Legislature(2013 - 2014)SENATE FINANCE 532

04/01/2014 09:00 AM FINANCE


Download Mp3. <- Right click and save file as

* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ SB 28 SUSITNA STATE FOREST; SALE OF TIMBER TELECONFERENCED
Heard & Held
+ SB 66 IMITATION CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE TELECONFERENCED
Moved CSSB 66(JUD) Out of Committee
+ SB 178 PASSENGER VEHICLE RENTAL TAX TELECONFERENCED
Heard & Held
+ HB 305 JUNK DEALER & METAL SCRAPPER LICENSING TELECONFERENCED
Scheduled But Not Heard
+ HB 297 HOME ENERGY RATING SYSTEMS TELECONFERENCED
Scheduled But Not Heard
+ Bills Previously Heard/Scheduled TELECONFERENCED
SENATE BILL NO. 28                                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
     "An Act relating to the sale of timber on state land;                                                                      
     establishing the Susitna State Forest; and providing                                                                       
     for an effective date."                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
9:09:47 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
JOE BALASH,  COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF  NATURAL RESOURCES,                                                                    
explained  the legislation.  He stressed  that the  governor                                                                    
was interested  in a positive  investment, and he  felt that                                                                    
the legislation  was in line with  the governor's intention.                                                                    
The bill would  create a state forest in  the Susitna Valley                                                                    
and  expand  the  Department   of  Natural  Resources  (DNR)                                                                    
authority  to offer  negotiated timber  sales statewide.  He                                                                    
stated  that  DNR currently  managed  9.5  million acres  of                                                                    
state land in  the Mat-Su valley under the  area plans. This                                                                    
bill  would establish  the Susitna  State  Forest from  land                                                                    
that the  plans classify  for forestry  and DNR  manages for                                                                    
timber  harvest and  multiple use.  Remaining state  land in                                                                    
the  area  was  designated   for  land  sales,  agriculture,                                                                    
recreation, water resources, and  fish and wildlife habitat,                                                                    
including  over   3.  1   million  acres   of  legislatively                                                                    
designated state  parks, refuges, and public  use areas. The                                                                    
proposal  excludes  lands  that   were  priorities  for  the                                                                    
state's land  disposal program. It  was consistent  with the                                                                    
area plans,  and was recommended  by the Alaska  Timber Jobs                                                                    
Task   Force.    The   proposed   state    forest   included                                                                    
approximately  686,800  acres of  land  in  20 parcels.  The                                                                    
state  forest would  help meet  the growing  regional demand                                                                    
for   state  timber   sales   and   personal  use   firewood                                                                    
harvesting. Local  mills depend heavily on  state timber for                                                                    
their  raw  materials. Interest  in  logs,  chips, and  wood                                                                    
pellets  for  commercial,  public  school,  and  residential                                                                    
space  heating  also  continues  to  expand.  Active  forest                                                                    
management provided forest  stand with a variety  of ages to                                                                    
support  diverse  and  healthy  wildlife  habitat.  It  also                                                                    
helped  reduce wild  land  fire risk  by  breaking up  large                                                                    
expanses   of   hazardous   fuel   types   and   encouraging                                                                    
regeneration by  less-flammable hardwood species.  The state                                                                    
forest would be managed as  part of the State Forest System,                                                                    
and would  continue to  be open for  public use  and access,                                                                    
including   wildlife   habitat  management,   harvest,   and                                                                    
recreational   activities.  He   announced   that  DNR   had                                                                    
conducted extensive  outreach on the proposal.  In additions                                                                    
to meetings on the area  plans, DNR held community meetings,                                                                    
and made  a presentation  at a  legislative town  meeting in                                                                    
Wasilla.                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair  Meyer understood  that the  legislation would  not                                                                    
make the  land unavailable for property  development for the                                                                    
private sector  to add to  the borough's property  tax base.                                                                    
Commissioner   Balash  replied   that  there   were  various                                                                    
conversations with the borough and  in the region. He stated                                                                    
that  DNR had  a  received an  endorsement  from the  Mat-Su                                                                    
Borough  assembly,  and  referred  to a  resolution  in  the                                                                    
