Legislature(2007 - 2008)HOUSE FINANCE 519
04/17/2007 01:30 PM House FINANCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB133 | |
| HB159 | |
| HB205 | |
| HB147 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | HB 147 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 159 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 205 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 133 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HOUSE FINANCE COMMITTEE
April 17, 2007
1:43 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER
Co-Chair Meyer called the House Finance Committee meeting to
order at 1:43:41 PM.
MEMBERS PRESENT
Representative Mike Chenault, Co-Chair
Representative Kevin Meyer, Co-Chair
Representative Bill Stoltze, Vice-Chair
Representative Harry Crawford
Representative Richard Foster
Representative Les Gara
Representative Mike Hawker
Representative Reggie Joule
Representative Mike Kelly
Representative Mary Nelson
Representative Bill Thomas Jr.
MEMBERS ABSENT
None
ALSO PRESENT
Speaker John Harris; Representative Bob Buch; Representative
Carl Gatto; Dwayne Peeples, Deputy Commissioner, Department
of Corrections; Charisse Millett, Staff, Representative John
Harris; Sandra Wilson, Intern Staff, Representative Carl
Gatto; Eleanor Wolfe, Staff, Representative Kurt Olson;
Philip Mitchel, State Registrar, Bureau of Vital Statistics,
Department of Health & Social Services; Brett Carlson, Vice
Chair, Alaska Travel Industry Association (ATIA); Stan
Stephens, President, Stan Stephens Wildlife Cruises, Valdez
PRESENT VIA TELECONFERENCE
Richard Olson, Founder, National Stillborn Society, Arizona;
Dave Feeken, Alaska Association of Realtors, Anchorage
SUMMARY
HB 133 An Act relating to requiring electronic monitoring
as a special condition of probation for offenders
whose offense was related to a criminal street
gang.
CS HB 133 (FIN) was reported out of Committee with
a "no recommendation" and with zero note #1 by the
Department of Law and indeterminate notes #2, #3
and #4 by the Department of Administration,
Department of Corrections and Alaska Court System.
HB 147 An Act relating to matching funds in state tourism
marketing contracts with trade associations.
HB 147 was HEARD and HELD in Committee.
HB 159 An Act relating to the issuance of a certificate
of birth resulting in a stillbirth.
HB 159 was HEARD and HELD in Committee.
HB 205 An Act relating to real estate broker and real
estate salesperson licensing; and providing for an
effective date.
HB 205 was HEARD and HELD in Committee.
1:44:38 PM
HOUSE BILL NO. 133
An Act relating to requiring electronic monitoring as a
special condition of probation for offenders whose
offense was related to a criminal street gang.
REPRESENTATIVE BOB BUCH, SPONSOR, referenced the memo he
submitted to the Committee dated 4/12/07, addressing
previous concerns voiced by Representative Hawker. The
issues were addressed during testimony taken in the House
Judiciary Committee. He added that there is nothing
unconstitutional about the bill before the Committee, which
is fiscally responsible.
Representative Hawker noted that he had spoken with the
Department of Law & the law enforcement community regarding
these concerns and thought that the intended application
would be narrowly utilized in the current form.
1:48:19 PM
Co-Chair Chenault mentioned the fiscal note from the
Department of Corrections and asked what the intensive
supervision of the current monitoring system would be.
Representative Buch explained that in the original drafting,
the use of "continuous" caused confusion as well as a fiscal
note. The interpretation by the Department of Corrections
differed from the State Police Department. He recommended a
better way to monitor.
DWAYNE PEEPLES, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS, addressed the continuous monitoring, in which
there would be a 1 to 15 ratio for probation officers. He
discussed other adjustments reducing the pool of potential
bodies by removing the reference to misdemeanors being
charged to the felony category. The fiscal narrative has
remained the same, documenting the pool. Mr. Peeples noted,
currently, the Department is using a 1 to 40 probation
officer ratio for problematic probations, reducing the
numbers. Due to previous bill changes, the Department does
not know when candidates will appear under the Department of
Correction's supervision.
