Legislature(2021 - 2022)BARNES 124
04/27/2021 08:00 AM House COMMUNITY & REGIONAL AFFAIRS
Note: the audio ![]()
and video ![]()
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB16 | |
| HB11 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| *+ | HB 16 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 11 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
ALASKA STATE LEGISLATURE
HOUSE COMMUNITY AND REGIONAL AFFAIRS STANDING COMMITTEE
April 27, 2021
8:03 a.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT
Representative Sara Hannan, Co-Chair
Representative Calvin Schrage, Co-Chair
Representative Harriet Drummond
Representative Ken McCarty
Representative Kevin McCabe
MEMBERS ABSENT
Representative Josiah Patkotak, Vice Chair
Representative Mike Prax
COMMITTEE CALENDAR
HOUSE BILL NO. 16
"An Act relating to the right of first refusal of a volunteer
search and rescue group with respect to surplus state property."
- HEARD & HELD
HOUSE BILL NO. 11
"An Act relating to assault in the third and fourth degrees; and
relating to reckless endangerment."
- HEARD & HELD
PREVIOUS COMMITTEE ACTION
BILL: HB 16
SHORT TITLE: SEARCH AND RESCUE SURPLUS STATE PROPERTY
SPONSOR(s): REPRESENTATIVE(s) JOHNSON
02/18/21 (H) PREFILE RELEASED 1/8/21
02/18/21 (H) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
02/18/21 (H) CRA, STA
04/27/21 (H) CRA AT 8:00 AM BARNES 124
BILL: HB 11
SHORT TITLE: DEFENSIVE DISPLAY OF FIREARM
SPONSOR(s): REPRESENTATIVE(s) RAUSCHER
02/18/21 (H) PREFILE RELEASED 1/8/21
02/18/21 (H) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
02/18/21 (H) CRA, STA, JUD
04/27/21 (H) CRA AT 8:00 AM BARNES 124
WITNESS REGISTER
REPRESENTATIVE DELENA JOHNSON
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: As prime sponsor, presented HB 16.
SAVAYA BIEBER, Staff
Representative DeLena Johnson
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Explained the changes made under a proposed
committee substitute for HB 16 on behalf of Representative
Johnson, prime sponsor.
MARK STIGAR, President
Alaska Search and Rescue Association
City & State
POSITION STATEMENT: Answered questions during the hearing on HB
16.
THOR VUE, Chief Procurement Officer
Office of Procurement and Property Management
Department of Administration
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Responded to questions during the hearing
on HB 16.
LIEUTENANT PAUL FUSSEY, Search and Rescue Coroner
Alaska State Troopers
Department of Public Safety
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Answered questions during the hearing on HB
16.
REPRESENTATIVE GEORGE RAUSCHER
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: As prime sponsor, offered the sponsor
statement for HB 11.
JESSE LOGAN, Staff
Representative George Rauscher
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Offered a sectional analysis for HB 11 and
responded to questions on behalf of Representative Rauscher,
prime sponsor.
ACTION NARRATIVE
8:03:56 AM
CO-CHAIR CALVIN SCHRAGE called the House Community and Regional
Affairs Standing Committee meeting to order at 8:03 a.m.
Representatives McCarty, Drummond, McCabe, Hannan, and Schrage
were present at the call to order.
HB 16-SEARCH AND RESCUE SURPLUS STATE PROPERTY
8:04:42 AM
CO-CHAIR SCHRAGE announced that the first order of business
would be HOUSE BILL NO. 16, "An Act relating to the right of
first refusal of a volunteer search and rescue group with
respect to surplus state property."
8:05:09 AM
CO-CHAIR HANNAN moved to adopt the proposed committee substitute
(CS) for HB 16, Version 32-LS0128\B, Bannister, 4/19/21, as a
work draft.
8:05:21 AM
CO-CHAIR SCHRAGE objected for the purpose of discussion.
8:05:32 AM
REPRESENTATIVE DELENA JOHNSON, Alaska State Legislature, as
prime sponsor, presented HB 16. She explained that there is
similar legislation making its way through the Senate, and the
proposed CS was created to conform with the bill in the Senate.
