Legislature(2021 - 2022)BARNES 124
05/06/2021 08:00 AM House COMMUNITY & REGIONAL AFFAIRS
Note: the audio ![]()
and video ![]()
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HR8 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HR 8 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
ALASKA STATE LEGISLATURE
HOUSE COMMUNITY AND REGIONAL AFFAIRS STANDING COMMITTEE
May 6, 2021
8:04 a.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT
Representative Sara Hannan, Co-Chair
Representative Calvin Schrage, Co-Chair
Representative Josiah Patkotak, Vice Chair
Representative Harriet Drummond
Representative Ken McCarty
Representative Kevin McCabe
MEMBERS ABSENT
Representative Mike Prax
COMMITTEE CALENDAR
HOUSE RESOLUTION NO. 8
Creating the House Task Force on Poverty and Opportunity.
- MOVED CSHR 8(CRA) OUT OF COMMITTEE
PREVIOUS COMMITTEE ACTION
BILL: HR 8
SHORT TITLE: POVERTY AND OPPORTUNITY TASK FORCE
SPONSOR(s): REPRESENTATIVE(s) TARR
04/21/21 (H) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
04/21/21 (H) CRA
05/04/21 (H) CRA AT 8:00 AM BARNES 124
05/04/21 (H) Heard & Held
05/04/21 (H) MINUTE(CRA)
05/06/21 (H) CRA AT 8:00 AM BARNES 124
WITNESS REGISTER
REPRESENTATIVE GERAN TARR
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: As prime sponsor, presented HR 8.
CHARLES MCKEE
No address provided
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified during the hearing on HR 8.
TREVOR STORRS, President/CEO
Alaska Children's Trust
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified during the hearing on HR 8.
CAROL PISCOYA
Kawerak, Inc.
Nome, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified during the hearing on HR 8.
ED MARTIN
Kenai, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified during the hearing on HR 8.
ACTION NARRATIVE
8:04:00 AM
CO-CHAIR SARA HANNAN called the House Community and Regional
Affairs Standing Committee meeting to order at 8:04 a.m.
Representatives Patkotak, Drummond, McCabe, Schrage, and Hannan
were present at the call to order. Representative McCarty
arrived as the meeting was in progress.
HR 8-POVERTY AND OPPORTUNITY TASK FORCE
8:04:41 AM
CO-CHAIR HANNAN announced that the only order of business would
be HOUSE RESOLUTION NO. 8, Creating the House Task Force on
Poverty and Opportunity.
8:05:22 AM
REPRESENTATIVE GERAN TARR, Alaska State Legislature, as prime
sponsor of HR 8, said many people in Alaska are suffering [as a
result of poverty], especially during the pandemic. She said
the idea for HR 8 came from the Rural Alaska Community Action
Program, Inc. ("RurAL CAP"). She said if there are Alaskans
willing to volunteer their time, as suggested under HR 8, she
believes there are options for spending dollars more wisely to
improve outcomes. She mentioned Representatives Patkotak and
McCabe and that issues differ in rural and urban areas. She
spoke of improving service or program delivery in a way that not
only "can overcome people being in desperate situations but also
provide opportunities for people."
8:07:25 AM
REPRESENTATIVE PATKOTAK moved to adopt Amendment 1, labeled 32-
LS0728\B.1, Dunmire, 5/4/21, which read as follows:
Page 4, lines 12 - 13:
Delete all material and insert:
"(4) two members from tribal governments or
tribal nonprofits;
(5) two members from corporations formed
under the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act;"
Renumber the following paragraphs accordingly.
Page 4, line 19, following "members":
Insert ", not from the same municipality,"
Page 4, line 21, following "members":
Insert ", not from the same municipality,"
8:07:30 AM
CO-CHAIR HANNAN objected for discussion purposes.
REPRESENTATIVE PATKOTAK spoke to Amendment 1. He said the
reason for dividing four of the proposed members into two from
tribal governments or tribal nonprofits and two from Native
corporations is because those factors play different economic
roles in the villages. The second part of the amendment would
ensure that there are not two members from the same
municipality, and the reason for that is to ensure geographical
diversity.
