Legislature(2017 - 2018)GRUENBERG 120

02/27/2018 10:00 AM FISHERIES

Note: the audio and video recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.

Download Mp3. <- Right click and save file as
Download Video part 1. <- Right click and save file as

* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+= HB 231 CFEC: BD. SALARY;STAFF CLASSIFIED SERVICE TELECONFERENCED
Heard & Held
-- Public Testimony --
<Bill Hearing Rescheduled from 2/22/18>
+= HB 272 TANGLE LAKES STATE GAME REFUGE TELECONFERENCED
Moved HB 272 Out of Committee
-- Public Testimony --
+= HB 260 FISH & GAME LICENSES;ELECTRONIC FORM TELECONFERENCED
Moved HB 260 Out of Committee
-- Public Testimony --
*+ HB 386 VESSELS: REGISTRATION/TITLES; DERELICTS TELECONFERENCED
Heard & Held
+= HB 188 COMM. FISH. ENTRY PERMITS; LOANS; TRUSTS TELECONFERENCED
Moved CSHB 188(FSH) Out of Committee
-- Public Testimony --
+ Bills Previously Heard/Scheduled TELECONFERENCED
        HB 231-CFEC: BD. SALARY;STAFF CLASSIFIED SERVICE                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
11:16:31 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR STUTES announced  that the next order of  business would be                                                               
HOUSE BILL  NO. 231,  "An Act relating  to the  Alaska Commercial                                                               
Fisheries  Entry  Commission;  and  providing  for  an  effective                                                               
date."                                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
11:16:49 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  NEUMAN  moved  to adopt  the  proposed  committee                                                               
substitute  (CS)  for  HB   231,  labeled  30-GH1053\D,  Bullard,                                                               
2/14/18 [Version D] as the working document.                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR STUTES advised that the motion  could not be adopted as the                                                               
committee lacked a quorum.                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
[The  committee   proceeded  as   though  the  motion   had  been                                                               
withdrawn.]                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
11:17:35 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
The committee took a brief at ease.                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
11:17:58 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  EDGMON  moved  to adopt  the  proposed  committee                                                               
substitute  (CS)  for  HB   231,  labeled  30-GH1053\D,  Bullard,                                                               
2/14/18,  as the  working document.   There  being no  objection,                                                               
Version D was before the committee.                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
[CHAIR STUTES listed the individuals available to testify.]                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
11:19:11 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
MATT GRUENING, Staff, Representative  Louise Stutes, Alaska State                                                               
Legislature, introduced himself.                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
11:19:16 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
MINTA MONTALBO,  Special Assistant,  Office of  the Commissioner,                                                               
Department of Administration (DOA), introduced herself.                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
11:19:23 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
MR. GRUENING  stated that the proposed  committee substitute (CS)                                                               
for  HB  231, Version  D,  represents  efforts between  the  bill                                                               
sponsor,  the  administration,   representatives  of  the  United                                                               
Fishermen  of Alaska  (UFA), and  the Commercial  Fisheries Entry                                                               
Commission (CFEC).   He stated that the changes  were a consensus                                                               
of all parties.                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
11:19:50 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
MR. GRUENING referred to page 1, line  9, to Section 1 of HB 231.                                                               
He stated  that this reduced  the number of commissioners  on the                                                               
Commercial Fisheries  Entry Commission (CFEC) from  three to two.                                                               
He  offered to  explain  more on  this later.    The next  change                                                               
occurred on page  1, lines 13-14, which specifies  that a vacancy                                                               
on  the  commission does  not  impair  the  ability of  a  single                                                               
commissioner to  exercise all  powers of  the commission.   Since                                                               
the  proposed  CS for  HB  231  removed  one commissioner,  if  a                                                               
vacancy occurs, this gives the  commissioner to exercise the full                                                               
authority   of  the   commission  in   adjudicatory  proceedings,                                                               
transactions, and day to day activities.                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
MR.  GRUENING directed  attention  to page  2,  lines 3-5,  which                                                               
specifies that  a single member  of the commission  constitutes a                                                               
quorum.   He  stated that  another  change will  be necessary  in                                                               
proposed Section 3.  On page 2,  line 3-6, the proposed CS for HB                                                               
