Legislature(2017 - 2018)SENATE FINANCE 532

05/10/2017 09:00 AM FINANCE

Note: the audio and video recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.

Download Mp3. <- Right click and save file as
Download Video part 1. <- Right click and save file as
Download Video part 2. <- Right click and save file as

* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ HB 222 LICENSURE OF MANICURISTS/NAIL TECHS TELECONFERENCED
Heard & Held
+ HB 103 OPTOMETRY & OPTOMETRISTS TELECONFERENCED
Moved CSHB 103(FIN) Out of Committee
+= HB 111 OIL & GAS PRODUCTION TAX;PAYMENTS;CREDITS TELECONFERENCED
<Bill Hearing Canceled>
+ SB 79 OPIOIDS;PRESCRIPTIONS;DATABASE;LICENSES TELECONFERENCED
<Pending Referral> <Bill Hearing Canceled>
+ Bills Previously Heard/Scheduled TELECONFERENCED
CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 103(FIN)                                                                                                
     "An Act relating to the practice of optometry; and                                                                         
     providing for an effective date."                                                                                          
10:22:52 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE IVY SPOHNHOLZ,  SPONSOR, introduced the bill.                                                                    
She relayed that HB 103, as  amended in the house, would not                                                                    
allow  optometrists to  perform  services  outside of  their                                                                    
scope  of   practice;  performing  invasive   surgery  would                                                                    
continue  to  be  illegal. She  said  that  if  optometrists                                                                    
wanted  to  perform  procedures beyond  what  was  currently                                                                    
allowed  in  statute  and regulation,  they  would  only  be                                                                    
allowed  to do  so if  the  licensee had  been educated  and                                                                    
trained in  the procedure at  one of the  accredited schools                                                                    
of  optometry. Additionally,  procedures  would  need to  be                                                                    
authorized by  regulations adopted by the  board. She stated                                                                    
that there should  be room for innovation  in the healthcare                                                                    
sector,   but  that   optometrists   should  only   practice                                                                    
procedures  that had  been taught  by a  credited school  of                                                                    
optometry. She noted that  the ophthalmologist definition of                                                                    
"surgery" was used in the  bill, which expressly stated that                                                                    
optometrists   would  not   practice  any   of  the   listed                                                                    
surgeries,  with narrow  exceptions.  She  relayed that  the                                                                    
definition  of "surgery"  was  broad and  that  some of  the                                                                    
things  that   optometrists  currently  practiced   met  the                                                                    
definition of  surgery. She  added that there  had to  be an                                                                    
allowance  for narrow  exceptions, which  would change  over                                                                    
time as  the skills and training  of optometrists continued.                                                                    
She offered  a personal anecdote pertaining  to the nebulous                                                                    
definition of  surgery under the current  law. She concluded                                                                    
that  the bill  would allow  for the  board of  optometry to                                                                    
regulate  itself in  an ongoing  and iterative  fashion that                                                                    
would allow for evolution in best practices.                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
10:27:29 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
BERNICE  NISBETT,   STAFF,  REPRESENTATIVE   IVY  SPOHNHOLZ,                                                                    
discussed the sectional analysis for HB 103:                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
     Notes differences between HB 103 v. U and SB 36 v. J                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
     Section 1  - The Board  of Examiners of  Optometry will                                                                  
     regulate prescriptive  authority and  develop standards                                                                    
     for the practice of optometry. No difference.                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
     Section 2  - The  board will publish  advisory opinions                                                                  
     regarding  standards  for  the practice  of  optometry.                                                                    
     Language  was changed  by the  House  Labor &  Commerce                                                                    
     committee:  expanded   to  state  that  the   Board  of                                                                    
     Examiners  of  Optometry  will be  allowed  to  publish                                                                    
     advisory opinions  to the public regarding  whether the                                                                    
     standards of practice of optometry  comply with what is                                                                    
     currently written in statute.                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
     Section  3 -  The licensee  must provide  evidence that                                                                  
     they  have completed  their continuing  education hours                                                                    
     during the preceding licensing period. No difference.                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