1:52:13 PM
Co-Chair Chenault assumed that the Department of Corrections
would handle juveniles within the program. He understood
that the current ratio, however, was concerned if prisoners
moving outside areas they do not currently live in and how
they would be monitored. Mr. Peeples explained that by
removing the word "continuous", their movements would be
reviewed on a daily basis, making sure they are complying
with the conditions of probation.
Representative Hawker asked if the fiscal note was based on
the 96 offender's currently on probation, asking if it was
the same criteria for the mandatory element. Mr. Peeples
did not know; it is now the current pool & no one in that
pool has passed the aggravating probation factor hurtle.
Representative Hawker inquired if the factor was determined
by the judge at the time of conviction. Mr. Peeples said
yes and that only two have reached that as reported. It is
a moving target & the prosecutors will need to bring it
forward, there is an incentive.
Representative Hawker understood that the bill would have
future advantage. He pointed out that the fiscal note is an
unreasonable assumption and is not supported by the body of
testimony. Mr. Peeples pointed out that the current version
provides a sunset date.
1:58:27 PM
Representative Buch said it is important to place a sunset
in order to determine if the project is functional. The
sunset is five years.
Co-Chair Meyer indicated concern with the size of the note
and asked if three years could work. Representative Buch
said the Department of Corrections indicated three years
would not be long enough to gather and implement required
data.
Representative Thomas asked where the convicts currently
are. Representative Buch replied they are not addressed
through the legal issues of the legislation. HB 133 is the
initial step, providing tools to the police force so that
they can enact some-kind of a stop-gap to prevent
recidivism. Mr. Peeples thought that most are concentrated
in the Anchorage area; no one yet has gone through the
program.
2:02:33 PM
Representative Hawker MOVED to REPORT CS HB 133 (FIN) out of
Committee with individual recommendations and with the
accompanying fiscal notes. There being NO OBJECTION, it was
so ordered.
CS HB 133 (FIN) was reported out of Committee with a "no
recommendation" and with zero note #1 by the Department of
Law and indeterminate notes #2, #3 and #4 by the Department
of Administration, Department of Corrections and Alaska
Court System.
AT EASE: 2:04:04 PM
RECONVENE: 2:05:26 PM
HOUSE BILL NO. 159
An Act relating to the issuance of a certificate of
birth resulting in a stillbirth.
2:05:43 PM
SANDRA WILSON, STAFF & INTERIM, REPRESENTATIVE CARL GATTO,
noted that HB 159 is meant to help bring closure to those
who have suffered the loss of a stillborn child by providing
them a Birth Certificate reflecting that they had a child
who was stillborn. In existing law, parents of a stillborn
child receive a Death Certificate. The bill would allow
parents the option of requesting a certificate of birth for
their child. The Birth Certificate would be optional. She
added that there are an increasing number of states that are
now offering Birth Certificates for parents of stillborns.
Ms. Wilson urged the Committee's support for HB 159.
2:07:39 PM
REPRESENTATIVE CARL GATTO, SPONSOR, spoke to the "darkness"
for those mothers that have stillborn babies. HB 159 would
help provide that family a sense of closure by providing a
document, acknowledging that there was a pregnancy and that
there was a birth.
2:09:58 PM
Representative Gara indicated he supports the idea, however,
asked if it was something that people want. Ms. Wilson
explained that the bill had been requested by a constituent
and since that time, there has been wide support indicated.
Representative Gara asked how women would be notified that
they have the right to apply for the Birth Certificate.
Representative Gatto commented that the legislation has been
implemented in fifteen states, pointing out the birth
certificate would clearly indicate that it was not a live
birth; hence, none would be able to apply for a Permanent
Fund Dividend or State aid.
2:12:43 PM
Co-Chair Chenault acknowledged that loosing a child in still
birth is the same as having a death in the family.
Representative Thomas asked if the effective date would
allow women who in the past that had experienced still
births, to be able to get a certificate. Ms. Wilson
responded that Section F provides language which allows a
parent who has had a still born child to request, through
Vital Statistics, a Birth Certificate and that information
would be taken off the fetal Death Certificate.
Representative Gatto added that the Division of Vital
Statistics was willing to go back and offer that service.
Representative Thomas asked how that would happen.
Representative Joule pointed out that Paragraph F contains
information on retroactive birth information.