member's packets.  He stated that  there were  some concerns                                                                    
that were  addressed in order  to alleviate some  impacts to                                                                    
municipal and residential developments.                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair  Meyer wondered  if the  land could  return to  the                                                                    
private  sector  after it  was  designated  as forest  land.                                                                    
Commissioner  Balash  responded   that  state  forests  were                                                                    
public lands that  were still managed for  multiple use, but                                                                    
not  considered for  settlement or  residential development.                                                                    
He stressed  that there was  still economic activity  on the                                                                    
land. He  stated that  moving the land  back to  the general                                                                    
use category would require legislative action.                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
9:16:16 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair  Meyer wondered  if there  would  be anything  that                                                                    
would   prevent  timber   harvest  in   the  state   forest.                                                                    
Commissioner Balash  replied that  all of the  activities in                                                                    
the  forest  would  be  governed  by  the  Forest  Resources                                                                    
Practices Act,  and other regulatory authorities.  He stated                                                                    
that the  forest would be  sustainably managed with  a long-                                                                    
term management plan.                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
Senator Olson  wondered how the designation  would result in                                                                    
the  prohibition  of  exploiting the  resources  within  the                                                                    
designation.   Commissioner   Balash    replied   that   the                                                                    
designation of  the forest  did not  preclude other  uses of                                                                    
the land,  particularly the  mineral rights  associated with                                                                    
the land. He stressed that  DNR would still have the ability                                                                    
to issue  mining leases and  provide for exploration  of the                                                                    
other minerals  on the land.  He agreed that the  land would                                                                    
not be available for residential development.                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
Senator Olson queried  the effect of the  legislation on the                                                                    
traditional  campsites that  were used  to harvest  fish and                                                                    
game seasonally.  Commissioner Balash replied that  DNR must                                                                    
continue  to  maintain  the  other  uses  in  the  area.  He                                                                    
deferred to Mr. Maisch.                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
Senator Olson queried the effects  of the established camps.                                                                    
Commissioner  Balash responded  that  the designations  that                                                                    
were already public  lands would remain in  public lands. He                                                                    
stressed  that the  inholdings would  remain outside  of the                                                                    
designated forest.                                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
Senator Olson stressed that an  individual with a camp might                                                                    
have their  claim overrun. Commissioner Balash  replied that                                                                    
he had worked hard to ensure that it would not be an issue.                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
9:22:55 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Senator Dunleavy asked  for a brief history  of the proposed                                                                    
concept. Commissioner Balash deferred to Mr. Maisch.                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
JOHN  "CHRIS"   MAISCH,  DIRECTOR,  DIVISION   OF  FORESTRY,                                                                    
DEPARTMENT OF  NATURAL RESOURCES,  explained the  history of                                                                    
the proposed  concept. He  stated that  there were  two area                                                                    
plans that  were updated in  2009, and public  meetings were                                                                    
held in seven communities. He  stated that the idea of state                                                                    
forest classified  lands was  discussed as  part of  an area                                                                    
planning  process,  and  the concept  that  a  state  forest                                                                    
proposal would be drafted at  the conclusion of the process.                                                                    
In addition,  there were six  open houses when  the Division                                                                    
of  Forestry  took  over  the  project.  There  were  twelve                                                                    
additional  public   meetings,  when  the   legislation  was                                                                    
initially proposed  three years prior. He  stated that there                                                                    
had been recent meetings to  outreach to local entities that                                                                    
were not  on the road  system. There  was a concern  for the                                                                    
