Legislature(2017 - 2018)BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)

03/09/2017 01:30 PM LABOR & COMMERCE

Note: the audio and video recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.

Download Mp3. <- Right click and save file as
Download Video part 1. <- Right click and save file as

Audio Topic
01:40:28 PM Start
01:41:11 PM Confirmation Hearings
02:38:00 PM SB56
03:29:20 PM Adjourn
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ Governor's Boards And Commissions Appointments: TELECONFERENCED
Alaska State Board of Public Accountancy
Fisherman's Fund Advisory & Appeals Council
Board of Pharmacy
Board of Certified Real Estate Appraisers
State Board of Registration for Architects,
Engineers, and Land Surveyors
Heard & Held
-- Public Testimony --
+ Bills Previously Heard/Scheduled TELECONFERENCED
-- Public Testimony --
          SB  56-PRODUCT WARRANTIES & REQUIRED UPDATES                                                                      
2:38:00 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR  COSTELLO   reconvened  the   meeting  and   announced  the                                                               
consideration of SB 56.                                                                                                         
2:38:29 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR  CATHY GIESSEL,  sponsor of  SB 56,  introduced the  bill                                                               
speaking to the following sponsor statement:                                                                                    
     Senate  Bill  56  proposes fair  treatment  to  Alaskan                                                                    
     consumers and businesses.  Heavy equipment is expensive                                                                    
     and complicated. Most  resource companies, contractors,                                                                    
     and  many   other  consumers   are  dependent   on  the                                                                    
     availability  of equipment  to  keep Alaskans  employed                                                                    
     and businesses running.                                                                                                    
     Our   state's  remote   locations  and   transportation                                                                    
     challenges,  coupled with  high  shipping costs,  often                                                                    
     can  result   in  high  costs  to   local  dealers  and                                                                    
     distributors  when   delivering  warranty   and  update                                                                    
     services  for a  manufacturer's defective  or deficient                                                                    
     products. Many of these services  are not reimbursed by                                                                    
     the  manufacturers who  require  this  high cost  work.                                                                    
     This  results   in  our  local  businesses,   or  their                                                                    
     customers,    absorbing    expenses    for    shipping,                                                                    
     transportation, and  labor that  should be paid  by the                                                                    
     company  that manufactures  the defective  or deficient                                                                    
     products,  provides  the  warranty,  and  requires  the                                                                    
     Senate Bill 56 protects  buyers of heavy equipment. If,                                                                    
     during the  term of a  warranty or, if  earlier, within                                                                    
     one year  after the  date equipment  is delivered  to a                                                                    
     buyer, the  manufacturer or dealer is  unable to repair                                                                    
     equipment after  a  reasonable number  of attempts, the                                                                    
     bill   requires  a   refund  or   replacement  of   the                                                                    
     Senate  Bill 56  also would  ensure that  local dealers                                                                    
     and  distributors of  heavy  equipment, machinery,  and                                                                    
     tools  used  for construction,  maintenance,  resources                                                                    
     development  and  similar   activities  are  adequately                                                                    
     compensated  when providing  required warranty  service                                                                    
     and  manufacturer's required  updates  on the  products                                                                    
     they sell.                                                                                                                 
     Senate Bill 56 builds  on existing state law pertaining                                                                    
     to   boats,  and   all-terrain  vehicles   (ATVs).  The                                                                    
     legislation  provides clarity,  and certainty,  for the                                                                    
     consumers that  use and  the manufacturers  and dealers                                                                    
     that provide  the equipment  that keeps  Alaska's heavy                                                                    
     equipment industries running. Senate  Bill 56 would not                                                                    
     apply  to vehicles  licensed for  use on  roads, boats,                                                                    
     and ATVs; those items are  covered under a separate and                                                                    
     current statute.                                                                                                           
     Senate  Bill 56  protects  consumers  and balances  the                                                                    
     interests of local dealers to  be adequately made whole                                                                    
     for  meeting  their  obligations  to  customers,  while                                                                    
     setting  clear guidelines  for  manufacturers of  heavy                                                                    