Co-Chair Meyer inquired how the 20-week number had been
determined. Representative Gatto noted that when looking at
other state's legislation, 20-weeks was the identifying
length beyond which accounted for. Fetal Death Certificates
are issued at 20 weeks.
2:16:11 PM
Vice Chair Stoltze asked if the bill was intended to only
cover still born births. Representative Gatto responded
that the definition of a still born is death of a baby
carried in the womb. Vice Chair Stoltze questioned the
legal implications of the bill.
Representative Gara was comfortable allowing the Birth
Certificate for those families that had past still born
births. He pointed out that the definition only applies to
that section and would not affect definitions in other
statutes, pointing out on Page 2, Line 15.
2:18:33 PM
PHILIP MITCHEL, STATE REGISTRAR, BUREAU OF VITAL STATISTICS,
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & SOCIAL SERVICES, testified in support
of the bill, noting that they had received requests from
parents to acquire a certificate as proposed. He added that
the Division has addressed retroactivity on the bill.
2:20:05 PM
RICHARD OLSON, (TESTIFIED VIA TELECONFERENCE), FOUNDER,
NATIONAL STILLBORN SOCIETY, ARIZONA, noted that he was a
father of a stillborn birth and after much grief, created
the National Stillbirth Society. He estimated the number of
stillbirths that occur in the United States each year. He
voiced support for the certificate, indicating that the 20-
week number had been agreed upon by all the states and is an
arbitrary point. He emphasized that people really support
and want the proposed legislation.
2:27:20 PM
PUBLIC TESTIMONY CLOSED
Co-Chair Meyer proposed holding the bill in Committee to
deal with the amendment addressing retroactivity. Ms.
Wilson noted that she had checked with the Department of Law
and that language had been redrafted in the House HESS
Committee. Representative Gara supported the language,
stating it is correct. Mr. Mitchel stated that the language
was taken from other states, who passed legislation similar
to HB 159.
HB 159 was HELD in Committee for further consideration.
2:29:23 PM
HOUSE BILL NO. 205
An Act relating to real estate broker and real estate
salesperson licensing; and providing for an effective
date.
ELEANOR WOLFE, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE KURT OLSON, testified
that HB 205 would clarify and strengthen a number of items
in current statute and increase consumer protection in the
buying and selling process of homes. The Association of
Alaska Realtors (AAR) strongly supports the bill. She noted
that the committee substitute contains the changes
recommended by the Division of Occupational Licensing,
Department of Commerce, Community & Economic Development.
2:31:03 PM
Representative Gara referenced Page 3, which provides the
Association the judgment to not suspend a license if they
are convicted of a crime of "dishonesty", which affects
their ability to practice.
2:32:13 PM
DAVE FEEKEN, (TESTIFIED VIA TELECONFERENCE), ALASKA
ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS, ANCHORAGE, stated that HB 205 is
the modernization of existing statutes related to real
estate brokerage, addressing issues of education of real
estate licensees and the supervision relationship between
brokers and licensees.
Sections 1, 4, 5, & 6: Realtors proposes clarifying the
issuing a license to persons convicted of felonies. Current
law is unclear as to time elapses since the completion of a
sentence for those crimes. HB 205 clarifies and
standardizes the 7 years as is required with the broker and
the associate broker license with the language needed to
protect the public from people convicted of felonies.
Additionally, it standardizes language for all license,
broker, associate broker, or sales associate, when a
licensee is convicted of a felony or other crime committed
while licensed under statute, in the judgment of the real
estate commission, if the crime or felony affects the
ability of that person to practice competently and safely,
the commission may revoke it for a period of 7 years.
Section 2: The current requirement for 20 hours of pre-
licensing education is 20 years old, when brokers controlled
the information, however, with the world wide web, nearly
80% of current buyers use the web for their property search,
no home inspections, a couple of loan programs available
from Alaska Housing Finance Corporation (AHFC) have been
replaced by hundreds from all over the country, with no
concerns about wetlands maps, required disclosure of
property condition, predatory lending issues, and that no
one knew that mold endangered mental capacity; the list goes
on.
Mr. Feeken stated that the Real Estate Commission has
continued to increase the required course material for pre-
licensing education, but the number of hours has not
increased. HB 205 would increase the required education
hours from 20 to 40 in order to take the exam. Even at 40
hours, Alaska is the lowest in the country.