231  read,  "A single  member  [TWO  MEMBERS] of  the  commission                                                             
constitutes  [CONSTITUTE]   a  quorum  for  the   transaction  of                                                             
business, for the  performance of a duty, or for  the exercise of                                                               
a power of the commission.                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
MR. GRUENING explained that the intent  was for this to apply for                                                               
the  transaction of  business and  the performance  of duty  when                                                               
there was not  a vacancy; but only when a  vacancy occurred would                                                               
it include the exercise of a  power of the commission.  He stated                                                               
that  further  clarification  was   necessary  to  clarify  which                                                               
instances the single commissioner can  exercise all powers of the                                                               
commission and  when the commissioner  can transact  business and                                                               
perform  duties.   The sponsor  wanted  to avoid  an instance  in                                                               
which there  was not a vacancy  and the commissioner was  able to                                                               
exercise  the full  powers  on an  adjudication  simply when  the                                                               
other  commissioner  was not  available.    However, the  sponsor                                                               
would like a single commissioner  to be able to transact business                                                               
or perform his/her duties for day-to-day routine work.                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
11:22:23 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  NEUMAN related  his understanding  that a  single                                                               
commissioner would  have the  authority to  sign off  on matters.                                                               
He expressed  concern that the  Governor would have the  power to                                                               
keep a position vacant and  therefore one commissioner would have                                                               
significant power.                                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
MR. GRUENING  said that he had  not had any discussions  with the                                                               
administration; however, he understood the concern.                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
11:23:22 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
MR. GRUENING  directed attention to  proposed Section 4,  on page                                                               
2,  lines  6-10, AS  16.43.060  of  HB 231.    He  read from  the                                                               
document titled  "CS HB 231  Explanation of Changes,"  which read                                                               
as follows [original punctuation provided]:                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
     Section  4:  Modified  from   original  bill.  This  section                                                               
     maintains the current  statutory salary at Range  27 for the                                                               
     commissioner serving as  chair, as the chair  is expected to                                                               
     perform additional  duties and functions. The  original bill                                                               
     reduced the chair's  salary to a Range 24.  The salary range                                                               
     for  the second  commissioner continues  to be  reduced from                                                               
     Range 27 to 24, as in the original bill.                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
MR.  GRUENING   explained  that  the  chair   would  have  direct                                                               
oversight  of the  other commissioner  and would  have the  final                                                               
say.    Further,  the  chair  would  absorb  the  duties  of  the                                                               
executive  director.   He further  explained that  the it  seemed                                                               
appropriate to  leave the chair  at a  range 27, since  the chair                                                               
would have direct  oversight, but to set  the second commissioner                                                               
at a range 24.                                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
11:24:06 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN asked how  the chair is currently selected                                                               
and if that would be changed with the proposed HB 231.                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
MR. GRUENING responded that the  current chair is selected by the                                                               
governor, but the current bill does not change that process.                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR STUTES responded that is correct.                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
11:24:39 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
MR. GRUENING  said there were no  changes to Section 5.   He then                                                               
directed attention to proposed Section  6, on page 2, lines 15-19                                                               
to  proposed AS  16.43.119(f),  which read  as follows  [original                                                               
punctuation provided]:                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
     (f) In case  of a tie vote between  commissioners in an                                                                    