She said the CS would broaden the scope of search and rescue
groups contained under the proposed legislation. In response to
Co-Chairs Hannan and Schrage, she said she thinks the changes
that would be made under the proposed CS are good.
8:08:49 AM
SAVAYA BIEBER, Staff, Representative DeLena Johnson, Alaska
State Legislature, explained the changes made under a proposed
committee substitute for HB 16 on behalf of Representative
Johnson, prime sponsor. She said there are 1,100 search and
rescue groups across Alaska that do the following rescue
missions: avalanche, flood, grid rescues, lost sailors and
hikers, and people trapped in collapsed buildings. The rescue
groups receive little to no financial compensation. The
proposed legislation would allow these groups to exercise first
right to obtain surplus state property that may be necessary to
carry out search and rescue missions after state agencies have
had the opportunity to buy the property.
MS. BIEBER explained that the Department of Public Safety (DPS)
would decide what property is necessary for the rescue groups,
and the Department of Administration (DOA) would choose
regulations and price. Groups approved by DOA would receive a
list of items going up for auction. She offered further details
about the auction process, including that the items would be
available to the search and rescue groups for 7-14 days before
they are made available to the general public. She noted people
available for questions.
8:10:43 AM
The committee took an at-ease from 8:10 a.m. to 8:12 a.m.
8:12:03 AM
CO-CHAIR SCHRAGE announced that the committee would hear invited
testimony.
8:12:18 AM
MARK STIGAR, President, Alaska Search and Rescue Association,
listed his experience in search and rescue, including
volunteering with "MAT+SAR Search & Rescue" in the Matanuska-
Susitna ("Mat-Su") Valley, training and safety board member,
canine handler, and incident commander. He said he retired from
running the Alaska Army National Guard Aviation Program, which
uses Blackhawk helicopters, and he was involved in hundreds of
search and rescue and medivac operations in his 10 years with
the guard. He noted that unique to Alaska is that all land
search and rescue fall under the Alaska State Troopers, while in
other states they fall under county sheriffs.
MR. STIGAR said the Alaska Search and Rescue Association (ASRA)
is the Alaska State Trooper's search and rescue first
responders, and it operates with little or no funding, other
than limited reimbursement from the Alaska State Troopers for
fuel, plane tickets, and [costs resulting from] minor equipment
damage. Many times ASRA runs the search. To be effective, its
volunteers need equipment beyond their personally owned trucks,
all-terrain vehicles (ATVs), and boats. He said ASRA was losing
its certification for its canines. He explained the process by
which a canine works on a boat with humans and can detect human
remains under water, but said the person with a boat left the
search team. All other expenses are out of pocket or gained
through fund-raising. Mr. Stigar said ASRA is looking at HB 16
as a means to gain benefits found in other states, wherein basic
equipment is available to conduct searches. He offered to
answer questions.
8:15:21 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE relayed his experience 30 years ago
handling a search dog. He asked whether "govdeals.com" would
allow search and rescue volunteers access to federal surplus
items, as well as state.
MR. STIGAR responded that he has gone through the process "to
get MAT+SAR on that list" and periodically it receives "an e-
mail from them." Generally the surplus items available are
office equipment.
REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON suggested someone from DOA could add to
Mr. Stigar's response.
8:17:25 AM
THOR VUE, Chief Procurement Officer, Office of Procurement and
Property Management, Department of Administration, confirmed
that volunteer rescue groups could get federal surplus items
from govdeals.com, and he said to do so would require signing
up.
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE expressed a desire for the legislature to
help. He then asked Mr. Stigar whether MAT+SAR has "a higher
priority" on the govdeals.com list.
8:19:24 AM
MR. STIGAR offered his understanding that MAT+SAR is just on the
list. He said the group has a point of contact person. He
added that MAT+SAR has never tried to obtain anything [from
govedeals.com], so he does not know the process.
8:19:50 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MCCARTY asked whether there was a timeframe under
HB 16 by which the search and rescue groups had priority to
obtain items before they were offered to the general public.
MS. BIEBER reiterated that the time would be 7-14 days.
8:20:30 AM
REPRESENTATIVE HANNAN asked Mr. Vue if the search and rescue
groups would be acting as state agencies in their acquisition of
items through deals.com.