8:08:52 AM
REPRESENTATIVE DRUMMOND said she thought Amendment 1 was a good
amendment. She asked how many tribal governments, tribal
nonprofits, and Native corporations there are.
REPRESENTATIVE PATKOTAK answered that he does not have exact
numbers, but explained he was distinguishing the roles of
village and regional economics. In response to follow-up
questions, he shared some history of regional corporations and
the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA), and he
confirmed that any corporation formed under ANCSA could have two
members under Amendment 1.
8:12:37 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE asked for the definition of "municipality"
in order to make a decision on Amendment 1.
8:13:42 AM
REPRESENTATIVE TARR said she was looking for a definition.
8:14:10 AM
REPRESENTATIVE PATKOTAK said the language of Amendment 1
mimicked that of HR 8; however, if desired, he suggested
"subdivision of the state" could be used instead of
"municipality".
CO-CHAIR HANNAN offered her understanding that the definition of
"municipality" is found under statutes pertaining to the
organization of governments.
8:14:34 AM
REPRESENTATIVE TARR cited AS 01.10.060(4), which read as
follows:
(4) "municipality" means a political subdivision
incorporated under the laws of the state that is a
home rule or general law city, a home rule or general
law borough, or a unified municipality;
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE noted that Wasilla has a population of
10,000, but if Knik Fairview is included, that increases the
population to 27,000. He said, "So, there's ... sort of a
little issue here." He told Representative Patkotak, "I think I
know what you're trying to get at, and I'm not sure Wasilla
would fit under what you're trying to get at." He clarified
that he is in favor of Amendment 1 but just wanted "to have a
little clarification on that."
CO-CHAIR HANNAN reminded members that the House Community and
Regional Affairs Standing Committee serves as governing body to
unorganized boroughs and unorganized lands of Alaska. She
offered her understanding that Wasilla is a first-class, home
rule city. She said Knik, while not having its own municipal
government, would still be within the Matanuska-Susitna ("Mat-
Su") Borough.
8:16:46 AM
REPRESENTATIVE PATKOTAK, following up on his previous response
to Representative Drummond, reported that there are 13 regional
corporations, over 200 village corporations, and 229
"legitimately listed" federal recognized tribes; therefore, he
said he thinks "it's fair to break distinction between the two
because they're pretty well balanced."
8:17:11 AM
REPRESENTATIVE DRUMMOND opined that since there are so many
tribal governments, they should have more representation on the
task force proposed under HR 8.
REPRESENTATIVE DRUMMOND moved [Conceptual] Amendment 1 to
Amendment 1, to change "two" to "three" on line 3 and "two" to
"one" on line 4 [lines as numbered on the hard copy of Amendment
1].
8:18:15 AM
REPRESENTATIVE PATKOTAK responded that while he respects the
intent, he thinks that if one of the groups is increased to
three memberships, then the other should be, as well.
8:19:39 AM
REPRESENTATIVE TARR said she is open to that and agrees about
the balance.
REPRESENTATIVE PATKOTAK noted he has sat as a tribal council
member and a village corporation member. He gave an
illustration of how both groups play a role in spending money
and overseeing projects. In response to a question from
Representative McCabe as to whether members of a tribal
government would automatically be part of a corporation, he
explained that anyone who is at least "some kind of Native" can
be part of a tribe. He explained that someone from another
tribe in the Lower 48, a Navajo for example, could move to
Barrow and appeal to become part of the tribe there. He pointed
out that grant money from the federal government is awarded
based on tribal membership. He indicated that membership in
regional village corporations is based on genealogy. A
grandparent born before 1971, which is when ACSA was passed, was
an original shareholder of a corporation. In the '90s, an
amendment to ANCSA allowed "after-borns" - those born after
December 18, 1971 - to be shareholders by proving, for example,
that their grandfather was an original shareholder.
8:24:35 AM
CO-CHAIR SCHRAGE observed that Conceptual Amendment 1 to
Amendment 1 would increase the numbers unequally, yet the
discussion is now focused on having equal representation. He
questioned whether Representative Drummond would like to amend
Conceptual Amendment 1 to Amendment 1.
