Legislature(1999 - 2000)
03/11/1999 09:08 AM Senate FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SENATE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 11
Urging the Congress of the United States to provide
federal education funds as a block grant to the state.
The Senate Finance Committee sponsored this resolution and
earlier discussions were on record relating to the drafting
of the language and its content.
BRUCE JOHNSON, Director Teaching and Learning Support,
Department of Education, testified that the department
generally supported block grant funding, which gave the
state and local districts the greatest flexibility in
program development and delivery. However, he urged the
Legislature to maintain vigilance as the federal block
funding was finalized in the US Congress when assessing the
long-term benefits to Alaskan students and school
districts. The department encouraged the oversight for two
reasons. First, Alaska was a small state in terms of
overall state population and school enrollment. Since many
allocations from the federal level were based on student
population, it could be that future allocations could be
diminished as a result of formula revisions based solely on
student populations. Secondly, as federal dollars become
tighter in future years, the tendency could be to reduce
overall funding for block grants than money allocated on a
categorical basis, which generally had a strong and vocal
constituency.
Co-Chair John Torgerson asked if he was in favor of the
resolution and if he believed block grants should be
requested. Bruce said he supported both but encouraged
oversight, as there were some potential shortcomings with
block grant funding. He felt that the Legislature should
maintain vigilance and support for Alaska's fair share.
Senator Al Adams asked for the status of the pending
federal bill. Bruce Johnson said it had passed the House
and was currently in the Senate. Senator Al Adams wanted
to know, if the law was in effect and the state was to
receive a block grant, how would the selection process be
made as to who got the money. Bruce Johnson said that
wasn't known precisely. The general procedure with block
grants was that local communities had the power to set its
priorities in terms of expenditure. They would have
flexibility if there were no state regulations governing a
particular group of students. If so, civil rights laws
would need to be followed to make sure no population was
short-changed.
Co-Chair John Torgerson referred to the block grant system
for welfare funding and said because of problems
encountered in drafting that legislation, a certain
"whereas" was inserted into this resolution.
Senator Al Adams asked if the Legislature was placing the
cart before the horse by sending this before Congress had
passed the bill. Bruce Johnson didn't have any direct
knowledge of what was occurring with the federal bill
except that there was negotiation ongoing. The concerns
seemed to be with some proposed amendments rather than with
the block grant concept.
Co-Chair John Torgerson noted a proposed CS that referenced
the federal bills on line 11. The CS would apply the
resolution to the current federal bills.
Senator Randy Phillips moved for adoption of the CS Version
"I". Senator Al Adams asked if the aforementioned change
was the only difference from the original resolution. Co-
Chair John Torgerson affirmed and pointed out that this was
a time sensitive item to send to Congress. The CS was
adopted without objection.
Senator Sean Parnell offered a motion to move CS SJR
11(FIN) from committee. Without objection, it was so
ordered.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|