     equipment products.                                                                                                        
SENATOR GIESSEL said her staff, Mr. Gialopsos, is available to                                                                  
take the committee through a sectional analysis if the chair                                                                    
2:44:10 PM                                                                                                                    
AKIS GIALOPSOS, Staff, Senator Cathy Giessel, provided a                                                                        
sectional analysis for SB 56 speaking to the following prepared                                                                 
     Section 1: Enacts 45.45.772  - 45.45.788, which outline                                                                  
     the   obligations   and    duties   of   manufacturers,                                                                    
     contractors, dealers,  and distributors  when providing                                                                    
     "required  services"   which  include   warranty  work,                                                                    
     corrective  work  on  defective products,  and  updates                                                                    
     required by  manufacturers. For simplification  of this                                                                    
     sectional,  the  word  "dealer"   is  used  instead  of                                                                    
     "dealer  or distributor,"  the phrase  that appears  in                                                                    
     the bill.                                                                                                                  
     Sec.  45.45.772  Requires  a   dealer  to  provide  any                                                                  
     manufacturer's warranty  in effect at the  time of sale                                                                    
     to  the purchaser.  Outlines  the  obligations of  each                                                                    
     party when  a contractor  provides warranty  service on                                                                    
     behalf of the manufacturer.                                                                                                
     Sec.  45.45.773  Requires  a   dealer  to  explain  the                                                                  
     warranty    coverage,   including    disclaimers,   and                                                                    
     limitations;   prohibits  a   dealer   from  making   a                                                                    
     representation  about a  warranty that  is not  made in                                                                    
     the  warranty;  and  requires  the  dealer  to  provide                                                                    
     manuals to the purchaser.                                                                                                  
     Sec. 45.45.774 Requires the  dealer to provide warranty                                                                  
     service   and  to   make   all   claims  for   warranty                                                                    
     reimbursement   in  the   manner  established   by  the                                                                    
     Sec.   45.45.775   Prohibits    a   manufacturer   from                                                                  
     restricting  the nature  or extent  of  labor or  parts                                                                    
     that are needed to perform  the work in accordance with                                                                    
     generally accepted standards.                                                                                              
     Sec. 45.45.776 Requires the  manufacturer to follow the                                                                  
     process  outlined in  this bill  and standard  industry                                                                    
     claim  procedures when  paying  a  dealer for  required                                                                    
     Sec.  45.45.777  Establishes the  minimum  compensation                                                                  
     for  work  performed  by  a   dealer  on  behalf  of  a                                                                    
     manufacturer. Specifies  the minimum rate and  time for                                                                    
     labor costs. Also requires the  manufacturer to pay for                                                                    
     transportation and  lodging costs if the  dealer has to                                                                    
     send an employee to the field to perform the work.                                                                         
     Sec. 45.45.778  Requires a manufacturer to  reimburse a                                                                  
     dealer  for  parts  used  at  the  manufacturer's  full                                                                    
     suggested retail price.                                                                                                    
     Sec.  45.45.779 If  a part  needed that  is not  in the                                                                  
     dealer's  inventory, requires  the manufacturer  to pay                                                                    
     the cost to send the item,  as soon as possible, to the                                                                    
     purchaser's choice  of either the dealer  that sold the                                                                    
     product or the dealer closest to the purchaser.                                                                            
     Sec.  45.45.780 Requires  the  manufacturer  to pay  or                                                                  
     disapprove a claim  within 30 days or  it is considered                                                                    
     approved and accrues a penalty of 1.5% per month.                                                                          
     Sec.   45.45.781   Requires  a   manufacturer's   claim                                                                  
     disapproval to be in writing  and issued within 30 days                                                                    
     of receipt of the claim.                                                                                                   
     "Lemon Law" Provisions:                                                                                                  
