Legislature(2019 - 2020)GRUENBERG 120

03/10/2020 03:00 PM STATE AFFAIRS

Note: the audio and video recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.

Download Mp3. <- Right click and save file as
Download Video part 1. <- Right click and save file as

* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+= HB 233 ELECTRONIC DISPLAY OF REQUIRED DOCUMENTS TELECONFERENCED
Moved HB 233 Out of Committee
-- Public Testimony --
+= HB 264 PROOF OF INSURANCE: UNSATISFIED JUDGMENTS TELECONFERENCED
Moved HB 264 Out of Committee
-- Public Testimony --
+= HB 250 VOTER REGISTRATION AGE TELECONFERENCED
Moved HB 250 Out of Committee
-- Public Testimony --
*+ HB 307 EXPANDING PRISONER ACCESS TO COMPUTERS TELECONFERENCED
Heard & Held
*+ HB 285 ALASKA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 2022 TELECONFERENCED
Heard & Held
*+ HB 228 SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY; NOTICE TO VICTIMS TELECONFERENCED
Heard & Held
+ Bills Previously Heard/Scheduled TELECONFERENCED
        HB 228-SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY; NOTICE TO VICTIMS                                                                     
                [Contains discussion of HB 49.]                                                                               
4:06:17 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
CO-CHAIR  KREISS-TOMKINS  announced  that   the  final  order  of                                                               
business would be HOUSE BILL NO.  228, "An Act relating to notice                                                               
provided  to  victims  regarding  petitions for  removal  from  a                                                               
registry  that is  published  on the  Internet;  relating to  the                                                               
duration  of the  duty to  register as  a sex  offender or  child                                                               
kidnapper;  relating to  petitions  for removal  from a  registry                                                               
that is  published on the  Internet; relating to  the definitions                                                               
of  'tier  I  sex  offense,'   'tier  II  sex  offense  or  child                                                               
kidnapping,'  and 'tier  III sex  offense  or child  kidnapping';                                                               
amending  the  definition  of  'sex  offense';  relating  to  the                                                               
jurisdiction  of the  Court of  Appeals; establishing  Rule 35.3,                                                               
Alaska  Rules  of  Criminal  Procedure;   and  providing  for  an                                                               
effective date."                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
4:07:34 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
JOHN  SKIDMORE,  Deputy   Attorney  General,  Criminal  Division,                                                               
Department of  Law (DOL), on  behalf of the House  Rules Standing                                                               
Committee, sponsor, by  request of the governor,  relayed that HB                                                               
228 is in  response to the Alaska Supreme Court  decision of June                                                               
2019,  Doe  v.  Department  of  Public  Safety.    It  held  that                                                             
offenders  on the  sex  offender registry  must  be afforded  the                                                               
opportunity  to  be  removed  from  the  registry,  if  they  can                                                               
demonstrate  that they  no longer  pose a  danger to  the public.                                                               
The decision was based on  the Alaska State Constitution's "Right                                                               
of Privacy"  provision [Article I,  Section 22], and  stated that                                                               
the state's sex offender registry,  without affording an offender                                                               
the  opportunity  to  be  removed,   is  unconstitutional.    The                                                               
decision  discussed  an offender  on  the  registry being  denied                                                               
housing, employment, and living in a certain community.                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
MR. SKIDMORE explained that HB  228 would provide the legislature                                                               
with an opportunity to provide  guidance to practitioners and the                                                               
courts about  the burden of  proof that an offender  must produce                                                               
to  establish that  he/she  is no  longer a  danger  - "beyond  a                                                               
reasonable doubt," "clear and  convincing evidence," or "probable                                                               
cause."   He posed the following  questions:  What sort  of prior                                                               
convictions or  other factors might influence  the decision about                                                               
whether an  individual is dangerous?   How long must  an offender                                                               
be on the  registry before he/she is able to  apply to be removed                                                               
from the registry?  If an  offender is denied, can he/she reapply                                                               
to be  removed?  If so,  how frequently and what  sort of factors                                                               
would determine whether the offender could reapply?"                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
MR.  SKIDMORE  stated  that  there  are  two  components  to  the                                                               
registry:   the law enforcement  registry, which is used  for law                                                               
enforcement purposes,  and the information posted  online for the                                                               
public  to view.   Under  current law,  a smaller  subset of  the                                                               
information provided  to law enforcement  is posted online.   All                                                               
the concepts  that the  Alaska Supreme  Court found  that violate                                                               
the Alaska State  Constitution are based on  the public registry.                                                               
Another  very significant  question is,  "When an  individual has                                                               
the opportunity to  be removed from the registry,  is that simply                                                               
