Legislature(2017 - 2018)BARNES 124

04/09/2018 01:00 PM RESOURCES

Note: the audio and video recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.

Download Mp3. <- Right click and save file as
Download Video part 1. <- Right click and save file as

Audio Topic
02:04:18 PM Start
02:05:05 PM Presentation(s): Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority
02:32:24 PM HB331
03:12:28 PM Adjourn
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
-- Recessed to 4/10/18 at 8:00 am --
Presentation: AIDEA & Ambler Road
-- Testimony <Invitation Only> --
+ Bills Previously Heard/Scheduled TELECONFERENCED
+= HB 331 TAX CREDIT CERT. BOND CORP; ROYALTIES TELECONFERENCED
Heard & Held
-- Testimony <Invitation Only> --
          HB 331-TAX CREDIT CERT. BOND CORP; ROYALTIES                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
2:32:24 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
CO-CHAIR TARR  announced that  the final  order of business  would                                                              
be  HOUSE  BILL NO.  331,  "An  Act establishing  the  Alaska  Tax                                                              
Credit  Certificate Bond  Corporation;  relating  to purchases  of                                                              
tax credit certificates;  relating to overriding  royalty interest                                                              
agreements; and providing for an effective date."                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  BIRCH related  his and  his constituents'  support                                                              
of  the  bill  which  would  honor  the  state's  commitments  and                                                              
positively  affect the state's  economy.   He urged the  committee                                                              
to act expeditiously.                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
The committee took a brief at ease.                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
2:35:12 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
MIKE BARNHILL,  Deputy Commissioner, Department of  Revenue (DOR),                                                              
directed  attention  to  two  slides   entitled,  "COMPANY  X  Tax                                                              
Credits:   Potential  Impact  of HB331/SB176."    He informed  the                                                              
committee the  slides are examples  of the estimates  DOR provided                                                              
to each  tax credit holder; however,  the figures provided  on the                                                              
slides  are de-identified  and thus  do not represent  any  one of                                                              
the 37  companies who  hold tax  credit certificates.   One  slide                                                              
reflects figures for  fiscal year 2019 (FY 19) through  FY 24, and                                                              
the second slide reflects figures for FY 19 through FY 31.                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
2:36:50 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
KEN ALPER, Director,  Tax Division, DOR, explained  the purpose of                                                              
the slides  is to  show how  a company  with $50  million in  2016                                                              
credits and  $50 million  in 2017  would be paid  off.   The slide                                                              
illustrating figures  for FY  19-FY 24 was  prepared as if  HB 331                                                              
was enacted;  the slide illustrating  figures for FY 19-FY  31 was                                                              
prepared  as if HB  331, amended  to fund  a smaller,  alternative                                                              
appropriation, was enacted.                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
2:37:53 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
The committee took an at-ease from 2:37 p.m. to 2:39 p.m.                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
2:39:32 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
MR.  ALPER  restated the  slides  are  a hypothetical  example  of                                                              
information  that was  twice provided  by DOR  to each  of the  37                                                              
impacted  companies.   He first  directed attention  to the  slide                                                              
illustrating  figures for  FY 19-FY 24  and gave  an example  of a                                                              
company with $50  million in the "first pool" of  2016 credits and                                                              
$50  million in  the  "second  pool" of  2017  credits.   If  $184                                                              
million were  appropriated in FY  19, it would represent  about 45                                                              
percent  of  the $400  million  in  total  2016 tax  credits,  and                                                              
credit  holders would  be  paid approximately  $0.45  on each  $1.                                                              
Thus, the  example company  would be eligible  for $23  million in                                                              
FY 19; in FY  20, a statutory appropriation of  $168 million would                                                              
pay an  additional 40 percent, and  the example company  would get                                                              
$21 million.   The FY  21 appropriation  of $168 million  would be                                                              
split to  pay off the  last of the 2016  credits and the  first of                                                              
the 2017 credits.   Further, FY 22 and FY 23  appropriations would                                                              
continue  to pay  off  the example  company's  share  of the  2017                                                              
pool, as affected  by the number of years the  discounts rates are                                                              
applied, until  FY 24.  Mr. Alper  said the columns on  the slides                                                              
labeled Face  Value show what the  example company expects  to get                                                              
paid;  the  columns labeled  Discount  Rates  show the  money  the                                                              
example company  would receive  under the terms  of HB 331  and HB                                                              
331,  amended.   He concluded  the example  company, depending  on                                                              
its discount  rate,  would be offered  either  $85 million  or $91                                                              
million  if it  chose to  relinquish $100,000  million in  credits                                                              
and participate  in  the program.   He directed  attention  to the                                                              
slide  illustrating figures  for  FY 19-FY  31  and explained  the                                                              
