He shared his intent to omit any
non-undesignated general fund (UGF) items, but he was
prepared to speak to the items at the will of the
committee. The subcommittee recommended deleting the UGF
portion of the reduced executive branch travel by 50
percent or -$596,900 UGF; deleting 50 percent cost of rural
airport maintenance by -$22,600; approving the Airport
Contracts and Maintenance of $422,000 UGF; implementing a
fund source change for capital improvement project (CIP)
receipts for general funds for the Adak airport at an
increase of $146,000 UGF; and adding office technology
salary adjustments billed to agencies for $43,800.
Mr. Labolle reviewed recommendations made by members of the
subcommittee including a reduction in Marine Highway Funds
personal service line from Marine Shore Operations and to
transfer those funds to replace UGF funds in Marine Vessel
Operations at a reduction of $1.2 million UGF; and intent
language for the department to examine adding a third
weekly sailing from the Port of Bellingham. The actions
resulted in a UGF spend of $178.8 million (a reduction of
approximately $1.2 million compared to the FY 20 adjusted
base) and a $630.9 million total spend including all funds.
He highlighted an addition of $42 million in receipt
authority to allow collection of revenue for facilities,
maintenance, and operations. The change did not impact
DOT's UGF fund, but it may affect UGF spend in other
agencies where the funds would be collected.
1:40:25 PM
Co-Chair Foster added that overall the budget was down by
about $1.2 million year-over-year in state funds. He
mentioned he had introduced another amendment that would
have reduced the budget by another $8.4 million and would
have spread out the cost of $4.2 million to state highways
and aviation and another $4.2 million to the Alaska Marine
Highway System (AMHS). He reported that the amendment had
failed in subcommittee.
Representative Sullivan-Leonard highlighted that the
committee's budget showed an overall increase of
$55,976,000 or 45.6 percent over the governor's amended FY
20 budget.
Co-Chair Wilson referenced the reduction by $1.2 million
UGF to designated general funds (DGF). She asked where the
DGF were coming from.
Mr. Labolle replied that the DGF were moved from shoreside
operations to vessel operations and UGF of the same amount
were reduced from vessel operations.
Co-Chair Wilson asked for the balance in the vessel fund
aside from the $1.2 million.
ROB CARPENTER, ANALYST, LEGISLATIVE FINANCE DIVISION,
clarified that the vessel fund had not been amended. The
shoreside operations budget had been reduced by $1.2
million of marine highway funding. The funding had been
utilized in vessel operations to replace UGF. He summarized
that there had been a decrement of $1.2 million in
shoreside operations and the money had been moved to vessel
operations.
Co-Chair Wilson was trying to figure out where the DGF had
come from.
1:43:20 PM
Mr. Carpenter answered that the funding source was the AMHS
fund, which housed all of the revenue collected by AMHS.
Co-Chair Wilson asked for the balance of the fund.
Mr. Carpenter replied that at the beginning of session
there had been a projected surplus of approximately $27
million at the end of FY 19.
Co-Chair Wilson asked for verification there was a balance
of $27 million although there was $20 million of the amount
included in the supplemental budget. She surmised that
since the supplemental had not yet passed, there was $27
million in the fund.
Mr. Carpenter replied in the affirmative.
Vice-Chair Johnston referenced the $42 million in receipt
authority. She asked if the subcommittee had included any
intent language to track measurable outcomes and
efficiencies from the $42 million.
Mr. Labolle replied in the negative.
1:44:36 PM
Co-Chair Foster asked if Representative Sullivan-Leonard
had been referencing the comparison to the governor's
budget or all funds.
Representative Sullivan-Leonard replied UGF.
Co-Chair Foster asked if it was UGF compared to the FY 20
budget or the governor's budget.
Representative Sullivan-Leonard replied that it was the
governor's budget compared to the subcommittee budget.
Co-Chair Foster relayed that the governor had proposed a
cut of $65 million to AMHS, which the subcommittee had not
approved. However, the subcommittee had cut $1.2 million
from the prior year's adjusted base budget.
Representative Josephson asked for detail on the receipt
authority of $42 million.
Mr. Labolle answered that the $42 million was part of a
restructuring of maintenance across departments. The
administration believed efficiencies could be achieved if
DOT ran facilities maintenance for all agencies.
Departments other than DOT would funnel funds they had used
for maintenance through DOT. He elaborated that DOT would
use the interagency receipts to take over the
responsibility of the work.
Representative Josephson asked if it meant other agencies
would not receive the funds.
1:46:25 PM
Mr. Labolle replied that the change would most likely
affect other budgets [outside of DOT] because the funds
would need to be forwarded to DOT; it would be up to each
department appropriation to obtain funds to forward to DOT.
He added the funds should already be in the departments'
base because they had been historically operating the
function.
^OFFICE of GOVERNOR
1:47:31 PM
RYAN JOHNSON, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE NEAL FOSTER, addressed
the budget for the Office of the Governor with a prepared
narrative (copy on file):
Fund Source: (dollars are in thousands)
Unrestricted General Funds (UGF) $22,094.3
Designated General Funds (DGF) $0.0
Other Funds $4,171.8
Federal Funds $229.0
Total $26,494.9
The Unrestricted General Fund difference from FY20
Adjusted Base to the House Subcommittee budget
recommendation is a reduction of $906.2 thousand of
Unrestricted General Funds, which is 3.9% below FY20
Adjusted Base.
Mr. Johnson continued to address the budget for the Office
of the Governor. Positions in the governor's office had
increased from 159 to 175 due to the transfer of
administrative services directors (ASD) from each
department into the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
Additionally, the governor's budget included two new
positions for a deputy director and a budget director.