an opportunity  to not  have their  information published  to the                                                               
public, or  does that mean  that they  never have to  provide any                                                               
information to  law enforcement,  once they've met  that burden?"                                                               
He  maintained that  these  are  all questions  that  need to  be                                                               
answered and are best answered by  the legislature.  He said that                                                               
HB 228  would afford the  legislature the opportunity  to discuss                                                               
these issues and provide guidance on policy.                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
MR.  SKIDMORE  noted  that  HB  228  would  also  bring  Alaska's                                                               
registry into  closer alignment with  the federal  government and                                                               
other  states.     He  relayed  that   the  proposed  legislation                                                               
accomplishes this in two ways:   First, it creates three tiers of                                                               
registry for  evaluating different  types of offenses  instead of                                                               
two tiers of  registry.  Second, there  is additional information                                                               
that Alaska does not currently  require that would be helpful for                                                               
law   enforcement.      An  example   is   international   travel                                                               
information.  When an individual  from another country travels to                                                               
the U.S.,  the U.S.  State Department asks  the other  country to                                                               
advise  it  if   the  individual  has  been   convicted  or  held                                                               
responsible in  that other country for  a sex offense.   The U.S.                                                               
government wants  to monitor  the sex offender  who is  coming to                                                               
the  U.S.   Likewise, other  countries want  that information  on                                                               
U.S. citizens that travel.   This information is valuable for law                                                               
enforcement but is never posted on a public registry.                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
4:14:01 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
CO-CHAIR   KREISS-TOMKINS  asked   what  would   happen  if   the                                                               
legislature took no action.                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
MR. SKIDMORE  answered that all  the questions that he  posed are                                                               
under litigation in the superior  court.  If the legislature does                                                               
not  act, then  the courts  would have  to continue  to legislate                                                               
"from the  bench" to  answer the  questions.   He stated  that if                                                               
decisions are  made on a case  by case basis, then  each superior                                                               
court  judge would  make decisions  independently  on each  case.                                                               
There  is no  controlling  guidance from  one  superior court  to                                                               
another.   The  only way  judges  would be  bound and  uniformity                                                               
brought to  the process is if  there was a conflict  in the lower                                                               
courts and  the case  was heard  by the court  of appeals  or the                                                               
Alaska Supreme  Court.  In that  case, one of them  would have to                                                               
legislate  from the  bench and  provide guidance.   He  said that                                                               
another  option would  be for  the Alaska  Court System  to adopt                                                               
rules to answer  the questions - again resulting  in the judicial                                                               
branch legislating  and providing policy guidance  instead of the                                                               
legislature.   He  added that  if the  legislature does  not act,                                                               
there  would  be  two  outcomes:   1)  increased  litigation  and                                                               
expense,  and  2)  a  lack of  guidance  resulting  in  continued                                                               
confusion and cases handled in  different manners.  He added that                                                               
if the legislature were to decide  that it doesn't agree with the                                                               
courts, it would have no ability to reverse the decisions.                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
4:17:54 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE HOPKINS asked  how a minor - in the  case of a 14-                                                               
year-old  sending a  nude  photograph through  a  [cell] phone  -                                                               
would be  treated under the tiered  system and be removed  from a                                                               
sex registry.                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
MR. SKIDMORE replied  that in Alaska, minors are  not required to                                                               
register for sex offenses; therefore,  they would not be impacted                                                               
under HB 228 or current law.                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  VANCE referred  to the  chart from  DOL, entitled                                                               
"Sex  Offender  Registration"  and   included  in  the  committee                                                               
packet, and asked  how the benchmarks for the  tiers were chosen:                                                               
registration with  the Department of  Public Safety (DPS)  for 10                                                               
years under Tier  I, 15 years under Tier II,  and Life under Tier                                                               