8:25:10 AM
REPRESENTATIVE DRUMMOND indicated that any further increase in
the total number of the task force may be unwieldy, and that was
not the intent of [Conceptual Amendment 1 to Amendment 1]. She
said she would almost prefer to leave [the total number] of
members from Native corporations, tribal governments, or tribal
nonprofits at four, and "let them decide" along with the Speaker
of the House. She stated, "I feel that on the basis of how many
village corporations and federally recognized tribes there are
that they need to have more representation rather than equal
representation."
REPRESENTATIVE PATKOTAK remarked that he was now more open to
Conceptual Amendment 1 to Amendment 1 after recalling that a lot
of Indian Health Service (HIS) hospitals are compacts of village
tribal governments, which opens up even more representation in
terms of the healthcare system.
8:26:55 AM
The committee took an at-ease from 8:26 a.m. to 8:27 a.m.
8:27:46 AM
REPRESENTATIVE DRUMMOND restated the motion to adopt Conceptual
Amendment 1 to Amendment 1.
CO-CHAIR HANNAN offered her understanding that there had been an
objection by Representative Patkotak.
8:28:03 AM
REPRESENTATIVE PATKOTAK removed his objection. There being no
further objection, Conceptual Amendment 1 to Amendment 1 was
adopted.
8:28:25 AM
REPRESENTATIVE DRUMMOND regarding Amendment 1, as amended, said,
"I am not sure that the items regarding the municipality are
very clear for this organization." She said someone may live in
a borough but not in a municipality, home rule city, or any of
the other small governments within the borough. She explained
that she was uncertain whether "municipality" would be inclusive
of all the various governments in the state.
8:29:35 AM
CO-CHAIR HANNAN stated as follows:
Let me just interject to make sure that we're all
reading that the original bill is not saying you're
from [emphasis on "from"] a municipality; so you work
... [emphasis on "work"] ... in the municipal
government, and then it defines the size of it, so
you've got two categories. ... So, that's one of the
things I think that helps clear it up. There are a
lot of people that live outside a municipal
government, but these two appointees, well, four,
would be people who work for municipal governments,
and I think that narrows the definition, right?
CO-CHAIR HANNAN concluded that there would have to be a
municipal government in order for an individual to work for one,
but that individual might live outside the municipal government
and commute to the municipality for work.
8:30:30 AM
REPRESENTATIVE TARR re-read the definition of municipality. She
said, "The purpose here are people involved with the service
delivery, and that's ... sort of the role they would play in
this task force." She added the goal was to figure out how this
could be done with better outcomes and in a cost-effective
manner.
8:31:26 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MCCARTY directed attention to the phrase, "two
members who work in municipal government", on page 4, line 19,
of HR 8, and he made a distinction between working "in" or "for"
a municipal government.
8:32:00 AM
CO-CHAIR SCHRAGE, while admitting that he was not a lawyer, said
he was not sure there was a distinction made there. In other
words, the language "makes it clear that you work for a
government."
REPRESENTATIVE TARR responded that she thought that was true.
8:32:32 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE suggested focusing on the intent, which he
offered his understanding was to "access somebody that works in
a service level of the government that would be able to help
provide information to this task force on ... sort of what they
do to help out..."
REPRESENTATIVE TARR interjected an affirmation that [desired on
the task force] would be people knowledgeable about program
delivery, what works and does not work, and what is needed.
8:33:16 AM
CO-CHAIR HANNAN gave an example of an individual hired by the
City & Bureau of Juneau, whose work includes serving as a
homelessness coordinator, and she surmised he would make a good
task force member, representing a municipality of over 15,000
and offering insight into those living in poverty.
8:33:50 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MCCARTY asked for clarity on tribal structure.
He asked whether an elder steeped in wisdom would be excluded
because he/she does not work for a municipal government.
8:34:36 AM
REPRESENTATIVE TARR noted that one task force member would be
selected from senior citizens, a category separate from the
others.
8:35:08 AM
REPRESENTATIVE PATKOTAK [moved to adopt Amendment 2] to
Amendment 1, as amended, to replace "not from the same
municipality" with "not representing the same municipality".
The language is found in Amendment 1, as amended, on lines 10
and 13, [as numbered on the hardcopy of Amendment 1].
8:35:50 AM
The committee took an at-ease from 8:35 a.m. to 8:36 a.m.