Mr. Johnson reviewed other governor's budget items approved
by the subcommittee including the reduction to executive
branch travel by 50 percent or $618,400 UGF; a $300,000 UGF
decrease to the governor's contingency fund; the alignment
of receipt authority of $2,893,400 to pay for the transfer
of the ASD positions to OMB. The subcommittee also moved
the appropriation of $1 million UGF for the 2020 census
based redistricting process from the capital budget to the
operating budget based on a recommendation by the
Legislative Finance Division. The division believed the
item belonged in the language section of the operating
budget and not as a capital appropriation in the capital
budget.
1:50:11 PM
Representative Josephson asked about an item related to
Department of Commerce, Community and Economic Development
(DCCED) staff.
Mr. Johnson responded that the subcommittee had rejected
one of the governor's budget items, which would have added
three positions with a focus on economic development.
Vice-Chair Ortiz asked if the increased number of positions
due to moving ASD positions from departments to the
governor's office reflected the actions of the
subcommittee. He explained that the Department of Fish and
Game (DFG) the subcommittee had not accepted the governor's
proposal to move positions. He asked if the information
reflected the governor's plan or subcommittee actions.
Mr. Johnson answered that the number in the subcommittee
report was accurate. He explained there were two brand new
positions in the governor's budget. He stated that a
[position] transfer may not have gone through from DFG;
therefore, the increment had created the two new positions.
^LEGISLATURE
1:51:44 PM
Mr. Johnson reviewed the budget for the Legislature with a
prepared narrative (copy on file):
Fund Source: (dollars are in thousands)
Unrestricted General Funds (UGF) $64,129.2
Designated General Funds (DGF) $327.7
Other Funds $1,883.8
Federal Funds $00.0
Total $66,340.7
The Unrestricted General Fund difference from FY20
Adjusted Base to the House Subcommittee budget
recommendation is a decrease of $3.2 thousand of
Unrestricted General Funds, which is 0.005% below FY20
Adjusted Base.
Mr. Johnson elaborated that the subcommittee had accepted
the following governor's requests: the approval of two PCNs
[position control number] for the expansion of the Senate
Finance Committee for $390,000 UGF; $210,000 UGF for
federal compliance audits for Legislative Budget and Audit
(LB&A); $85,900 to reduced vacancy factor for the
Legislative Finance Division; and various fund source swaps
to reduce the General Fund obligations by $640,200 UGF
(including Wells Fargo rent receipts in Anchorage and
teleconference revenue to offset costs). He elaborated that
because of the passage of HB 216 in 2018, the Office of
Victims' Rights (OVR) had restorative justice funds to
offset their General Fund costs. He explained that fewer
UGF was spent in OVR and more restorative justice funds
were used.
Mr. Johnson reported that the subcommittee had denied $1.1
million UGF for performance audits that had been placed on
hold. He relayed LB&A had not requested the funds.
Additionally, the legislature had reduced the state
facilities rent by $50,000 UGF to match anticipated
expenditures.
1:54:10 PM
Representative Sullivan-Leonard saw that other departments
had reduced their travel. She asked if there had been a
discussion about reducing travel for the legislature.
Mr. Johnson answered that the governor's request had not
included a travel reduction for the legislature; the issue
had not been discussed by the subcommittee.
Representative Josephson referenced the LB&A request that
had been approved by the subcommittee. He asked for
verification that LB&A had control over its budget and
could, by committee action, spend resources as needed. He
asked if the increment was a housekeeping issue or an
update of the budget status.
DAVID TEAL, DIRECTOR, LEGISLATIVE FINANCE DIVISION, asked
for clarification on the question. He asked Representative
Josephson to provide the dollar amount he was referring to.
Representative Josephson stated there had been some funds
denied for performance audits. He asked if the legislature
had directed LB&A that it could not entertain performance
audits in the coming fiscal year. Alternatively, he
wondered if LB&A could act on its own to authorize the
audits.
Mr. Teal replied that the law remained on the books
relating to the responsibility or duty to complete the
performance audits, which were on a five or seven-year
schedule. For the past three years, the performance audits
had not been funded. He reported that the legislative
auditor [Kris Curtis, Legislative Auditor, Alaska Division
of Legislative Audit] believed that because the
responsibility remained on the books, she was required to
ask for the money and have the request denied in order to
feel comfortable with not performing those duties. He
elaborated that the auditor had put the issue before the
committee and the committee had failed to appropriate the
money to the Division of Legislative Audit; therefore, the
division did not have the funds to perform the audits. He
expected it would take direction from the legislature to
the division to communicate that the audits were not being
funded; therefore, the division did not need to do the
work.
Representative Josephson would like to hear more about the
issue. He thought it sounded that the legislature was not
compliant. He thought the legislature should comply with
the law. He wanted to delve into the issue further at the
appropriate time.
Co-Chair Wilson referenced discussion about the governor's
50 percent travel reductions. She believed the 50 percent
reduction was not across the board, but the governor had
decided where the reduction would be made in each
department. She asked for the accuracy of her
understanding.
Mr. Teal replied in the affirmative. He detailed that not
every agency or allocation in the agencies received
reductions and the reductions were not always 50 percent or
every fund code. He stated that it was a mix.
1:58:03 PM
Co-Chair Wilson surmised the governor could have proposed
the travel reduction to the legislature if he chose.
Mr. Teal agreed it was possible; however, he noted that the
governor's budget had initially included a statement that
the governor had forwarded the legislature's request as he
had received it (the committee had removed the statement
because it was no longer necessary). The governor did not
examine the budgets of the legislature or the Court System
but was required to submit a budget reflecting all state
expenditures. The governor did not review or reduce the
other branches of government budgets.
Co-Chair Wilson emphasized that the governor could have
made the reduction to the legislature's travel if he had
chosen to do so. She asked for verification there was
nothing preventing the governor from making the reduction
to the legislature as he had done with other agencies.
Mr. Teal agreed.
^DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
1:59:36 PM
Co-Chair Wilson reviewed the Department of Commerce,
Community and Economic Development (DCCED) budget with a
prepared narrative (copy on file):
Fund Source: (dollars are in thousands)
Unrestricted General Funds (UGF) $7,357.1
Designated General Funds (DGF) $46,935.9
Other Funds $56,541.3
Federal Funds $21,438.3
Total $132,272.6
Co-Chair Wilson reported the subcommittee recommendations
represented a decrease of $1,505,900 UGF or 17 percent from
the FY 20 adjusted base. The subcommittee accepted the
governor's department-wide travel reductions of $807,100.
She noted the reduction was not necessarily 50 percent of
the particular agency.
Co-Chair Wilson highlighted that the subcommittee had
denied the travel reduction of $209,000 to the Alaska
Seafood Marketing Institute (ASMI). She explained that the
ASMI travel funds were statutory designated receipts. The
administration had told the subcommittee that the funds
would be left in a savings account for ASMI. She explained
that the companies taxed themselves and there was no state
funding going in. The funds were to develop the marketplace
and the subcommittee saw no reason to restrict ASMI's
travel.
Co-Chair Wilson reported that the subcommittee had accepted
the governor's $1 million reduction in local government
assistance, returning to the actuals of FY 18. The
subcommittee had accepted the governor's increase of
$1,574,400 to restore marijuana regulation funding; the
fund source was from business license receipts and not UGF.
The subcommittee accepted the governor's deletion of
funding of two development specialists in economic
development. The subcommittee denied the governor's
transfer of economic function from DCCED to the governor's
office and had deleted the three positions and funding from
the economic development of $713,200 UGF and $106,000 from
vehicle rental tax. The economic development process would
go to the governor; the subcommittee had determined the
governor could had a large staff and plenty of existing
money for the functions.
Co-Chair Wilson continued to review subcommittee
recommendations for DCCED. The subcommittee had denied the
governor's request to replace $381,800 of Power Cost
Equalization (PCE) endowment funds with UGF. Although, PCE
was included in the language section of the budget and not
under DCCED, the subcommittee hoped the co-chair [Co-Chair
Foster] would choose to keep PCE funds as endowment funds
and not UGF. She reported the state was receiving over 6
percent interest in the PCE fund versus approximately 1.5
percent if it went to the General Fund. The subcommittee
had accepted the governor's request to delete $450,000 UGF
for the Alaska Legal Services grant; however, it had funded
the grant of $450,000 with Alaska Gasline Development
Corporation (AGDC) LNG funds by reducing personal services
in AGDC by $450,000. She reported that the current
executive director was earning $350,000, not $800,000,
which had freed up $450,000.
Co-Chair Wilson detailed that the subcommittee had deleted
language allowing funding to be transferred between all
appropriations; the responsibility was under the
legislature's purview, not the governor's.
2:03:06 PM
Vice-Chair Ortiz asked how the total DCCED budget
recommended by the subcommittee compared to the FY 15
level.
Co-Chair Wilson replied that the subcommittee
recommendations reflected a 27.2 percent decrease from the
FY 19 management plan and 17 percent from the FY 20 budget.
Mr. Carpenter pointed to page 2, column 6 of the "Multi-
Year Agency Totals - Operating Budget - FY 2020 House
Structure," provided by the Legislative Finance Division.
He reported that there was a $23.5 million reduction from
the FY 15 management plan to the House subcommittee budget.
Vice-Chair Ortiz asked for the percentage reduction.
Mr. Carpenter replied that the reduction was approximately
76 percent from the FY 15 management plan.
^DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
2:05:12 PM
Co-Chair Wilson reviewed the Department of Corrections
(DOC) budget with a prepared narrative (copy on file):
Fund Source: (dollars are in thousands)
Unrestricted General Funds (UGF) $255,378.5
Designated General Funds (DGF) $9,542.0
Other Funds $32,044.7
Federal Funds $1,587.0
Total $308,552.2
Co-Chair Wilson reported the subcommittee budget
represented a decrease of $35,729,500 UGF or 12.3 percent
from the FY 20 adjusted base. One of the biggest debates
the subcommittee had undergone was on whether to send
inmates out of state and whether it would be more
affordable than keeping them in-state. The subcommittee had
identified there would be more savings keeping inmates in-
state and doing a program that started in an institution,
moved to a community residential center (CRC), and
electronic monitoring (if mandated by the courts) on
probation and parole.
Co-Chair Wilson explained that the governor's amended
budget requested a $6 million UGF reduction for the closure
of the sentence portion of the Wildwood facility, which had
a maximum of 326 inmates. Additionally, the governor's
budget included $30,600,000 UGF reduction associated with
cost savings for sending 500 inmates out of state. The
total reduction of $36,600,000 was offset by a $17,800,000
increase for out of state contract beds, which resulted in
a net savings of $18,800,000. She underscored that the
subcommittee had never been shown where the inmates may go
and had not seen a request for information. She was
uncertain where the numbers had come from. She found the
proposal to shut down a successful prison concerning.
Co-Chair Wilson highlighted that the subcommittee
discussion had addressed benefits of keeping inmates in-
state, close to their families and treatment. The
subcommittee had also considered ways to potentially
increase treatment availability outside of prisons. The
subcommittee recommended a reduction of $36,900,000
associated with moving inmates out of prisons, but keeping
them in-state and placing 400 qualified inmates in CRCs and
200 inmates on electronic monitoring. She reported an
additional $10.5 million had been added to the budget for
CRCs and $2.4 million was added for electronic monitoring.
The actions resulted in a net savings of $24 million - $5.2
million UGF more than the governor's proposed budget.
Co-Chair Wilson relayed the subcommittee had denied
videoconferencing of $969,000, which would have added 10
additional individuals. She reported the subcommittee had
not received an explanation for the proposal.
2:08:28 PM
Co-Chair Wilson underscored the state had a process in
place that was not being utilized. She elaborated that the
subcommittee was not asking DOC to allow any individual to
go into a CRC without going through the current process.
