Legislature(2013 - 2014)HOUSE FINANCE 519

02/21/2013 01:30 PM FINANCE


Download Mp3. <- Right click and save file as

* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ HB 24 SELF DEFENSE TELECONFERENCED
Heard & Held
-- Testimony <Invitation Only> --
- Initial Hearing
+ HB 35 HOME HEATING CONVERSION LOANS TELECONFERENCED
Heard & Held
+ HB 75 CONTRIBUTION FROM PFD: AUDITS; UNIVERSITY TELECONFERENCED
Scheduled But Not Heard
+ Bills Previously Heard/Scheduled TELECONFERENCED
                  HOUSE FINANCE COMMITTEE                                                                                       
                     February 21, 2013                                                                                          
                         2:18 p.m.                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
2:18:34 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
CALL TO ORDER                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair Stoltze called the House Finance Committee meeting                                                                     
to order at 2:18 p.m.                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
MEMBERS PRESENT                                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
Representative Alan Austerman, Co-Chair                                                                                         
Representative Bill Stoltze, Co-Chair                                                                                           
Representative Mark Neuman, Vice-Chair                                                                                          
Representative Mia Costello                                                                                                     
Representative Les Gara                                                                                                         
Representative Lindsey Holmes                                                                                                   
Representative Scott Kawasaki, Alternate                                                                                        
Representative Cathy Munoz                                                                                                      
Representative Steve Thompson                                                                                                   
Representative Tammie Wilson                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
MEMBERS ABSENT                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
Representative Bryce Edgmon                                                                                                     
Representative David Guttenberg                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
ALSO PRESENT                                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
Brandon  Brefczynski,  Aide, Representative  Tammie  Wilson;                                                                    
Stacy Schubert, Director,  Governmental Relations and Public                                                                    
Affairs, Alaska  Housing Finance Corporation,  Department of                                                                    
Revenue; Rex Shattuck, Aide, Representative Mark Neuman.                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
PRESENT VIA TELECONFERENCE                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Brian   Judy,   Senior   State   Liaison,   National   Rifle                                                                    
Association.                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
SUMMARY                                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
HB  24    SELF DEFENSE                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
          HB 24 was HEARD and HELD in committee for further                                                                     
          consideration.                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
HB  35    HOME HEATING CONVERSION LOANS                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
          HB 35 was HEARD and HELD in committee for further                                                                     
          consideration.                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
HB  75    CONTRIBUTION FROM PFD: AUDITS; UNIVERSITY                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
          HB 75 was SCHEDULED but not HEARD.                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
HOUSE BILL NO. 35                                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
     "An Act creating a low-interest loan program for                                                                           
     homeowners who improve or replace their home heating                                                                       
     systems; and providing for an effective date."                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
2:20:33 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Representative Wilson stated  that HB 35 will  create a low-                                                                    
interest  loan  program,  providing Alaskans  an  affordable                                                                    
avenue  for converting  their current  heating  system to  a                                                                    
more efficient  heating system. She pointed  to some letters                                                                    
of  support  from  different communities  and  organizations                                                                    
across the state (copies on file).                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
BRANDON  BREFCZYNSKI,  AIDE, REPRESENTATIVE  TAMMIE  WILSON,                                                                    
explained  that  HB 35  established  under  HB 35  would  be                                                                    
overseen by  the Alaska Housing Finance  Corporation (AHFC),                                                                    
allowing qualified  applicants, regardless of  income level,                                                                    
to  receive  up  to  a   $15,000  loan  for  a  new  heating                                                                    
appliance,  including  the  costs of  labor  and  materials.                                                                    
Conditions of the loan are  set at one percent interest over                                                                    
a ten  year term. The loan  program is open to  all forms of                                                                    
heating  systems,  allowing  homeowners to  convert  to  the                                                                    
available low-cost  heating methods within  their community.                                                                    
An  additional  benefit  of  HB 35  will  be  the  program's                                                                    
effects on  a community's  air quality. Currently,  the U.S.                                                                    
Environmental  Protection  Agency  (EPA)  has  declared  the                                                                    
Fairbanks North  Star Borough (FNSB) a  PM 2.5 nonattainment                                                                    
area.  This  designation  has serious  economic  development                                                                    
impacts. One example  of such impacts is  the potential loss                                                                    
of  Federal  highway  funding.   By  converting  to  cleaner                                                                    
heating systems, such as natural  gas, the FNSB will be able                                                                    
to apply  the loan program  of HB 35 towards  their required                                                                    
EPA state  implementation plan to mitigate  the existing air                                                                    