Section 3: Additionally, the required topics of Post
Licensing education should be increased from 20 to 30 hours
to adequately teach the required course material. He
pointed out that the Alaska Association supports an increase
in hours verses a reduction in course content, in order to
meet the publics need for competent real estate
practitioners.
Section 7: Multiple Business Operations: The issue of a
single broker owning, operating, or being employed by
multiple corporations or partnerships is further clarified
to require all organizations to share a single physical
address. Many brokerage firms are multiple companies for
insurance and other reasons.
Section 8: Statutes have always stated that brokers are
responsible for the actions of their licensees, until the
Alaska Supreme Court ruled in the 80's that the broker is
not responsible for conduct they had no knowledge of, which
requires the broker to have a written policy and procedure
addressing issues:
1. Require real estate licensees to comply with all real
estate laws
2. Require real estate licensees to act fairly and
honestly in all dealings
3. Require real estate licensees to notify the broker or a
broker designee of any legal dispute or allegation of
wrong-doing from a seller, buyer, lesser, or lessee
4. Require real estate licensees to maintain regular
communication with the broker or a broker designee
Mr. Feeken concluded, in order to implement the education
hour changes, the Association requests an effective date of
Feb 1, 2008, the renewal date for all licensing.
2:37:46 PM
Representative Gara pointed out sections in the bill where
the crimes for which one could loose their license was
changed and asked if that was for the public's best. Mr.
Feeken responded that in the original draft, they only
addressed the sales associate license & was language that
had been added by the Department of Law, wanting to
eliminate specific crimes, while providing the Commission
latitude.
2:39:21 PM
Representative Gara countered that the Department most
likely wanted to give the Commission the discretion to
revoke the license for any felony. He asked if the
Association would object to leaving the language the way it
is, noting that if the felony is already on the books, it be
left there. Mr. Feeken explained that the intent was not to
limit it to five; the Commission needs the authority to
regulate people with a license and those wanting to obtain
the license should not have a felony record. Representative
Gara requested leaving the new language as is, but adding
the inclusion of old language, which provides the Commission
discretion to take away the felons license.
2:41:50 PM
Representative Hawker addressed Section 7 and questioned why
the principal office must share a physical address. Mr.
Feeken explained that there was a problem with a broker that
owned separate businesses at separate locations. The
intention was to make the licensure for a single business.
Representative Hawker suggested that there could be
occasions when successful businesses could have legitimate
occasion to have separate offices. Mr. Feeken replied, in
one Anchorage case, a broker reported to be under the
supervision of a broker in Denver. He voiced support
maintaining the language.
2:45:25 PM
Co-Chair Chenault questioned how many real estate agents had
lost their licenses due to felonies in the last five years.
Mr. Feeken did not respond, but emphasized that it is an
issue of moral turpitude. He noted that the current
Commission denies licenses for Driving While Intoxicated
(DWI's). The intent is to expand the net.
In response to a question by Co-Chair Chenault, Mr. Feeken
observed that the Commission denied a license to a broker
with a multiple DWI record. Co-Chair Chenault said he would
be concerned if a license were denied based on minor
offenses.
2:48:46 PM
Representative Hawker expressed concern with the broadness
of the "moral turpitude" language, since that is indefinable
and objective. Representative Gara agreed with concerns
regarding definable terms.
HB 205 was HELD in Committee for further consideration.
2:51:25 PM
HOUSE BILL NO. 147
An Act relating to matching funds in state tourism
marketing contracts with trade associations.
CHARISSE MILLETT, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE JOHN HARRIS,
explained that the legislation changes the current 50/50 to
90/10 match for tourism funding. The Alaska Travel Industry
Association (ATIA) does not believe that they are able to do
a good job at marketing the State of Alaska at the 50/50
match.
BRETT CARLSON, VICE CHAIR, ALASKA TRAVEL INDUSTRY
ASSOCIATION (ATIA), COLDFOOT, spoke in support of HB 147,
noting that it is a "critical must have" piece of
legislation to the future of the tourism industry.
Mr. Carlson pointed out that Alaska's destination marketing
program is facing a 60% fund cut unless the bill passes.