She explained that CRCs were not currently utilized to help
individuals get jobs or treatment. The subcommittee was
asking the commissioner not to merely send inmates to
halfway houses [also called CRCs], but to consider whether
some of the halfway houses could be turned into treatment
centers. She highlighted the myriad behavioral health and
substance abuse issues existing in Alaska. The CRCs could
act as a step-down process. For example, for individuals
who had been in jail for many years. She discussed that
when individuals were released from prison, they were
unable to access treatment or other resources they needed
and within three years, two out of three individuals ended
up back in prison. The step-down approach would enable
individuals to get necessary services.
Co-Chair Wilson discussed that electronic monitoring was
currently used for probation and parole. She explained that
some individuals going to a halfway house may need to be
monitored longer. She noted that at one time 400
individuals had been on electronic monitoring; the number
was currently around 100. She emphasized the items were in
place. She explained the proposal was a way to conduct
business differently. She stressed that every time someone
reoffended there was a new victim. She underscored the
importance of slowing the recidivism rate down, while
following the existing rules.
Vice-Chair Johnston asked if DOC had done a request for
proposal for the out of state [prison] facilities.
Co-Chair Wilson replied in the negative. The department was
still working on it. She shared the subcommittee's
frustration that DOC could have done a request for
information to give the subcommittee a range of the
possibilities and services. The subcommittee had heard
rumor that because of things taking place in the Lower 48,
there were no prison beds available.
2:11:01 PM
Representative Josephson referenced the subcommittee's
proposed reduction to videoconferencing. He asked if the
subcommittee had discussed whether the reduction would meet
due process. He assumed it meant that defendants in some
circumstances need not appear as part of the
videoconferencing hearing.
Co-Chair Wilson replied that the subcommittee meetings had
been very frustrating because of a lack of information
[from the department]. The specific request had asked for
10 more individuals to do videoconferencing. The department
had been unable to tell the subcommittee where the
individuals would be. Additionally, DOC had reported it
could not make inmates participate. She noted that DOC
already had videoconferencing in Fairbanks and Anchorage.
She discussed that DOC could not make inmates participate
by videoconference; individuals had a right to appear in
person if they chose. The subcommittee did not believe
adding ten positions was justified without truly
understanding what the positions would be for and how they
would fill the positions. She reported there were currently
75 unfilled correctional officer positions that resulted in
the state paying over $10 million in overtime to existing
officers. Ultimately, the subcommittee had denied the
request because of a lack of knowledge about where the
individuals would go and who would utilize it.
2:12:52 PM
AT EASE
2:14:35 PM
RECONVENED
Co-Chair Wilson thanked Representative Josephson for
bringing up electronic monitoring. She noted there had been
significant talk about a specific case involving pretrial,
which the committee would not get into during the current
meeting. She clarified the electronic monitoring she had
discussed was not related to pretrial. She added that the
subcommittee had put pretrial, electronic monitoring, and
halfway houses into their own entities in order to know
where the money was being spent. She detailed that most
individuals did not serve their entire sentence (conditions
were placed on a sentence).
Co-Chair Wilson explained that once a person had been
convicted, served their jail sentence, and proved
themselves (there was already regulation specifying who
qualified for halfway houses), they would have the
opportunity to go into a halfway house (likely in their
last two or three years) to get assistance with substance
abuse, mental health treatment, jobs, or other items
required by the department. The electronic monitoring would
be for individuals on parole or probation by a court order.
The issue was not related to a person's time served; it was
specifically to ensure a person would abide by set
conditions. She explained that if a person did not abide by
the terms of their probation and parole they would be put
back into prison. She reiterated the item did not relate to
pretrial, but those how had already been sentenced. The
option would offer a stepdown for individuals to reenter
society productively.
2:16:48 PM
Co-Chair Foster shared that the current meeting was to hear
subcommittee closeouts and the committee would hold policy
debates the following week in greater detail.
Representative Carpenter reported that the discussion in
subcommittee had revolved around the concept that
videoconferencing was not functioning on all cylinders at
present. He noted that DOC was not solely to blame for that
issue. He explained that the two departments needed to get
together to figure out their different issues to make
videoconferencing work better. He reported that DOC needed
new personnel, but it currently had 70 unfilled vacancies.
Therefore, the subcommittee had determined it made no sense
to add an additional 10 positions if the 70 could not be
filled. He stated that if the 70 positions were filled,
perhaps there could be a conversation the following year
about increasing the number of positions if necessary.
Representative Knopp referenced a wordage report document
"2019 Legislature - Operating Budget Wordage Report - House
Structure," generated by the Legislative Finance Division
(copy on file). He asked for verification that the
subcommittee did not adopt conditional language regarding
appropriations [Conditional language: at the discretion of
the Office of Management and Budget, funding may be
transferred between all appropriations in the Department.].
Co-Chair Wilson replied that the subcommittee had removed
the language allowing the governor to transfer from one
area to another in DCCED and DOC.
^DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND EARLY DEVELOPMENT
2:19:25 PM
CAROLINE HAMP, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE DAN ORTIZ, provided
highlights of the action taken on the Department of
Education and Early Development (DEED) budget with a
prepared narrative (copy on file):
The House Finance Budget Subcommittee for the
Department of Education and Early Development
recommends that the House Finance Committee accepts
the FY2020 Amended Base budget with the included
subcommittee amendments.
The numbers-only budget with amendment recommendations
totals:
Fund Source: (dollars are in thousands)
Unrestricted General Funds (UGF) $45,699.9
Designated General Funds (DGF) $25,058.9
Other Funds $63,772.4
Federal Funds $256,133.1
Total $390,664.3
Ms. Hamp elaborated that the subcommittee's recommended UGF
budget was 19.9 percent less than the governor's amended
budget where UGF had equaled $57,880,000. She detailed the
difference was due to the subcommittee's decision to fund
programs using the same fund sources as previous years,
whereas, the governor's amended budget switched multiple
programs to UGF that had previously been funded through the
Public School Trust Fund and the Higher Education
Investment Fund with the intent to sweep the latter of the
two; the subcommittee did not agree to the fund source
changes.
