Legislature(2021 - 2022)GRUENBERG 120

03/09/2021 03:00 PM STATE AFFAIRS

Note: the audio and video recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.

Download Mp3. <- Right click and save file as

* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
Moved HB 18 Out of Committee
Heard & Held
-- Public Testimony --
+ Bills Previously Heard/Scheduled TELECONFERENCED
**Streamed live on AKL.tv**
         HB  18-TEACHERS: NATIONAL BOARD CERTIFICATION                                                                      
3:02:39 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR KREISS-TOMKINS announced that the first order of business                                                                 
would be HOUSE BILL NO. 18, "An Act relating to national board                                                                  
certification for public school teachers."                                                                                      
3:03:22 PM                                                                                                                    
The committee took an at-ease from 3:03 p.m. to 3:05 p.m.                                                                       
3:05:01 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR  KREISS-TOMKINS  said  the  committee  would  take  up  the                                                               
consideration of amendments for HB 18.                                                                                          
3:05:11 PM                                                                                                                    
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN  moved to adopt Amendment  1, [labeled 32-                                                               
LS0168\A.1, Klein, 3/6/21], which read:                                                                                         
     Page 1, line 5:                                                                                                            
          Following "certification":                                                                                            
          Insert "In this subsection, "prominent location"                                                                      
     includes a school-managed Internet website."                                                                               
CHAIR KREISS-TOMKINS objected.                                                                                                  
REPRESENTATIVE  EASTMAN stated  that  Amendment  1 would  clarify                                                               
that the school's prominent location would include a school-                                                                    
managed website.   He added  that the school would  be encouraged                                                               
to use  that website  to promote  the information  encompassed by                                                               
the bill, should it pass.                                                                                                       
3:05:48 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR  KREISS-TOMKINS   spoke  in  opposition  to   the  proposed                                                               
amendment.  He  conveyed that one of the central  purposes of the                                                               
bill is to uplift and  highlight national board certification and                                                               
the excellent  educators who attain it.   He said one  of the key                                                               
ideas,  although  subtle, is  to  display  that physical,  visual                                                               
recognition.   He noted  that the idea  was in  consultation with                                                               
superintendents, school boards, and teachers  and wasn't meant to                                                               
be an  onerous, "from-the-top"  requirement.   He added  that the                                                               
bill has the  support of all those stakeholders.   He pointed out                                                               
that  it's  similar  to  the   concept  of  license  plates  that                                                               
recognize  veterans,  created  by the  legislature,  for  visual,                                                               
physical recognition rather than an online registry.                                                                            
3:07:18 PM                                                                                                                    
REPRESENTATIVE   STORY  offered   to   discuss   the  idea   with                                                               
stakeholders  when   the  bill   goes  to  the   House  Education                                                               
3:07:50 PM                                                                                                                    
REPRESENTATIVE TARR said she doesn't  disagree with the sentiment                                                               
[of  the proposed  amendment]; however,  after speaking  with the                                                               
bill sponsor,  she resolved to  stick with his intent  to display                                                               
physical recognition.   For that  reason, she said she  would not                                                               
be  supporting   the  proposed   amendment.     Nonetheless,  she                                                               
suggested  that  in addition  to  being  prominently placed,  the                                                               
website  could  also  include   the  information  [pertaining  to                                                               
national board certification].                                                                                                  
3:08:49 PM                                                                                                                    
REPRESENTATIVE  VANCE pointed  out  that  the proposed  amendment                                                               
includes a  school-managed website,  which would not  exclude the                                                               
information from being  displayed at the physical  location.  She                                                               
asked if that is an accurate assessment.                                                                                        
REPRESENTATIVE  EASTMAN  confirmed  [that the  physical  location                                                               
would not be excluded].                                                                                                         
REPRESENTATIVE  VANCE  said,  as  a parent  who  homeschools  her                                                               
children, she  is often  referred to the  school's website.   She                                                               
stated her  belief that the  proposed amendment would  expand the                                                               
prominence of  [national board  certification] recognition.   She                                                               
stated her  belief that as  the internet has become  an immediate                                                               
point of entry  to the school system, this could  be an asset for                                                               
teachers who don't have direct one-on-one contact with students.                                                                