need for  community expansion lands in  Houston, Willow, and                                                                    
Wasilla, so 70,000  acres were removed from  the proposal to                                                                    
alleviate that concern. He shared  that there was a blocking                                                                    
nature  in  the way  that  the  state forest  was  proposed,                                                                    
because there  was a forest  inventory for the  lands, which                                                                    
showed  a  good  commercial   interest.  The  area  planning                                                                    
process  determined that  the proposed  lands were  the most                                                                    
preferred lands for the forestry  process, which was why the                                                                    
location was  spread across the valley  with twenty parcels.                                                                    
He stated that there was  some concern regarding access, and                                                                    
the need  for access development,  which was one of  the key                                                                    
features of state forests.                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
9:26:28 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Senator Dunleavy looked at the  earmarked parcels, and noted                                                                    
that there was  a considerable amount of  acreage that could                                                                    
be logged. He  wondered how the approach  was different form                                                                    
the  forest   designated  parcels  versus   the  state-owned                                                                    
parcels   that   were   already  designated   for   logging.                                                                    
Commissioner  Balash replied  that the  area plan  processes                                                                    
for a  particular primary  use did  not preclude  other uses                                                                    
including disposals  of the  land. While  the blocks  may be                                                                    
designated  for   forestry  purposes,   in  the   area  plan                                                                    
implementation, it would not  preclude someone from applying                                                                    
for the land to be disposed in a different way.                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
Senator Dunleavy  wondered if logging was  the only activity                                                                    
that could  occur on the  state forest. He wondered  if, for                                                                    
example,  mining  would  occur  on  the  land.  Commissioner                                                                    
Balash responded  that logging  was the  primary development                                                                    
interest, but mining could occur given the process time.                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair Meyer  wondered if  there would  be a  problem with                                                                    
bringing  a pipeline  through the  forest  area. Mr.  Maisch                                                                    
responded  that a  pipeline in  the forest  would not  be an                                                                    
issue, as there were utilities across other state forests.                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
9:30:28 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair  Meyer queried  the state  royalty from  the timber                                                                    
sale. Mr. Maisch responded that  the sales were sold through                                                                    
a competitive process for the  majority of timber. He stated                                                                    
that  there was  no royalty,  but  rather by  sealed bid  or                                                                    
outcry auction, so  the best dollar took the  sale which was                                                                    
known as "stumpage return."                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
Vice-Chair Fairclough  wondered if the  pale yellow   on the                                                                    
map  was  current  forestry. Commissioner  Balash  responded                                                                    
that the pale yellow was considered general state lands.                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
Vice-Chair  Fairclough  restated her  question  Commissioner                                                                    
Balash  replied that  the lands  were designated  as habitat                                                                    
under the area  plans. Mr. Maisch furthered  that the yellow                                                                    
lands  were classified  as forestry  use,  but were  dropped                                                                    
from the designation in the  state forest. The hatched lands                                                                    
were  considered habitat  classified  lands  under the  area                                                                    
plans.                                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
Vice-Chair Fairclough wondered if  there was a separate land                                                                    
classification  for   habitat,  which  was   not  considered                                                                    
forest. Commissioner Balash replied  in the affirmative, and                                                                    
stated that  the habitat lands  were currently  not included                                                                    
in the legislation as part of the forest.                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
Senator  Hoffman  queried  the  number of  acres  that  were                                                                    
considered  for the  proposal.  Commissioner Balash  replied                                                                    
that there was an initial  proposal which was around 760,000                                                                    