quality  concerns. I  urge your  support  of HB  35 to  help                                                                    
provide Alaska's homes and  families with cleaner, efficient                                                                    
and affordable heating options.                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
Representative  Costello   wondered  how  the   program  was                                                                    
different from other AHFC programs.                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
2:23:53 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
STACY SCHUBERT, DIRECTOR,  GOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS AND PUBLIC                                                                    
AFFAIRS, ALASKA  HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION,  DEPARTMENT OF                                                                    
REVENUE, explained that  the loan program proposed  in HB 35                                                                    
was  a $30,000  loan  program,  but had  short  terms and  a                                                                    
current 3.75 interest rate.                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair Stoltze wondered  how HB 35 was  different than the                                                                    
other AHFC Home Energy  Rebate program, specifically related                                                                    
to furnace  replacement. Ms. Schubert replied  that the Home                                                                    
Energy  Rebate Program  offered  up to  $10,000 returned  to                                                                    
homeowners  who  chose  to participate;  but  the  homeowner                                                                    
would only  receive the  rebate after  an energy  rating was                                                                    
complete.  She stated  that  the upgrades  to  the home  may                                                                    
include   a  furnace   replacement,  insulation,   etc.  She                                                                    
stressed that the $10,000 may  not completely cover the cost                                                                    
of   the  homeowner   investment,   because   most  of   the                                                                    
participants in the Home Energy  Rebate Program spend around                                                                    
$6,000 out-of-pocket.                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
Representative Wilson  remarked that some people  may choose                                                                    
to  participate in  the Home  Energy  Rebate Program  rather                                                                    
than the proposed loan in HB 35.                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair  Stoltze  wondered if  the  two  programs could  be                                                                    
combined.  Ms.   Schubert  replied  that   homeowners  could                                                                    
participate in both programs.                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
2:27:19 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Representative Kawasaki looked at page  2, lines 2 and 4. He                                                                    
wondered  if  increasing  energy   efficiency  of  the  home                                                                    
specifically  referred to  efficiency of  the heating  unit.                                                                    
Representative  Wilson  replied  that  the  intent  of  that                                                                    
language  was  specific to  the  efficiency  of the  heating                                                                    
unit.                                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
Representative Kawasaki felt that  language was not specific                                                                    
enough.                                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
Representative  Kawasaki surmised  that the  intent of  bill                                                                    
was  to  provide  money  for  individuals  with  inefficient                                                                    
heaters to  upgrade to  an efficient  system. Representative                                                                    
Wilson replied  that the  intent of  the legislation  was to                                                                    
allow for cost and energy efficiency.                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
Representative  Kawasaki wondered  if someone  could qualify                                                                    
for the  loan, if  they intended to  install a  coal burning                                                                    
heater  that   was  more  efficient   than  a   gas  heater.                                                                    
Representative  Wilson responded  that in  order to  qualify                                                                    
for  an AHFC  program,  the system  must  me automated.  She                                                                    
furthered that if  the heater was an  automated coal system,                                                                    
it could  qualify for  the program.  She furthered  that the                                                                    
automated systems that were installed  in Fairbanks met air-                                                                    
quality standards.                                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
Representative  Kawasaki  wondered  if homes  that  did  not                                                                    
already have a heating unit  installed would qualify for the                                                                    
program. Representative Wilson replied  that the program was                                                                    
intended  for   upgrades  only,  therefore   upgrading  from                                                                    
nothing would not be considered an "upgrade."                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
Representative  Kawasaki looked  at the  income limitations,                                                                    
and  wondered  if there  was  a  consideration for  allowing                                                                    
lower  income  applicants  to participate  in  the  program.                                                                    
Representative    Wilson   replied    that   the    Interior                                                                    
Weatherization  program  was  available  for  extremely  low                                                                    
income  individuals to  have their  furnaces replaced  at no                                                                    
cost.  She remarked  that  the bill's  intent  was to  allow                                                                    
homeowners  to take  advantage of  Alaska's  new sources  of                                                                    
energy.                                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
Representative  Gara expressed  appreciation  that the  bill                                                                    
was geared toward all Alaskan communities.                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
Representative Munoz wondered  how much capitalization would                                                                    
be  required  to  fund the  program.  Representative  Wilson                                                                    