Ms. Hamp addressed action items in the governor's budget.
She reported the subcommittee had voted in favor of
multiple technical changes (her review would only include
UGF changes). The budget included a salary adjustment
increment of $24,000 for the Office of Information
Technology; a decrement of $17,300 to the Special Education
Service Agency to account for fewer students than in FY 19;
an increment of $50,000 to reinstate lapsed funds from the
previous year to complete Regional Educational Attendance
Area (REAA) and small municipal school construction
standards; an increment of $320,000 for a Kindergarten
through third grade literacy project; and an increment of
$215,100 for the APK museum facilities maintenance. The
subcommittee did not approve the governor's proposal to
completely cut Pre-K funding, the Washington, Wyoming,
Alaska, Montana, and Idaho (WWAMI) program, the State
Council on the Arts, live homework help, or the Online With
Libraries program.
Ms. Hamp detailed that subcommittee member amendments
included an increment of $237,000 to Parents As Teachers
(an early learning program); an $400,000 increment for the
Dyslexia Taskforce; a reduction of $47,400 to travel; and a
decrement of $1,093,900 to the Higher Education Investment
Fund for broadband access grants (the figure matched the
number of grant applicants). The subcommittee's UGF total
was 1.6 percent or $723,800 higher than the FY 20 adjusted
base. To help offset the increase the subcommittee had
included a decrement of $457,600 for the three positions
for the education curriculum requirement program. She
detailed that the decrement went hand-in-hand with the
subcommittee's language recommendation to eliminate $19.5
million for the education curriculum requirement program.
2:23:21 PM
Representative Carpenter remarked that the subcommittee's
budget for DEED was a 3.9 percent or $14.6 million increase
over the governor's proposed balanced budget.
Representative Josephson addressed language items related
to curriculum development grants. He asked if the items had
been funded through DEED. Alternatively, he wondered if Ms.
Hamp had merely highlighted the grants because of their
link to the three staff.
Ms. Hamp replied that she had highlighted the grants
because they were linked to the three staff.
^DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
2:24:35 PM
LIZ HARPOLD, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE DAN ORTIZ, reviewed the
subcommittee's proposed budget for the Department of
Environmental Conservation (DEC) with a prepared narrative
(copy on file).
The House Finance Budget Subcommittee for the
Department of Environmental Conservation recommends
that the House Finance Committee accepts the FY2020
Amended Base budget with the included subcommittee
amendments.
The numbers-only budget with amendment recommendations
totals:
Fund Source: (dollars are in thousands)
Unrestricted General Funds (UGF) $15,359.9
Designated General Funds (DGF) $24,719.9
Other Funds $17,083.9
Federal Funds $23,506.3
Total $80,670.0
Ms. Harpold reported that the UGF difference from the FY 20
adjusted base to the FY 20 House subcommittee recommended
budget was $31,900 or 0.2 percent. The subcommittee
accepted 6 of the 17 budget action items. Five pertained to
fund source changes. The sixth related to an increase in
the Office of Information Technology for salary increases
that was billed to the department. The subcommittee chose
not to eliminate the Ocean Ranger Program, Dairy Program,
and an economist III position as proposed by the governor.
The subcommittee had rejected across the board 50 percent
travel reductions but later an amendment passed to reduce
UGF by 50 percent in the travel allocations.
^DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME
2:26:40 PM
Ms. Harpold reviewed the subcommittee's proposed budget for
the Department of Fish and Game (DFG) with a prepared
narrative (copy on file).
The House Finance Budget Subcommittee for the
Department of Fish and Game recommends that the House
Finance Committee accepts the FY2020 Amended Base
budget with the included subcommittee amendments.
The numbers-only budget with amendment recommendations
totals:
Fund Source: (dollars are in thousands)
Unrestricted General Funds (UGF) $52,603.4
Designated General Funds (DGF) $14,186.2
Other Funds $66,892.5
Federal Funds $67,780.7
Total $201,462.8
Ms. Harpold reported that the UGF difference from the FY 20
adjusted base to the FY 20 House subcommittee recommended
budget was an increase of $1,026,200 or 2 percent. The
subcommittee accepted 10 of the governor's 29 action items.
Four items were related to removing the now depleted
Charter Fishing Revolving Loan Fund as a fund source from
the Division of Commercial Fisheries. She noted that the
previous year, the DFG subcommittee had added $997,000 UGF
to the budget to be built into the base for different
management projects around the state. She explained that
the Senate had switched the UGF to a one-time fund source,
which had now been depleted; therefore, the subcommittee
had voted to remove the item. The subcommittee had later
passed an amendment to restore the $997,000 UGF.
Ms. Harpold detailed that the subcommittee accepted the
removal of the Charter Fishing Revolving Loan Fund from the
Saltwater Logbook Program and had later passed an amendment
to add $350,000 of fish and game funding to continue
funding the program. The subcommittee had rejected budget
action items related to the elimination of special areas
management; travel reductions across the board (though the
subcommittee had passed an amendment to reduce funding in
some statewide service areas); and the transfer of two
director-level PCNs and associated funding from the
Division of Habitat and the Division of Subsistence
Research. The subcommittee had adopted intent language
directing the department that the PCNs and associated
funding were not to be used outside their respective
allocations. Additional amendments included adding $800,000
of fish and game funds to match Pittman-Robertson funds.
2:29:03 PM
Co-Chair Wilson queried the amount of Pittman-Robertson
funds that had not been used the previous year and had been
returned to the federal government.
MORGAN FOSS, ANALYST, LEGISLATIVE FINANCE DIVISION,
believed $1.9 million in Pittman-Robertson funds had been
reverted back to the federal government. She would check
the number and follow up.