The focus of HB 147 is to determine language to govern
ATIA's ability to access dollars, changing the level at
which the private sector is required to match dollars. He
provided chart handouts - Tourism Marketing Industry Payment
in Lieu of Taxes (Copy on File.)
Mr. Carlson noted that in 2001, the Millennium plan was
introduced, in which the Alaska tourism industry faced two
options:
· Tax themselves, trusting that future legislatures
would reinvest new travel industry tax dollars back
into destination marketing, or
· Attempt to raise destination marketing funds through
voluntary payments in lieu of taxes, from cruise
ships. That is what ATIA choose.
2:57:46 PM
Mr. Carlson pointed that during the years of a payment in
lieu of taxes scenario, destination marketing did survive,
but did not thrive. ATIA met match through payments in lieu
of taxes. He recommended the need for change.
In recent years, legislators through the vehicle rental tax
and cruise taxes made the tax versus the payment in lieu of
taxes decision. Changes in the tax landscape called for a
return to a more traditional destination funding model.
Mr. Carlson informed members that travelers come to Alaska
and leave their money behind. State and local governments
take a portion and reinvest it, as does private industry.
He maintained that HB 147 returns the legislation to the
norm.
Mr. Carlson continued, $2 million dollars is the level of
non-cruise, pay to play dollars that can be generated by
ATIA. The goal is $20 million, $18 million, which hopefully
will come from the State.
Mr. Carlson stressed that if the State only contributes $8
million, ATIA would still contribute $2 million. There is
incentive to contribute the maximum possible. ATIA's goal
is to have a match that will work this year and in the
future without additional legislative changes. ATIA
believes that the 90/10 match is the answer & will help
prepare Alaska for the future.
3:04:22 PM
Representative Gara questioned the number of ATIA members
that contribute. Mr. Carlson estimated that there is about
1,000 contributing members. Representative Gara observed
then the average would then be about $2,000 each. Mr.
Carlson indicated there are large and small contributors.
Representative Gara asked the percentage of businesses that
pay a corporate tax back to the State. Mr. Carlson did not
know.
3:06:14 PM
Co-Chair Meyer inquired if a bed tax had been considered,
noting that Anchorage collects a bed tax & then pays it into
regional tourism. Mr. Carlson acknowledged that a bed tax
was a potential option. He noted that small businesses are
concerned with additional taxes being reinvested; he
discussed the vehicle rental tax, which initially was not
reinvested.
3:08:21 PM
Co-Chair Meyer advised that car rental tax brings in about
$8 million dollars, of which about $5 million is reinvested
into tourism. He expressed concern that the tourism
industry relies so heavily on support from the General Fund.
STAN STEPHENS, PRESIDENT, STAN STEPHENS WILDLIFE CRUISES,
VALDEZ, spoke in support of HB 147. He noted that the
changes that took place last fall with the new cruise ship
tax initiative changed the financial structure of the ATIA
marketing program. Two-thirds of the ATIM Board represents
small businesses in Alaska reflecting the make-up of
membership. Also, even though the cruise industry
represents the smaller number of board members, they still
voluntarily contributed 60% of State required match. With
the amount of unknowns about the initiative, ATIA's mission
is to find a way to save the marketing program, hence HB
147.
Mr. Stephens continued, in FY07, the total combined funds
from the State and private contributions was $l0 million
dollars; $5 million State matched by $5 million voluntarily
contributed by the travel industry. With the passage of the
cruise ship initiative, the cruise industry will now be
required to pay millions of dollars directly to the State
and no longer is likely to pay a voluntary contribution to
Alaska's travel marketing campaign targeted at the non-
cruise travelers.
3:13:36 PM
Representative Crawford referred to the Cruise ship
Initiative, questioning what would occur if the cruise ship
industry withheld their contribution. Mr. Stephens said
they would have to wait to see, emphasizing the importance
of marketing.
3:14 :53 PM
Co-Chair Meyer questioned if the cruise ship industry would
withhold their support. Mr. Stephens emphasized that all
business must help in the generic marketing program.