deferred to Ms. Schubert.                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
2:32:33 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Ms.  Schubert furthered  that AHFC  could not  determine how                                                                    
many  homes  may  participate  in   the  program,  which  is                                                                    
reflected in the indeterminate fiscal note.                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
Representative Munoz  wondered if the 1  percent interest on                                                                    
the  loan  program was  sufficient  to  cover the  costs  of                                                                    
administration. Ms.  Schubert responded that  AHFC estimated                                                                    
a  10 percent  administration fee.  She explained  that AHFC                                                                    
would partner  with a financial institution,  so individuals                                                                    
could request the loan through the institution.                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
Representative Munoz wondered if  the 10 percent referred to                                                                    
the loan  or the fund.  Ms. Schubert replied that  she meant                                                                    
10 percent of the appropriation.                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
Representative Holmes surmised that  the homeowner would not                                                                    
be  required  to upgrade  their  system,  regardless of  the                                                                    
inspector's findings.  Representative Wilson replied  in the                                                                    
affirmative,   but  could   be  dealt   with  through   AHFC                                                                    
regulations.                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Representative  Holmes  wondered  if  AHFC  would  have  the                                                                    
ability  to write  regulations that  would require  findings                                                                    
under the  bill's language. Ms. Schubert  responded that the                                                                    
Home  Energy  Rebate Program  had  thresholds  in place  for                                                                    
certain efficiency requirements for  the maximum rebate. She                                                                    
remarked  that  AHFC  would  not  foresee  the  drafting  of                                                                    
regulations   that  created   a   requirement,  unless   the                                                                    
legislature created an amendment.                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
Representative Holmes felt that  the bill's language allowed                                                                    
for loan-approval,  regardless of the  inspector's findings.                                                                    
Representative  Wilson  felt   that  individuals  would  not                                                                    
participate  in the  program, unless  they had  a need.  She                                                                    
remarked  that  it  was  a loan  program.  She  stated  that                                                                    
individuals would  not participate  in the program,  if they                                                                    
did not have the need to  upgrade, because it would put them                                                                    
further into debt.                                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
Representative  Holmes  looked  at  page  2,  line  19,  and                                                                    
wondered  if   that  language  allowed   prepayment  without                                                                    
interest. Ms. Schubert responded that  all of the AHFC loans                                                                    
allowed  for prepayment  without penalty,  and the  proposed                                                                    
program would be implemented in the same manner.                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
Representative  Kawasaki  looked  at wondered  if  a  person                                                                    
could qualify for  the loan, if their home did  not have the                                                                    
current natural hookup capability.                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
2:37:42 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair  Stoltze  stated  that  there  were  many  ways  to                                                                    
convert a home to natural  gas, including propane to natural                                                                    
gas conversion.                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
Representative Wilson furthered that  she would provide more                                                                    
information  regarding natural  gas  conversion language  in                                                                    
the bill.                                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
Representative  Kawasaki felt  that natural  gas energy  was                                                                    
important to Fairbanks'  future. He wondered if  there was a                                                                    
possibility to upgrade,  even if the natural  gas supply did                                                                    
not  reach  the  individual's  home.  Representative  Wilson                                                                    
anticipated that  the first applicants to  the program would                                                                    
be individuals who had access to a natural gas supply.                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair  Stoltze  wondered how  the  10  percent that  AHFC                                                                    
would  use  for  administration  would be  outlined  in  the                                                                    
portfolio. Ms. Schubert  responded that page 3,  lines 1 and                                                                    
2 of the  bill stated that the interest from  loans shall be                                                                    
deposited  in  the  general  fund.  She  remarked  that  the                                                                    
proposed program was not a revolving fund.                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair Stoltze  understood that  the program would  not be                                                                    
revolving, because it  only held a 1  percent interest rate.                                                                    
He stated that the committee  would hear more about the bill                                                                    
at a later date.                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
Representative  Wilson  stressed that  program  participants                                                                    
would not  be required to  dispose of their  current heating                                                                    
system. She furthered  that the new system would  need to be                                                                    
the  primary heating  system, but  the old  system could  be                                                                    