     Section 4  - A  licensee can  prescribe pharmaceuticals                                                                  
     in a  manner that is consistent  with board regulations                                                                    
     and  complies  with  the   limitation  on  practice  in                                                                    
     section 5. No difference.                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
     Section   5  -   Limits  an   individual  licensee   to                                                                  
     performing services  that are  within the scope  of the                                                                    
     licensee's  education,  training,  and  experience.  No                                                                    
     difference in  subsection (a). Subsections (b)  and (c)                                                                    
     were added  in the  House Finance committee:  (b) added                                                                    
     setting a  limitation on performing  ophthalmic surgery                                                                    
     unless a  licensee has received education  and training                                                                    
     from  an   accredited  school  of  optometry   and  the                                                                    
     procedure  is  authorized  in regulations  set  by  the                                                                    
     Board  of Examiners  of Optometry.  Subsection (c)  has                                                                    
     been added to define ophthalmic surgery.                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
     Section  6  -  The  definition of  optometry  has  been                                                                  
     updated. No difference.                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
     Section 7  - Section 2  is effective July 17,  2017. No                                                                  
     difference.                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
10:29:11 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
Representative  Spohnholz stressed  the importance  that the                                                                    
board have the flexibility  to evolve, while also addressing                                                                    
the issue of access to  healthcare. She said that there were                                                                    
26 ophthalmologists, verses  160 optometrists, providing the                                                                    
majority  of  eye  healthcare   throughout  the  state.  She                                                                    
thought that allowing the board  to manage itself would help                                                                    
to increase access  to high quality eye  healthcare in rural                                                                    
Alaska.                                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
10:30:40 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
Senator Hughes asked about Page  2, line 29. She asked about                                                                    
the  word  "experience"  and  wondered  how  it  applied  to                                                                    
someone  fresh out  of school.  She wondered  how experience                                                                    
would be measured.                                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
Representative   Spohnholz   explained   that   there   were                                                                    
optometrists practicing  in the state that  had been trained                                                                    
in  procedures that  they  had not  had  the opportunity  to                                                                    
provide  in 20  years. She  said that  before those  doctors                                                                    
could practice  those procedures  they would be  expected to                                                                    
be retrained in updated methods.                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
Senator Hughes  remained confused  about how  the experience                                                                    
levels would be measured.                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
Representative Spohnholz referred the  question to the board                                                                    
of optometry.                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair MacKinnon OPENED public testimony.                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
10:33:41 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
DAVID     ZUMBRO,     OPHTHALMOLOGIST,    ANCHORAGE     (via                                                                    
teleconference), spoke in opposition to  HB 103. He spoke to                                                                    
the assertion that the statutes  pertaining to optometry had                                                                    
not been  updated in  40 years;  he countered  that multiple                                                                    
times in the  past 25 years legislation had  been passed and                                                                    
signed  into law  that expanded  the scope  of practice.  He                                                                    
contended that  optometry and ophthalmology  educations were                                                                    
not equivalent or similar. He  encouraged members to further                                                                    
study  the  accreditation  requirements  for  completing  an                                                                    
ophthalmology residency. He said  that his opposition to the                                                                    
bill had  nothing to  do with  economics. He  contended that                                                                    
the  reason behind  standards  and  board certification  was                                                                    
patient safety, and that the  only way to expand medical and                                                                    