     adjudicatory  proceeding, the  decision of  the hearing                                                                    
     officer  is the  final administrative  decision of  the                                                                    
     commission subject to review  by a superior court under                                                                    
     AS 44.62 (Administrative 22 Procedure Act).                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
MR. GRUENING  explained that  the process.   Initially  a hearing                                                               
officer  issues   a  decision  and   if  the  party   seeking  an                                                               
adjudication appeals  the decision  it goes to  the commissioner.                                                               
In the event the two commissioners  have a 1-1 tie, this language                                                               
would  allow  for  the original  hearing  officer's  decision  to                                                               
become the  decision of the  commission.  He clarified  that this                                                               
was due to removing one of the commissioners in statute.                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
11:25:33 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
MR. GRUENING stated that there was  no change to Section 8 of the                                                               
proposed CS for HB 231, Version  D.  This section matched Section                                                               
5, related to removing employees from exempt service, he said.                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
MR. GRUENING said that there were  no changes to Section 9 in the                                                               
proposed CS for HB 231, Version D.                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
11:25:48 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
MR. GRUENING directed  attention to proposed Section  10, to page                                                               
3, lines  14-16 of Version  D.   He explained that  this language                                                               
was  added to  satisfy  Article  1, Section  15  of Alaska  State                                                               
Constitution,   which    specifies   that   the    state   cannot                                                               
retroactively  reduce  someone's  pay  under  the  impairment  of                                                               
contract's provision.   The current commissioner's  salaries will                                                               
remain at  the current  amount, but  any reappointments  would be                                                               
made at the lower amount.                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
11:26:36 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN  asked for clarification in  the case that                                                               
the governor appointed  a new chair if the  former chair's salary                                                               
would be reduced.                                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
MR.  GRUENING answered  that  he would  defer  to the  Commercial                                                               
Fisheries Entry Commission to respond.                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
11:27:39 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
FATE   PUTMAN,   Commissioner  designee;   Chairman,   Commercial                                                               
Fisheries Entry  Commission (CFEC),  Alaska Department of  Fish &                                                               
Game (ADF&G) introduced himself.                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  EASTMAN   related  his  understanding   that  the                                                               
current Chair of the CFEC serves at  a range 27.  If the governor                                                               
decided to appoint  a new chair, would the former  chair become a                                                               
range 24.                                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
MR. PUTMAN  related his understanding that  the governor appoints                                                               
the Chair of  the CFEC to serve  a two-year term.   Once the two-                                                               
year term is up, the governor  could appoint a new chair and that                                                               
person would serve at a range 24.                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
11:28:19 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  EASTMAN  further  asked whether  it  because  the                                                               
governor has appointed  someone new as a chair  that creates this                                                               
change or if it was because  that former chair's term was up, and                                                               
the person was being reappointed to a new term.                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
MR. PUTMAN answered no; that it  was because the two-year term of                                                               
that  chairmanship was  finished,  even though  the person  could                                                               
still  serve  on  the  commission  for a  four-year  term.    The                                                               
chairmen serve  for two years but  could then be designated  as a                                                               
non-chairman once  the chairmanship  has run  out and  the person                                                               
would serve as commissioner, he said.                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
11:29:00 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  NEUMAN  asked  for  additional  clarification  on                                                               
changes for  exempt positions.   He further  asked for  the staff                                                               