     Sec. 45.45.782  Requires the manufacturer or  dealer to                                                                  
     repair a product defect that  is covered under warranty                                                                    
     when reported by the purchaser.                                                                                            
     Sec. 45.45.783 If a product  cannot be repaired after a                                                                  
     "reasonable number" of attempts  during the term of the                                                                    
     warranty or  one year  after purchase,  whichever comes                                                                    
     first, requires the manufacturer  to either replace the                                                                    
     product  with a  new  comparable product  or refund  an                                                                    
     amount  equal  to  the  full  purchase  price  minus  a                                                                    
     "reasonable amount"  for the period that  the purchaser                                                                    
     was able to  use the product. The  purchaser can choose                                                                    
     whether to  get a new  product or refund.  Outlines how                                                                    
     to calculate the "reasonable amount" for a refund.                                                                         
     Sec. 45.45.784 Establishes a  process for the purchaser                                                                  
     to  make a  claim under  45.45.783. The  purchaser must                                                                    
     make  a   written  claim  by  certified   mail  to  the                                                                    
     manufacturer within 60  days of the end of  the term of                                                                    
     the  warranty  or one  year  after  the purchase  date,                                                                    
     whichever comes  first. Outlines  what must be  in that                                                                    
     written claim. Allows the manufacturer  to make a final                                                                    
     attempt to fix the item within 30 days.                                                                                    
     Sec. 45.45.785  States that  the manufacturer  does not                                                                  
     have to  replace/refund if  the claimed  product defect                                                                    
     is  either not  a defect  or resulted  from alteration,                                                                    
     abuse or neglect  by a person who is  not an authorized                                                                    
     Sec.  45.45.786 Creates  a rebuttable  presumption that                                                                  
     if the product  has been in the shop  for repairs three                                                                    
     separate  times  or for  30  days  during the  warranty                                                                    
     period  or  first  year   of  ownership,  whichever  is                                                                    
     shorter, a  "reasonable number of attempts"  to fix the                                                                    
     product has been made.                                                                                                     
     Definitions for language enacted in this bill:                                                                           
     Sec.  45.45.787 Defines  what products  are covered  by                                                                  
     this legislation.                                                                                                          
     Sec.   45.45.788  Establishes   what  qualifies   as  a                                                                  
     "warranty service."                                                                                                        
     Section 2:  Amends the  definition of  "merchandise" in                                                                  
     AS  45.45.790 to  include "covered  products" -  a term                                                                    
     used in this bill.                                                                                                         
     Section 3:  Adds definitions to AS  45.45.790 for terms                                                                  
     used in this legislation.                                                                                                  
     Section  4:  Adds  violations   to  the  provisions  in                                                                  
     Section 1 to the list  of unfair methods of competition                                                                    
     and unfair or  deceptive acts or practices  found in AS                                                                    
     Section [5]:  Applicability - specifies that  this bill                                                                  
     applies  to agreements  entered into  on and  after the                                                                    
     effective date of this act.                                                                                                
2:54:01 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR STEVENS asked if passing this bill might result in a                                                                    
manufacturer such as Caterpillar deciding it isn't worth doing                                                                  
business in Alaska.                                                                                                             
SENATOR  GIESSEL  clarified  that   the  vendor  travels  to  the                                                               
locations,  not  the  manufacturer. She  posed  the  hypothetical                                                               
scenario  of a  vendor in  Anchorage  who is  required to  either                                                               
travel  to the  remote location  to provide  warranty service  or                                                               
ship the equipment  back to Anchorage for repair.  Right now, the                                                               
vendor is  required to  do that  to cover  the warranty,  but the                                                               
manufacturer  may decline  to pay  the vendor's  full costs.  The                                                               