figures  on  this  slide reflect  a  forthcoming  amendment  which                                                              
would lower  the appropriation schedule  and base the  schedule on                                                              
a percentage of  the actual taxes received, rather  than the "raw"                                                              
tax  calculations, thus  the appropriations  would be  in the  $40                                                              
million  to $60  million range.    The example  company would  not                                                              
receive  2016  credits  until  FY  25-FY 26,  due  to  more  years                                                              
affected  by its discount  rate.   In this  situation, the  credit                                                              
holders  would receive  dramatically  less,  and  the state  would                                                              
borrow less.                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
2:44:27 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  PARISH  asked,  "Which  of  these  two  scenarios,                                                              
would  you  say,   more  accurately  reflects,  or   more  closely                                                              
reflects,  the net present  value  of these credit  assets  to the                                                              
companies?"                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
MR.  ALPER  stated  the credit  holders'  internal  economics  and                                                              
valuing are unknown  to DOR; however, he expressed  his belief the                                                              
companies are anticipating  a statutory appropriation,  similar to                                                              
what the state has appropriated in the last two years.                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  PARISH   surmised  the  tax  credit   holders  are                                                              
amenable to [the proposals shown on both slides].                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
MR. ALPER recalled  testimony from a representative of  one of the                                                              
banks that holds  debt that is guaranteed by the  tax credits owed                                                              
to one of  the credit holders:   from the bank's  perspective, the                                                              
reduced appropriation  schedule would enable a company  to pay off                                                              
its  debt to  the bank.    However, from  the  perspective of  the                                                              
company,  a reduced  appropriation  would  not repay  the  company                                                              
that  did the  [exploration]  work, and  he  provided an  example.                                                              
Mr. Alper said,  "So, I think you would get a  different answer if                                                              
you had  a representative of the  actual explorer up  here, rather                                                              
than  their  banker."    In  further  response  to  Representative                                                              
Parish, he  said the companies  [holding tax credit  certificates]                                                              
would  like  an amount  that  would  enable  them to  continue  in                                                              
business.                                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
MR.  BARNHILL  restated  the  administration  is  seeking  a  fair                                                              
balance between  various interests through its introduction  of HB                                                              
331; however,  if the  forthcoming amendment  were to be  adopted,                                                              
HB 331 would no longer be fair.  He remarked:                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
     We're  trying to  find  a way,  not  only  to clear  the                                                                   
     decks, but  clear the decks  in a way that  accomplishes                                                                   
     a  variety  of  purpose.   Paying  off  the  tax  credit                                                                   
     holders is  certainly one of  those purposes,  but, just                                                                   
     as important,  is attempting to reestablish  the state's                                                                   
     credibility, with  respect to the oil and  gas industry.                                                                   
     And restore  ... Alaska, in  the perspective of  the oil                                                                   
     and gas  industry, as a place  to come and  invest money                                                                   
     ....                                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
2:49:30 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE BIRCH  expressed support for HB 331  as introduced.                                                              
He asked  how many  businesses are  impacted by  the inability  of                                                              
the state to fulfil its obligation to pay the tax credits.                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
MR.  ALPER said  there  are 37  companies  - approximately  20  of                                                              
which received  cash in 2017 for  pro rata shares of  2016 credits                                                              
- that have credits.   There are new companies  with 2017 credits,                                                              
some of which  are very small  and received $10,000 or  less, such                                                              
as  some  of  the  working  interest  partners  within  the  Point                                                              
Thomson Unit.                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE   BIRCH  observed   the  affected  businesses   are                                                              
largely Alaska  businesses  with Alaskan employees.   He  returned                                                              
attention  to the discount  rates  shown on the  slides and  noted                                                              
one  tier  would  incentivize investment  in  Alaska  and  restore                                                              
Alaska's credibility.                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
MR. ALPER expressed  his hope that both discount  rates would help                                                              
restore   Alaska's    credibility;   the   lower    rate   rewards                                                              
reinvestment  because to  qualify  for the  lower  rate a  company                                                              
would  have  to  spend all  of  its  appropriation  on  "qualified                                                              