surgical  scope of  practice was  proper  education and  not                                                                    
legislation.                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
10:36:58 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
JEFF   GONNASON,   CHAIR,  ALASKA   OPTOMETRY   ASSOCIATION,                                                                    
ANCHORAGE  (via teleconference),  spoke  in  support of  the                                                                    
bill. He believed  that the bill was innocuous  and would do                                                                    
very little  to the practice  of optometry in the  state. He                                                                    
noted that  he had sent a  letter to the committee  (copy on                                                                    
file).                                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
10:38:34 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
GRIFF  STEINER,  OPHTHALMOLOGIST,  ANCHORAGE,  testified  in                                                                    
opposition to the bill. He  asserted that the bill pertained                                                                    
to  surgical procedures.  He stated  that optometrists  were                                                                    
not qualified to  perform surgery. He relayed  that the cost                                                                    
for care would increase under the legislation.                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
10:40:47 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
ANDREW  PETER, SELF,  HOMER (via  teleconference), spoke  in                                                                    
support of  HB 103. He  believed that the bill  would create                                                                    
board autonomy, which would remove  the legislature from the                                                                    
position of  managing optometry. He noted  that optometrists                                                                    
catered to a  diverse section of the  state's population. He                                                                    
offered  some details  as to  how his  practice worked  on a                                                                    
day-to-day  basis.  He  contended that  emergency  cases  in                                                                    
rural  areas  of the  state  posed  the need  for  immediate                                                                    
attention,  which occasionally  called  for optometrists  to                                                                    
perform services like ophthalmologists.                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
10:44:07 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
CARL     ROSEN,      OPHTHALMOLOGIST,     ANCHORAGE     (via                                                                    
teleconference),  testified  in  strong  opposition  to  the                                                                    
bill.  He highlighted  that the  optometry board  should not                                                                    
have  the authority  to  decide  which surgical  procedures,                                                                    
laser procedures,  and injections  were possible.  He argued                                                                    
that  optometrists were  not qualified  to perform  the same                                                                    
medical procedures as ophthalmologists  because they did not                                                                    
have the  same rigorous  medical training. He  believed that                                                                    
the bill  would work if  the word "unless" was  removed from                                                                    
the language pertaining to surgery and optometry.                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
10:46:43 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
REBEKAH SAWERS, SELF, HOONAH  (via teleconference), spoke in                                                                    
opposition to the bill.                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
10:47:08 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
LUCRETIA  DENNIS,  SELF,   ANCHORAGE  (via  teleconference),                                                                    
testified  in  opposition  to  the   bill.  She  provided  a                                                                    
comparison between armed and  unarmed security officers, and                                                                    
ophthalmologists versus optometrists.                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
10:50:13 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
DAVID  KARPIK, SELF,  KENAI (via  teleconference), spoke  in                                                                    
support  of  HB 103.  He  testified  that optometrists  were                                                                    
sometimes  the only  eyecare providers  in rural  Alaska. He                                                                    
said  that as  an  optometrist he  supported practices  that                                                                    
provided  comprehensive  eyecare  services and  referred  to                                                                    
sub-special  services,  which   enhanced  patient  care  and                                                                    
lowered  costs by  allowing primary  eyecare to  be provided                                                                    
locally. He  referred to a  U.S News and World  report study                                                                    
published  in early  2017,  that ranked  Alaska  as last  in                                                                    
access  to  healthcare.  He  believed  that  the  delays  to                                                                    
healthcare   that  were   currently  written   into  statute                                                                    
hindered   access  to   eyecare.   He   believed  that   the                                                                    
legislation would create an optometry  statute that would be                                                                    