Alaska  vendor assumes  the extra  costs. SB  56 seeks  to remedy                                                               
that; the manufacturer must agree to cover the full costs.                                                                      
SENATOR   STEVENS  voiced   concern  about   potential  harm   if                                                               
manufacturers decided  not to do  business in Alaska if  they had                                                               
to cover what could be enormous additional costs.                                                                               
SENATOR GIESSEL suggested that he  ask the vendors who are online                                                               
to offer their perspective, but  she believes it is unlikely that                                                               
the bill  would cause  a company like  Caterpillar to  stop doing                                                               
business in Alaska.                                                                                                             
2:57:48 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR GARDNER  said she too shares  that concern. It may  be an                                                               
unintended consequence that Alaskans  would have to buy equipment                                                               
in Seattle and  the warranty would only be valid  in the state of                                                               
She  referred to  Sec. 45.45.787  on page  7 that  refers to  the                                                               
products that are  covered under the bill. She asked,  if this is                                                               
a good idea, why not apply it to all products sold in Alaska?                                                                   
MR. GIALOPSOS  explained that this legislation  was introduced at                                                               
the   request  of   some  of   the  affected   stakeholders  that                                                               
specifically  work with  off the  road  system manufacturing  and                                                               
dealer  issues. The  language is  based on  the legislation  that                                                               
passed in  2009 when all-terrain  vehicles, boats,  snow machines                                                               
and  other  off-road vehicles  were  brought  under coverage  for                                                               
warranty  service in  remote regions.  The legislative  intent in                                                               
2009  was  clear  that  there was  a  delineation  between  items                                                               
registered  for   operation  on  a   road  and  those   that  are                                                               
specifically purposed for off-road use.                                                                                         
SENATOR GARDNER  continued to question  limiting the  coverage to                                                               
items  involved  in  resource development  or  construction.  She                                                               
pointed out that it could  be similarly expensive to get warranty                                                               
work done on  a commercial refrigerator that was  shipped to Cold                                                               
Bay, for example.                                                                                                               
MR.  GIALOPSOS said  the individuals  who will  testify can  talk                                                               
about the relationship between a  dealer of industrial commercial                                                               
pieces of equipment versus a home  appliance from a big box store                                                               
that provides a  direct, through-the-manufacturer warranty. Those                                                               
purchases are different for several  reasons, one of which is the                                                               
exclusivity  clause for  some franchise  holders and  dealers. He                                                               
said  it  was  the  sponsor's   intent  to  narrowly  tailor  the                                                               
legislation to cover the products it does.                                                                                      
SENATOR GARDNER asked if the  provisions in subsections (b), (c),                                                               
(d), and (e) that start on page  3, line 1, are the same in other                                                               
parts of the country or unique to Alaska.                                                                                       
MR. GIALOPSOS deferred the question to the Department of Law.                                                                   
CHAIR COSTELLO indicated the question would be held until later.                                                                
SENATOR GARDNER reviewed the provision  in subsection (e) on page                                                               
3, lines  17-20, that  requires the  manufacturer to  reimburse a                                                               
dealer  or distributor  for transportation  and lodging  costs to                                                               
travel to a location to perform  required service. She said a lot                                                               
of her questions  are about whether this is done  in other states                                                               
or is unique to Alaska.                                                                                                         
3:03:49 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR GIESSEL  responded that it  is impossible to  compare the                                                               
challenges associated  with doing  business in  a remote  area of                                                               
Indiana, for example, versus the  challenges of doing business in                                                               
remote areas  of Alaska that can  only be reached by  air. "It is                                                               
in fact true that Alaska is different."                                                                                         
SENATOR GARDNER referred  to Sec. 45.45.785 on page  6 that talks                                                               
about exceptions. She asked if  a manufacturer would to need send                                                               
