Legislature(1993 - 1994)
01/28/1994 09:15 AM Senate FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SB 246 REIMBURSABLE SERVICE AGREEMENTS
Co-chair Pearce directed that SB 246 be brought on for
discussion. NANCY SLAGLE, Director of Budget Review, Office
of Management and Budget, came before committee to present
an amendment. Senator Randy Phillips sought concurrence in
the amendment from the Legislative Auditor and Director of
Legislative Finance. Mrs. Slagle explained that the first
provision of the amendment removes redundant language
prohibiting use of RSAs to merely transfer money between
appropriations. That prohibition is covered in the previous
sentence of the legislation.
(Senator Rieger arrived at this time.)
The second change within the amendment eliminates subsection
(2) wording requiring that the agency that provides the
service have authority, by law, to do so. The change would
provide flexibility in areas where an agency provides
certain expertise but may not have specific statutory
authority.
Mrs. Slagle said that the remainder of the amendment simply
provides a better flow of bill language. She then directed
attention to subsection (2)(A) of the amendment and noted
need to correct a typographical error by replacing "of" with
"to."
RANDY WELKER, Legislative Auditor, came before committee in
response to questions from Senator Kerttula. Mr. Welker
explained that the bill attempts to curtail past RSA abuses
highlighted by an audit of the Dept. of Health and Social
Services. Statutory clarification is needed concerning
allowable uses of reimbursable service agreements. An RSA
should only provide reimbursement for a service. The bill
attempts to cut off potential transfer of funds between
appropriations under the guise of an RSA. There is
presently no statutory language that addresses these
agreements. The proposed bill would "put some . . .
direction in statute."
Responding to an earlier question from Senator Phillips, Mr.
Welker said that amendment language proposed by OMB poses no
significant problem. Legal authority language proposed for
removal is an inherent requirement for use of an RSA.
MIKE GREANY, Director, Legislative Finance Division,
concurred in comments by Mr. Welker that the proposed
amendment would present no problem. Mr. Greany next noted
that when the bill was previously before committee,
questions were raised concerning legislative ability to
continue to make necessary transfers within the annual
budget document. Subsequent review has not evidenced
problems in that area.
Senator Rieger commented regarding subsection (2)(B)
language relating to cost allocation methods and asked if it
provides a loophole. Mr. Welker acknowledged the concern,
but questioned whether there was any way to totally preclude
intentional circumvention. It will be incumbent upon OMB to
critically review proposed cost allocation plans to ensure
that they have a rational basis in cost. Bill language
identifies and places responsibility for approval of the
plan with OMB.
Senator Frank MOVED for adoption of amendment no. 1. No
objection having been raised, amendment no. 1 was ADOPTED.
Co-chair Pearce noted that the title of the legislation
appears to be broad. Senator Rieger concurred in need to
limit the title to reimbursable service agreements. Senator
Kelly MOVED to tighten and clarify the title. No objection
having been raised, amendment no. 2, to restrict the title,
was ADOPTED.
Co-chair Frank MOVED that CSSB 246 (Fin), incorporating
amendment no. 1 and the conceptual title change of amendment
no. 2, pass from committee with individual recommendations
and the accompanying zero fiscal note. No objection having
been raised, CSSB 246 (Fin) was REPORTED OUT of committee
with a unanimous "do pass" recommendation, new title, (An
Act permitting the use of reimbursable service agreements
and other agreements between state agencies to finance the
provision of services if the agency that requires the
service has the authority to obtain or provide the service
and has an appropriation that may be used for that purpose
and if the agency that provides the service bills the agency
administering the funds available for that service based on
the actual cost to provide the service or a cost allocation
method approved by the office of management and budget) and
zero fiscal note from the Office of Management and Budget.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|