durable  and  would  allow  for  the  incorporation  of  new                                                                    
technology in the field.                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
10:52:38 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
DAVID KATZEEK,  SELF, JUNEAU (via teleconference),  spoke in                                                                    
opposition to  HB 103. He  testified of the  delicate nature                                                                    
and  importance of  the  human eye.  He  asserted that  eyes                                                                    
"speak"   in   a   way  understood   by   optometrists   and                                                                    
ophthalmologists. He  worried that  the bill was  being used                                                                    
as a  political tool  at the  expense of  the eye  health of                                                                    
Alaskans.  He  warned that  the  legislation  passed by  the                                                                    
committee  should protect  the  eyes of  current and  future                                                                    
Alaskans.  He  stressed  the importance  of  teaching  young                                                                    
people  to  maintain a  health  whole  body, which  included                                                                    
their eyes.                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
10:57:28 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
STANLEY  FULLER MD,  SELF,  FAIRBANKS (via  teleconference),                                                                    
testified  in opposition  to  the bill.  He  noted that  the                                                                    
expansion of the  scope of practice for  optometrists was an                                                                    
issue that  was being discussed  on the national  level, and                                                                    
what more than  just a housekeeping issue.  He believed that                                                                    
the   legislation  would   allow  optometrists   to  perform                                                                    
surgery,  which   would  result  in  dangerous   and  unsafe                                                                    
practices.   He stressed that optometrists  were not trained                                                                    
in surgical  procedures, and that optometry  schools did not                                                                    
offer  training  in  surgical  procedures.  He  agreed  that                                                                    
access to  healthcare in Alaska  was a problem, but  he felt                                                                    
that access to providers  that were appropriately trained to                                                                    
safely  perform   procedures  should   be  germane   to  the                                                                    
conversation.                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
11:00:35 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
MARY NANUWAK,  SELF, BETHEL  (via teleconference),  spoke in                                                                    
opposition to the bill. She  provided remarks in Yup'ik. She                                                                    
thanked  the  committee for  allowing  her  to testify.  She                                                                    
believed  that optometrists  should  not  be performing  eye                                                                    
surgery.                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
11:03:22 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
JILL GEERING  MATHESON, OPTOMETRY, JUNEAU, spoke  in support                                                                    
of  the   bill.  She  believed   that  the  intent   of  the                                                                    
legislation  was   to  allow  the  Alaska   State  Board  of                                                                    
Optometry  to  regulate  optometrists   in  the  state.  She                                                                    
asserted  that  the bill  would  not  expand the  privileges                                                                    
allowed to optometrists, but would  give the optometry board                                                                    
the  ability to  decide what  optometrists were  trained and                                                                    
qualified to  perform and then  provide for  regulation. She                                                                    
believed  that the  opposition  was  employing fear  tactics                                                                    
concerning surgery to  sway public opinion on  the bill. She                                                                    
argued that the board needed to  be able to act quickly, via                                                                    
the  regulatory  process,  to  make  changes  as  technology                                                                    
advanced.                                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
11:07:00 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
PAUL  BARNEY,  BOARD  OF  OPTOMETRY,  JUNEAU,  testified  in                                                                    
support  of the  bill. He  discussed his  experience in  the                                                                    
field. He believed  that the bill would allow  for the board                                                                    
of  optometry to  regulate the  details of  the practice  of                                                                    
optometry,  and  would  allow optometrists  to  practice  to                                                                    
their  highest  education  level.  He  felt  that  the  bill                                                                    
clearly defined "surgery".                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
11:10:31 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
Senator  Olson  asked  what kind  of  complaints  the  board                                                                    