III; eligible  for removal  from the online  registry at  5 years                                                               
under Tier  I, 10 years  under Tier II,  and 15 years  under Tier                                                               
III.                                                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
MR. SKIDMORE answered that the tiers  in the chart are those used                                                               
by  the federal  government and  by most  states in  the country.                                                               
Alaska  is   following  other  states  for   a  uniform  approach                                                               
nationwide.   The tier  system and  the time  frames are  in line                                                               
with what other states are doing.                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE asked  whether there is data  showing that a                                                               
sex  offender  or  kidnapper  is unlikely  to  reoffend  after  a                                                               
certain number of years to support the schedule in the chart.                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
MR.  SKIDMORE acknowledged  that he  is not  aware of  studies on                                                               
that issue.   Most of  the states  in the country  have statutory                                                               
provisions like  what the Alaska  Supreme Court is  requiring the                                                               
legislature to enact  - a way for individuals to  be removed from                                                               
the registry if  they can demonstrate that they no  longer pose a                                                               
danger.                                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
4:21:10 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE asked Mr. Skidmore  to elucidate on "Class A                                                               
Misdemeanor Sex Offense:   Sexual Abuse of a Minor  4" under Tier                                                               
1.                                                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
MR.  SKIDMORE responded  that misdemeanor  sex  offences are  the                                                               
least  serious   of  the   sex  offenses.     Sex   offenses  are                                                               
characterized  by  sexual  penetration and  sexual  contact;  and                                                               
misdemeanors  relate  to  sexual  contact, as  defined  under  AS                                                               
11.41.427(a)(1)-(5), which read in part:                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
     (a) An offender commits the crime of sexual assault in                                                                     
     the fourth degree if                                                                                                       
          (1) while employed in a state correctional                                                                            
     facility or other placement designated by the                                                                              
     commissioner of corrections for the custody and care                                                                       
     of prisoners, the offender engages in sexual contact                                                                       
     with a person who the offender knows is committed to                                                                       
     the custody of the Department of Corrections to serve                                                                      
     a term of imprisonment or period of temporary                                                                              
     commitment;                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
          (2) the offender engages in sexual contact with a                                                                     
     person 18 or 19 years of age who the offender knows is                                                                     
     committed to the custody of the Department of Health                                                                       
     and Social Services under AS 47.10 or AS 47.12 and the                                                                 
     offender is the legal guardian of the person;                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
MR. SKIDMORE pointed  out that the sexual  contact cited involves                                                               
someone older and not sexual abuse of a minor.                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE  asked what the  legal effects would  be for                                                               
the state, if it chose to  increase the time frames [for being on                                                               
the online registry] under the tiers.                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
MR. SKIDMORE  answered that he  does not  know at what  point the                                                               
court would  conclude that the length  of time someone is  on the                                                               
registry  is longer  than what  the court  considers due  process                                                               
required under  the Alaska State  Constitution.  He  offered that                                                               
the courts have  indicated that someone needs to  be afforded the                                                               
opportunity  to  be removed  from  the  registry.   The  proposed                                                               
legislation would set  a clear and convincing  evidence burden of                                                               
proof to show  that the person is not a  danger; that is, looking                                                               
at subsequent  convictions, other  assessments, and  whatever DOL                                                               
considers would give the greatest  assurance that someone removed                                                               
from the registry would not be a  danger.  He added that under HB                                                               
228,  the  individual  would  only be  removed  from  the  public                                                               
registry  but   would  still  be   required  to  report   to  law                                                               
enforcement.                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
4:25:38 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
KACI  SCHROEDER, Assistant  Attorney General,  Criminal Division,                                                               