acres,  but  had been  adjusted  and  was currently  688,000                                                                    
acres.                                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
Senator  Hoffman  queried  the  classifications  within  the                                                                    
proposed lands.  Commissioner Balash  replied that  the land                                                                    
was currently designated forestry lands.                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
9:36:07 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Senator Hoffman  asked if there  was a plan for  the private                                                                    
selection. Commissioner  Balash responded  that there  was a                                                                    
planning cycle for  the disposals, but was  not certain that                                                                    
the map included any in the cycle.                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
Senator  Hoffman requested  those plans  and how  many acres                                                                    
were considered for the program  in the region. Commissioner                                                                    
Balash agreed to provide that information.                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
Senator Dunleavy  noted a testimony  in the packet  from the                                                                    
Grouse  Society,  and  there were  some  issues  raised.  He                                                                    
wondered  if those  concerns  were considered.  Commissioner                                                                    
Balash  stated that  the Grouse  Society would  like to  see                                                                    
that the forest  be larger, and include some  of the habitat                                                                    
lands to  ensure that those  lands were not disposed  of for                                                                    
some other purpose.                                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
9:39:26 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
JOHN  STURGEON, CEO,  OUZINKI NATIVE  CORPORATION, ANCHORAGE                                                                    
(via   teleconference),   testified   in  support   of   the                                                                    
legislation.  He  shared that  he  had  been in  the  timber                                                                    
industry  in  Alaska  for  43  years.  He  stated  that  his                                                                    
operation logged  approximately 50  million board  feet each                                                                    
year.  He  shared that  there  had  been many  conversations                                                                    
regarding losing  the oil resource  in Alaska. He  felt that                                                                    
it  was time  to  examine alternatives  to bring  additional                                                                    
revenue into  Alaska, and he  felt that the  timber industry                                                                    
could provide some of that revenue.                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
9:42:32 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
GLEN HOLT,  SELF, FAIRBANKS  (via teleconference),  spoke in                                                                    
support  of  the  legislation.  He stated  that  he  was  in                                                                    
further favor of further land  designations of habitat lands                                                                    
currently designated, because of  the opportunity to enhance                                                                    
those lands through forest management programs.                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
9:45:54 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
MARK STAHL, SELF,  TALKEETNA (via teleconference), testified                                                                    
in favor  of the  legislation. He stated  that he  owned and                                                                    
operated a small saw mill  in Talkeetna. He stated that many                                                                    
of his  customers and  neighbors expressed  appreciation for                                                                    
access to local resources. His  ability to grow the business                                                                    
was  hampered by  the  lack of  a  predictable and  reliable                                                                    
timber  base.  There was  too  little  private land  in  the                                                                    
Susitna valley to provide a  steady raw materials supply, so                                                                    
establishing a state forest would resolve the issue.                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
9:48:27 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
ERIN MCLARNON, SELF,  WILLOW (via teleconference), testified                                                                    
in support  of the  legislation. She stated  that she  was a                                                                    
business owner  and six year  Board of Forestry  member. She                                                                    
stated  that the  Mat-Su  valley was  a  wonderful place  to                                                                    
live. She  felt that a state  forest would help to  grow the                                                                    
local economy,  and guarantees all users  place to recreate.                                                                    
She  frequently   utilized  state   forest  lands   for  her                                                                    
training, because of the access to trails.                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
ROD  ARNO,  EXECUTIVE   DIRECTOR,  ALASKA  OUTDOOR  COUNCIL,                                                                    
JUNEAU,  testified in  support  of the  concept  of a  state                                                                    
forest  in the  Mat-Su  valley, multiple  use  in the  state                                                                    