3:10:29 PM                                                                                                                    
REPRESENTATIVE   KAUFMAN   echoed   the  sentiments   shared   by                                                               
Representative Vance.   He stated  that [the  proposed amendment]                                                               
would clarify that  the "burden" could be made easier.   He added                                                               
that it would help with communication.                                                                                          
3:10:55 PM                                                                                                                    
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN  surmised that  requiring a  physical name                                                               
and  space   may  have  several  unintended   consequences.    He                                                               
considered a future scenario in  which a public school might have                                                               
an  exclusively virtual  presence,  which  would make  satisfying                                                               
this  requirement   problematic.    He  considered   a  different                                                               
scenario in which a teacher  did not want his/her name displayed.                                                               
He questioned  why [physical recognition] is  being "[forced]" if                                                               
it's a  good idea.   He suggested  allowing the school  to choose                                                               
whether to display the physical  recognition instead of making it                                                               
a requirement  and, effectively,  an unfunded  mandate.   He said                                                               
Amendment  1  would  lower  that   threshold  and  expressed  his                                                               
maintained support for the proposal.                                                                                            
3:12:48 PM                                                                                                                    
A roll call vote was  taken.  Representatives Vance, Kaufman, and                                                               
Eastman  voted  in   favor  of  the  adoption   of  Amendment  1.                                                               
Representatives  Tarr, Story,  Claman,  and Kreiss-Tomkins  voted                                                               
against it.  Therefore, Amendment 1 failed by a vote of 3-4.                                                                    
3:13:37 PM                                                                                                                    
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN  moved to adopt Amendment  2, [labeled 32-                                                               
LS0168\A.4, Klein, 3/6/21], which read:                                                                                         
     Page 1, line 9, following "Standards":                                                                                     
          Insert "or another organization offering national                                                                     
     board certification"                                                                                                       
REPRESENTATIVE CLAMAN objected.                                                                                                 
3:13:45 PM                                                                                                                    
REPRESENTATIVE  EASTMAN explained  that Amendment  2 would  allow                                                               
another  organization offering  national board  certification, in                                                               
addition  to   the  National  Board  for   Professional  Teaching                                                               
Standards (NBPTS),  to satisfy  the requirement.   He  noted that                                                               
[the  proposed  amendment]  was   drafted  without  a  particular                                                               
organization in mind.  Additionally,  he posited that it would be                                                               
prudent to  ensure that the  legislature would not have  to amend                                                               
the statute for a future organization.                                                                                          
CHAIR  KREISS-TOMKINS expressed  his opposition  to the  proposed                                                               
amendment.     He   said  it   would  have   no  effect   on  the                                                               
implementation of the bill because  there is no other entity that                                                               
provides national board  certification at this time.   He further                                                               
noted that the organization presently  named in the bill has been                                                               
providing   certification  for   decades  without   any  emerging                                                               
"competitors."  For  that reason, he said it makes  sense to keep                                                               
the  bill "tight  and clean,"  later adding  that there  is ample                                                               
precedent of naming different nonprofit entities in statute.                                                                    
3:15:40 PM                                                                                                                    
REPRESENTATIVE TARR  said she felt  assured by  the stakeholders'                                                               
involvement  and deep  familiarity with  the [NBPTS]  program and                                                               
its associated requirements.  She  expressed her concern that the                                                               
proposed amendment  could allow and encourage  certification from                                                               
an organization with unknown merit.                                                                                             
3:17:07 PM                                                                                                                    
REPRESENTATIVE  KAUFMAN  shared  his  belief  that  the  proposed                                                               
amendment would  allow for more  local control if a  school board                                                               
were to  choose another certifying  board, should one exist.   He                                                               
stated that times are changing  faster than ever, and Amendment 2                                                               
could be a concession for the future.                                                                                           
3:17:45 PM                                                                                                                    
REPRESENTATIVE  EASTMAN  opined  that  inserting the  name  of  a                                                               
private  organization  into  statute  is  not  ideal  because  it                                                               