Department of Law (DOL), on  behalf of the House Rules Committee,                                                               
sponsor,  by  request  of  the  governor,  paraphrased  from  the                                                               
sectional analysis for HB 228, which read:                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
          Sections 1 and  2 require a victim  to be notified                                                                    
     of  the  filing  of  a  petition  for  removal  from  a                                                                    
     registry  that  is published  on  the  Internet and  of                                                                    
     their right to participate in the subsequent hearing.                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
          Sections  3,  4,   and  5  add  to   the  list  of                                                                    
     information  that a  sex  offender  or child  kidnapper                                                                    
     must provide  to the Department  of Public  Safety upon                                                                    
     registering to  include such things  as if  they intend                                                                    
     to   leave    the   state    or   intend    to   travel                                                                    
     internationally.                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
          Section 6 of the bill  creates a third tier of sex                                                                    
     offenders   and  child   kidnappers.   The  tier   will                                                                    
     determine the  length of the registration  period. Tier                                                                    
     I offenders  will need to  register for 10  years after                                                                    
     unconditional  discharge, tier  II offenders  will need                                                                    
     to   register   for   15  years   after   unconditional                                                                    
     discharge,  and   tier  III  offenders  will   need  to                                                                    
     register for life after unconditional discharge.                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
          Section 7  of the  bill clarifies that  the period                                                                    
     of registration is tolled if  the sex offender or child                                                                    
     kidnapper is  not in  compliance with  the registration                                                                    
     requirements  or  is  incarcerated. The  period  tolled                                                                    
     would be  equal to the  amount of time that  the person                                                                    
     was out of compliance or was incarcerated.                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
4:28:33 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
          Section  8  outlines  the criteria  that  must  be                                                                    
     satisfied before a sex offender  or child kidnapper may                                                                    
     be removed from an  Internet registry. The sex offender                                                                    
     or child kidnapper must have                                                                                               
               (1)  successfully   completed  all  treatment                                                                    
          programs ordered  by the court or  required by the                                                                    
          parole board;                                                                                                         
               (2) within  the previous year,  been assessed                                                                    
          as low-risk  by a  treatment provider  approved by                                                                    
          the Department of Corrections under AS 44.28.020;                                                                     
               (3) since being convicted  of the offense for                                                                    
          which  the person  is  registering,  has not  been                                                                    
          convicted  of an  offense, attempt,  solicitation,                                                                    
          or  conspiracy  to  commit any  of  the  following                                                                    
          offenses:                                                                                                             
                    (i) a crime against a person under AS                                                                       
               11.41;                                                                                                           
                    (ii) a violation by sex offender of                                                                         
                    condition of probation under AS                                                                             
               11.56.759;                                                                                                       
                    (iii) sending an explicit image of a                                                                        
               minor under AS 11.61.116;                                                                                        
                    (iv) cruelty to animals under AS                                                                            
               11.61.140;                                                                                                       
                    (v) misconduct involving weapons under                                                                      
               AS 11.61.190  11.61.250;                                                                                         
                    (vi) a sex offense or child kidnapping                                                                      
               as defined in AS 12.63.100; or                                                                                   
                    (vii) a crime of domestic violence                                                                          
               under AS 18.66.990.                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
          In  addition,  the  person   must  not  have  been                                                                    
     convicted of failure  to register as a  sex offender or                                                                    