8:36:31 AM
REPRESENTATIVE PATKOTAK repeated the motion to adopt Amendment 2
to Amendment 1, as amended. There being no objection, Amendment
2 to Amendment 1, as amended, was adopted.
8:37:34 AM
CO-CHAIR HANNAN removed her objection to Amendment 1, as
amended. There being no further objection, Amendment 1, as
amended, was adopted.
8:38:04 AM
CO-CHAIR SCHRAGE moved to adopt Amendment 2, labeled 32-
LS0728\B.2, Dunmire, 5/5/21, which read as follows:
Page 4, line 14:
Delete "one member"
Insert "two members"
Page 4, line 15:
Delete all material.
Renumber the following paragraphs accordingly.
CO-CHAIR HANNAN objected for discussion purposes.
CO-CHAIR SCHRAGE deferred to the sponsor of HR 8.
8:38:16 AM
REPRESENTATIVE TARR explained she originally had considered
offering the proposed legislation as a House joint resolution,
but she indicated the choice to use a House resolution as the
vehicle had to do with "the dynamics of the progress." She said
Amendment 2 would change the number of House members on the task
force from one member of each body to two members from the
House. She further remarked that the current number of proposed
legislators for the task force is "light," but assured that any
legislator would be welcome to attend task force meetings.
8:39:26 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MCCARTY said he liked the resolution as
originally written to include a member from the House and one
from the Senate.
REPRESENTATIVE TARR explained her understanding that the Speaker
of the House cannot appoint a member of the other body;
therefore, since HR 8 is not a joint resolution, that is why the
legislative members appointed on the task force need to be from
the House.
REPRESENTATIVE MCCARTY observed that HR 8 "is not even going to
the other body to consider."
CO-CHAIR HANNAN asked for confirmation that if HR 8 passes in
committee and is adopted on the House floor, "it is a House task
force on poverty versus a legislative task force."
REPRESENTATIVE TARR confirmed that is correct. She reiterated
the issue of timing. She related that she had reached out to
the Senate President but proceeded with a House resolution after
not receiving a response.
8:41:11 AM
REPRESENTATIVE DRUMMOND asked for confirmation that HR 8 is the
House stating its intent to instigate a task force, and it would
not be signed by the governor.
[AN UNIDENTIFIED SPEAKER] said, "Um-hmm."
REPRESENTATIVE TARR pointed to language [from paragraph (7), on
page 5, lines 2-5, of HR 8], which read as follows:
(7) not later than December 31, 2022, the
task force shall deliver to the speaker of the house
of representatives, the president of the senate, the
chief clerk of the house of representatives, and the
senate secretary a final report with legislative
recommendations and notify the legislature that the
report is available.
REPRESENTATIVE TARR said she felt comfortable moving forward,
since the membership of legislators on the proposed task force
would be light.
8:42:16 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MCCARTY asked whether there would be a
differentiation between the two House members, such that one
would be from a rural area and one from an urban area.
REPRESENTATIVE TARR responded that that was a great question.
She noted that there had been discussion regarding partisanship,
but the intent was to "leave it open for any interested member
of the House." She allowed that one urban and one rural House
member may be helpful in terms of representation.
REPRESENTATIVE MCCARTY said he would be willing to offer an
amendment, and then he questioned what the distinction between
urban and rural may be.
REPRESENTATIVE TARR shared her ideas on rural and urban being
geographical, since each representative has roughly the same
number of constituents.
8:44:28 AM
REPRESENTATIVE DRUMMOND proffered that urban areas, such as
Anchorage, are densely populated, while rural areas, such as
Representative Patkotak's district are vast and sparsely
populated in comparison; therefore, she opined that selecting
one urban and one rural member from the House for the task force
would be "a fair ... characterization of ... one of the
differences amongst our districts."
8:45:50 AM
CO-CHAIR SCHRAGE concurred with Representative Drummond. He
suggested one distinction could be a railbelt community. He
indicated he would be agreeable with whatever the committee
decides is the comfortable solution.
8:46:07 AM
REPRESENTATIVE PATKOTAK noted that the Department of Commerce,
Community & Economic Development (DCCED) publishes "economic
opportunity zones," which he observed were "well-balanced" on a
map. He suggested one House member could be chosen from within
an economic opportunity zone and one from outside such a zone,
and that may create the desired balance.