MR. VUE replied that they would not be "acting as state entities
at no cost for these properties." The properties would be
acquired at fair market value. The first line of transfer of
surplus goods would remain interdepartmental; the second line of
transfer would be search and rescue organizations; the third
tier would be the general public.
CO-CHAIR HANNAN asked how DOA would determine which of the
search and rescue entities get a boat, for example, if more than
one of them wanted the boat.
MR. VUE speculated there would be an evaluation of the specific
needs of each entity, and the department may determine "whether
there is the opportunity to acquire the property at a little bit
higher cost than what is being listed just to see if there is a
way for us to implement that in the most fair manner."
REPRESENTATIVE HANNAN asked what the current process is for
state entities vying for the same item. She explained that she
wants to ensure that the search and rescue groups that would
qualify for surplus items under HB 16 would not be "competing in
a cutthroat way for vital resources that they need" while also
ensuring DOA is not overburdened in the process.
8:25:23 AM
MR. VUE answered that in-house, the property is awarded to the
agency that asks for it first. For the general public, the
property is awarded to the highest bidder. He said perhaps "it
could be some sort of hybrid function for the search and rescue
groups."
8:26:16 AM
REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON shared that the original bill addressed
only the search and rescue organizations that work for the state
through the Alaska State Troopers. She then related that "many
of these groups will pay out of pocket, so it doesn't take away
the need for a grant necessarily, it just makes things
available." She said groups such as ones that work with search
and rescue dogs are funded fully in other states but not in
Alaska, where its members pay their expenses out of pocket. She
said she does not think DOA has a process for dispensing of
property "pre-public disposal" yet; however, "that is something
that we can define as we go."
8:28:20 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE speculated that search and rescue groups
would have to pay for transport of any item they acquired from
state surplus not in their area; therefore, if a boat were
available through state surplus and located in King Salmon, he
surmised, the only people that would bid on it would be "the
people around King Salmon that would be able to get to that boat
pretty cheap." He further speculated that the state has certain
areas where surplus items are stored. He asked Mr. Vue for
comment.
8:29:43 AM
MR. VUE replied that economics is not the only driver and
entities far from the item needed are willing to take the
responsibility to transport it.
8:31:31 AM
CO-CHAIR HANNAN referenced AS 18.60.120, which refers to search
and rescue parties and does not distinguish between the various
types, and she asked Mr. Stigar to talk about which groups may
be included under statute.
8:32:37 AM
MR. STIGAR responded that the most accurate list of search and
rescue groups is maintained by the Alaska State Troopers. He
indicated that [the proposed legislation] would include anyone
that is known by the Alaska State Troopers to conduct search and
rescue missions.
8:34:21 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MCCARTY noted there are areas in the state far
from any troopers; therefore, he asked for confirmation that [HB
16] would include any organized search and rescue group in
Alaska.
MR. STIGAR answered that was his original intent. He offered
his understanding that remote areas would follow the same
process, wherein information would be spread through the village
and then the Alaska State Troopers would be notified.
8:35:46 AM
CO-CHAIR HANNAN said it appears the groups listed under AS
18.60.120 are those that the Alaska State Troopers can utilize.
She questioned whether there is an active list and how many
groups there are.
8:36:27 AM
LIEUTENANT PAUL FUSSEY, Search and Rescue Coroner, Alaska State
Troopers, Department of Public Safety, related there are some
501(c)(3) groups that can be deployed across the state, as well
as small search and rescue entities in each village across the
state that can be deployed to do searches at the request of the
Alaska State Troopers.
8:37:22 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE offered his understanding that the
Department of Natural Resources (DNR) utilizes a voluntary
assistance program to provide surplus items to volunteer fire
fighters, and "this is sort of separate from that."
8:38:01 AM
REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON responded that it seems like an oversight
that Alaska's search and rescue groups are paying for search and
rescue out of their own pockets; those are the groups targeted
under HB 16.
8:38:47 AM
REPRESENTATIVE DRUMMOND noted the use of the word "obsolete" and
asked how, if the state is getting rid of equipment because it
is obsolete, that equipment would be useful to search and rescue
operations.
REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON remarked that "one man's trash is another
man's treasure" and said the homily illustrates that something
that is considered obsolete by the state could be something a
local organization could use.
REPRESENTATIVE DRUMMOND noted that search and rescue dogs are
expensive and trained for specific purposes. She asked whether
the dogs are the personal property of search and rescue
volunteers, and she speculated that the volunteers would need to
raise funds to acquire such animals.
REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON responded that these animals are a cost
borne by the search and rescue groups as a "labor of love." She
said the search dogs she has known were each paired with one
human, and they are not "surplus" dogs.
8:41:48 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE, having done search and rescue with dogs,
proffered that the dog is part of the trainer's family. He said
he spent hundreds of hours training a dog named "Toga" from the
time she was a pup. He confirmed there would be no surplus in
terms of dogs.
8:42:27 AM
MR. STIGAR added that what got him into search and rescue was a
new dog he had and the desire to do more with her than having
her be his exercise buddy. He said the trainer/owner bears the
cost of vaccinations and potential injuries.
8:43:05 AM
REPRESENTATIVE DRUMMOND relayed that during her time on the
Anchorage School Board, she learned about the police using a dog
to search hundreds of lockers for any suspect materials. She
noted dogs have a limited time in which they can stay on a scent
track. She commented on the emotional nature of having a dog
find a body in the water, for example, and she expressed that a
conversation about this topic is helpful in educating members of
the committee.
8:44:28 AM
CO-CHAIR HANNAN asked about a short title on page 1, line 6, of
the proposed CS, which read as follows:
SHORT TITLE. This Act may be known as the Ellie
Mae Act.
8:44:58 AM
REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON related her understanding that Ellie Mae
was the name of a service dog; she said that language was not
part of the original bill.
8:45:11 AM
CO-CHAIR SCHRAGE removed his objection to the motion to adopt
the proposed CS for HB 16, Version 32-LS0128\B, Bannister,
4/19/21, as a work draft. There being no further objection,
Version B was before the committee.
8:45:23 AM
CO-CHAIR SCHRAGE announced that HB 16 was held over.
HB 11-DEFENSIVE DISPLAY OF FIREARM
8:45:32 AM
CO-CHAIR SCHRAGE announced that the final order of business
would be HOUSE BILL NO. 11, "An Act relating to assault in the
third and fourth degrees; and relating to reckless
endangerment."
8:45:53 AM
REPRESENTATIVE GEORGE RAUSCHER, Alaska State Legislature, as
prime sponsor, offered the sponsor statement for HB 11, which
read as follows [original punctuation provided]:
Article 1, Section 19 of the Alaska Constitution,
among the declaration of rights enshrines the right of
Alaskans to keep and bear arms.
"A well-regulated militia being necessary to the
security of a free state, the right of the people to
keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. The
individual right to keep and bear arms shall not be
denied or infringed by the State or a political
subdivision of the State."
House Bill 11 is an effort to preserve these rights,
and protect individuals acting in a manner in defense
of self, defense of a third party or defense of
property and premises, from arrest when defensively
displaying a firearm.
Current law allows for police to arrest individuals
who display a weapon defensively for third or fourth
degree assault, or for reckless endangerment. This
bill would exclude the provisions of the above
mentioned offenses against a person if the individual
displays a weapon in a defensive manner.
The bill continues to define defensive display as
follows:
? Openly wearing, carrying or possessing a
firearm
Verbally informing another person of the
possession of a firearm
? Holding a firearm in a position that does not
point the firearm directly at another person
? Displaying a firearm to dissuade a threatening
person
? Warning another person of the availability of a
firearm to dissuade a threat by the other person
House Bill 11 will protect the rights of Alaskans from
the unnecessary arrests and expense of claiming a
justification defense, when they merely displayed a
firearm, and did not act in a manner that is beyond
definition in the bill.
I urge your support for this bill to protect the
rights of Alaskans to bear arms in a defensive manner.
8:49:00 AM
JESSE LOGAN, Staff, Representative George Rauscher, Alaska State
Legislature, offered a sectional analysis for HB 11 on behalf of
Representative Rauscher, prime sponsor. The sectional analysis
read as follow [original punctuation provided]:
Section 1 Excludes defensive display of a firearm from
the violations of third degree assault.