     child kidnapper  for the previous  15 years for  a tier                                                                    
     III offender, 10 years for  a tier II offender, or five                                                                    
     years for  a tier I  offender. These time  periods must                                                                    
     not   include  the   period   prior  to   unconditional                                                                    
     discharge.                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
4:30:33 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE HOPKINS  referred to  Section 8(a)(3), on  page 9,                                                               
line 29  - page  10, line  11, of  HB 228,  and asked  whether an                                                               
offender   convicted  of   any   of  the   crimes  listed   under                                                               
subparagraphs (A)-(G)  would never  be removed from  the offender                                                               
registry.                                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
MS. SCHROEDER answered, "That's  correct. Those are disqualifying                                                               
offenses."                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
CO-CHAIR   KREISS-TOMKINS  asked   whether  the   standards  were                                                               
consistent with the Alaska Supreme Court ruling.                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
MS.  SCHROEDER  replied  that  the supreme  court  was  not  very                                                               
prescriptive regarding the standards;  DOL looked to other states                                                               
to  develop a  list that  the  department thought  would work  in                                                               
Alaska.                                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
MS.  SCHROEDER   continued  to  paraphrase  from   the  sectional                                                               
analysis, which read:                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
          The  court  must  find  by  clear  and  convincing                                                                    
     evidence  that  (1)  the  registration  and  compliance                                                                    
     requirements outlined  in statute have  been satisfied;                                                                    
     (2) the sex offender or  child kidnapper is unlikely to                                                                    
     commit  another sex  offense or  child kidnapping;  and                                                                    
     (3)  continued  registration  on  a  registry  that  is                                                                    
     published  on the  Internet is  not  necessary for  the                                                                    
     protection  of   the  public.  Even  if   the  person's                                                                    
     information is  removed from an Internet  registry, the                                                                    
     person  must  still  register with  the  Department  of                                                                    
     Public Safety for law enforcement purposes.                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
          This  section  also  requires  the  Department  of                                                                    
     Corrections to  pay for  the risk  assessments required                                                                    
     under  this section  if the  court determines  that the                                                                    
     person petitioning for removal  from a registry that is                                                                    
     published on the Internet is indigent.                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
          Finally, this  section makes clear that  the court                                                                    
     must  allow the  victim of  the offense  which required                                                                    
     the  sex offender  or child  kidnapper  to register  to                                                                    
     submit comments  to the court about  whether the person                                                                    
     should be  removed from the registry  that is published                                                                    
     on the Internet.                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
          Section 9  of the  bill makes sexual  conduct with                                                                    
     animals a registerable sex offense.                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
          Section 10  of the bill defines  "registry that is                                                                    
     published  on the  Internet" and  "tier I,"  "tier II,"                                                                    
     and "tier III" sex offenses.                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
          Section 11 is a conforming change.                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
          Section 12 of the  bill allows the public defender                                                                    
     to represent  an indigent person in  their petition for                                                                    
     removal from an Internet registry.                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
          Section   13   gives    the   Court   of   Appeals                                                                    
     jurisdiction to hear appeals  regarding removal from an                                                                    
     Internet registry.                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
          Section 14 requires  the Department of Corrections                                                                    
     adopt   standards  for   the  administration   of  risk                                                                    
     assessments for sex offenders and child kidnappers.                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
          Section 15 establishes a  court rule which mirrors                                                                    
     the requirements in section 8 of the bill.                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
          Section  16   amends  the  applicability   of  the                                                                    
     requirements  for  an   out-of-state  sex  offender  to                                                                    