capital expenditures"  - which  are capital expenditures  upstream                                                              
of the  point of  production in  its oilfields  - within  the next                                                              
two years.  He provided an example.                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE BIRCH restated his support for the bill.                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
2:53:28 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
CO-CHAIR JOSEPHSON  surmised the  forthcoming amendment  may cause                                                              
[small, independent,  oil and gas  industry businesses]  to either                                                              
sell   their  assets   under  the   current   statute  or   suffer                                                              
foreclosure.                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
MR. BARNHILL agreed.                                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  PARISH gave  an example of  a small  multimillion-                                                              
dollar  oil and gas  company with  a marginal  oilfield and  asked                                                              
whether  said company  could  be prevented  from  "agreeing to  an                                                              
overriding royalty  interest and then  pulling up stakes  the next                                                              
year."                                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
MR. ALPER  stated if that  were the intent,  the company  would be                                                              
lying to  the Department  of Natural  Resources (DNR) because  the                                                              
overriding royalty interest is a negotiated agreement.                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
2:55:41 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  PARISH moved Amendment  1, labeled  30-GH2863\A.2,                                                              
Nauman, 4/6/18, which read [original punctuation provided]:                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
     Page 13, line 14:                                                                                                          
            Delete "before the application of any tax                                                                           
     credits"                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
CO-CHAIR JOSEPHSON objected.                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  PARISH  explained  Amendment  1 would  return  the                                                              
language in HB  331 to the current statutory language,  which does                                                              
not make  any reference  to the  application of  tax credits,  and                                                              
would give  DOR the  option to follow  a repayment schedule  based                                                              
on actual  taxes received.  Amendment  1 would reduce the  risk to                                                              
the state,  reduce the amount of  debt incurred by the  state, and                                                              
bring  appropriations  closer to  the  real  market value  of  the                                                              
assets.   Further, Amendment 1  would constrain subsidies  paid to                                                              
multinational interests.                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE BIRCH expressed his opposition to Amendment 1.                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  RAUSCHER  questioned   whether  this  was  another                                                              
situation  in  which "they  roll  the  dice  again and  invest  in                                                              
Alaska."                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  PARISH  said,  "...  they  decided  to  invest  in                                                              
Alaska,  sure, they,  presumably  read their,  their contracts,  I                                                              
certainly  hope that they  did.   I have  nothing but respect  for                                                              
people and  their ability to  serve their rational  self-interest.                                                              
Where  it  gets  murky  is when  you  start  moving  around  other                                                              
people's money."   He assured the committee [HB  331] contemplates                                                              
spending - not  the oil industry's money because  tax credits [are                                                              
not  money]  -  money  that  belongs  to  the  people  of  Alaska.                                                              
Further, Amendment  1 would balance the interests  of the industry                                                              
with those of Alaska in an equitable way.                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
2:59:52 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
MR.  BARNHILL  recalled the  original  intent  of the  tax  credit                                                              
program was  for the  state to  invest alongside  the oil  and gas                                                              
industry  to expand  the exploration  and development  of oil  and                                                              
gas  resources.    [HB  331]  seeks  to  create  a  cycle  of  new                                                              
investment  and new production  that would  result in new  revenue                                                              
to the state  for the benefit of its citizens;  however, Amendment                                                              
1 signals industry  that Alaska is not competitive  with other oil                                                              
and  gas basins  around  the world.   He  urged  the committee  to                                                              
consider the long-term ramifications of Amendment 1.                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
CO-CHAIR  TARR noted  several  of  the state's  current  problems,                                                              
that  are  related  to  the tax  credit  program,  may  have  been                                                              
avoided.    She said  her  concern  is if  the  state's  financial                                                              
situation  does not  improve,  and  HB 331  is  enacted -  because                                                              
nonpayment  of  debt  secured  by   bonding  would  downgrade  the                                                              
state's  financial  position -  payments  on  the bonds  would  be                                                              
elevated and  prioritized over other  programs such  as healthcare                                                              
