Legislature(2015 - 2016)BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)

04/15/2015 01:30 PM JUDICIARY

Note: the audio and video recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.

Download Mp3. <- Right click and save file as
Download Video part 1. <- Right click and save file as

Audio Topic
01:38:02 PM Start
01:39:15 PM Confirmation Hearing: Commission on Judicial Conduct
01:49:57 PM HB11
02:09:14 PM HB15
02:49:58 PM HB75
02:58:53 PM Adjourn
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ Bills Previously Heard/Scheduled: TELECONFERENCED
Commission on Judicial Conduct
George R. Boatright
+ HB 83 REPEAL COLLECTION OF CIVIL LITIG. INFO TELECONFERENCED
Scheduled but Not Heard
+ HB 11 NO INTERNET ACCESS TO SOME CRIM. CASES TELECONFERENCED
Moved CSSSHB 11(JUD) AM Out of Committee
+ HB 75 MARIJUANA REG;CLUBS;MUNIS;LOCAL OPT ELECT TELECONFERENCED
Heard & Held
+ HB 15 CREDITS FOR TIME SERVED/GOOD TIME TELECONFERENCED
Heard & Held
Bills Previously Heard/Scheduled
                    ALASKA STATE LEGISLATURE                                                                                  
              SENATE JUDICIARY STANDING COMMITTEE                                                                             
                         April 15, 2015                                                                                         
                           1:38 p.m.                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
MEMBERS PRESENT                                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
Senator John Coghill, Vice Chair                                                                                                
Senator Mia Costello                                                                                                            
Senator Peter Micciche                                                                                                          
Senator Bill Wielechowski                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
MEMBERS ABSENT                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
Senator Lesil McGuire, Chair                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
COMMITTEE CALENDAR                                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
CONFIRMATION HEARING                                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
     Commission on Judicial Conduct                                                                                             
          George R. Boatright                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
      CONFIRMATION ADVANCED                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 83(JUD)                                                                                                   
"An   Act  relating   to  collecting   information  about   civil                                                               
litigation  by  the  Alaska   Judicial  Council;  repealing  Rule                                                               
41(a)(3), Alaska Rules  of Civil Procedure, and  Rules 511(c) and                                                               
(e), Alaska  Rules of Appellate  Procedure; and providing  for an                                                               
effective date."                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
     -SCHEDULED BUT NOT HEARD                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
CS FOR SS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 11(JUD) AM                                                                                         
"An  Act  restricting  the  publication  of  certain  records  of                                                               
criminal  cases on  a publicly  available  Internet website;  and                                                               
providing for an effective date."                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
     - MOVED CSSSHB 11(JUD) AM OUT OF COMMITTEE                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 15(FIN)                                                                                 
"An Act  relating to  credits toward  a sentence  of imprisonment                                                               
for certain persons under electronic monitoring."                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
     - HEARD & HELD                                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 75(JUD) AM                                                                              
"An Act relating to the  registration of marijuana establishments                                                               
by  municipalities; relating  to the  definition of  'marijuana';                                                               
clarifying standards for personal use  of marijuana by persons 21                                                               
years  of age  or older;  prohibiting the  public consumption  of                                                               
marijuana;  authorizing  the  registration  of  marijuana  clubs;                                                               
relating to  established villages  and to local  option elections                                                               
regarding   the  operation   of  marijuana   establishments;  and                                                               
providing for an effective date."                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
     - HEARD & HELD                                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
PREVIOUS COMMITTEE ACTION                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
BILL: HB  11                                                                                                                  
SHORT TITLE: NO INTERNET ACCESS TO SOME CRIM. CASES                                                                             
SPONSOR(s): REPRESENTATIVE(s) WILSON                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
01/21/15       (H)       PREFILE RELEASED 1/9/15                                                                                
01/21/15       (H)       READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS                                                                        
01/21/15       (H)       HSS, JUD                                                                                               
03/04/15       (H)       SPONSOR SUBSTITUTE INTRODUCED                                                                          
03/04/15       (H)       READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS                                                                        
03/04/15       (H)       JUD                                                                                                    
03/20/15       (H)       JUD AT 1:00 PM CAPITOL 120                                                                             
03/20/15       (H)       -- MEETING CANCELED --                                                                                 
03/23/15       (H)       JUD AT 1:00 PM CAPITOL 120                                                                             
03/23/15       (H)       Heard & Held                                                                                           
03/23/15       (H)       MINUTE(JUD)                                                                                            
04/01/15       (H)       JUD AT 1:00 PM CAPITOL 120                                                                             
04/01/15       (H)       Moved CSSSHB 11(JUD) Out of Committee                                                                  
04/01/15       (H)       MINUTE(JUD)                                                                                            
04/02/15       (H)       JUD RPT CS(JUD) NT 3DP 3NR                                                                             
04/02/15       (H)       DP: MILLETT, KELLER, LEDOUX                                                                            
04/02/15       (H)       NR: CLAMAN, GRUENBERG, FOSTER                                                                          
04/09/15       (H)       TRANSMITTED TO (S)                                                                                     
04/09/15       (H)       VERSION: CSSSHB 11(JUD) AM                                                                             
04/10/15       (S)       READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS                                                                        
04/10/15       (S)       JUD                                                                                                    
04/15/15       (S)       JUD AT 1:30 PM BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
BILL: HB  15                                                                                                                  
SHORT TITLE: CREDITS FOR TIME SERVED/GOOD TIME                                                                                  
SPONSOR(s): WILSON                                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
01/21/15       (H)       PREFILE RELEASED 1/9/15                                                                                
01/21/15       (H)       READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS                                                                        
01/21/15       (H)       STA, FIN                                                                                               
01/23/15       (H)       STA REFERRAL REMOVED                                                                                   
01/23/15       (H)       JUD REFERRAL ADDED BEFORE FIN                                                                          
02/18/15       (H)       BILL REPRINTED 2/16/15                                                                                 
02/20/15       (H)       JUD AT 1:00 PM CAPITOL 120                                                                             
02/20/15       (H)       Heard & Held                                                                                           
02/20/15       (H)       MINUTE(JUD)                                                                                            
03/18/15       (H)       JUD AT 1:00 PM CAPITOL 120                                                                             