level of the CFEC and whether this would affect them.                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
MR. GRUENING responded yes.  He deferred to Mr. Putman.                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
11:30:04 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE NEUMAN  related his understanding that  one of the                                                               
sections [Section 5] would remove  employees from exempt service.                                                               
He asked whether the two  [commissioners] would be exempt and how                                                               
many staff the CFEC has and if they would be exempt.                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
MR. PUTMAN responded  that the two commissioners  would remain in                                                               
the exempt  service and  the staff  would be  classified, meaning                                                               
unionized, if HB 231 was adopted.                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
11:30:39 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE NEUMAN said  an issue raised has  been the backlog                                                               
of lawsuits and  settlements.  This bill would  reduce the number                                                               
of commissioners from  three to two.  He asked  whether there was                                                               
there a proposal or other remedy to rectify this issue.                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
MR.  PUTMAN stated  that it  is the  intent of  the chairman  and                                                               
staff  to  resolve  the  outstanding  cases  at  the  CFEC.    He                                                               
estimated the backlog  at 13 cases pending from  25-35 years ago.                                                               
He  emphasized  his intent  to  review  and resolve  these  cases                                                               
through settlement  with the potential  appellees.   He explained                                                               
that when the cases are pending  each of the appellees receive an                                                               
interim-use permit, which  allows them to fish  until their cases                                                               
are resolved.   He  reported that two  cases have  been resolved.                                                               
He  reiterated  his intent  to  resolve  the remaining  13  cases                                                               
within the next year or two.                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
11:32:00 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE NEUMAN raised the  matter of authority over staff.                                                               
He asked  whether the  bill changes the  authority of  the chair.                                                               
He asked for further clarification  on how staff would be managed                                                               
and the structure of the CFEC as it falls under the ADF&G.                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
MR.  PUTMAN  stated  that  when employees  move  from  exempt  to                                                               
classified  status, they  are  protected  through the  collective                                                               
bargaining agreement; however, exempt  employees can be hired and                                                               
fired at  will.  Classified  employees are subject to  a process,                                                               
including progressive  discipline before they can  be terminated.                                                               
He stated that the chairman  will serve as the executive director                                                               
and   he/she  would   make   determinations   about  hiring   and                                                               
recommendations for firing of underperforming staff.                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
11:33:26 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
MR. GRUENING said he had finished with the changes.                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
11:33:42 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR STUTES  referred to an earlier  comment on a 1-1  tie.  She                                                               
pointed out  that there was an  appeal process and the  party can                                                               
appeal to the superior court.                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
11:34:10 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
MS. MONTALBO gave  a section-by-section analysis of HB  231.  She                                                               
directed attention  to Section 1,  which would reduce  the number                                                               
of  commissioners appointed  to  the  Commercial Fisheries  Entry                                                               
Commission (CFEC) from three to two, she said.                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
MS.   MONTALBO   directed  attention   to   Section   2,  to   AS                                                               
16.43.030(c),  which   would  allow  a  single   commissioner  to                                                               
exercise the powers  and duties of the commission,  when there is                                                               
a vacancy on the commission.                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
MS. MONTALBO directed attention to  Section 3, which will need to                                                               
be  amended, as  Mr. Gruening  previously mentioned  but for  now                                                               
this  change addresses  the need  to  establish a  quorum of  one                                                               
commissioner.                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