and education.                                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  TALERICO  related he  had considered  offering  an                                                              
amendment, however,  he carefully  reviewed previous  testimony on                                                              
the bill  presented by  representatives of  the Department  of Law                                                              
and  DOR.     After  revisiting  Sections  3-11,   he  stated  his                                                              
preference  to move  the bill,  without amendments,  to the  House                                                              
Finance  Committee  for  further   review  and  additional  expert                                                              
testimony.                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
3:04:32 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  PARISH  withdrew   Amendment  1.    Representative                                                              
Parish moved Amendment  2, labeled 30-GH2863\A.3,  Nauman, 4/9/18,                                                              
which read [original punctuation provided]:                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
     Page 6, line 25:                                                                                                           
          Delete "1.5"                                                                                                          
          Insert "two"                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
     Page 13, line 24:                                                                                                          
          Delete "of 10 percent a year"                                                                                         
          Insert "based on the true interest cost plus                                                                          
          seven percent"                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
     Page 13, lines 29-30:                                                                                                      
        Delete "1.5 percent and is less than ten percent                                                                        
          applies each year"                                                                                                    
          Insert "two percent"                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
     Page 14, lines 3-4:                                                                                                        
        Delete "1.5 percent and is less than ten percent                                                                        
          applies each year"                                                                                                    
          Insert "two percent"                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
CO-CHAIR TARR objected.                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  PARISH cautioned  HB 331  exposes the  state to  a                                                              
good  degree of  risk.    If the  state's  true cost  of  interest                                                              
rises,  that   would  erode   the  incentive   for  companies   to                                                              
participate   in  the   proposal,   and  for   meeting  the   four                                                              
requirements  for  a discounted  rate.    He  pointed out  if  the                                                              
distance between  the higher discount  rate and the  state's rates                                                              
close,  it  will  reduce  the incentive  to  reinvest  in  Alaska.                                                              
Amendment 2 would  also increase the differential  that covers the                                                              
state's  risk,  in  the  event  of   a  drop  in  oil  prices,  by                                                              
increasing the difference  to the true cost of  borrowing from 1.5                                                              
percent to 2 percent.                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
3:07:11 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  BIRCH asked for  an assessment  of Amendment  2 by                                                              
the representatives from DOR.                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
MR.  BARNHILL advised  the  first change  brought  by Amendment  2                                                              
increases the  "cushion" from 1.5 percent  to 2 percent.   He said                                                              
Amendment 2  does not provide  additional protection to  the state                                                              
if there  is a drop  in the  price oil; in  fact, the  1.5 percent                                                              
added  to the  true interest  cost  is designed  to replicate  the                                                              
state's opportunity  cost of  capital, which  is about  5 percent,                                                              
and reflects the  rate of earnings garnered from  earnings reserve                                                              
accounts, general  funds, and  the constitutional budget  reserve.                                                              
He opined  1.5 percent  is sufficient  for the  purpose of  HB 331                                                              
due to the long-term  nature of the bill.  The  second change made                                                              
by Amendment  2, which  would increase  the default discount  rate                                                              
for participants,  is not  an issue of  protecting the  state, but                                                              
is "tipping  that balance more  in the state's  favor.   We picked                                                              
10 percent  intentionally to,  kind of, be  a median point  if you                                                              
will.  ...  We'd prefer not to do that at this point in time."                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE PARISH stated a drop in the price of oil would                                                                   
dramatically affect the state's opportunity cost by changing the                                                                
schedule of repayment under the existing statute.                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
3:11:29 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
MR. ALPER remarked:                                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
     I think  what Representative  Parish is referring  to is                                                                   
     we're  sort of locking  in the  payment schedule at  the                                                                   
     bonding moment.   We are going  to make them  a one-time                                                                   
     offer, we're going  to give them a bunch  of money based                                                                   
     on  what  the  schedule  of payments  would  be  if  our                                                                   