Co-Chair Wilson asked how much Pittman-Robertson funding
the state had to utilize in the current year and how much
the state was intending to use before the end of the fiscal
year.
Ms. Foss answered that in FY 20 the state would be in the
second year of needing to obligate funds from FY 19. There
were roughly $33.2 million that needed to be obligated in
order to not revert funds. Another $27 million or so had
been appropriated to the state for FY 20, which the state
had 2 years to obligate.
Co-Chair Wilson stated that the legislature had increased
the cost of fishing and hunting licenses in order to be
able to utilize the Pittman-Robertson funds. She found it
disturbing to hear that funds would be given back to the
federal government. She requested a report showing the
current status and what projects DFG may be able to
complete before the funds expired. Additionally, she asked
how much the state was receiving from license fees compared
to previous years. She thought the legislature had made a
promise to Alaskans when it had asked for more money from
them in order to utilize the federal funds, yet the state
was returning federal funds.
2:30:59 PM
Representative Josephson believed the administration wanted
to put critical habitat areas under passive management. He
asked for verification that the subcommittee had fully
restored the funds.
Ms. Harpold replied in the affirmative.
Co-Chair Foster highlighted an increase of just under $1
million to recapitalize the Charter Fishing Revolving Loan
Fund. He asked for verification that the money had been
added because it had been removed the previous year in
conference committee.
Vice-Chair Ortiz answered that the House had passed an
increment totaling $997,000 UGF to fund projects to
increase opportunity for fisherman. The Senate had
subsequently switched the fund source to the Charter
Fishing Revolving Loan Fund that was a one-time source that
was now depleted. The subcommittee recommended keeping the
projects and funding them with UGF for FY 20.
^DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
2:32:49 PM
SHAY SIEGERT, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE GARY KNOPP, reported on
the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) budget with a
prepared narrative (copy on file).
The House Finance Budget Subcommittee for the Department of
Natural Resources submits recommended operating budgets for
FY 20 to the House Finance Committee:
Fund Source: (dollars are in thousands)
Unrestricted General Funds (UGF) $66,953.5
Designated General Funds (DGF) $31,949.3
Other Funds $35,944.6
Federal Funds $15,670.7
Total $150,518.1
Mr. Siegert reported there was a decrease in the number of
permanent full-time positions from 622 to 615 (a total of 7
positions) between the FY 20 adjusted base and the FY 20
subcommittee budget. There was a decrease in permanent
part-time positions from 216 to 215 (a total of 1 position)
between the FY 20 adjusted base and the FY 20 subcommittee
budget. Temporary positions had been reduced from 63 to 60
(a total of 3 positions) between the FY 20 adjusted base
and the FY 20 subcommittee budget.
Mr. Siegert relayed that the DNR subcommittee had held five
meetings with the department analyzing the governor's
budget and accepted 32 out of 37 proposed action items. The
following items were not accepted: recorder's office
consolidation and efficiencies; agriculture development,
reducing lower priority programs; North Latitude Plant
Material Center, reducing lower priority programs; deleting
the Agriculture Revolving Loan Fund; and Parks and
Management reorganization of the Recreational Trails
Program. He detailed that the conversation in subcommittee
had revolved around the impact the proposals would have on
communities and the agricultural industry, which ultimately
resulted in the subcommittee's decision to reject the
items.
Mr. Siegert highlighted the subcommittee amendment
submitted to the House Finance Committee for consideration
that would remove $210,800 UGF and delete two permanent
full-time positions including a divisions specialist option
B (vacant since 2017) and the state veterinarian (the
position was never filled).
2:36:09 PM
Representative Josephson asked about the Agriculture
Division. He recalled that the administration's proposal
was to delete 18 positions. He thought it came close to
decimating the division. He asked if the positions had all
been restored in the subcommittee budget.
Mr. Siegert answered that the 19 positions had been
restored.
ALEXEI PAINTER, ANALYST, LEGISLATIVE FINANCE DIVISION,
noted the exception was the removal of the two agricultural
veterinarian positions by a subcommittee amendment. He
noted the reductions had been included in the governor's
reduction, but it had been taken as a separate subcommittee
action.
Co-Chair Wilson asked if there was still a state
veterinarian.
Mr. Painter replied in the affirmative. He elaborated that
the regulatory functions of the state veterinarian were in
DEC. He explained that veterinarian position under DNR had
been added the previous year with the goal of helping to
expand the livestock industry in Alaska; the DNR position
did not have regulatory functions.
2:37:33 PM
Co-Chair Wilson asked why the veterinarian was under DEC
and not DNR.
Mr. Painter replied that the Office of the State
Veterinarian in DEC worked for the Environmental Health Lab
and performed regulatory functions that were similar to
other parts of environmental health. The position under DNR
had been focused on promoting the agricultural industry,
which was closer to the mission of the Division of
Agriculture; however, the program had never been
implemented by DNR and the department was seeking to remove
it in the current year.
^DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT
2:38:24 PM
Mr. Siegert reviewed the proposed budget for the Department
of Labor and Workforce Development (DLWD) with a prepared
narrative (copy on file).
The House Finance Budget Subcommittee for the
Department of Labor and Workforce Development submits
recommended operating budgets for FY 20 to the House
Finance Committee:
Fund Source: (dollars are in thousands)
Unrestricted General Funds (UGF) $20,413.0
Designated General Funds (DGF) $36,110.1
Other Funds $16,961.4
Federal Funds $74,971.1
Total $148,401.6
Mr. Siegert reported there was no proposed change to PCN
numbers between FY 19 and FY 20. The subcommittee accepted
25 of the 28 items proposed by the governor. The following
three items were not accepted by the subcommittee:
1. Labor Standards and Safety Wage and Hour
Administration Executive Branch 50 percent Travel
Reduction of $3,500.00 UGF.
2. Labor Standards and Safety Mechanical Inspection
Executive Branch 50 percent Travel Reduction of
$52,800.00 from the Building Safe Fund, and $3,800.00
from Interagency Receipts.