forest  such   as  resource  development   and  recreational                                                                    
pursuit.  He  stressed  that the  location  should  be  kept                                                                    
intact. He  felt that there  were a number of  Alaskans that                                                                    
were  interested in  food harvest.  He stated  that the  tax                                                                    
burden on  the Mat-Su  valley could  be counteracted  by the                                                                    
resource development.                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
9:56:28 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
NICK  STEEN, MEMBER,  RUFFED  GROUSE  SOCIETY, WASILLA  (via                                                                    
teleconference),  testified in  support of  the legislation.                                                                    
He believed that  the establishment of a  state forest would                                                                    
help  solidify and  expand the  forest product  industry. It                                                                    
would be  an economic  boost to the  Mat-Su borough  and all                                                                    
Southcentral   Alaska  residents.   Through  proper   forest                                                                    
management, the  forest should  be either  revenue enhancing                                                                    
or revenue neutral. In addition  to the timber resource, the                                                                    
wildlife would greatly benefit.                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
9:58:38 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
BARBARA  J.  MILLER,  SELF,  WASILLA  (via  teleconference),                                                                    
urged the committee to develop  the west side of the Susitna                                                                    
River. She  encouraged the private  development of  the land                                                                    
on the  east side of  the Susitna  River. She felt  that the                                                                    
land on the  east side would provide a  boundary, because it                                                                    
was difficult determine where one was located.                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
10:00:10 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
GARY STEVENS, SELF, CHUGIAK  (via teleconference), felt that                                                                    
the forest  aspect of the legislation  was too disconnected,                                                                    
and would be difficult to manage.                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
10:01:51 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
CARL   PORTMAN,   DEPUTY  DIRECTOR,   RESOURCE   DEVELOPMENT                                                                    
COUNCIL,  ANCHORAGE (via  teleconference),  spoke in  strong                                                                    
support  of the  legislation.  He felt  that  the new  state                                                                    
forest would enhance  access and encourage a  broad range of                                                                    
multiple  uses.  The  new  state   forest  would  allow  the                                                                    
Division  of  Forestry to  more  actively  manage lands  and                                                                    
vegetation to  promote a  variety of  forest ages,  which in                                                                    
turn  would maximize  the sustainable  supply  of timber  to                                                                    
provide a more diverse and  healthy habitat for wildlife. He                                                                    
added that  active forest management  would reduce  the risk                                                                    
of  wildfires. The  Division of  Forestry  would manage  the                                                                    
forest  to  help  meet growing  regional  demand  for  state                                                                    
timber sales.                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
10:04:37 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
THOMAS MALONE,  CHAIR, TANANA  VALLEY STATE  FOREST CITIZENS                                                                    
ADVISORY  COMMITTEE, FAIRBANKS  (via teleconference),  spoke                                                                    
in favor  of the legislation.  He felt that  dedicated lands                                                                    
would  provide the  multiple  use aspects  of  the land,  in                                                                    
addition to specific forestry uses.                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
10:07:51 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
AL BARRETTE, SELF, FAIRBANKS  (via teleconference), spoke in                                                                    
support of aspects of the  proposal, but remarked that there                                                                    
should be a focus on maintaining traditional uses.                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair Meyer CLOSED public testimony.                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
10:10:41 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair Meyer wondered  if this was the same  bill that was                                                                    
proposed  two years  prior, and  asked  why that  particular                                                                    
bill  did not  pass  through  the legislature.  Commissioner                                                                    
Balash replied  that the legislation  that was  proposed two                                                                    
years  prior   included  more   parcels  than   the  current                                                                    
legislation.  There  was  local opposition,  and  the  local                                                                    
assembly did not support the bill.                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
Mr.  Maisch  added  that  there  was  a  difference  in  the                                                                    