     spring 2018  forecast comes in  true.  If, in  fact, the                                                                   
     price of oil  is lower ... that schedule  would decline,                                                                   
     and those companies  would actually be getting  less, so                                                                   
     they'd be benefitting,  so to speak, from  the structure                                                                   
     in the bill.   Likewise, if the price of oil  were to be                                                                   
     higher  than forecasted  in  the spring,  they would  be                                                                   
     losing out  by taking the offer  at this point  cause it                                                                   
     turned  out  the  scheduled  payments  would  have  been                                                                   
     higher  than anticipated.   So yes,  to the extent  that                                                                   
     is true,  it's exaggerated  a little  bit by  increasing                                                                   
     the, the interest rate, the, the spread.                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
[HB 331 was held over.]                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                

Document Name Date/Time Subjects
HB331 Transmittal Letter.pdf HRES 3/30/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/4/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/6/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/7/2018 2:00:00 PM
HRES 4/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/10/2018 8:00:00 AM
HB 331
HB331 Version A.PDF HRES 3/30/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/4/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/6/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/7/2018 2:00:00 PM
HRES 4/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/10/2018 8:00:00 AM
HB 331
HB331 Fiscal Note -DNR-DOG 1.29.18.pdf HRES 3/30/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/4/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/6/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/7/2018 2:00:00 PM
HRES 4/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/10/2018 8:00:00 AM
HB 331
HB331 Fiscal Note-DOR-TAX 2.5.18.pdf HRES 3/30/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/4/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/6/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/7/2018 2:00:00 PM
HRES 4/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/10/2018 8:00:00 AM
HB 331
HB331 Supporting Document - Presentation Credit Bonds for HRES 3.30.18.pdf HRES 3/30/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/6/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/7/2018 2:00:00 PM
HRES 4/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/10/2018 8:00:00 AM
HB 331
HB331 Supporting Document - DOR.LAW 3.2.18.pdf HRES 3/30/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/4/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/6/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/7/2018 2:00:00 PM
HRES 4/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/10/2018 8:00:00 AM
HB 331
HB331 Sectional Analysis 3.29.18.pdf HRES 3/30/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/4/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/6/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/7/2018 2:00:00 PM
HRES 4/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/10/2018 8:00:00 AM
HB 331
HB331 Supporting Document - Letter of Support 3.29.18.pdf HRES 3/30/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/4/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/6/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/7/2018 2:00:00 PM
HRES 4/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
HB 331
HB331 Credit Bonds for HRES 4-2-18.pdf HRES 4/4/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/6/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
HB 331
AOGA Testimony - HB 331 - 4.4.2018.pdf HRES 4/4/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/6/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/7/2018 2:00:00 PM
HRES 4/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
HB 331
HB 331 Amendment One - A.2 - Rep. Parish 4.6.18.pdf HRES 4/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/10/2018 8:00:00 AM
HB 331
Ambler CSPP invited testimony.pdf HRES 4/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
AMDIAR
Ambler CSPP PPT.pdf HRES 4/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
AMDIAR
Ambler_AIDEA statutes re Regional Resource Advisory Council review.pdf HRES 4/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
AMDIAR
Ambler_APRN article 1.30.18.pdf HRES 4/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
AMDIAR
Ambler_Cardno econ analysis excerpts.pdf HRES 4/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
AMDIAR
Ambler_AIDEA PPT.pdf HRES 4/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
AMDIAR
Ambler_Clarke invited testimony.pdf HRES 4/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
AMDIAR
Ambler_Clarke PPT.pdf HRES 4/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
AMDIAR
Ambler_DOWL AIDEA Cost Estims 2.26.18.pdf HRES 4/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
AMDIAR
Ambler_DOT May 2012 Report, Excerpt.pdf HRES 4/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
AMDIAR
Ambler_Doyon ltr to BLM 1.24.18.pdf HRES 4/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
AMDIAR
Ambler_Trilogy Metals PPT.pdf HRES 4/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
AMDIAR
Ambler_Trustees' Follow-up Letter to BLM re Leg Hearing.pdf HRES 4/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
AMDIAR
Ambler_v_Allakaket Opposition Resolution.pdf HRES 4/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
AMDIAR
Ambler_v_Ambler Opposition Resolution.pdf HRES 4/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
AMDIAR
Ambler_v_Bettles Opposition Resolution.pdf HRES 4/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
AMDIAR
Ambler_v_Evansville Opposition Resolution.pdf HRES 4/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
AMDIAR
Ambler_v_Huslia Opposition Resolution.pdf HRES 4/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
AMDIAR
Ambler_v_Kobuk Opposition Resolution.pdf HRES 4/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
AMDIAR
Ambler_v_Kotzebue Opposition Resolution.pdf HRES 4/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
AMDIAR
Ambler_v_Koyukuk Opposition Resolution.pdf HRES 4/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
AMDIAR
Ambler_v_Louden Opposition Resolution.pdf HRES 4/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
AMDIAR
Ambler_v_Rampart Opposition Resolution.pdf HRES 4/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
AMDIAR
Ambler_v_Ruby Opposition Resoulution.pdf HRES 4/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
AMDIAR
Ambler_WIRAC 2017 Letter.pdf HRES 4/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
AMDIAR
Ambler_APRN article 1.30.18.pdf HRES 4/6/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
Ambler
AMDIAR
HB 331 Amendment Two - A.3 - Rep. Parish 4.9.18.pdf HRES 4/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/10/2018 8:00:00 AM
HB 331
HB331 theoretical 100m company.pdf HRES 4/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
Ambler_AIDEA bonds are not an indebtedness or liability of the state.pdf HRES 4/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRCHearingResponse_041218.pdf HRES 4/9/2018 1:00:00 PM