8:46:46 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE suggested the committee may be "getting
into the weeds" with the minutia. He speculated that it is
probably more important to have representatives from the House
who have an interest in the task force regardless of their
politics.
8:47:50 AM
CO-CHAIR SCHRAGE echoed Representative McCabe's remark that the
important thing is to have members on the task force who are
actively engaged. He cautioned putting up too many sideboards.
CO-CHAIR HANNAN described her district as including urban and
rural communities, and she recommended not defining the two
members from the legislative body. She agreed that
fundamentally it is important to have legislators serving on the
task force who have the interest in doing so.
8:49:30 AM
REPRESENTATIVE TARR expressed that her experience attending
meetings of a task force on which she was not a member revealed
to her how some who were members were not in attendance. She
surmised she was more interested because it was an issue on
which she had worked. That said, she expressed hope that the
two House members on the task force would end up being from two
different areas, because "that would add value."
CO-CHAIR HANNAN drew attention to the short time period in which
the task force would be compiled and need to complete its task
and make recommendations - the deadline being December 31, 2022.
8:50:56 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MCCARTY reflected back to Representative Tarr's
mention of one House member being from the majority and one from
the minority, and he said, "I'm good with that, as well."
REPRESENTATIVE TARR replied that she was open to that; she just
had not gotten to know all the legislators, and she left the
number at two, unspecified House members in the end. She agreed
with Representative McCabe about not wanting to choose members
based on which caucus they were apart of if those members had no
interest in working on the task force.
8:52:04 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE said while he appreciated Representative
McCarty's efforts to be all-inclusive, he opined that poverty
does not have politics associated with it and "we need to be
above that." He said the task force membership Representative
Tarr had proposed was already diverse, and he questioned how
necessary it would be to require minority and majority
membership. He reiterated the importance of seeking interested
participants.
8:52:48 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MCCARTY moved to adopt Conceptual Amendment 1 to
Amendment 2, on page 4, line 14, to require of the two members
from the House that one be from the majority and one from the
minority.
REPRESENTATIVE DRUMMOND objected. She pointed out that the
legislature has one member who is not a member of either caucus,
and she questioned, "How do we deal with that?" She stated her
preference to leave the resolution as is, so that the two
members from the House serving on the task force can be those
interested in doing so.
8:54:05 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MCCARTY said Representative Drummond brought up a
good point about not all members of the legislature being part
of the majority or minority. For that reason, he stated that he
would withdraw the motion to adopt Conceptual Amendment 1 to
Amendment 2.
8:54:41 AM
CO-CHAIR HANNAN removed her objection to the motion to adopt
Amendment 2. There being no further objection, Amendment 2 was
adopted.
8:55:25 AM
CO-CHAIR HANNAN opened public testimony on HR 8, as amended.
8:55:58 AM
CHARLES MCKEE, testified that "this is not a remedy." He noted
he had submitted written testimony. He opined that there is "a
mental condition that gets ... woven into a group of people that
cause poverty to begin with." He mentioned "injunction by
court" and posited that "you're not using these injunctions
appropriately."
8:58:58 AM
TREVOR STORRS, President/CEO, Alaska Children's Trust, advised
that "one of the most effective ways of preventing child abuse
and neglect is by addressing the social determinants that foster
an environment that promotes trauma and discourages building the
skills necessary to manage it." He said Alaska ranks thirty-
sixth in the nation for child overall well-being and thirty-
fourth for family economic well-being. He said growing up in
poverty is a major barrier to healthy child development,
increasing the likelihood of poor academic, cognitive, and
health outcomes. He offered statistics about childhood poverty
in Alaska in 2018. He said the pandemic has magnified issues;
families are struggling to have food and shelter, and nearly 20
percent of adults in Alaska living in households with children
"have little or no confidence in their ability to pay the next
rent or mortgage payment." He added that 38 percent have
difficulty paying typical monthly household expenses.