03/18/15       (H)       Heard & Held                                                                                           
03/18/15       (H)       MINUTE(JUD)                                                                                            
03/23/15       (H)       JUD AT 1:00 PM CAPITOL 120                                                                             
03/23/15       (H)       Moved  CSHB 15(JUD) Out of Committee                                                                   
03/23/15       (H)       MINUTE(JUD)                                                                                            
03/25/15       (H)       JUD RPT CS(JUD) NT 2DP 4NR                                                                             
03/25/15       (H)       DP: CLAMAN, LEDOUX                                                                                     
03/25/15       (H)       NR: MILLETT, KELLER, GRUENBERG, FOSTER                                                                 
04/03/15       (H)       FIN AT 1:30 PM HOUSE FINANCE 519                                                                       
04/03/15       (H)       <Bill Hearing Canceled>                                                                                
04/06/15       (H)       FIN AT 1:30 PM HOUSE FINANCE 519                                                                       
04/06/15       (H)       Heard & Held                                                                                           
04/06/15       (H)       MINUTE(FIN)                                                                                            
04/10/15       (H)       FIN AT 1:30 PM HOUSE FINANCE 519                                                                       
04/10/15       (H)       Moved  CSHB 15(FIN) Out of Committee                                                                   
04/10/15       (H)       MINUTE(FIN)                                                                                            
04/11/15       (H)       FIN RPT CS(FIN) NT 6DP 3AM                                                                             
04/11/15       (H)       DP: SADDLER, PRUITT, WILSON, GATTIS,                                                                   
                        EDGMON, THOMPSON                                                                                        
04/11/15       (H)       AM: GARA, KAWASAKI, GUTTENBERG                                                                         
04/13/15       (H)       TRANSMITTED TO (S)                                                                                     
04/13/15       (H)       VERSION: CSHB 15(FIN)                                                                                  
04/14/15       (S)       READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS                                                                        
04/14/15       (S)       JUD                                                                                                    
04/15/15       (S)       JUD AT 1:30 PM BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
BILL: HB  75                                                                                                                  
SHORT TITLE: MARIJUANA REG;CLUBS;MUNIS;LOCAL OPT ELECT                                                                          
SPONSOR(s): COMMUNITY & REGIONAL AFFAIRS                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
01/23/15       (H)       READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS                                                                        
01/23/15       (H)       CRA, JUD                                                                                               
02/21/15       (H)       CRA AT 10:00 AM BARNES 124                                                                             
02/21/15       (H)       -- MEETING CANCELED --                                                                                 
02/24/15       (H)       CRA AT 8:00 AM BARNES 124                                                                              
02/24/15       (H)       Heard & Held                                                                                           
02/24/15       (H)       MINUTE(CRA)                                                                                            
03/03/15       (H)       CRA AT 8:00 AM BARNES 124                                                                              
03/03/15       (H)       Moved  CSHB 75(CRA) Out of Committee                                                                   
03/03/15       (H)       MINUTE(CRA)                                                                                            
03/05/15       (H)       CRA AT 8:00 AM BARNES 124                                                                              
03/05/15       (H)       Moved  CSHB 75(CRA) Out of Committee                                                                   
03/05/15       (H)       MINUTE(CRA)                                                                                            
03/06/15       (H)       CRA RPT CS(CRA) NT 3DP 3NR                                                                             
03/06/15       (H)       DP: NAGEAK, SEATON, TILTON                                                                             
03/06/15       (H)       NR: DRUMMOND, REINBOLD, HUGHES                                                                         
03/11/15       (H)       JUD AT 1:00 PM CAPITOL 120                                                                             
03/11/15       (H)       Heard & Held                                                                                           
03/11/15       (H)       MINUTE(JUD)                                                                                            
03/18/15       (H)       JUD AT 1:00 PM CAPITOL 120                                                                             
03/18/15       (H)       <Bill Hearing Canceled>                                                                                
03/25/15       (H)       JUD AT 1:00 PM CAPITOL 120                                                                             
03/25/15       (H)       <Bill Hearing Canceled>                                                                                
03/27/15       (H)       JUD AT 1:00 PM CAPITOL 120                                                                             
03/27/15       (H)       Moved  CSHB 75(JUD) Out of Committee                                                                   
03/27/15       (H)       MINUTE(JUD)                                                                                            
03/30/15       (H)       JUD RPT CS(JUD) NT 1DP 3NR 3AM                                                                         
03/30/15       (H)       DP: LEDOUX                                                                                             
03/30/15       (H)       NR: MILLETT, CLAMAN, FOSTER                                                                            
03/30/15       (H)       AM: LYNN, KELLER, GRUENBERG                                                                            
04/02/15       (H)       TRANSMITTED TO (S)                                                                                     
04/02/15       (H)       VERSION: CSHB 75(JUD) AM                                                                               
04/03/15       (S)       READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS                                                                        
04/03/15       (S)       CRA, JUD                                                                                               
04/07/15       (S)       CRA AT 3:30 PM BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)                                                                      
04/07/15       (S)       Heard & Held                                                                                           
04/07/15       (S)       MINUTE(CRA)                                                                                            
04/14/15       (S)       CRA AT 3:30 PM BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)                                                                      
04/14/15       (S)       Moved SCS CSHB 75(CRA) Out of Committee                                                                
04/14/15       (S)       MINUTE(CRA)                                                                                            
04/15/15       (S)       JUD AT 1:30 PM BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
WITNESS REGISTER                                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
GEORGE R. BOATRIGHT, Nominee                                                                                                    
Commission on Judicial Conduct                                                                                                  
Wasilla, Alaska                                                                                                                 
POSITION STATEMENT:  Testified as nominee to the Commission on                                                                
Judicial Conduct.                                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE TAMMIE WILSON                                                                                                    
Alaska State Legislature                                                                                                        
Juneau, Alaska                                                                                                                  
POSITION STATEMENT:  Sponsor of HB 11 and HB 15.                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
BARBARA BARNES, Staff                                                                                                           
Representative Tammie Wilson                                                                                                    
Alaska State Legislature                                                                                                        
Juneau, Alaska                                                                                                                  
POSITION STATEMENT:  Introduced HB 11 and answered questions                                                                  