definition from timber to fiber  in the current legislation,                                                                    
and there  was also  a recommendation  of three  clauses for                                                                    
the  118  timber  authority  in  order  to  apply  authority                                                                    
statewide.                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair Meyer  noted that the Alaska  Outdoor Council (AOC)                                                                    
did  not previously  support it,  and  still expressed  some                                                                    
concerns  that the  legislation  was not  robust enough.  He                                                                    
wondered  if  the  current   legislation  was  considered  a                                                                    
compromise.  Commissioner  Balash  replied that  there  were                                                                    
some suggestions, and  remarked that he would  be willing to                                                                    
work  with  the  committee  to  establish  a  more  workable                                                                    
outline for the proposal.                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair  Meyer noted  that the  fiscal  note was  currently                                                                    
zero,  but wondered  if  the proposal  may  have a  positive                                                                    
fiscal  impact to  the  state.  Commissioner Balash  replied                                                                    
that the state forests were,  at worst, revenue neutral. The                                                                    
funds  that  were  raised  from   the  sale  of  the  timber                                                                    
resources  supported  the  expenses  of  managing  them  and                                                                    
building infrastructure.                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair Meyer wondered  if the Mat-Su borough  was in favor                                                                    
of  the  bill. Senator  Dunleavy  indicated  that there  was                                                                    
support from the borough.                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
10:15:49 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
Vice-Chair Fairclough  noted three concerns that  were worth                                                                    
addressing:  1)   the  establishment  of  language   of  the                                                                    
patchwork;  2)  the  natural  boundary  issue,  and  posting                                                                    
trespassing warnings; and 3) the issue of public access.                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
Commissioner  Bishop stated  that Vice-Chair  Fairclough had                                                                    
pointed out his concerns.                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
Senator  Dunleavy queried  a timeline  for the  proposal. He                                                                    
wondered  what  was  expected of  the  individuals  who  had                                                                    
contracts.  Mr. Maisch  replied that  there was  a published                                                                    
five year timber sale program.                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
SB  28  was   HEARD  and  HELD  in   committee  for  further                                                                    
consideration.                                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
10:19:57 AM                                                                                                                   
AT EASE                                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
10:23:18 AM                                                                                                                   
RECONVENED                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                

Document Name Date/Time Subjects
CSSB28(RES) Briefing Paper.pdf SFIN 4/1/2014 9:00:00 AM
SB 28
CSSB28(RES) Forest Map.pdf SFIN 4/1/2014 9:00:00 AM
SB 28
CSSB28(RES) Sectional Analysis.pdf SFIN 4/1/2014 9:00:00 AM
SB 28
CSSB28(RES) Summary of Changes.pdf SFIN 4/1/2014 9:00:00 AM
SB 28
SB 28 Opposition Letters.pdf SFIN 4/1/2014 9:00:00 AM
SB 28
SB 28 Support Letters.pdf SFIN 4/1/2014 9:00:00 AM
SB 28
SB028CS(RES)-DNR-DOF-3-24-14.pdf SFIN 4/1/2014 9:00:00 AM
SB 28
SB28 Public Testimony - Phelps.msg SFIN 4/1/2014 9:00:00 AM
SB 28
CSSB 178 Letter of Intent.docx SFIN 4/1/2014 9:00:00 AM
SB 178
Dept. of Revenue Research.pdf SFIN 4/1/2014 9:00:00 AM
HB 305
HB 305 letter to Sen Kelly - Mar 28 2014.pdf SFIN 4/1/2014 9:00:00 AM
HB 305
HB 305 Ver P letter of support Senator Kelly RockTenn 3 28 14.pdf SFIN 4/1/2014 9:00:00 AM
HB 305
HB305 APA metals theft Res.pdf SFIN 4/1/2014 9:00:00 AM
HB 305
HB305 KellyAPAsupport.pdf SFIN 4/1/2014 9:00:00 AM
HB 305
HB305 support - APA.pdf SFIN 4/1/2014 9:00:00 AM
HB 305
Junk Car Statute.pdf SFIN 4/1/2014 9:00:00 AM
HB 305
Leg Research-Junk Dealers.pdf SFIN 4/1/2014 9:00:00 AM
HB 305
Scale Pictures TINTZJ.pdf SFIN 4/1/2014 9:00:00 AM
HB 305
Scale Ticket TINTZJ.pdf SFIN 4/1/2014 9:00:00 AM
HB 305
Scrap Metal Laws State by State.pdf SFIN 4/1/2014 9:00:00 AM
HB 305
Scrap Metal Media.pdf SFIN 4/1/2014 9:00:00 AM
HB 305
Sectional-CSHB 305 (FIN).pdf SFIN 4/1/2014 9:00:00 AM
HB 305
Sponsor Statement-CSHB 305 (FIN).pdf SFIN 4/1/2014 9:00:00 AM
HB 305
SB066CS(JUD)-DOC-OC-03-28-14.pdf SFIN 4/1/2014 9:00:00 AM
SB 66
CSSB 66 Sectional Analysis.pdf SFIN 4/1/2014 9:00:00 AM
SB 66
CSSB66 Explanation of Changes.pdf SFIN 4/1/2014 9:00:00 AM
SB 66
SB 66 Sponsor Statement.pdf SFIN 4/1/2014 9:00:00 AM
SB 66
SB66 Answers to Committee Questions.pdf SFIN 4/1/2014 9:00:00 AM
SB 66
SB66 Legal Services Memo.pdf SFIN 4/1/2014 9:00:00 AM
SB 66
SB66 Letter of Support - Chiefs of Police.pdf SFIN 4/1/2014 9:00:00 AM
SB 66
SB66 Letter of Support - City & Borough of Juneau.PDF SFIN 4/1/2014 9:00:00 AM
SB 66
SB66 Letter of Support - Peace Officers.pdf SFIN 4/1/2014 9:00:00 AM
SB 66
CSHB 297(FIN) Summary of Changes from Version A to Version N - Copy.pdf SFIN 4/1/2014 9:00:00 AM
HB 297
CSHB 297(FIN) AHFC Fact Sheet - Copy.pdf SFIN 4/1/2014 9:00:00 AM
HB 297
CSHB 297(FIN) Sponsor Statement - Copy.pdf SFIN 4/1/2014 9:00:00 AM
HB 297
SB 28 Senate State Forest.pdf SFIN 4/1/2014 9:00:00 AM
SB 28
CSSB 178 North Slope Map 2.pdf SFIN 4/1/2014 9:00:00 AM
SB 178
CSSB 178 North Slope Map.pdf SFIN 4/1/2014 9:00:00 AM
SB 178
CSSB28(RES) Forest Map.pdf SFIN 4/1/2014 9:00:00 AM
SB 28