MR. STORRS stated that federal poverty guidelines do not account
for costs related to health insurance, child care, and other
necessities such as Internet access. He said, "Behind every
statistic there's a child going to bed with an empty belly, a
single mother unable to take her child to the pediatrician, and
youth who do not see a viable career without a college or trade
education, which all cost money." He emphasized the importance
of addressing the "structural reasons that are causing these
numbers." He expressed how easy it is to write off those in
poverty as having made wrong life choices or to say they should
just pull themselves up by their bootstraps. He reminded
everyone that some do not have boots, let alone bootstraps. He
talked about HR 8 as putting focus on solutions to poverty and
providing opportunity. He concluded, "Alaska needs to take a
comprehensive approach and create opportunity for economic
mobility, provide hope, and collectively ensure all children,
youth, and families in Alaska have the chance and tools they
need to thrive."
9:02:02 AM
CAROL PISCOYA, Kawerak, Inc., gave a brief overview on Kawerak,
Inc. She shared her sources for information were primarily from
a Bering Strait community needs assessment completed in 2019,
with additional information from DCCED, the Department of Labor
& Workforce Development (DLWD), and the 2010 Census. Regarding
poverty and opportunity, she said overcrowding is an issue; 30
percent of households are overcrowded, with some regions
experiencing overcrowding in up to 60 percent of households.
She said housing is expensive, homeowners pay 30 percent of
their income on housing. She talked about the age of houses and
the lack of water services in some communities, which means
little or no sanitation. She named issues related to poverty,
including housing, water, sewer, substance abuse, health impacts
due to alcohol and drugs, limited economic opportunity,
inadequate public safety, high turnover of teachers, limited
treatment for mental illness, and more, and she said the
pandemic has magnified many of these issues. She stated that
Kawerak, Inc. fully supports a fact-finding task force that can
come up with solutions for its region.
9:06:05 AM
ED MARTIN testified that he read the sponsor statement, and he
said the war on poverty "hasn't done the job that Lyndon Baines
Johnson enacted ... by federal law in '64." He posited that the
permanent fund dividend (PFD) has helped to bring people in
Alaska out of poverty, and not receiving PFDs pushed some
Alaskans across the poverty line. He noted the sponsor
statement mentions COVID-19 and people losing their jobs. He
said the government wants "to save us all" and yet "they don't
do much to actually help us." He speculated that the war [on
poverty] is probably one of the worst being taken on. He said
he thinks [the task force] is worth having but advised, "Let's
make it quick, because we're not getting any further ahead ...
with this so-called war on poverty, and a lot of it we can't
cure." He explained there will never be 100 percent employment
or eradication of abuse and fraud and waste. He suggested
keeping the task force limited in size for the sake of
efficiency.
9:09:23 AM
CO-CHAIR HANNAN, after ascertaining that there was no one else
who wished to testify, closed public testimony on HR 8, as
amended.
9:10:03 AM
REPRESENTATIVE TARR expressed thanks for the great discussion
and testimony and said she felt positive about the task force.
9:10:51 AM
CO-CHAIR SCHRAGE moved to report HR 8, as amended, out of
committee with individual recommendations and the accompanying
zero fiscal note. There being no objection, CSHR 8(CRA) was
reported out of the House Community and Regional Affairs
Standing Committee.
9:13:46 AM
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the committee, the House
Community and Regional Affairs Standing Committee meeting was
adjourned at 9:14 a.m.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HR 8 Amendment Patkotak 5.4.2021.pdf |
HCRA 5/6/2021 8:00:00 AM |
HR 8 |
| HR 8 Supporting Documents.pdf |
HCRA 5/4/2021 8:00:00 AM HCRA 5/6/2021 8:00:00 AM |
HR 8 |
| HR 8 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HCRA 5/4/2021 8:00:00 AM HCRA 5/6/2021 8:00:00 AM |
HR 8 |
| HR 8 Zero Fiscal Note.pdf |
HCRA 5/4/2021 8:00:00 AM HCRA 5/6/2021 8:00:00 AM |
HR 8 |
| HR 8 Version A.PDF |
HCRA 5/4/2021 8:00:00 AM HCRA 5/6/2021 8:00:00 AM |
HR 8 |
| HR 8 Letters of Support 5.6.21.pdf |
HCRA 5/4/2021 8:00:00 AM HCRA 5/6/2021 8:00:00 AM |
HR 8 |
| HR 8 Amendment B.2.pdf |
HCRA 5/6/2021 8:00:00 AM |
HR 8 |