somebody  to Cold  Bay,  for  example, to  show  that an  alleged                                                               
defect either is  not a defect or is the  result of an alteration                                                               
by somebody who is not the dealer or distributor.                                                                               
MR. GIALOPSOS deferred the question  to the people online waiting                                                               
to testify. They can recount specific case studies, he said.                                                                    
3:05:27 PM                                                                                                                    
At ease                                                                                                                         
3:06:22 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR COSTELLO  reconvened the meeting  and asked Mr.  Sniffen to                                                               
respond to Senator Gardner's questions.                                                                                         
3:06:43 PM                                                                                                                    
ED SNIFFEN,  Deputy Attorney General, Civil  Division, Regulatory                                                               
Affairs &  Public Advocacy (RAPA), Department  of Law, Anchorage,                                                               
Alaska, said he  is not aware of what other  states do with lemon                                                               
laws  for  large  construction  equipment.  He  agreed  with  Mr.                                                               
Gialopsos that some of the dealers  who are online to testify may                                                               
have  a  more comprehensive  understanding  of  how other  states                                                               
handle this.                                                                                                                    
3:07:26 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR HUGHES referred to the  list of products that are covered                                                               
starting  on page  7,  line 7.  She asked  if  the Department  of                                                               
Transportation and  Public Facilities  (DOTPF) will  benefit from                                                               
the bill, resulting in a cost savings to the state.                                                                             
SENATOR GIESSEL offered  to follow up after  doing research about                                                               
whether DOTPF purchases equipment through  a local vendor or goes                                                               
directly to the manufacturer.                                                                                                   
SENATOR  HUGHES  said if  the  department  does deal  with  local                                                               
vendors, the list should be reviewed to ensure it is complete.                                                                  
CHAIR  COSTELLO  asked Mr.  Sniffen  why  contract law  fails  to                                                               
address the concerns  that prompted the sponsor  to introduce the                                                               
MR.  SNIFFEN said  most of  these  franchise relationships  start                                                               
with  contract negotiations  and over  time it  becomes something                                                               
like an adhesion contract where the  dealer doesn't have a lot of                                                               
bargaining  power.  That's  why  states  like  Alaska  have  auto                                                               
franchise laws.                                                                                                                 
SENATOR  STEVENS asked  if a  manufacturer could  declare that  a                                                               
warranty is not covered in distant or remote locations.                                                                         
MR.  SNIFFEN   said  that  would   be  difficult  to  do   for  a                                                               
manufacturer that  sells equipment into  a state knowing  that it                                                               
is likely  it will  be transported to  a remote  area. Warranties                                                               
generally  follow the  equipment and  unless there  is a  clearly                                                               
stated exception, the manufacturer  would probably be required to                                                               
provide that service.                                                                                                           
SENATOR  STEVENS observed  that  it is  simple  economics; if  it                                                               
costs too  much to do business  you find a  way not to do  it. He                                                               
said he  agrees with Senator  Gardner's comment  about unintended                                                               
consequences but Mr. Sniffen doesn't seem to agree.                                                                             
MR. SNIFFEN  clarified that he  is saying the  manufacturer might                                                               
adjust the  warranty after  getting stuck with  a large  bill. He                                                               
added,  "It's  hard   to  say  what  the   consequences  of  this                                                               
legislation might be."                                                                                                          
3:12:50 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR  HUGHES asked  the estimated  annual  dollar amount  that                                                               
dealers are paying for unreimbursed warranty work.                                                                              
SENATOR  GIESSEL  suggested  the  franchise  dealers  answer  the                                                               
question. She added that she  has anecdotal evidence that they do                                                               
not  pass those  unreimbursed  costs on  to  the consumer.  "They                                                               
absorb that  cost as Alaskan  businesses themselves,  and therein                                                               
lies the problem."                                                                                                              