3. Labor Standards and Safety Occupational Safety and
Health Executive Branch 50 percent Travel Reduction of
$26,500.00 in Federal Receipts, $6,800.00 from a
General Fund Match, and $21,100.00 from the Workers
Safe Fund.
2:41:32 PM
Co-Chair Wilson clarified her earlier answer to Vice-Chair
Ortiz related to DCCED. She had looked into Vice-Chair
Ortiz's question about whether DCCED had been reduced by
76.1 percent [from the FY 15 management plan]. She stated
that the department's UGF budget had been reduced by 76.1
percent, but DGF had increased by 9.1 percent, other funds
had increased by 14.4 percent, and federal funds had
increased 27.1 percent (a total of 50.6 percent). There had
been a 26 percent decrease in all funds. She elaborated
that most of the grants to communities provided when the
state had money had a five-year span and had been
reutilized for other projects. She reasoned that the
department would not need as many personnel because it had
fewer grants. She clarified that accounting for all funds
there had been a 26 percent reduction, not a 76.1 percent
reduction. She noted that economic development was included
and had moved to the governor's office.
Co-Chair Foster relayed that the committee would hear
public testimony later in the day. He reviewed the schedule
for the following meeting. He provided information about
the public testimony process.
2:44:38 PM
AT EASE
2:46:40 PM
RECONVENED
Representative Sullivan-Leonard requested to receive the
remaining subcommittee reports (via email) that would be
heard the following day.
Co-Chair Wilson replied that the subcommittee reports were
all on the Legislative Finance Division website.
Vice-Chair Ortiz made an inaudible remark.
Co-Chair Foster agreed to provide the information for the
committee.
Co-Chair Foster provided additional specifics on the public
testimony times. He reminded committee members the
committee would hold a meeting the following morning at
9:00 a.m.
HB 39 was HEARD and HELD in committee for further
consideration.
HB 40 was HEARD and HELD in committee for further
consideration.
ADJOURNMENT
2:50:34 PM
The meeting was adjourned at 2:50 p.m.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| LEG-AgencyTotals.pdf |
HFIN 3/25/2019 1:30:00 PM |
HB 39 |
| LEG-Spreadsheet.pdf |
HFIN 3/25/2019 1:30:00 PM |
HB 39 |
| LEG-TransactionCompare1.pdf |
HFIN 3/25/2019 1:30:00 PM |
HB 39 Subcommittee Closeout Reports |
| LEG-Narrative.pdf |
HFIN 3/25/2019 1:30:00 PM |
HB 39 Subcommittee Closeout Reports |
| LEG-TransactionCompare2.pdf |
HFIN 3/25/2019 1:30:00 PM |
HB 39 Subcommittee Closeout Reports |
| LEG-Wordage.pdf |
HFIN 3/25/2019 1:30:00 PM |
HB 39 Subcommittee Closeout Reports |
| GOV-AgencyTotals.pdf |
HFIN 3/25/2019 1:30:00 PM |
HB 39 Subcommittee Closeout Reports |
| GOV-Narrative.pdf |
HFIN 3/25/2019 1:30:00 PM |
HB 39 Subcommittee Closeout Reports |
| GOV-Spreadsheet.pdf |
HFIN 3/25/2019 1:30:00 PM |
HB 39 Subcommittee Closeout Reports |
| GOV-TransactionCompare1.pdf |
HFIN 3/25/2019 1:30:00 PM |
HB 39 Subcommittee Closeout Reports |
| GOV-TransactionCompare2.pdf |
HFIN 3/25/2019 1:30:00 PM |
HB 39 Subcommittee Closeout Reports |
| GOV-Wordage.pdf |
HFIN 3/25/2019 1:30:00 PM |
HB 39 Subcommittee Closeout Reports |
| DOT-AgencyTotals.pdf |
HFIN 3/25/2019 1:30:00 PM |
HB 39 Subcommittee Closeout Reports |
| DOT-Spreadsheet.pdf |
HFIN 3/25/2019 1:30:00 PM |
HB 39 Subcommittee Closeout Reports |
| DOT-TransactionCompare1.pdf |
HFIN 3/25/2019 1:30:00 PM |
HB 39 Subcommittee Closeout Reports |
| DOT-TransactionCompare2.pdf |
HFIN 3/25/2019 1:30:00 PM |
HB 39 Subcommittee Closeout Reports |
| DOT-Wordage.pdf |
HFIN 3/25/2019 1:30:00 PM |
HB 39 Subcommittee Closeout Reports |
| FY20 DOT Close-out narrative.pdf |
HFIN 3/25/2019 1:30:00 PM |
HB 39 Subcommittee Closeout Reports |
| DEC-AgencyTotals.pdf |
HFIN 3/25/2019 1:30:00 PM |
HB 39 Subcommittee Closeout Reports |
| DEC-Narrative.pdf |
HFIN 3/25/2019 1:30:00 PM |
HB 39 Subcommittee Closeout Reports |
| DEC-Spreadsheet.pdf |
HFIN 3/25/2019 1:30:00 PM |
HB 39 Subcommittee Closeout Reports |