3:16:29 PM
In response to a question by Co-Chair Meyer, Mr. Carlson
noted that the cruise ship industry has indicated that they
would not contribute the previous $2 million. Mr. Carlson
stressed that those benefits do not spread evenly into each
area and that the independent visitors must be reached. The
program should be by and for Alaskans, offering vacation
planning and allowing all visitors to connect with the 3,000
plus independent tourism businesses.
3:18:22 PM
Co-Chair Chenault inquired how many tourism businesses exist
statewide. Mr. Carlson estimated that there are between
2,500 to 3,000. He explained that some businesses are so
small that they contribute only to their local tourism
marketing effort.
Co-Chair Chenault commented on the tourism level in Kenai.
Mr. Stephens noted that ATIA does represent all the very
small business statewide even though there are not members.
The State has a responsibility to help all business
advertise.
Co-Chair Meyer commended the track taken, while encouraging
the membership to participate at a higher level.
Representative Kelly noted something must shift. ATIA was
funded at a higher amount than last year; he was intrigued
with the percentage option, but supported the cruise ship
choice.
3:26:33 PM
Representative Hawker observed that the issue appears to be
the passage of the cruise tax, which changed the Industry.
He noted the number of communications from the general
public and the tourism industry was done deliberately and is
off limit funds. Understanding that, he commented that the
cruise industry will pass the tax on to their customers. He
did not have sympathy for that industry. He emphasized that
the concern is "big".
3:30:21 PM
Vice Chair Stoltze mentioned the vehicle rental tax
relationship to the visitor industry and questioned if
"history was being revised". Mr. Carlson recalled that it
was not a tax that the visitor industry supported or
proposed. The final bill did hurt the independent traveler.
There was language added indicating that funds raised would
be placed into a separate account and could be used for
marketing.
Vice Chair Stoltze asked if a lower rate had been proposed
for recreational vehicles. Mr. Carlson said yes, lowered
from 10% to 3% for recreational vehicles only.
In response to a question by Vice Chair Stoltze, Mr. Carlson
commented on the long term vision for Alaska's marketing
program. It would not be bad if the independent small
business, in order to meet their match, could be completely
cruise focused. He wanted to see that the State of Alaska
program become a generic program to help all travelers.
Vice Chair Stoltze asked about language requiring ATIA to
come in at least 10%, if that allows the Department of
Community & Economic Development the required flexibility.
Mr. Carlson determined that should be the minimum.
3:36:35 PM
Representative Gara commented that the legislation initially
"rubbed him the wrong way" when anticipating that the
Industry should not get the rental car tax funds back; he
did not accept that tourism related dollars should be
returned.
3:41:42 PM
Representative Gara commented on his personal frustration on
the $15 million dollar increase request to the tourism
industry. He thought that the industry should be taxed at
the State level. He asked the total amount included in the
operating budget for tourism marketing. Co-Chair Meyer
advised that the State was in for $6 million dollars for the
50/50 match program and another $3 million dollars for the
independent travelers. Representative Kelly pointed out
that the difference comes from the Senate's position. The
House Finance Committee version proposed $6 million dollars
plus $720 thousand for the independent marketing. Mr.
Carlson corrected, the Senate has recommended $8 million and
$1.5 million for the independent traveler portion.
Representative Joule was surprised by the various
approaches. He commented that tourists are no longer coming
to his area. He hoped for an arrangement with the cruise
industry to bring more visitors in. He pointed out that his
district gets about 1,000 tourists a year now. He did not
think that the State's tourism dollars would get to people
off the beaten track. He commented that it was important to
invest in Rural Alaska. He appreciated the effort of the
legislation.
Mr. Stephens concluded that the tourism industry puts about
$20 million dollars into the General Fund. The Industry is
between a rock and hard spot at this time. In FY06, ATIA
placed $1.5 billion dollars into the State's economy. Many
statewide businesses could not survive without tourism
during the summer. If the future holds corporate and
gambling taxes, then maybe there could be funds taken from
those 1090's.
At present time, the gas line is about 10 years away. If
not for the price of oil, Alaska would be hurting. He
thought that tourism was the answer until the gas line comes
on. Alaska has tourism potential and the Legislature needs
to help find that potential. He urged a long range plan,
which includes funding tourism.
3:53:24 PM
HB 147 was HELD in Committee for further consideration.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 3:56 P.M.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|