3:13:36 PM                                                                                                                    
At ease                                                                                                                         
3:13:55 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR COSTELLO  reconvened the meeting  and asked Mr.  Sniffen if                                                               
lemon laws are in current statute.                                                                                              
MR.  SNIFFEN replied  Alaska has  two  lemon laws.  The 2009  ATV                                                               
lemon law  that was predicated  on the existing  automobile lemon                                                               
law.  Alaska also  has a  distributorship  law in  Title 45  that                                                               
protects distributors  of all products from  certain practices of                                                               
CHAIR  COSTELLO   observed  that  the  committee   heard  similar                                                               
legislation last week; the legislature  is being asked to set the                                                               
guidelines in  certain areas because  it doesn't appear  that the                                                               
contracts are addressing the issues.                                                                                            
MR.  SNIFFEN  said  this  bill  does  not  have  the  retroactive                                                               
provision that SB 47 has. It would only apply to new contracts.                                                                 
3:16:23 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR COSTELLO opened public testimony on SB 56.                                                                                
3:16:37 PM                                                                                                                    
CHRIS   GERONDALE,   Construction  Machinery   Industrial,   LLC,                                                               
Anchorage, Alaska, testified in support  of SB 56. He stated that                                                               
his  family has  been  in the  construction  and heavy  equipment                                                               
industry  in Alaska  since  the  1930s. He  works  in the  family                                                               
business and  also does contract  work for other  heavy equipment                                                               
contractors and several  mines in Southeast Alaska.  He said that                                                               
he can see this issue from both sides.                                                                                          
He discussed  heavy equipment warranties and  product updates and                                                               
noted that in both instances  the manufacturer is not required to                                                               
cover all labor  or freight associated with these  repairs. SB 56                                                               
would  require  manufacturers to  cover  a  higher percentage  of                                                               
those  costs.  This  will  be   particularly  helpful  for  small                                                               
contractors, farmers, loggers, and placer miners.                                                                               
MR. GERONDALE explained  the process when there is  a failure and                                                               
the equipment is  under warranty. First, the end user  has to pay                                                               
the airfare,  travel labor, and  travel costs to get  the problem                                                               
diagnosed. Once diagnosed, the part  is ordered on a stock order,                                                               
which can  take four weeks  or 15-20 percent of  the construction                                                               
season in Alaska. To speed the  process the end user often elects                                                               
to  pay for  expedited freight.  Once the  part arrives,  the end                                                               
user will again  have to pay the costs to  have the mechanic come                                                               
back out and  fix the piece of equipment. He  estimated that on a                                                               
$4,000-$5,000  warranty work  order,  the  manufacturer may  only                                                               
cover $500.                                                                                                                     
Product updates  are similarly problematic. The  costs can easily                                                               
be $3,000-$4,000 on a repair that  only takes two hours, which is                                                               
what  the  manufacturer will  cover  plus  maybe $450  in  travel                                                               
costs. The balance is put on the vendor or the end user.                                                                        
MR.  GERONDALE said  the only  opposition to  SB 56  that he  has                                                               
heard  comes   from  the  manufacturers.  They   argue  that  the                                                               
additional cost  will increase  the price  of equipment,  but the                                                               
reality is  that the end user  already assumes the burden  of the                                                               
additional  costs. SB  56 puts  some of  the burden  back on  the                                                               
manufacturer that  built a  piece of equipment  that needs  to be                                                               
Responding to  the concern expressed that  manufacturers may stop                                                               
doing  business in  Alaska,  he  pointed out  that  boat and  ATV                                                               
manufacturers  did not  pull  out  after the  ATV  lemon law  was                                                               
enacted in 2009.                                                                                                                
3:22:13 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR GARDNER  asked where product  updates are covered  in the                                                               