about HB 15 on behalf of the sponsor.                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
NANCY MEADE, General Counsel                                                                                                    
Administrative Staff                                                                                                            
Alaska Court System                                                                                                             
Anchorage, Alaska                                                                                                               
POSITION STATEMENT:  Answered questions related to HB 11 and HB                                                               
75.                                                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
GENEVIEVE WOJTUSIK, Staff                                                                                                       
Senator Lesil McGuire                                                                                                           
Alaska State Legislature                                                                                                        
Juneau, Alaska                                                                                                                  
POSITION STATEMENT:  Spoke to the changes in the Senate CS for                                                                
HB 15.                                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
RON TAYLOR, Commissioner                                                                                                        
Department of Corrections (DOC)                                                                                                 
Anchorage, Alaska                                                                                                               
POSITION STATEMENT:  Responded to questions related to HB 15.                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
DENNIS JOHNSON, Program Director                                                                                                
Alaska Pretrial Services                                                                                                        
Anchorage, Alaska                                                                                                               
POSITION STATEMENT:  Discussed the 24/7 program during the                                                                    
hearing on HB 15.                                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE CATHY TILTON                                                                                                     
Alaska State Legislature                                                                                                        
Juneau, Alaska                                                                                                                  
POSITION STATEMENT:  Sponsor of HB 75.                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
HEATH HILYARD, Staff                                                                                                            
Representative Cathy Tilton                                                                                                     
Alaska State Legislature                                                                                                        
Juneau, Alaska                                                                                                                  
POSITION STATEMENT:  Described the policy components of HB 75.                                                                
                                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
ACTION NARRATIVE                                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
1:38:02 PM                                                                                                                    
VICE  CHAIR JOHN  COGHILL called  the  Senate Judiciary  Standing                                                             
Committee meeting  to order at 1:38  p.m. Present at the  call to                                                               
order were Senators Micciche, Costello, and Vice Chair Coghill.                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
^Confirmation Hearing: Commission on Judicial Conduct                                                                           
                      CONFIRMATION HEARING                                                                                  
                 Commission on Judicial Conduct                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
1:39:15 PM                                                                                                                    
VICE CHAIR  COGHILL announced the  first order of  business would                                                               
be a  confirmation hearing.  He asked Mr.  Boatright to  tell the                                                               
committee  about  himself and  his  interest  in serving  on  the                                                               
Commission on Judicial Conduct.                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
GEORGE  R. BOATRIGHT,  Nominee, Commission  on Judicial  Conduct,                                                               
said he  lives in Wasilla.  He's been  in Alaska since  the 1960s                                                               
and  has more  than 40  years of  experience in  law enforcement.                                                               
He's  been retired  for about  three years  and looks  forward to                                                               
this public service.                                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
VICE CHAIR  COGHILL asked if  he'd had the opportunity  to attend                                                               
any commission meetings.                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
MR. BOATRIGHT answered no.                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
VICE CHAIR COGHILL asked if he sought the nomination.                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
MR. BOATRIGHT replied he was solicited.                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
VICE CHAIR  COGHILL asked  if he'd  had a chance  to look  at the                                                               
goals of the commission and how he might help achieve them.                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
MR.  BOATRIGHT  replied  he   received  the  commission  workbook                                                               
yesterday and pursued it a  little. He opined that his background                                                               
in investigations  and confidential personnel  issues compliments                                                               
this service.                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
1:42:31 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR MICCICHE asked  if he understands some of  the issues and                                                               
if  he  can explain  why  he  feels  he's  equipped and  fair  in                                                               
evaluating different processes.                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
MR. BOATRIGHT replied he learned  in dealing with law enforcement                                                               
personnel  that complaints  are  oftentimes  lodged for  ulterior                                                               
reasons. In the  judicial context, complaints about  a judge have                                                               
to be  based on  conduct and  whether his  or her  actions comply                                                               
with  the ethical  standards. It's  not a  matter of  agreeing or                                                               
disagreeing with a judge's findings.                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR MICCICHE  asked how he  would have handled  the potential                                                               
prosecutorial  misconduct,  assuming   the  Senator  Ted  Stevens                                                               
prosecution was a state case.                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
MR. BOATRIGHT replied he wasn't familiar with the case.                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
VICE CHAIR COGHILL  summarized the federal case  and advised that                                                               
it was a different set of circumstances.                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR MICCICHE  asked how he would  view it if someone  did not                                                               
have a fair trial in a state case.                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
MR.  BOATRIGHT  replied  it  would  be  unconscionable.  It's  of                                                               
paramount importance for someone to  be able to demonstrate their                                                               
innocence and that right can't be infringed upon.                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
1:48:02 PM                                                                                                                    
VICE  CHAIR   COGHILL  announced  that  in   accordance  with  AS                                                               
39.05.080  the  Senate  Judiciary Standing  Committee  recommends                                                               
forwarding  the  appointment  of  George  Boatright  to  a  joint                                                               
session for  consideration. He reminded members  that signing the                                                               
report in no way reflects  individual members' intent to vote for                                                               
or  against  the  conformation  of  the  individual.  Finding  no                                                               
objection, the  name George Boatright  was forwarded to  the full                                                               