received from licensees.                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
Dr. Barney  relayed that he  had been  on the board  for the                                                                    
past 6  years and in that  time the board had  received zero                                                                    
complaints.                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
Senator  Olson asked  whether Dr.  Barney was  familiar with                                                                    
the Oklahoma study  that had been referenced  earlier in the                                                                    
meeting.                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
Dr. Barney replied  that he was familiar with  the study. He                                                                    
said that  the study was regarding  a laser trabeculoplasty,                                                                    
which was a  surgery used to lower pressure  in glaucoma. He                                                                    
said that the study examined  billing codes. He spoke to the                                                                    
details  of  the  study  and   concluded  that  it  had  not                                                                    
accurately   examined   outcomes    of   different   surgery                                                                    
procedures.                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
11:12:52 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
Senator  von  Imhof  stated  that   she  had  researched  an                                                                    
optometry  school  in  Ohio. She  felt  that  an  accredited                                                                    
school  of  optometry  could license  a  person  to  perform                                                                    
ophthalmic surgery non-invasively.                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
Dr. Barney  stated that he  performed procedures  daily that                                                                    
were considered surgery. He added  that there were different                                                                    
levels to ophthalmic surgery.                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
11:14:35 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair MacKinnon CLOSED public testimony.                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
11:14:57 AM                                                                                                                   
RECESSED                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
2:37:40 PM                                                                                                                    
RECONVENED                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair MacKinnon discussed housekeeping.                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
Senator Olson asked whether the  Alaska Native Tribal Health                                                                    
Consortium (ANTHC) supported the legislation.                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
Ms.  Nisbett  responded  that ANTHC  had  not  provided  any                                                                    
comments regarding HB 103.                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
Senator  Olson understood  that the  Southcentral Foundation                                                                    
had provided an opinion on the legislation.                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
Ms. Nisbett relayed  that the bill carried with  it a letter                                                                    
of support from the  Southcentral Foundation, in addition to                                                                    
one from the Alaska Native Health Board.                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
Senator  Olson  commented   that  healthcare  was  primarily                                                                    
handled  by  tribal  health   corporations  in  Western  and                                                                    
Southern Alaska.  He asked whether  the sponsor had  been in                                                                    
contact with tribal health corporations regarding HB 103.                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
Ms.  Nisbett  stated  that  the  sponsor's  office  had  not                                                                    
reached out to those organizations,  but would be willing to                                                                    
do so.                                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
2:40:06 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Senator Hughes  referred to her  earlier question  about how                                                                    
experience  would be  quantified for  new optometrists.  She                                                                    
wondered whether Dr. Barney could speak to the issue.                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
Dr. Barney provided that as  part of their clinical training                                                                    
optometrists would experience any  procedures that needed to                                                                    
be  done,  which  would  provide  them  with  the  necessary                                                                    
experience upon graduation.                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
Senator  Hughes  asked  what procedures  a  newly  graduated                                                                    
optometrist in  the state was  trained to do, but  could not                                                                    
currently execute due to current statutes.                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
Dr. Barney provided the example  of removal of minor eye lid                                                                    
lesions. He  said that optometrists would  receive education                                                                    
and training for the procedure  during optometry school, but                                                                    
that state statute currently did  not allow for optometrists                                                                    