MR. GERONDALE deferred the question to Steve Seward.                                                                            
3:22:44 PM                                                                                                                    
At ease                                                                                                                         
3:22:48 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR COSTELLO reconvened the meeting.                                                                                          
3:23:10 PM                                                                                                                    
STEVE  SEWARD, Attorney  for  Construction Machinery  Industrial,                                                               
LLC, Seattle, Washington, directed attention  to page 8, line 12.                                                               
It is part of the definition of required services.                                                                              
3:23:52 PM                                                                                                                    
JIM HALLORAN, Caterpillar Inc.,  Peoria, Illinois, said he wanted                                                               
to make three points. First,  N.C. Machinery and Caterpillar have                                                               
had an  agreement in place since  1926 and there has  not been an                                                               
issue. Second,  because Caterpillar's  agreements are  global, he                                                               
disputes  the   statement  that  Alaska  is   unique.  Third,  he                                                               
maintained  that Caterpillar's  contracts  are  working and  have                                                               
allowed the company  to service its Alaska customers  for over 90                                                               
SENATOR STEVENS  asked how much  of the  burden would go  back on                                                               
the manufacturers if the bill were to pass.                                                                                     
MR. HALLORAN explained  that Caterpillar pays for  parts. They do                                                               
not pay for time and travel,  but they will discount the price of                                                               
the machine  to cover  things like  that. The  dealer appreciates                                                               
that unique twist because they can  use the money as they see fit                                                               
if  warranty service  isn't required.  For example,  it could  be                                                               
used to  provide an  incentive for the  customer to  purchase the                                                               
3:27:01 PM                                                                                                                    
NICK  YAKSICH, Senior  Vice President,  Association of  Equipment                                                               
Manufacturers  (AEM),   stated  that  AEM  represents   over  950                                                               
companies that  manufacture off-road  highway equipment.  He made                                                               
four points  and reinforced Mr. Halloran's  comments. First, they                                                               
work  with  and   support  the  dealer  and   manufacturer  as  a                                                               
partnership to  ensure customer satisfaction. Second,  he has yet                                                               
to hear  any specific problems  that have arisen with  dealers in                                                               
Alaska. In  any event,  they would prefer  to work  directly with                                                               
the dealer  to resolve  an issue. Third,  this bill  infringes on                                                               
the  private contractual  relationship  between the  manufacturer                                                               
and the dealer.  Fourth, they would prefer to  work directly with                                                               
the  dealer  and  outside  the  legislative  process  to  find  a                                                               
solution to ultimately serve the customer.                                                                                      
3:28:43 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR  COSTELLO held  SB 56  in committee  with public  testimony                                                               

Document Name Date/Time Subjects
SB 56 - Fiscal Note - Dept. of Law.pdf SL&C 3/9/2017 1:30:00 PM
SB 56
SB 56 - Opposition Letter - John Deere.pdf SL&C 3/9/2017 1:30:00 PM
SB 56
SB 56 - Sectional Analysis.pdf SL&C 3/9/2017 1:30:00 PM
SB 56
SB 56 - Sponsor Statement.pdf SL&C 3/9/2017 1:30:00 PM
SB 56
SB 56 - Support Letter - Chad Gerondale.pdf SL&C 3/9/2017 1:30:00 PM
SB 56
SB 56 - Support Letter - State Chamber.pdf SL&C 3/9/2017 1:30:00 PM
SB 56
SB 56.PDF SL&C 3/9/2017 1:30:00 PM
SB 56
Accountancy - Fact Sheet.pdf SL&C 3/9/2017 1:30:00 PM
Accountancy Resume - Beltrami.pdf SL&C 3/9/2017 1:30:00 PM
Accountancy - Roster.pdf SL&C 3/9/2017 1:30:00 PM
Accountancy Resume - Hogue.pdf SL&C 3/9/2017 1:30:00 PM
Accountancy Resume - Rulien.pdf SL&C 3/9/2017 1:30:00 PM
Architects, Engineers, Land Surveyors - Fact Sheet.pdf SL&C 3/9/2017 1:30:00 PM
Architects, Engineers, Land Surveyors - Roster.pdf SL&C 3/9/2017 1:30:00 PM
Architects, Engineers, Land Surveyors Resume - Johnston.pdf SL&C 3/9/2017 1:30:00 PM
Architects, Engineers, Land Surveyors Resume - Jones.pdf SL&C 3/9/2017 1:30:00 PM
Architects, Engineers, Land Surveyors Resume - Kerr.pdf SL&C 3/9/2017 1:30:00 PM
Architects, Engineers, Land Surveyors Resume - Koonce.pdf SL&C 3/9/2017 1:30:00 PM
Fishermens Fund Advisory Appeals Council - Fact Sheet.pdf SL&C 3/9/2017 1:30:00 PM
Fishermens Fund Advisory Appeals Council - Roster.pdf SL&C 3/9/2017 1:30:00 PM
Fishermens Fund Advisory Appeals Council Resume - Bezenek.pdf SL&C 3/9/2017 1:30:00 PM
Pharmacy - Fact Sheet.pdf SL&C 3/9/2017 1:30:00 PM
Pharmacy Resume - Bell.pdf SL&C 3/9/2017 1:30:00 PM
Pharmacy - Roster.pdf SL&C 3/9/2017 1:30:00 PM
Pharmacy Resume - Giessel.pdf SL&C 3/9/2017 1:30:00 PM
Pharmacy Resume - Henderson.pdf SL&C 3/9/2017 1:30:00 PM
Real Estate Appraisers - Fact Sheet.pdf SL&C 3/9/2017 1:30:00 PM
Real Estate Appraisers - Roster.pdf SL&C 3/9/2017 1:30:00 PM
Real Estate Appraisers Resume - Piszczek.pdf SL&C 3/9/2017 1:30:00 PM
SB 56 - Opposition Letter - AEM.pdf SL&C 3/9/2017 1:30:00 PM
SB 56
SB 56 - Support Letter - Melissa DeGroat.pdf SL&C 3/9/2017 1:30:00 PM
SB 56
SB 56 - Support Letter -Dana Pruhs.pdf SL&C 3/9/2017 1:30:00 PM
SB 56
SB 56 -Support Letter -Eric Holst.pdf SL&C 3/9/2017 1:30:00 PM
SB 56