body for consideration.                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
At ease from 1:49:26 pm to 1:46:57 pm.                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
         HB  11-NO INTERNET ACCESS TO SOME CRIM. CASES                                                                      
                                                                                                                              
1:49:57 PM                                                                                                                    
VICE  CHAIR  COGHILL reconvened  the  meeting  and announced  the                                                               
consideration of  HB 11. "An Act  restricting the  publication of                                                               
certain  records  of  criminal  cases  on  a  publicly  available                                                               
Internet website; and providing for an effective date."                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
BARBARA BARNES,  Staff, Representative Tammie  Wilson, introduced                                                               
HB 11, reading from the following sponsor statement:                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
     "Every  person   is  presumed  innocent   until  proven                                                                    
     guilty".  HB  11 directs  the  Alaska  Court System  to                                                                    
     remove  from its  public  internet  website records  of                                                                    
     criminal cases  that were acquitted of  all charges, by                                                                    
     dismissal  of  all charges,  or  by  acquittal of  some                                                                    
     charges  and dismissal  of remaining  charges after  60                                                                    
     days  have  elapsed  from  the  date  of  acquittal  or                                                                    
     dismissal of the case.                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
     CourtView,  the  Alaska  Trial Courts  online  publicly                                                                    
     accessible  database,   provides  access   for  persons                                                                    
     seeking  information  on  the status  of  criminal  and                                                                    
     civil  cases,  the  nature of  criminal  charges  filed                                                                    
     against persons,  and the final outcome  of litigation.                                                                    
     Court  View  forever  shows  the  arrest  and  charging                                                                    
     documents  for   persons  who  were   never  convicted,                                                                    
     allowing society to scrutinize  any individual, for any                                                                    
     reason, and  socially chastise  the innocent.  In spite                                                                    
     of CourtView user warnings, that  a charge is not to be                                                                    
     considered  a  conviction,  this public  posting  of  a                                                                    
     person's name  and charges  can have  dire consequences                                                                    
     on the individual's  livelihood and inherent liberties.                                                                    
     From housing to employment  prospects, the innocent are                                                                    
     socially judged  guilty by the  very presence  of their                                                                    
     names  on CourtView  regardless of  the outcome  of the                                                                    
     case.                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
     By  very definition,  a  person is  not  a criminal  if                                                                    
     acquitted at  trial, or if  their case is  dismissed by                                                                    
     the   courts.  In   American   jurisprudence,  we   are                                                                    
     considered   innocent  until   proven  guilty.   HB  11                                                                    
     champions  this principle.  We  ask  that Alaskans  who                                                                    
     have not been found guilty  of any wrong doing be given                                                                    
     the  right  to  emancipation  of  social  distrust  and                                                                    
     inherent prejudices.                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
1:53:04 PM                                                                                                                    
VICE CHAIR COGHILL  asked Ms. Meade to comment on  whether or not                                                               
case files would be confidential and  if the court could meet the                                                               
60-day deadline.                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
1:53:40 PM                                                                                                                    
NANCY MEADE, General Counsel,  Administrative Staff, Alaska Court                                                               
System, clarified that the Court System  is neutral on HB 11. She                                                               
confirmed that under  the wording of this bill,  case files would                                                               
be public,  not confidential. The  bill directs the  Court System                                                               
to remove the cases from  CourtView within 60 days of disposition                                                               
of the  case, and  that can  be done. The  court believes  it can                                                               
comply  with  the  legislative intent  to  do  it  retroactively,                                                               
although there may be some glitches in that piece, she said.                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
VICE CHAIR COGHILL  asked the sponsor's staff  if the information                                                               
that  was removed  from CourtView  would be  available through  a                                                               
records search at the courthouse.                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
MS. BARNES replied that's correct.                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
VICE  CHAIR COGHILL  asked  Ms. Meade  how  someone would  access                                                               
those paper files  at the courthouse after they  had been removed                                                               
from the website.                                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
MS. MEADE replied the court  is working on the process. Initially                                                               
they were  thinking that people  could go to  one of the  40 some                                                               
courthouses and submit  a request for the clerk to  look up those                                                               
dismissed and acquitted  cases. The other alternative  is for the                                                               
court  to  create a  third  portal  on  CourtView that  would  be                                                               
available at courthouses  so a citizen could look  up somebody by                                                               
their last  name and find  something more  than is on  the public                                                               
version.  They haven't  figured out  how to  do that  yet, or  if                                                               
that's the best option, but they will before the effective date.                                                                
                                                                                                                                
VICE CHAIR COGHILL asked if it  will impose a financial burden on                                                               
the Court System to create the third portal.                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
MS. MEADE replied  the Court System submitted a  zero fiscal note                                                               
with the knowledge  that it would require staff  time and perhaps                                                               
actual dollars to comply with the bill.                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
1:58:08 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR  MICCICHE asked  how often  someone who  is convicted  of                                                               
domestic  violence  is found  to  have  a  long track  record  of                                                               
dismissals and acquittals.                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
MS. MEADE  replied she  didn't know how  often that  happens, but                                                               
she understands the concern. Some  people would not have anything                                                               
on CourtView yet they may have  had cases filed against them that                                                               
ended in dismissal  or acquittal for some reason  or another. She                                                               