| DEC-TransactionCompare1.pdf |
HFIN 3/25/2019 1:30:00 PM |
HB 39 Subcommittee Closeout Reports |
| DEC-TransactionCompare2.pdf |
HFIN 3/25/2019 1:30:00 PM |
HB 39 Subcommittee Closeout Reports |
| DEC-Wordage.pdf |
HFIN 3/25/2019 1:30:00 PM |
HB 39 Subcommittee Closeout Reports |
| DOC-AgencyTotals.pdf |
HFIN 3/25/2019 1:30:00 PM |
HB 39 Subcommittee Closeout Reports |
| DOC-Narrative.pdf |
HFIN 3/25/2019 1:30:00 PM |
HB 39 Subcommittee Closeout Reports |
| DOC-Spreadsheet.pdf |
HFIN 3/25/2019 1:30:00 PM |
HB 39 Subcommittee Closeout Reports |
| DOC-TransactionCompare1.pdf |
HFIN 3/25/2019 1:30:00 PM |
HB 39 Subcommittee Closeout Reports |
| DOC-TransactionCompare2.pdf |
HFIN 3/25/2019 1:30:00 PM |
HB 39 Subcommittee Closeout Reports |
| DOC-Wordage.pdf |
HFIN 3/25/2019 1:30:00 PM |
HB 39 Subcommittee Closeout Reports |
| DOE-Spreadsheet.pdf |
HFIN 3/25/2019 1:30:00 PM |
HB 39 Subcommittee Closeout Reports |
| DOE-AgencyTotals.pdf |
HFIN 3/25/2019 1:30:00 PM |
HB 39 Subcommittee Closeout Reports |
| DOE-Narrative.pdf |
HFIN 3/25/2019 1:30:00 PM |
HB 39 Subcommittee Closeout Reports |
| DOE-TransactionCompare1.pdf |
HFIN 3/25/2019 1:30:00 PM |
HB 39 Subcommittee Closeout Reports |
| DOE-TransactionCompare2.pdf |
HFIN 3/25/2019 1:30:00 PM |
HB 39 Subcommittee Closeout Reports |
| DOE-Wordage.pdf |
HFIN 3/25/2019 1:30:00 PM |
|
| DEC-AgencyTotals.pdf |
HFIN 3/25/2019 1:30:00 PM |
HB 39 Subcommittee Closeout Reports |
| DEC-Spreadsheet.pdf |
HFIN 3/25/2019 1:30:00 PM |
HB 39 Subcommittee Closeout Reports |
| DEC-Narrative.pdf |
HFIN 3/25/2019 1:30:00 PM |
HB 39 Subcommittee Closeout Reports |
| DEC-TransactionCompare1.pdf |
HFIN 3/25/2019 1:30:00 PM |
HB 39 Subcommittee Closeout Reports |
| DEC-TransactionCompare2.pdf |
HFIN 3/25/2019 1:30:00 PM |
HB 39 Subcommittee Closeout Reports |
| DEC-Wordage.pdf |
HFIN 3/25/2019 1:30:00 PM |
HB 39 Subcommittee Closeout Reports |
| DFG-Narrative.pdf |
HFIN 3/25/2019 1:30:00 PM |
HB 39 Subcommittee Closeout Reports |
| DFG-AgencyTotals.pdf |
HFIN 3/25/2019 1:30:00 PM |
HB 39 Subcommittee Closeout Reports |
| DFG-Spreadsheet.pdf |
HFIN 3/25/2019 1:30:00 PM |
HB 39 Subcommittee Closeout Reports |
| DFG-TransactionCompare1.pdf |
HFIN 3/25/2019 1:30:00 PM |
HB 39 Subcommittee Closeout Reports |
| DFG-TransactionCompare2.pdf |
HFIN 3/25/2019 1:30:00 PM |
HB 39 Subcommittee Closeout Reports |
| DFG-Wordage.pdf |
HFIN 3/25/2019 1:30:00 PM |
HB 39 Subcommittee Closeout Reports |
| DNR-AgencyTotals.pdf |
HFIN 3/25/2019 1:30:00 PM |
HB 39 Subcommittee Closeout Reports |
| DNR-Narrative.pdf |
HFIN 3/25/2019 1:30:00 PM |
HB 39 Subcommittee Closeout Reports |
| DNR-Spreadsheet.pdf |
HFIN 3/25/2019 1:30:00 PM |
HB 39 Subcommittee Closeout Reports |
| DNR-TransactionCompare1.pdf |
HFIN 3/25/2019 1:30:00 PM |
HB 39 Subcommittee Closeout Reports |
| DNR-TransactionCompare2.pdf |
HFIN 3/25/2019 1:30:00 PM |
HB 39 Subcommittee Closeout Reports |
| DNR-Wordage.pdf |
HFIN 3/25/2019 1:30:00 PM |
HB 39 Subcommittee Closeout Reports |
| DNR-AgencyTotals.pdf |
HFIN 3/25/2019 1:30:00 PM |
HB 39 Subcommittee Closeout Reports |
| DNR-Narrative.pdf |
HFIN 3/25/2019 1:30:00 PM |
HB 39 Subcommittee Closeout Reports |
| DNR-Spreadsheet.pdf |
HFIN 3/25/2019 1:30:00 PM |
HB 39 Subcommittee Closeout Reports |
| DNR-TransactionCompare1.pdf |
HFIN 3/25/2019 1:30:00 PM |
HB 39 Subcommittee Closeout Reports |
| DNR-TransactionCompare2.pdf |
HFIN 3/25/2019 1:30:00 PM |
HB 39 Subcommittee Closeout Reports |
| DNR-Wordage.pdf |
HFIN 3/25/2019 1:30:00 PM |
HB 39 Subcommittee Closeout Reports |
| DOL-AgencyTotals.pdf |
HFIN 3/25/2019 1:30:00 PM |
HB 39 Subcommittee Closeout Reports |
| DOL-Narrative.pdf |
HFIN 3/25/2019 1:30:00 PM |
HB 39 Subcommittee Closeout Reports |
| DOL-Spreadsheet.pdf |
HFIN 3/25/2019 1:30:00 PM |
HB 39 Subcommittee Closeout Reports |
| DOL-TransactionCompare1.pdf |
HFIN 3/25/2019 1:30:00 PM |
HB 39 Subcommittee Closeout Reports |
| DOL-TransactionCompare2.pdf |
HFIN 3/25/2019 1:30:00 PM |
HB 39 Subcommittee Closeout Reports |
| DOL-Wordage.pdf |
HFIN 3/25/2019 1:30:00 PM |
HB 39 Subcommittee Closeout Reports |