used as a secondary heating method.                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair Stoltze  wondered if two  heating systems  could be                                                                    
redundant  in this  program.  Representative Wilson  replied                                                                    
that the new  system was required to be  the primary source,                                                                    
but the secondary heating system could remain in place.                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
HB  35  was   HEARD  and  HELD  in   committee  for  further                                                                    
consideration.                                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
HOUSE BILL NO. 24                                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
     "An Act relating to self-defense in any place where a                                                                      
     person has a right to be."                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
2:44:31 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Vice-Chair Neuman stated  that HB 24 added  the language "in                                                                    
any other  place where a  person has  the right to  be" they                                                                    
have  a  right  to   defend  themselves.  He  remarked  that                                                                    
Alaskans  had  the  right   to  defend  themselves,  without                                                                    
worrying about how the court may see their actions.                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
2:45:51 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REX  SHATTUCK, AIDE,  REPRESENTATIVE MARK  NEUMAN, explained                                                                    
that Alaska Statutes already recognize  that we have a right                                                                    
to  use deadly  force  to protect  our  family, person,  and                                                                    
property.  HB 24  further clarifies  that  right exists  not                                                                    
only in our home but also in  any other place that we have a                                                                    
right  to be.  This legislation  clarifies the  individuals'                                                                    
right  to  stand  their  ground and  not  second  guess  the                                                                    
consequence  of  protecting  their  family or  self.  HB  24                                                                    
strengthens the legal recognition of  a basic human right to                                                                    
defend oneself,  by sending a  message to the  Judiciary and                                                                    
Law Enforcement that it is the  criminal who has the duty to                                                                    
retreat.                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
Mr. Shattuck  stated that federal  law, "Stand  Your Ground"                                                                    
and "No Duty to Retreat"  governed the United States federal                                                                    
case  law in  which  self-defense was  asserted against  the                                                                    
charge  of a  criminal  homicide. He  referred  to the  1895                                                                    
Supreme Court  ruling of  the Beard vs.  US case.  That case                                                                    
included  a ruling  with the  language  that a  man who  was                                                                    
"where he  had the right  to be"  when he came  under attack                                                                    
and  "did  not  provoke  the   assault,  and  had  the  time                                                                    
reasonable  grounds,  and in  good  faith  believe that  the                                                                    
deceased intended  to take  his life, or  do him  great body                                                                    
harm, was  not obligated to  retreat, nor to  consider where                                                                    
he safely retreat to, but  was entitled to stand his ground.                                                                    
He also referred  to a Minnesota case,  "State vs. Gardner."                                                                    
In this  case, a man was  acquitted for killing man  who had                                                                    
attempted to kill him with a  rifle. The judge for that case                                                                    
explained  that the  doctrine of  "retreat to  the wall"  or                                                                    
"duty  to  retreat"  had its  origin  in  medieval  England,                                                                    
before the general introduction  of guns. The judge stressed                                                                    
that  the  "duty  to  retreat" had  general  regard  to  the                                                                    
general use and type weapon.                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Representative Thompson  wondered how many other  states had                                                                    
similar  laws like  the proposed  legislation. Mr.  Shattuck                                                                    
replied  that there  were more  than  17 states  that had  a                                                                    
similar law,  but deferred to  Mr. Judy for a  more accurate                                                                    
count.                                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
Representative Thompson wondered if  the bill would enable a                                                                    
person to use  deadly force to protect a victim  of a crime.                                                                    
Mr.  Shattuck  responded  that  the  statutes  already  make                                                                    
provisions for that concern.                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
2:53:16 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
BRIAN   JUDY,   SENIOR   STATE   LIAISON,   NATIONAL   RIFLE                                                                    
ASSOCIATION  (via teleconference),  stated  that  HB 24  was                                                                    
important  self-defense legislation.  He  explained that  it                                                                    
would provide that  a law abiding person,  who was justified                                                                    
in  using  deadly force  in  self-defense,  had no  duty  to                                                                    
retreat from an  attack from any place a person  had a legal                                                                    
right  to  be.  He  reiterated   that  the  person  must  be                                                                    
justified  in   using  deadly  force.   He  felt   that  the                                                                    
opposition to  the bill  ignored the  point that  the person                                                                    
could only  use deadly  force for  a justifiable  reason. He                                                                    
explained  that existing  Alaska law  already provided  that                                                                    
there  was  no  duty  to  retreat,  if  a  person,  who  was                                                                    