recalled that concern was voiced last year.                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR  MICCICHE said  he wanted  it clear  for the  record that                                                               
acquittals  and  dismissals  would  still  be  available  at  the                                                               
courthouse.                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
MS. MEADE confirmed that was correct.                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR COSTELLO  asked what recourse  people would have  if they                                                               
didn't have a courthouse in their community.                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
MS. MEADE  explained that courthouses  are spread  throughout the                                                               
state  so  that  every  community  has access  to  a  court.  For                                                               
example,  the court  in Palmer  serves  Big Lake  and the  Bethel                                                               
court  serves  the community  of  Eek.  People  that want  to  do                                                               
research under this bill would have  to go to the courthouse that                                                               
serves their community.                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR  MICCICHE  asked if  someone  could  request the  records                                                               
telephonically.                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
MS.  MEADE responded  that the  Court System  doesn't offer  that                                                               
service as  a regular practice  because of  staffing limitations,                                                               
but the court does exercise a rule of reason.                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
VICE CHAIR COGHILL invited the sponsor to comment.                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  TAMMIE WILSON,  sponsor of  HB 11,  described the                                                               
bill  as a  "happy in  between" of  former Senator  Dyson's bill.                                                               
That  bill  would have  sealed  all  the  records whereas  HB  11                                                               
directs  the  court to  remove  records  of criminal  cases  from                                                               
CourtView  [60  days]  after  a criminal  case  is  acquitted  or                                                               
dismissed,  but  that  information  is  still  available  at  the                                                               
courthouse.                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR MICCICHE opined that it's  important that the information                                                               
is still available. He described the bill as a fair compromise.                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR COSTELLO asked how other states address this issue.                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE WILSON said she couldn't  find anything similar to                                                               
this when she researched county records.                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
VICE CHAIR COGHILL asked Ms. Meade to address the question.                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
2:06:48 PM                                                                                                                    
MS. MEADE said  there is a broad spectrum of  thinking about what                                                               
is appropriate  to post online and  it's handled in a  variety of                                                               
ways.  Some  courts  post every  document  while  others  exclude                                                               
family and  criminal law. The  Alaska Court System  favors public                                                               
court records,  although there has  to be  a balance. If  this is                                                               
the policy call of the legislature, the court will follow it.                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
2:08:40 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR  MICCICHE moved  to report  SSHB 11  from committee  with                                                               
individual recommendations and attached zero fiscal note.                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
VICE  CHAIR  COGHILL  announced  that  without  objection  CSSSHB                                                               
11(JUD)  AM  is  reported  from  the  Senate  Judiciary  Standing                                                               
Committee.                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
            HB  15-CREDITS FOR TIME SERVED/GOOD TIME                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
2:09:14 PM                                                                                                                    
VICE CHAIR COGHILL  announced the consideration of HB 15. "An Act                                                               
relating  to  credits  toward  a  sentence  of  imprisonment  for                                                               
certain  persons under  electronic  monitoring." He  asked for  a                                                               
motion to adopt the Senate CS.                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
At ease from 2:10 pm to 2:11 pm.                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
2:11:05 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR COSTELLO  motioned to  adopt the Senate  CS for  CSHB 15,                                                               
labeled 29-LS0102\X, as the working document.                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
VICE CHAIR COGHILL objected for discussion purposes.                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
2:11:28 PM                                                                                                                    
GENEVIEVE WOJTUSIK,  Staff, Senator  Lesil McGuire, spoke  to the                                                               
changes  in  the Senate  CS  for  HB 15.  Version  X  adds a  new                                                               
paragraph (21) to AS 12.55.155(d)  on page 2, lines [17-20]. This                                                               
is the  content of SB  82 that  the committee heard  and reported                                                               
out.  It allows  a judge  to consider  participation in  the 24/7                                                               
sobriety  program  as   a  mitigating  factor  at   the  time  of                                                               
sentencing. The  new paragraph states  that "the defendant,  as a                                                               
condition  of   release  ordered   by  the   court,  successfully                                                               
completed  an alcohol  and sub  stance  abuse monitoring  program                                                               
established  under   AS  47.38.020."   At  the  request   of  the                                                               
Department   of  Law,   the  word   "complied"  was   changed  to                                                               
"completed" to align with language that is already in statute.                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
VICE  CHAIR COGHILL  withdrew  his objection  and  version X  was                                                               
before the committee.                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
2:13:06 PM                                                                                                                    
REPRESENTATIVE TAMMIE  WILSON, sponsor  of HB 15,  stated support                                                               
for  the Senate  CS.  She explained  that  the legislation  would                                                               
allow the  courts to grant  a defendant credit toward  a sentence                                                               
for the  time spent under  electronic monitoring. The  purpose of                                                               
the bill is  to encourage people to get help  as soon as possible                                                               
versus sitting in jail awaiting  trial. Currently private vendors                                                               
are offering electronic  monitoring in the major  cities, but she                                                               
knows  that the  Department of  Corrections would  be excited  to                                                               
enter this realm.                                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR COSTELLO said  she appreciates the cost  savings the bill                                                               
represents. She  asked the cost of  a hard bed, the  average cost                                                               
of  residential  treatment,  and  the daily  cost  of  electronic                                                               
monitoring.                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE WILSON  replied the cost  of a prison bed  is $158                                                               
per day  and the  cost of electronic  monitoring in  Fairbanks is                                                               
about  $105  per  week.  Specialty   additions  such  as  alcohol                                                               
monitoring cost  more. She  didn't know  the cost  of residential                                                               
treatment.                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR COSTELLO asked her to  discuss the opportunity for people                                                               