Section 2 Excludes defensive display of a firearm from
the violations of fourth degree assault.
Section 3 Excludes defensive display of a firearm from
the violations of reckless endangerment.
Section 4 Defines defensive display of a firearm.
Section 5 Defines the applicability of the bill and
offenses to only those committed after the effective
date.
MR. LOGAN said third degree assault means to recklessly place
another person in fear of imminent serious injury by means of a
dangerous instrument; it is a Class C felony that carries a
penalty of up to five years in prison and up to a $50,000 fine.
He said fourth degree assault is a Class A misdemeanor, which
carries with it a fine of up to $10,000 and up to one year in
jail. Reckless endangerment is also a Class A misdemeanor, he
noted. He said anyone allowed carry a firearm can carry it
opened or concealed. An "open carry" can be seen by others.
Regarding concealed carry, Mr. Logan said the question before
the committee is: "How do you communicate that to a perceived
threat?" He said 19 states allow "permit-less carry" or
concealed carry; only 5 of those states have determined "how to
communicate that." He indicated that no [states] have defined
"brandishing," although there is federal code pertaining to the
term. He paraphrased the definition of "brandishing" found in
Merriam Websters Dictionary, which read as follows: "to shake
or wave (something, such as a weapon) menacingly."
MR. LOGAN directed attention to Section 4 [page 1, line 13,
through page 2, line 6], which he said offers a list of what is
included under "defensive display of a firearm." He warned that
in law, anything not included on the list "is considered to have
been excluded on purpose"; therefore, he urged the committee to
consider creating a committee substitute that would provide a
definition instead of a list.
MR. LOGAN named two scenarios: One is a person at home and the
other is a person in public; both perceive a threat. He asked,
"How do you communicate to that perceived threat that you have a
deadly weapon and you're willing to use it?" He then asked,
"Without that definition of communication, what's the purpose of
having [a] concealed weapon?"
8:52:25 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE noted that before President Joe Biden was
elected, he had talked about taking a shotgun out to his porch
and shooting a couple rounds. Representative McCabe said that
in Alaska, a person who fires a shotgun from the porch at a
person "coming at" the house would be arrested by the Alaska
State Troopers for "brandishing and scaring a person." He asked
whether HB 11 would "make that legal."
MR. LOGAN answered, "No, I don't think there's a scenario where
you fire a weapon in any direction that's going to be okay,
except for in defense of a deadly threat." He indicated that
[HB 11] "goes into the definitional of ... how do you
communicate it?"
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE remarked that if the person on the porch
announced, "I have a shotgun," then that would be considered
brandishing under Alaska law. He said the same would apply to
someone stepping outside his/her car and saying, "I have a
pistol."
8:54:14 AM
CO-CHAIR HANNAN questioned whether the bill sponsor had heard of
situations where an individual was apprehended solely for having
a weapon on the porch rather than also being a case of domestic
violence, for example, where the gun is being used by the
husband to remind the wife to behave. She explained that she is
curious whether "we are prosecuting those statements
exclusively, in isolation from ... the charge of threat."
REPRESENTATIVE RAUSCHER replied that his office has contacted
law enforcement and is "asking for those" but has not received
the information, which he said he would provide to the committee
once received.
MR. LOGAN, regarding Co-Chair Hannan's example, said he did not
think that would be considered defensive. He said he thinks it
would be an offensive display of a weapon - a situation he said
he thinks HB 11 does not seek to address. He noted that the
bill sponsor's office had spoken with the Department of Law
(DOL) to ensure that domestic violence cases "are not [in] any
way altered with this."
CO-CHAIR HANNAN said she understands, but also understands that
no bills change what is in the Constitution of the State of
Alaska regarding the right of Alaskans to own legal weapons.
She indicated the issue is crafting the distinction between
"where's the problem?" and "what's really happening?" She said
theoretically Alaska State Troopers could be arresting
individuals for saying, "I have a gun." She said she has never
heard of that happening, and she has carried and advertised
carrying a concealed weapon and permit to carry, both of which
must be professed to law enforcement immediately upon getting
pulled over. She said she is looking for the problem, not a
theoretical problem that may take place in the future. She said
in many cases of domestic violence, the threats have not been
carried out, which is what makes so many of the cases so
challenging.