MS. MONTALBO directed  attention to Section 4,  which would amend                                                               
AS  16.43.060, which  would provide  that the  member serving  as                                                               
chair will be paid a step in Range  27.  It would also adjust the                                                               
salary range from 27 to 24 for the other commissioner.                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
11:35:06 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
MS. MONTALBO directed  attention to Section 5,  which would amend                                                               
AS 16.43.080(a),  by removing language  placing employees  of the                                                               
commission in the exempt service.                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
MS. MONTALBO  directed attention to  Section 6, which adds  a new                                                               
subsection  (f) to  AS 16.43.110,  which would  provide that  tie                                                               
votes  between  commissioners  will  be settled  by  the  hearing                                                               
officer.                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
MS. MONTALBO directed  attention to Section 7,  which would amend                                                               
AS  16.43.960(d) to  allow  for cause  hearings  to be  conducted                                                               
before one commissioner and a hearing officer.                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
11:35:40 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
MS. MONTALBO  directed attention to  Section 8, which  repeals AS                                                               
39.25.110(11)(D).    She  referred  to  the  statute  text  being                                                               
repealed under  subparagraph (D) of AS  39.25.110(11), which read                                                               
as follows [original punctuation provided]:                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
     Sec. 39.25.110. Exempt service. Unless otherwise                                                                           
     provided by law, the following positions constitute                                                                        
     the exempt service and are exempt from the provisions                                                                      
     of this chapter and the rules adopted under it:                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
     (11) the officers and employees of the following                                                                           
     boards, commissions, and authorities:                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
          (A) [Repealed, Sec. 13 ch 43 SLA 1994];                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
          (B) Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation;                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
          (C) Alaska Industrial Development and Export                                                                          
          Authority;                                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
          (D) Alaska Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission;                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
       (E) Alaska Commission on Postsecondary Education;                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
          (F) Alaska Aerospace Corporation;                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
          (G) [Repealed, Sec. 23 ch 11 SLA 2013].                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
MS. MONTALBO  mentioned that change goes  along with transferring                                                               
employees from exempt service to classified service.                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
11:36:08 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
MS. MONTALBO  directed attention  to Section  9, which  would add                                                               
transition   language  to   uncodified   law,  which   stipulates                                                               
commission  staff   members  will  be  appointed   to  classified                                                               
services upon  the bill's effective  date; and if  the classified                                                               
position has  a lower rate of  pay, a staff member's  salary will                                                               
be held  at the rate received  in exempt service until  such time                                                               
as the classified rate meets it.                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
MS.  MONTALBO directed  attention to  Section 10,  which adds  an                                                               
applicability clause  to uncodified  law to stablish  that salary                                                               
changes  outlined  in  Section  4  of this  bill  will  apply  to                                                               
commissioners appointed after the bill's effective date.                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
MS.  MONTALBO  directed attention  to  Section  [11], which  sets                                                               
effective date as immediate.                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
11:37:02 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE EDGMON asked if there  was any scenario in which a                                                               
hearing officer could act as a tie breaker.                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
MR.  GRUENING offered  his belief  that the  answer was  no.   He                                                               
described  the current  process,  such that  the hearing  officer                                                               
makes an  initial review, issues  a decision, which  is forwarded                                                               