to remain employed while they're on electronic monitoring.                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  WILSON explained  that  this allows  a person  to                                                               
remain in  the community, with certain  restrictions depending on                                                               
the  charge,  and  therefore  hold down  their  job  rather  than                                                               
sitting in jail. She cited an  example and shared that the person                                                               
said it's been  easier for him to stop drinking  because he knows                                                               
the immediate consequence if he takes a drink.                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
2:17:53 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI joined the committee.                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
VICE CHAIR COGHILL  asked Commissioner Taylor if  DOC manages the                                                               
monitoring systems.                                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
RON  TAYLOR,  Commissioner,   Department  of  Corrections  (DOC),                                                               
answered  no; DOC  does not  monitor the  private companies  that                                                               
offer electronic monitoring services.                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
VICE CHAIR COGHILL  asked if DOC would be part  of the discussion                                                               
about  placing a  defendant on  electronic monitoring  instead of                                                               
sending them to jail awaiting trial.                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
COMMISSIONER   TAYLOR   replied   the  court   is   making   that                                                               
determination.                                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE WILSON clarified that this  is not directed by the                                                               
court.  She explained  that when  someone is  charged, the  court                                                               
either  sets bail  or designates  a  third party  to monitor  the                                                               
defendant 24/7. The defendant would  bring the monitoring company                                                               
to  court and  request  electronic monitoring  as  a third  party                                                               
custodian. The  court would question the  vendor's representative                                                               
just as it would any third party custodian.                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
VICE CHAIR  COGHILL asked  if someone who  requests this  type of                                                               
monitoring  is  admitting guilt  or  just  precluding other  risk                                                               
tools the court would use.                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  WILSON replied  electronic monitoring  is already                                                               
being done  but no  credit is  given at  sentencing for  the time                                                               
spent under electronic monitoring.                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
VICE CHAIR COGHILL asked what happens if there's a violation.                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  WILSON replied  the  defendant would  go back  to                                                               
jail if they violated a  condition of release while on electronic                                                               
monitoring.  She expressed  hope that  DOC would  eventually make                                                               
use of this tool.                                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
2:23:46 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI directed  attention to page 1,  line 11, and                                                               
asked  if  the  definition  of   "criminal  offense"  includes  a                                                               
probation or parole violation.                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE WILSON replied  this is just pretrial  so a person                                                               
would not be on parole or probation.                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
VICE  CHAIR COGHILL  asked Ms.  Meade to  describe how  the court                                                               
would see this option on a third party release.                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
NANCY MEADE, General Counsel,  Administrative Staff, Alaska Court                                                               
System, explained that a defendant who  has a bail condition of a                                                               
third party  custodian could use  a professional vendor  as their                                                               
third-party  custodian.  In  Anchorage,  Fairbanks,  Palmer,  and                                                               
Kenai, the defendant who has that  requirement to get out of jail                                                               
can bring the vendor's representative  and ask the judge to issue                                                               
an order approving  that company as a third  party custodian. The                                                               
order would include  conditions such using the  ankle monitor and                                                               
certain   exclusion   zones.   The    vendor   would   have   the                                                               
responsibility of reporting any  transgression to the court. They                                                               
would know that the person violated  one of the conditions set by                                                               
the  court because  the ankle  monitor would  send an  electronic                                                               
alert to the vendor's business  office where the monitoring takes                                                               
place.                                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
This  is  happening  now  and  a  person  can  be  on  electronic                                                               
monitoring for a  substantial amount of time  awaiting trial. The                                                               
intent of the  sponsor is that a person who  purchases a contract                                                               
with a third party vendor would receive credit.                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
MS. MEADE  clarified that the  court is  neutral on the  bill but                                                               
can comply.  The court  does not approve  or monitor  third party                                                               
venders;  it is  a  private  contract and  a  defendant pays  the                                                               
business between  $300 and  $600 per month  for the  service. The                                                               
court approves the  contract if it believes both will  be able to                                                               
fulfill  their responsibilities.  Under the  bill, the  defendant                                                               
would inform the  judge that they would seek credit  for the time                                                               
they  paid for  the electronic  monitor,  and that  they want  an                                                               
order that comports with the  statute so they can receive credit.                                                               
At the  time of sentencing the  court will look at  the order and                                                               
deduct the time  spent on electronic monitoring  if the defendant                                                               
didn't violate any of the conditions.                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR  MICCICHE asked  why current  law specifically  prohibits                                                               
the court from granting credit  for electronic monitoring when it                                                               
allows credit for time spent in a residential treatment program.                                                                
                                                                                                                                
MS. MEADE  explained that the residential  treatment described in                                                               
AS  12.55.027   is  required  to  have   the  characteristics  of                                                               
incarceration. She  recalled a  case where  a defendant  asked to                                                               
receive credit for the time  served on electronic monitoring, but                                                               
the court  was constrained  by the statute  and decided  that the                                                               
time  didn't qualify.  Later the  legislature  codified that  and                                                               
added a  subsection to 027  saying a  person does not  get credit                                                               
for electronic monitoring.                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR MICCICHE asked if electronic  monitoring has a particular                                                               
range.                                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
MS. MEADE replied the range varies  according to the order by the                                                               