designates a particular entity.   Nonetheless, he said he offered                                                               
the amendment  as a concession to  avoid inadvertently precluding                                                               
other  private  organizations  that might  benefit  teachers  and                                                               
REPRESENTATIVE CLAMAN maintained his objection.                                                                                 
3:18:58 PM                                                                                                                    
A roll call vote was  taken.  Representatives Eastman, Vance, and                                                               
Kaufman  voted  in   favor  of  the  adoption   of  Amendment  2.                                                               
Representatives  Tarr, Story,  Claman,  and Kreiss-Tomkins  voted                                                               
against it.  Therefore, Amendment 2 failed a vote of 3-4.                                                                       
3:19:43 PM                                                                                                                    
REPRESENTATIVE  KAUFMAN [moved  to adopt]  Amendment 3,  [labeled                                                               
32-LS0168\A.5, Klein, 3/8/21], which read:                                                                                      
     Page 1, line 4:                                                                                                            
          Delete "public school shall"                                                                                          
          Insert "local school board may require a public                                                                       
     school to"                                                                                                                 
REPRESENTATIVE CLAMAN objected.                                                                                                 
3:20:22 PM                                                                                                                    
REPRESENTATIVE KAUFMAN  noted that  local control is  the concept                                                               
behind Amendment  3, such that  a school  board could opt  for an                                                               
emerging opportunity that better fits  its purposes as opposed to                                                               
the state setting requirement.                                                                                                  
CHAIR KREISS-TOMKINS  spoke in opposition to  Amendment 3 despite                                                               
being sympathetic  to the  spirit in  which it  was written.   He                                                               
acknowledged  that  he  is cautious  of  state  requirements  and                                                               
mandates, noting that he had  dialogued with AASB [Association of                                                               
Alaska School Boards] and  the Alaska Superintendents Association                                                               
about repealing a variety of  state requirements that were passed                                                               
decades ago and had outlived  their useful purpose.  Nonetheless,                                                               
he maintained  his support  for the  "shall" in  this legislation                                                               
due to  close coordination with stakeholders  and their expressed                                                               
3:22:08 PM                                                                                                                    
REPRESENTATIVE  EASTMAN   expressed  his  appreciation   for  the                                                               
proposed  amendment  because it  would  give  authority to  local                                                               
school boards.   He  stated his  belief that  it offers  a better                                                               
long-term  solution than  a  state mandate.    He emphasized  the                                                               
importance of  local control,  adding "the  school board  that is                                                               
supportive today  may not be,  either with someone on  that board                                                               
changing [his/her] mind or ...  after an election."  He expressed                                                               
his  support  for  Amendment  3   out  of  deference  for  future                                                               
3:23:35 PM                                                                                                                    
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE  conveyed her "heartburn"  towards requiring                                                               
schools,  by  law,  to display  something  that  [schools]  would                                                               
naturally  be  proud  of.     She  said  the  proposed  amendment                                                               
recognizes school  boards as  the governing  body of  schools and                                                               
encourages   them   to   prominently  display   [national   board                                                               
certification].  She  stated her support for  Amendment 3 because                                                               
it  encourages local  school  boards to  choose  what's best  for                                                               
their communities.                                                                                                              
3:24:41 PM                                                                                                                    
REPRESENTATIVE  TARR noted  that  the  bill sponsor's  uneasiness                                                               
with  the proposed  amendment was  influential  in her  thinking.                                                               
Additionally,  she questioned  whether the  benefit would  be the                                                               
same without recognition.   She pointed out  that [national board                                                               
certification]  is  a big  investment  in  both time  and  money,                                                               
adding that teachers might see it  as a better investment if they                                                               
knew their investment would be  recognized anywhere in the state.                                                               
She  speculated   that  recognition  could   encourage  teachers,                                                               
further  noting  that  the  goal  is  to  double  the  number  of                                                               
[national  board certified]  teachers.   For  those reasons,  she                                                               
said she would not be supporting Amendment 3.                                                                                   
3:26:28 PM                                                                                                                    
REPRESENTATIVE STORY said she is glad  the bill would be heard by                                                               
the House Education  Committee and expressed her  support for the                                                               