REPRESENTATIVE RAUSCHER reiterated that information would be
forthcoming from DOL.
8:58:14 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MCCARTY said he knows of cases where people said,
"I've got a firearm; back off" and were arrested. He talked
about the dialogue as compared to the outcome of a court case.
REPRESENTATIVE RAUSCHER suggested that if what is acceptable and
what is not acceptable are defined, then a person does not have
to go to court to prove whether or not what he/she did was
acceptable.
REPRESENTATIVE MCCARTY distinguished between someone using a
firearm to get someone out of the house as compared to someone
trespassing on property and the property owner telling the
trespasser he/she has a firearm. He said he has heard of cases
where "people were arrested" and yet "the perpetrator was not
the person on the porch - it's the person who's trespassing."
9:01:05 AM
MR. LOGAN said he does not have any statistics on "how many
times this happened in Alaska" but said there are thousands of
cases across the country where someone has had a concealed
weapon, showed the weapon to a person harassing them in the next
lane, and got arrested. He said "we" have guns, but asked, "How
do we dispel a threat without using it?"
9:01:52 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE said he has carried a concealed weapon for
years and has been an officer of the law. He said, "We are
always taught, if you pull your weapon, you have to use it." He
opined, "An armed society is a polite society." He said if a
person instigates verbal conflict and must pull his/her gun and
take action, then that person is at fault. He countered that
sometimes a person will "go after" a polite person, and the
polite person cannot let the offensive person know that he/she
has a weapon without risking a felony or Class A misdemeanor for
brandishing a weapon. Being able to announce the presence of a
gun to deescalate a situation may fill "a gap," he suggested.
He indicated that [HB 11] makes sense to him. He said people
might abuse it, but the proposed bill is "kind of a hole that
has been needed for many, many years."
9:04:22 AM
CO-CHAIR SCHRAGE asked for distinction between verbally
informing another person of the possession of a firearm and
warning another person of the availability of a firearm to
dissuade a threat by the other person.
MR. LOGAN suggested changes may be needed to the language of the
CS and advised the language be made specific.
CO-CHAIR SCHRAGE said he thinks that how a person relates the
existence of a fire arm is important. He explained, "I think
informing someone that you have a gun may not cause the same
issues as informing someone and conveying an intent to utilize
that gun, and so I think there's some nuance to be worked out in
this bill."
[HB 11 was held over.]
9:07:22 AM
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the committee, the House
Community and Regional Affairs Standing Committee meeting was
adjourned at 9:07 a.m.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| 4.23.2021 HB 16 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HCRA 4/27/2021 8:00:00 AM HCRA 4/29/2021 8:00:00 AM |
HB 16 |
| 4.23.2021 HB16 Ver. A.PDF |
HCRA 4/27/2021 8:00:00 AM HCRA 4/29/2021 8:00:00 AM |
HB 16 |
| 4.23.2021 HB 16 Sectional.pdf |
HCRA 4/27/2021 8:00:00 AM HCRA 4/29/2021 8:00:00 AM |
HB 16 |
| 2021.4.27 HB 16 CS ver. B.pdf |
HCRA 4/27/2021 8:00:00 AM HCRA 4/29/2021 8:00:00 AM |
HB 16 |
| 2021.4.27 HB 16 DOA Fiscal Note.pdf |
HCRA 4/27/2021 8:00:00 AM HCRA 4/29/2021 8:00:00 AM |
HB 16 |
| 4.23.2021HB 11 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HCRA 4/27/2021 8:00:00 AM HCRA 4/29/2021 8:00:00 AM |
HB 11 |
| 4.23.2021 HB 11 ver A.PDF |
HCRA 4/27/2021 8:00:00 AM HCRA 4/29/2021 8:00:00 AM |
HB 11 |
| 4.23.2021 HB 11 Sectional Analysis.pdf |
HCRA 4/27/2021 8:00:00 AM HCRA 4/29/2021 8:00:00 AM |
HB 11 |