court.                                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
2:31:43 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI asked if taking  a drink would be considered                                                               
a criminal offense under the provision  in Section 2 if the court                                                               
order prohibited alcohol consumption.                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
MS.  MEADE answered  in the  affirmative. Disobeying  anything in                                                               
the bail order is violating a court order and that is a crime.                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI asked if a  person would lose all the credit                                                               
for  the time  spent on  electronic monitoring  if they  violated                                                               
their conditions of bail on day 364.                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
MS.  MEADE  replied  that  would  be  an  interpretation  of  the                                                               
statute, but  the district attorney  would argue that  the person                                                               
is not  entitled to  the credit because  they violated  the court                                                               
order, which is a criminal offense.                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
2:33:12 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI asked the sponsor's intent.                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
BARBARA BARNES, Staff, Representative  Tammie Wilson, offered her                                                               
understanding that a  person who violates the  conditions of bail                                                               
set by the court would  not receive credit. She acknowledged that                                                               
it may  be open  to interpretation  and added  "If you  break the                                                               
law, you're  not going to  get the credit  and I believe  that is                                                               
the intent of the sponsor."                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI  urged the  committee to clarify  its intent                                                               
because this  provision would  be litigated  and the  court would                                                               
look to these committee hearings for the legislative intent.                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR  MICCICHE observed  that both  Sections 1  and 2  use the                                                               
term may so  the court is not required to  grant credit. It would                                                               
be on a case-by-case basis.                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
MS. MEADE  agreed that it  does allow the court  some discretion,                                                               
but it would it  would be unusual for a judge  to deny credit for                                                               
some non-statutory reason.                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
VICE CHAIR  COGHILL questioned  whether it  would add  clarity to                                                               
add "only" on page 1, line 10, following "monitoring."                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
2:36:16 PM                                                                                                                    
DENNIS  JOHNSON,  Program   Director,  Alaska  Pretrial  Services                                                               
(APS), Anchorage, Alaska, stated  that APS administers the Alaska                                                               
24/7 Sobriety program  in the third judicial  district. They have                                                               
two offices  with testing  facilities in  the Anchorage  area and                                                               
are  expanding  to  Palmer.   APS  provides  pretrial  electronic                                                               
monitoring, which  is what HB 15  and SB 82 are  directly related                                                               
to.  He reported  that APS  currently has  about 126  active 24/7                                                               
participants  and about  162  offenders  under active  electronic                                                               
monitor. They provide  daily supervision for people  who live and                                                               
work from the  North Slope and Barrow through Kodiak  and down to                                                               
Juneau.  He opined  that both  HB  15 and  SB 82  provide a  cost                                                               
effective way  to monitor  and give credit  to offenders  who are                                                               
working toward sobriety and court compliance.                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
Addressing an  earlier question  about range,  he said  it varies                                                               
depending on  the severity  of the  alleged offense.  He believes                                                               
that  Alaska  Pretrial is  more  strict  that other  professional                                                               
vendors.  He said  the  bill  is a  cost-effective  tool to  help                                                               
people who are trying to change their behavior for the better.                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR MICCICHE asked  if his company offers  both proximity and                                                               
alcohol monitoring.                                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
MR. JOHNSON  answered yes; Alaska  Pretrial Services  uses active                                                               
GPS with  two way communication.  He described geo-fencing  on an                                                               
unclassified  felon who  is confined  to his  house. If  he steps                                                               
outside  his residence,  APS receives  an immediate  alarm and  a                                                               
case officer  responds and notifies law  enforcement. This system                                                               
was   developed  for   community  safety,   victim  safety,   and                                                               
compliance; exclusion zones can  be established around a victim's                                                               
residence, school  or place  of work  and range  from 10  feet to                                                               
five miles.                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
VICE CHAIR  COGHILL asked  the sponsor  if the  intent is  that a                                                               
person would lose  all credit if they violated  the conditions of                                                               
bail.                                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE WILSON  replied it would  be up to the  court. She                                                               
added "If  I was in  charge I'd make them  lose it all  because I                                                               
think that's a bigger incentive."                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
Responding to  an earlier question,  she explained  that "private                                                               
residence" was changed to "residence" to include halfway houses.                                                                
                                                                                                                                
2:46:38 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI  commented that Section 2  will be litigated                                                               
and then directed  attention to page 2, line 12.  That line talks                                                               
about the  court imposing restrictions  on a person's  freedom of                                                               
movement  and behavior.  He  asked if  the  court always  imposes                                                               
restrictions on both freedom of movement and behavior.                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
MS. MEADE confirmed  that there would be  restrictions on freedom                                                               
of movement  if the  electronic monitoring  had a  GPS component.                                                               
She guessed  that a standard  bail condition of commit  no crimes                                                               
would be interpreted as a restriction on behavior.                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI  suggested the Department of  Law (DOL) look                                                               
and consider whether or not to  replace the final "and" with "or"                                                               
on page 1, line 12.                                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE   WILSON   said   she  didn't   ask   about   that                                                               
specifically, but Department of Law did have a lot of input.                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
2:48:45 PM                                                                                                                    
VICE  CHAIR  COGHILL said  his  preference  is  for the  bill  to                                                               
clearly say that  a person would lose all credit  for a violation                                                               