     register in Alaska  when that person is  present in the                                                                    
     state (ch.4  FSSLA 2016 (HB  49)) to apply  to offenses                                                                    
     committed before, on, or after July 9, 2019.                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
4:35:47 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
CO-CHAIR KREISS-TOMKINS asked why the legislature did not make                                                                  
the requirement [for an out-of-state sex offender to register in                                                                
Alaska] retroactive at the time HB 49 was passed.                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
          Section   17   repeals    AS   12.63.100(1),   the                                                                    
     definition   of  aggravated   sex   offense  under   AS                                                                    
     11.41.100(a)(3) or similar  law of another jurisdiction                                                                    
     since the  bill moves  from the aggravated  sex offense                                                                    
     classification  to  the   tier  system  established  in                                                                    
     section 6.                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
          Section 18  is the applicability section.  Most of                                                                    
     the  bill   is  retroactive  and  will   apply  to  sex                                                                    
     offenders and  child kidnappers  who have  already been                                                                    
     convicted and are on the registry.                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
          Section 19  is the conditional effect  section for                                                                    
     the court rule.                                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
        Section 20 establishes the effective date of the                                                                        
     bill as July 1, 2020.                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
4:36:54 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE HOPKINS  asked whether  sex offenders from  out of                                                               
state, who must register in  Alaska, would be subject to Alaska's                                                               
requirements for removal from the  registry or those in the state                                                               
in which they were convicted.                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
MR. SKIDMORE answered that an  individual from out of state would                                                               
be required to  register for the same length of  time that he/she                                                               
is required  to register in the  state of conviction.   To afford                                                               
the person the opportunity to  be removed from Alaska's registry,                                                               
DOL would need to determine the appropriate tier.                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
MR.  SKIDMORE,  in  response to  Representative  Kreiss-Tomkins's                                                               
question,  said that  DOL wanted  to keep  the law  as narrow  as                                                               
possible in  dealing with out-of-state  sex offenders so  that if                                                               
there  was  a  legal  challenge,  it would  be  a  "clean"  legal                                                               
challenge.  He  explained that applying the  law retroactively is                                                               
a  different  legal  concept  -  one  that  DOL  wanted  to  keep                                                               
separate.  He  added that the case that  prompted introduction of                                                               
HB 228 had two components:   One component was whether Alaska sex                                                               
offender registration  may be imposed  on sex offenders  who have                                                               
moved  to Alaska.   At  the  time HB  49 was  moving through  the                                                               
legislature,  there was  litigation in  the Alaska  Supreme Court                                                               
addressing such issues.  That  portion of the opinion was decided                                                               
in Alaska's  favor.   The second component  was that  the court's                                                               
opinion led  DOL to believe  that applying the  law retroactively                                                               
would be legal.                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
CO-CHAIR KREISS-TOMKINS stated that HB 228 would be held over.                                                                  

Document Name Date/Time Subjects
HB 233 Letter of Support 3.9.20.pdf HSTA 3/10/2020 3:00:00 PM
HB 233
HB 233 Letter of Support #2 3.9.20.pdf HSTA 3/10/2020 3:00:00 PM
HB 233
HB 233 Letter of Support #3 3.9.20.pdf HSTA 3/10/2020 3:00:00 PM
HB 233
HB 307 Sponsor Statement v. A 3.9.2020.pdf HJUD 3/23/2020 1:00:00 PM
HSTA 3/10/2020 3:00:00 PM
HSTA 3/12/2020 3:00:00 PM
HB 307
HB 307 Sectional Analysis v. A 3.9.2020.pdf HSTA 3/10/2020 3:00:00 PM
HSTA 3/12/2020 3:00:00 PM
HB 307
HB 307 v. A 3.9.2020.PDF HSTA 3/10/2020 3:00:00 PM
HSTA 3/12/2020 3:00:00 PM
HB 307
HB 307 Fiscal Note DOC-IDO-03-06-20.pdf HSTA 3/10/2020 3:00:00 PM
HSTA 3/12/2020 3:00:00 PM
HB 307
HB 285 Sponsor Statement ver A 3.10.20.pdf HSTA 3/10/2020 3:00:00 PM
HB 285
HB 285 Sectional ver A 3.10.20.pdf HSTA 3/10/2020 3:00:00 PM
HB 285
HB 285 ver A 3.10.20.PDF HSTA 3/10/2020 3:00:00 PM
HB 285
HB 285 Fiscal Note DNR-DMLW-3-6-20.pdf HSTA 3/10/2020 3:00:00 PM
HB 285
HB 228 Transmittal Letter 1.27.2020.pdf HSTA 3/10/2020 3:00:00 PM
HB 228
HB 228 Sectional Analysis 1.27.2020.pdf HSTA 3/10/2020 3:00:00 PM
HB 228
HB 228 Fiscal Note DOA OPA 1.27.2020.PDF HSTA 3/10/2020 3:00:00 PM
HB 228
HB 228 Fiscal Note DMVA Offc Commissioner 1.27.2020.pdf HSTA 3/10/2020 3:00:00 PM
HB 228
HB 228 v. A 1.27.2020.pdf HSTA 3/10/2020 3:00:00 PM
HB 228
HB 228 Fiscal Note DOA PDA 1.27.2020.pdf HSTA 3/10/2020 3:00:00 PM
HB 228
HB 228 Fiscal Note DOC Health and Rehab 1.27.2020.pdf HSTA 3/10/2020 3:00:00 PM
HB 228
HB 228 Fiscal Note DPS Statewide Support 1.27.2020.pdf HSTA 3/10/2020 3:00:00 PM
HB 228
HB 228 Fiscal Note Law Crim. Div. 1.27.2020.pdf HSTA 3/10/2020 3:00:00 PM
HB 228
HB 233 Letter of Support - Testimony 3.9.20.pdf HSTA 3/10/2020 3:00:00 PM
HB 233
HB 233 Letter of Support - Testimony #2 3.9.20.pdf HSTA 3/10/2020 3:00:00 PM
HB 233