justified, was on premises which  the person owns or leases,                                                                    
or in a building where they  work. He stressed that a person                                                                    
would  be required  to retreat,  if they  were in  any other                                                                    
location.  He   remarked  that  there  were   currently  two                                                                    
considerations  that a  person  must take  into account:  1)                                                                    
Justification, which  was the  primary and  most significant                                                                    
consideration;  and   2)  Retreat,   which  was   much  less                                                                    
significant. He felt that the  only time "retreat" becomes a                                                                    
consideration  is  once a  person  felt  justified in  using                                                                    
deadly  force   in  self-defense.   He  stressed   that  the                                                                    
legislation  would   only  amend   the  subsection   (b)  AS                                                                    
11.81.335.  He remarked  that all  of the  statutes detailed                                                                    
the  legal framework  for what  constitutes "justification."                                                                    
He  felt that  it  was  critical to  review  the details  of                                                                    
"justification"  in order  to understand  what the  existing                                                                    
requires  for   a  person   to  claim   "justification."  He                                                                    
explained  that  a person  may  use  deadly force  in  self-                                                                    
defense, only if  a person reasonably believed  that the use                                                                    
of  deadly was  necessary  for  self-defense against  death,                                                                    
serious  physical  injury,  kidnapping, sexual  assault,  or                                                                    
robbery. He noted  that a person must  satisfy, under Alaska                                                                    
case law, both a subjective and an objective standard.                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
Mr. Judy shared that Alaska  statute also outlined a list of                                                                    
activities   that  specifically   preclude  a   person  from                                                                    
claiming justification:  if a person  was engaged  in mutual                                                                    
combat; if  a person  provoked the  other's conduct;  if the                                                                    
person  was the  initial  aggressor; or  if  the person  was                                                                    
involved in gang activity.                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
3:01:40 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Mr. Judy stated  that the NRA believed  that the legislation                                                                    
would reduce  the cost of criminal  prosecution, because the                                                                    
bill did  not change the  primary requirement that  a person                                                                    
using deadly force in  self-defense must have justification.                                                                    
He stressed  that the bill  did not change  what constitutes                                                                    
"justification."  He  stressed  that  once  the  prosecution                                                                    
determined that  there was justification, the  provisions of                                                                    
the bill allowed for the charges to be dropped.                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
Vice-Chair  Neuman thanked  the  committee  for hearing  the                                                                    
bill.   He  reiterated   Mr.   Judy's   points  related   to                                                                    
justification.  He  stressed  that   the  bill  stated  that                                                                    
individuals should  have the same  rights that they  have at                                                                    
home or at work, while at any  place a person has a right to                                                                    
be.                                                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
HB  24  was   HEARD  and  HELD  in   committee  for  further                                                                    
consideration.                                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
HOUSE BILL NO. 75                                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
     "An  Act  repealing   certain  audit  requirements  for                                                                    
     entities  receiving contributions  from permanent  fund                                                                    
     dividends; requiring  each campus of the  University of                                                                    
     Alaska  to apply  to be  included  on the  contribution                                                                    
     list for  contributions from permanent  fund dividends;                                                                    
     and requiring  a university to  pay an  application fee                                                                    
     for each  campus separately listed on  the contribution                                                                    
     list for contributions from permanent fund dividends."                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
HB 75 was SCHEDULED but not HEARD.                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
ADJOURNMENT                                                                                                                   
3:05:13 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
The meeting was adjourned at 3:05 p.m.                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                

Document Name Date/Time Subjects
HB 24 Explanation of Changes.pdf HFIN 2/21/2013 1:30:00 PM
HB 24
HB 24 Sponsor Statement.pdf HFIN 2/21/2013 1:30:00 PM
HB 24
HB 35 Sponsor Statement.pdf HFIN 2/21/2013 1:30:00 PM
HB 35
HB 35 Sierra Research Memo.pdf HFIN 2/21/2013 1:30:00 PM
HB 35
HB 35 Letters of Support.pdf HFIN 2/21/2013 1:30:00 PM
HB 35
HB 35 Fuel Oil Prices.pdf HFIN 2/21/2013 1:30:00 PM
HB 35
HB 35 Fuel Comaprison.pdf HFIN 2/21/2013 1:30:00 PM
HB 35
HB 35 Estimated Savings.pdf HFIN 2/21/2013 1:30:00 PM
HB 35
HB 35 Cost of Living.pdf HFIN 2/21/2013 1:30:00 PM
HB 35
HB 35 Conversion Costs.pdf HFIN 2/21/2013 1:30:00 PM
HB 35
HB 35 AFUE.pdf HFIN 2/21/2013 1:30:00 PM
HB 35
HB 75 Sponsor Statement.pdf HFIN 2/21/2013 1:30:00 PM
HB 75
HB 75 PickClickGive Application 2013.pdf HFIN 2/21/2013 1:30:00 PM
HB 75
HB 75 IRS Form 990 for tax-exempt organizations.pdf HFIN 2/21/2013 1:30:00 PM
HB 75
HB 75 Alaska Statute 43.23.062.pdf HFIN 2/21/2013 1:30:00 PM
HB 75
HB 75 About Pick.Click.Give..pdf HFIN 2/21/2013 1:30:00 PM
HB 75
HB 24 Related Statues on deadly and nondeadly force.docx HFIN 2/21/2013 1:30:00 PM
HB 24
HB 24 Letters of Support, Package 1 (2-15-13).pdf HFIN 2/21/2013 1:30:00 PM
HB 24
HB 35 Letters of Support 2.pdf HFIN 2/21/2013 1:30:00 PM
HB 35
DOC HB 24 Support 2.PDF HFIN 2/21/2013 1:30:00 PM
HB 24
HB 75 Letters of Support - 2014 update.pdf HFIN 2/21/2013 1:30:00 PM
HB 75