of  a bail  condition. He  held HB  15 in  committee for  further                                                               
consideration.                                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
        HB  75-MARIJUANA REG;CLUBS;MUNIS;LOCAL OPT ELECT                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
2:49:58 PM                                                                                                                    
VICE CHAIR COGHILL  announced the consideration of HB 75. "An Act                                                               
relating  to  the  registration of  marijuana  establishments  by                                                               
municipalities;  relating  to   the  definition  of  'marijuana';                                                               
clarifying standards for personal use  of marijuana by persons 21                                                               
years  of age  or older;  prohibiting the  public consumption  of                                                               
marijuana;  authorizing  the  registration  of  marijuana  clubs;                                                               
relating to  established villages  and to local  option elections                                                               
regarding   the  operation   of  marijuana   establishments;  and                                                               
providing for an effective date."                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
2:50:33 PM                                                                                                                    
REPRESENTATIVE CATHY  TILTON, sponsor of  HB 75, described  HB 75                                                               
as  a  guidebook  for  municipalities   as  they  put  ordinances                                                               
together  [to  regulate marijuana  clubs].  She  deferred to  her                                                               
staff to discuss the substantive parts of the bill.                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
HEATH HILYARD, Staff, Representative  Cathy Tilton, said he would                                                               
speak to the comprehensive  Senate Judiciary committee substitute                                                               
on Friday and today he would describe the policy components.                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
   · Page 2, line 21, has a household limit of 24 marijuana                                                                     
     plants.                                                                                                                    
   · It clarifies what aiding and supporting any activities for                                                                 
     personal use of marijuana constitutes.                                                                                     
   · It provides that established villages may hold local                                                                       
    elections to opt out of commercial marijuana activities.                                                                    
   · Several sections clarify that municipalities may use their                                                                 
     own ordinances in some of the decision making situations if                                                                
     they have a version of the Administrative Procedures Act                                                                   
     similar to AS 44.62.                                                                                                       
   · Page 6, lines 2-3, stipulates that municipalities that                                                                     
     currently  have the  power to  establish civil  and criminal                                                               
     penalties  related  to  alcohol   also  have  the  power  to                                                               
     establish  civil   and  criminal  penalties   for  marijuana                                                               
     violations of commercial establishments  only with regard to                                                               
     time, place, and manner. This is consistent with Title 4.                                                                  
   · It provides the local option for established villages that                                                                 
     is modified based on Title 4 as it currently exists.                                                                       
   · It includes the establishment of marijuana clubs at the                                                                    
     request of several municipalities.                                                                                         
   · A provision on page 10, line 20, allows the supreme court                                                                  
     to establish a bail schedule that does not require a court                                                                 
     appearance.                                                                                                                
   · Page 11 provides important definitions. In particular the                                                                  
     term "manufacture"  has the meaning  given in  AS 11.71.900,                                                               
     which  stipulates   that  grow  for  personal   use  is  not                                                               
     considered manufacture.  The definition of  "marijuana club"                                                               
     stipulates that  it is  not considered  a public  place, and                                                               
     public place is given a definition.                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
VICE CHAIR  COGHILL shared  that he  was not  a fan  of marijuana                                                               
clubs because of the question of determining inebriation.                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
MR. HILYARD  responded that  marijuana club  is loosely  based on                                                               
what  a  bottle club  in  under  Title 4.  He  said  this was  in                                                               
response to request  from municipalities, but it's  a policy call                                                               
for this committee.                                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
2:58:14 PM                                                                                                                    
VICE  CHAIR  COGHILL   held  HB  75  in   committee  for  further                                                               
consideration.                                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
2:58:53 PM                                                                                                                    
There being  no further  business to  come before  the committee,                                                               
Vice  Chair  Coghill  adjourned  the  Senate  Judiciary  Standing                                                               
Committee meeting at 2:58 p.m.                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                

Document Name Date/Time Subjects
Resume George Boatright_ Judicial Conduct.pdf SJUD 4/15/2015 1:30:00 PM
1_HB11 Sponsor Statement.pdf SJUD 4/15/2015 1:30:00 PM
HB 11
2 HB11 Version N.A.pdf SJUD 4/15/2015 1:30:00 PM
HB 11
3 HB 11(JUD) am Explanation Of Changes 4-9-2015.pdf SJUD 4/15/2015 1:30:00 PM
HB 11
4 HB 11 FN 1.pdf SJUD 4/15/2015 1:30:00 PM
HB 11
4.2 HB11 FN 3.pdf SJUD 4/15/2015 1:30:00 PM
HB 11
4.3 HB11 FN 4.pdf SJUD 4/15/2015 1:30:00 PM
HB 11
4.4 HB11 FN5.pdf SJUD 4/15/2015 1:30:00 PM
HB 11
4.5 HB 11 FN6.pdf SJUD 4/15/2015 1:30:00 PM
HB 11
4.6 HB 11 FN 7.pdf SJUD 4/15/2015 1:30:00 PM
HB 11
5 HB11 Letter of Support Whited.pdf SJUD 4/15/2015 1:30:00 PM
HB 11
5.1 HB11 Support Document SB108 - Carmen Gutierrez.pdf SJUD 4/15/2015 1:30:00 PM
HB 11
5.2 HB11 Support Document SB108 - James Noble.pdf SJUD 4/15/2015 1:30:00 PM
HB 11
5.3 HB11 Support Document SB108 - Mary Geddes.pdf SJUD 4/15/2015 1:30:00 PM
HB 11
5.4 HB11 Letter in Opposition - AK Assoc of Chiefs of Police.pdf SJUD 4/15/2015 1:30:00 PM
HB 11
5.5 HB11 Testimony Wally Tetlow.msg SJUD 4/15/2015 1:30:00 PM
HB 11
1 HB 15 Sponsor Statement.pdf SJUD 4/15/2015 1:30:00 PM
HB 15
2 HB 15(FIN).pdf SJUD 4/15/2015 1:30:00 PM
HB 15
2.1 Senate Judiciary CS for HB15 Version X.pdf SJUD 4/15/2015 1:30:00 PM
HB 15
3 HB 15 (FIN) Sectional Analysis 4-9-2015.pdf SJUD 4/15/2015 1:30:00 PM
HB 15
4 HB15 FIN Explanation Of Changes 4-9-2015.pdf SJUD 4/15/2015 1:30:00 PM
HB 15
5 HB15- FN 1.pdf SJUD 4/15/2015 1:30:00 PM
HB 15
5.1 HB15-FN 2.pdf SJUD 4/15/2015 1:30:00 PM
HB 15
5.3 HB15-FN 3.pdf SJUD 4/15/2015 1:30:00 PM
HB 15
5.4 HB15-FN 4.pdf SJUD 4/15/2015 1:30:00 PM
HB 15
6 HB15 Supporting Document - Electronic Monitoring Requirements.pdf SJUD 4/15/2015 1:30:00 PM
HB 15
6.1 HB15 Supporting Document - Electronic Monitoring Terms and Conditions.pdf SJUD 4/15/2015 1:30:00 PM
HB 15
6.1 HB15 Supporting Document - Electronic Monitoring Terms and Conditions.pdf SJUD 4/15/2015 1:30:00 PM
HB 15
6.2 HB15 Supporting Document - DOC House arrest and EM program indigent form.pdf SJUD 4/15/2015 1:30:00 PM
HB 15
1 HB75 Sponsor Statement versionU A.pdf SJUD 4/15/2015 1:30:00 PM
HB 75
2 HB75 Version U.A..pdf SJUD 4/15/2015 1:30:00 PM
HB 75
3 HB75(JUD)am Sectional Analysis versionUA.pdf SJUD 4/15/2015 1:30:00 PM
HB 75
4 CSHB75 Explanation of Changes U Aversion.pdf SJUD 4/15/2015 1:30:00 PM
HB 75
5 HB75 FN 1.pdf SJUD 4/15/2015 1:30:00 PM
HB 75
6 CSHB 75 Supporting AML.pdf SJUD 4/15/2015 1:30:00 PM
HB 75
6.1 HB 75 Supporting CBJ.pdf SJUD 4/15/2015 1:30:00 PM
HB 75
6.2 HB 75 Supporting MOA.pdf SJUD 4/15/2015 1:30:00 PM
HB 75
6.3 HB 75 Supporting MPP.pdf SJUD 4/15/2015 1:30:00 PM
HB 75
CSHB75 Explanation of Changes R version.pdf SJUD 4/15/2015 1:30:00 PM
HB 75
CSHB75 Version R.pdf SJUD 4/15/2015 1:30:00 PM
HB 75
6.5 HB15 Supporting Document - US Dept of Justice Electronic monitoring and recidivism.pdf SJUD 4/15/2015 1:30:00 PM
HB 15