[bill sponsor's] intent.                                                                                                        
3:27:34 PM                                                                                                                    
REPRESENTATIVE CLAMAN maintained his objection.                                                                                 
3:27:39 PM                                                                                                                    
A roll  call vote was  taken.  Representatives  Kaufman, Eastman,                                                               
and  Vance  voted  in  favor  of the  adoption  of  Amendment  3.                                                               
Representatives  Tarr, Story,  Claman,  and Kreiss-Tomkins  voted                                                               
against it.  Therefore, Amendment 3 failed by a vote of 3-4.                                                                    
3:28:27 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR KREISS-TOMKINS directed the discussion back to HB 18.                                                                     
REPRESENTATIVE TARR proposed  the idea of the  state covering the                                                               
cost of  [national board certification] to  avoid excluding those                                                               
who are  not financially able but  otherwise interested; however,                                                               
given  the state's  current [budget]  situation  and because  the                                                               
bill  does not  have a  fiscal  note, she  expressed interest  in                                                               
reconsidering  her proposal  if  Alaska's circumstances  improve.                                                               
She  further  noted her  gratitude  to  teachers who  make  these                                                               
investments in their profession.                                                                                                
3:29:34 PM                                                                                                                    
REPRESENTATIVE  EASTMAN thanked  the  sponsor  for bringing  this                                                               
legislation forward.   He  stated that he  would be  opposing the                                                               
bill as it's  currently written.  He  cautioned against inserting                                                               
the name of a private  organization into statute because it could                                                               
open the state up to liabilities in the future.                                                                                 
3:31:10 PM                                                                                                                    
REPRESENTATIVE CLAMAN  thanked the sponsor and  shared his belief                                                               
that the bill  is about teachers and giving  them the opportunity                                                               
to  obtain  a  certification  that that  would  send  a  positive                                                               
message to  students and parents  about the quality  of education                                                               
they receive in [Alaska's] schools.                                                                                             
3:31:30 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR  KREISS-TOMKINS   said  he  shared   Representative  Tarr's                                                               
perspective that  if there is  a future opportunity  to reimburse                                                               
teachers, at  minimum for the  fees of this credential,  it would                                                               
be  a  great step  for  the  state  and  a tremendous  return  on                                                               
investment.   He further noted  that it would be  consistent with                                                               
many  states   across  the   country.     He  opined   that  it's                                                               
extraordinary that two-plus percent  of Alaska teachers sacrifice                                                               
their  nights,  weekends,   and  thousands-of-dollars  to  become                                                               
certified as  a matter of  professional pride, later  adding that                                                               
it's worth celebrating  and recognizing, which is,  in part, what                                                               
this bill aims  to do.  He  acknowledged Representative Eastman's                                                               
point from  a philosophical perspective; however,  he highlighted                                                               
state  precedent in  which private  nonprofits  are written  into                                                               
law,  such   as  TVEP  [Alaska  Technical   Vocational  Education                                                               
Program]  and  VPSO  [Village   Public  Safety  Officer]  service                                                               
provided by the  Central Council of the Tlingit  and Haida Indian                                                               
Tribes of Alaska,  further noting that all of  the concerns cited                                                               
by Representative Eastman  would apply there too,  but it doesn't                                                               
impede them  from administering the services  they provide across                                                               
the state.                                                                                                                      
3:33:05 PM                                                                                                                    
REPRESENTATIVE  CLAMAN moved  to report  HB 18  out of  committee                                                               
with  individual  recommendations  and  the  accompanying  [zero]                                                               
fiscal notes.                                                                                                                   
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN objected.                                                                                                
3:33:21 PM                                                                                                                    
A  roll  call  vote  was taken.    Representatives  Tarr,  Story,                                                               
Claman, and Kreiss-Tomkins voted in  favor of reporting HB 18 out                                                               
of committee.  Representatives Vance,  Kaufman, and Eastman voted                                                               
against  it.   Therefore, HB  18 was  reported out  of the  House                                                               
State Affairs Standing Committee by a vote of 4-3.                                                                              
3:34:10 PM                                                                                                                    
The committee took a brief at-ease.                                                                                             

Document Name Date/Time Subjects
HB 18 Amendment Packet 3.9.21.pdf HSTA 3/9/2021 3:00:00 PM
HB 18