to perform the procedure.                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
Senator  Hughes  understood that  the  bill  would give  the                                                                    
board  the   authority  through  regulation  to   allow  for                                                                    
practices within  the scope of the  licensee's education and                                                                    
training from  an accredited school of  optometry. She asked                                                                    
how, as a  board member, Dr. Barney would  make decisions as                                                                    
to   whether  a   procedure  could   be   performed  by   an                                                                    
optometrist.                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Dr. Barney explained that  the federal accreditation process                                                                    
for optometry schools  within the state was  overseen by the                                                                    
U.S. Department  of Education. He  said that there  would be                                                                    
federal oversight into  the curricula to assure  that it was                                                                    
complete and  thorough. He stated  that an  optometrist that                                                                    
had been  practicing for 20  years that wanted to  perform a                                                                    
board approved procedure  would be required by  the board to                                                                    
acquire the proper updated training.                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
2:44:48 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Vice-Chair Bishop discussed FN2(CED) for the bill.                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
2:46:15 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair MacKinnon noted that  Senator Giessel had sponsored                                                                    
the Senate companion bill for HB 103.                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR  CATHY  GIESSEL,  remarked that  she  supported  the                                                                    
changes  that had  been made  in  the house  version of  the                                                                    
legislation.                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
2:46:58 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Vice-Chair  Bishop  MOVED to  report  CSHB  103(FIN) out  of                                                                    
Committee   with   individual    recommendations   and   the                                                                    
accompanying fiscal  note. There being NO  OBJECTION, it was                                                                    
so ordered.                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
CSHB  103(FIN)  was  REPORTED  out  of  committee  with  "no                                                                    
recommendation"  and with  one  previously published  fiscal                                                                    
impact note: FN2(CED).                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
2:47:30 PM                                                                                                                    
AT EASE                                                                                                                         
2:49:40 PM                                                                                                                    
RECONVENED                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair MacKinnon  discussed housekeeping for SB  79 and HB                                                                    
111. She  stated that  each member's  office had  received a                                                                    
Senate Finance  Committee Resolution  that pertained  to the                                                                    
Real ID Act and the handling of Alaskan's private data.                                                                         
                                                                                                                                

Document Name Date/Time Subjects
HB 103 Opposition Letter Packet 1.pdf SFIN 5/10/2017 9:00:00 AM
HB 103
HB103 Letters of Opposition 5.04.17.pdf SFIN 5/10/2017 9:00:00 AM
HB 103
HB 103 Support Letter Packet 1.pdf SFIN 5/10/2017 9:00:00 AM
HB 103
HB103 Letters of Support 5.04.17.pdf SFIN 5/10/2017 9:00:00 AM
HB 103
HB103 Sectional-SB 36 ver J to HB 103 ver U 5.04.17.pdf SFIN 5/10/2017 9:00:00 AM
HB 103
SB 36
HB103 Sponsor Statement 5.04.17.pdf SFIN 5/10/2017 9:00:00 AM
HB 103
HB103 Support Document Accreditation Council on Optometric Education 5.04.17.pdf SFIN 5/10/2017 9:00:00 AM
HB 103
HB103 Support Document Board of the Examiners in Optometry 5.04.17.pdf SFIN 5/10/2017 9:00:00 AM
HB 103
HB103 Support Document Medical Liability Premiums Fact Sheet 5.04.17.pdf SFIN 5/10/2017 9:00:00 AM
HB 103
HB103 Support Document Optometrist's Education 5.04.17.pdf SFIN 5/10/2017 9:00:00 AM
HB 103
HB103 Support Document Optometrists Practicing in AK 5.04.17.pdf SFIN 5/10/2017 9:00:00 AM
HB 103
HB103 Support Document Regulation Flow Chart 5.04.17.pdf SFIN 5/10/2017 9:00:00 AM
HB 103
HB 222 Opposition Letter Packet 1.pdf SFIN 5/10/2017 9:00:00 AM
HB 222
HB 222 Support Letter Packet 1.pdf SFIN 5/10/2017 9:00:00 AM
HB 222
HB222 Additional Document - Enrolled HB 131 5.3.17.pdf SFIN 5/10/2017 9:00:00 AM
HB 131
HB 222
HB222 Additional Document Ltr to J. Maiquis and C. Spencer 5.3.17.pdf SFIN 5/10/2017 9:00:00 AM
HB 222
HB222 Additional Documents Letter to Manicurists 5.3.17.pdf SFIN 5/10/2017 9:00:00 AM
HB 222
HB222 Sponsor Statement 5.3.17.pdf SFIN 5/10/2017 9:00:00 AM
HB 222
HB222 Supporting Document Bev Harper 5.3.17.pdf SFIN 5/10/2017 9:00:00 AM
HB 222
HB 222 Support Letter Packet 2.pdf SFIN 5/10/2017 9:00:00 AM
HB 222
HB 222 Support Letter Packet 3.pdf SFIN 5/10/2017 9:00:00 AM
HB 222
HB 103 Support Letter Packet 2.PDF SFIN 5/10/2017 9:00:00 AM
HB 103
HB 103 Opposition Letter Packet 2.PDF SFIN 5/10/2017 9:00:00 AM
HB 103
HB 103 Opposition Fuller.Stan 2017.05.10.pdf SFIN 5/10/2017 9:00:00 AM
HB 103
HB 103 Opposition Letter Ford.pdf SFIN 5/10/2017 9:00:00 AM
HB 103
HB 103 Support Letter Peterson.pdf SFIN 5/10/2017 9:00:00 AM
HB 103
HB 103 Opposition Letter Zumbro.pdf SFIN 5/10/2017 9:00:00 AM
HB 103