to the  [CFEC] commissioners who  make an adjudication.   He said                                                               
there was  not any process in  which the hearing officer  casts a                                                               
final vote in a tiebreaker.   He explained at that point it would                                                               
be decided by the superior court.                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
11:38:02 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE EDGMON  offered his  belief that it  would violate                                                               
the chain of due process, if that were to occur.                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
11:38:12 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  EASTMAN   said  he  noticed  that   it  has  been                                                               
customary  for courts  and even  this  committee to  have an  odd                                                               
number of  members to  resolve the  potential of  tie votes.   He                                                               
asked why not just go to one commissioner.                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
MR. GRUENING  responded that only  having one  commissioner would                                                               
result in  only one point of  view, which could lead  to room for                                                               
abuse.   He said that  there was a  certain value to  having more                                                               
than one  commissioner since the second  commissioner could raise                                                               
a  different point  of  view.   He characterized  it  as being  a                                                               
little  "heavy  handed" to  have  only  one commissioner  set  in                                                               
statute.                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
11:39:23 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR STUTES  opened public testimony  on HB 231 and  after first                                                               
determining no one wished to  testify, closed public testimony on                                                               
HB 231.  She asked to set HB 231 aside.                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
[HB 231 was held over.]                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                

Document Name Date/Time Subjects
CSHB 231 Additional Document CFEC Adjudications Graph 2014.pdf HFSH 2/27/2018 10:00:00 AM
HB 231
CSHB 231 Additional Document CFEC Adjudications Table 2014.pdf HFSH 2/27/2018 10:00:00 AM
HB 231
CSHB 231 Explanation of Changes.pdf HFSH 2/27/2018 10:00:00 AM
HB 231
CSHB 231 Fiscal Note DFG.PDF HFSH 2/27/2018 10:00:00 AM
HB 231
CSHB 231 Sectional Analysis.pdf HFSH 2/27/2018 10:00:00 AM
HB 231
CSHB 231 Supporting Document NPFA.PDF HFSH 2/27/2018 10:00:00 AM
HB 231
CSHB 231 Supporting Document USAG.PDF HFSH 2/27/2018 10:00:00 AM
HB 231
CSHB 231 Transmittal Letter.pdf HFSH 2/27/2018 10:00:00 AM
HB 231
CSHB 231(FSH) ver D.PDF HFSH 2/27/2018 10:00:00 AM
HB 231
HB 386 Bill Ver A 2.23.18.pdf HFSH 2/27/2018 10:00:00 AM
HB 386
HB 386 Power Point 2.23.18.pdf HFSH 2/27/2018 10:00:00 AM
HB 386
HB 386 Sectional Analysis 2.23.18.pdf HFSH 2/27/2018 10:00:00 AM
HB 386
HB 386 Sponsor Statement 02.23.18.pdf HFSH 2/27/2018 10:00:00 AM
HB 386
HB 386 Support Document - Article ADn Abandoned vessels litter 02.23.18.pdf HFSH 2/27/2018 10:00:00 AM
HB 386
HB 386 Support Document - Article ADN Boat carrying diesel fuel.pdf HFSH 2/27/2018 10:00:00 AM
HB 386
HB 386 Support Document - Article AED Unalaska pays thousands 2.23.18.pdf HFSH 2/27/2018 10:00:00 AM
HB 386
HB 386 Support Document - Article KTOO Juneau mulls anchoring.pdf HFSH 2/27/2018 10:00:00 AM
HB 386
HB 386 Support Document - Coming flood of abandoned 2.23.18.pdf HFSH 2/27/2018 10:00:00 AM
HB 386
HB 386 Support Document -Report McDowell Group, Inc 2.23.18.pdf HFSH 2/27/2018 10:00:00 AM
HB 386
HB 386 Support Letter - Homer 2.23.18.pdf HFSH 2/27/2018 10:00:00 AM
HB 386
HB 386 Support Document -Report State of Alaska Leg & Adm Review 2.23.18.pdf HFSH 2/27/2018 10:00:00 AM
HB 386
HB 386 Support Letter - Juneau 2.23.18.pdf HFSH 2/27/2018 10:00:00 AM
HB 386
HB188 Draft Proposed Blank CS ver L 2.22.18.pdf HFSH 2/27/2018 10:00:00 AM
HB 188
HB188 Fiscal Note DCCED.BS.pdf HFSH 2/27/2018 10:00:00 AM
HB 188
HB188 Fiscal Note DDCED.ED.pdf HFSH 2/27/2018 10:00:00 AM
HB 188
HB188 Sectional Analysis ver L 2.22.18.pdf HFSH 2/27/2018 10:00:00 AM
HB 188
HB188 Summary of Changes ver U-ver L 2.22.18.pdf HFSH 2/27/2018 10:00:00 AM
HB 188
HB188 Supporting Document BSFA 2.18.18.pdf HFSH 2/27/2018 10:00:00 AM
HB 188
HB188 Supporting Document-Afognak Corporation Letter 2.22.18.pdf HFSH 2/27/2018 10:00:00 AM
HB 188
HB260 Sponsor Statement 1.25.18.pdf HFSH 2/27/2018 10:00:00 AM
HB 260
HB260 Fiscal Note-DFG- 2.16.18.pdf HFSH 2/27/2018 10:00:00 AM
HB 260
HB260 Residential Hunters AK Letter of Support HB 260.pdf HFSH 2/27/2018 10:00:00 AM
HB 260
HB260 ver A 1.25.18.pdf HFSH 2/27/2018 10:00:00 AM
HB 260
HB 272 Presentation 2.9.18.pdf HFSH 2/27/2018 10:00:00 AM
HRES 3/12/2018 1:00:00 PM
HB 272
HB272 Additional Document-Map.pdf HFSH 2/27/2018 10:00:00 AM
HB 272
HB272 Fiscal Note-DFG.pdf HFSH 2/27/2018 10:00:00 AM
HB 272
HB272 Fiscal Note-DNR.pdf HFSH 2/27/2018 10:00:00 AM
HB 272
HB272 Opposing Documents(Combined) Ahtna, AMA, CVCC.pdf HFSH 2/27/2018 10:00:00 AM
HB 272
HB272 Sectional Analysis ver U 1.22.18.pdf HFSH 2/27/2018 10:00:00 AM
HB 272
HB272 Sponsor Statement 1.22.18.pdf HFSH 2/27/2018 10:00:00 AM
HRES 3/7/2018 1:00:00 PM
HB 272
HB272 Supporting Documents (Combined 49).pdf HFSH 2/27/2018 10:00:00 AM
HRES 3/7/2018 1:00:00 PM
HB 272
HB272 ver U 1.22.18.pdf HFSH 2/27/2018 10:00:00 AM
HB 272
HB272-support letters Palin and Murkowski.pdf HFSH 2/27/2018 10:00:00 AM
HB 272
HB 386 Fiscal Note DOA 02.27.18.pdf HFSH 2/27/2018 10:00:00 AM
HB 386
HB 386 Fiscal Note DNR 02.27.18.pdf HFSH 2/27/2018 10:00:00 AM
HB 386
HB 386 Fiscal Note DEC 02.27.18.pdf HFSH 2/27/2018 10:00:00 AM
HB 386
HB 386 Support Letter - Dillingham 02.27.18.pdf HFSH 2/27/2018 10:00:00 AM
HB 386
HB 386 Support Letter - Cordova.pdf HFSH 2/27/2018 10:00:00 AM
HB 386
HB 386 Support Letter - Seward.pdf HFSH 2/27/2018 10:00:00 AM
HB 386
HB 188 Opposing Document BBFA.pdf HFSH 2/27/2018 10:00:00 AM
HB 188