Legislature(2009 - 2010)SENATE FINANCE 532
03/22/2010 09:00 AM Senate FINANCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB144 | |
| SB215 | |
| SB238 | |
| SB246 | |
| SB257 | |
| SB219 | |
| SB237 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | SB 144 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 215 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 219 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 238 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 246 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 257 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 237 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
SENATE BILL NO. 237
"An Act extending the deadline for authorizing school
construction debt reimbursed by the state."
Co-Chair Stedman stated that it was the first hearing on
the bill.
Co-Chair Hoffman MOVED to ADOPT the CS for SB 237, labeled
26-LS1342/S.
Co-Chair Stedman OBJECTED.
9:27:43 AM
JAY LIVEY, STAFF, CO-CHAIR HOFFMAN, explained the changes
in Version S. He stated that the purpose of the CS is to
address the way in which state funds are used to pay for
school construction. The objectives are to provide a more
predictable method of funding for both the Regional
Educational Attendance Areas (REAA's) and municipal
districts. He explained that the first two sections of the
bill address the construction of REAA schools.
Mr. Livey reported that Section 1 contains legislative
findings which refer to the Kasayulie vs. Alaska court
case. This case was introduced seven or eight years ago,
but has not been finally settled. In the case, the judge
noted that the state has a statutory process for funding
municipal schools through the debt service program, but it
had no comparable program for funding REAA schools. The
court also found that this situation created an unfair
environment in terms of money available. The sponsor also
believes that it creates an unfair environment in which
REAA funding planners have considerable uncertainty about
funds available and makes it difficult to plan for future
construction of buildings.
9:30:00 AM
Mr. Livey highlighted Section 2 of the bill, which
addresses the above-mentioned deficiency by creating a fund
from which REAA construction dollars are dispersed. Money
is deposited in the fund according to a formula which is
linked to the outstanding debt amount for municipal
schools.
Mr. Livey explained how the formula works. The outstanding
debt amount for municipal schools represents what the
state's obligation currently is for the amount of money to
fund for new construction in schools. As noted in the
findings section, this amount is about $1.2 billion and is
expected to remain the same over the next two years. The
findings section also notes that about $515 million has
been spent in the last ten years on REAA's schools. In
addition, there is a backlog of about ten or eleven REAA
schools that need to be funded over the next few years. He
stated that spending amounts in municipal schools is higher
than the amount spent in REAA schools by about 28 percent.
If the outstanding debt amount of $1.2 billion is
multiplied by 28 percent, and that total is multiplied by
the percent of all REAA students, which is about 12
percent, the result is about $40 million per year. The bill
proposes using this formula to fund REAA construction.
Mr. Livey described aspects of the fund. The money would be
spent from the fund by the Department of Education in the
same manner as they would decide to fund REAA schools
currently. All requirements would be approved by the
department. The balance of the fund would not exceed
$100,000,000.
Mr. Livey emphasized that the funding would provide some
certainty to REAA construction planners and to the
Department of Education.
9:33:29 AM
Mr. Livey explained that the third section of the bill
addresses municipal districts. Currently, the state
reimburses municipal districts at 70 percent of their
outstanding debt for school construction; however, the
statute must be renewed every three years. The bill
proposes to make 70 percent permanent in order to reduce
funding uncertainty among district planners.
9:34:16 AM
Co-Chair Hoffman shared information as to how the bill
would address three of the backlogged school within the
$344 million backlog of eleven schools. He hoped that the
remaining eight schools could be addressed over the next
two years. He noted that $40 million is the minimum amount
and the legislature can provide more funding if it desires.
Co-Chair Stedman WITHDREW his objection to adopting the CS.
There being NO further OBJECTION, it was so ordered.
Co-Chair Stedman suggested that the sponsor define the
rural attendance area.
9:35:55 AM
SENATOR KEVIN MEYER, sponsor, related that the bill started
out as a simple extension of the current 70/30 debt
reimbursement program. The bill is normally extended for
two or three years at a time and an attempt is made to
incorporate rural schools with construction needs. The bill
formulizes a process already in place and puts it into
statute. He voiced support for the new CS and the suggested
changes.
Co-Chair Stedman asked where in the state schools are
needed. Senator Meyer could only speak for the Anchorage
schools, where there is a backlog of requests. The 70/30
program is in place for all municipal and urban schools and
is available every year.
9:38:47 AM
Co-Chair Stedman spoke of the needs in Southeast Alaska
being "kids and jobs".
Senator Huggins discussed the need in MatSu for 4-6
backlogged schools.
9:39:25 AM
Co-Chair Hoffman spoke of conversations with
superintendents in Anchorage and Fairbanks and hoped that
they were looking favorably at the legislation. He hoped to
assuage concerns over construction of urban and rural
schools.
Co-Chair Stedman noted one fiscal note from the Department
of Education showing the cost of debt reimbursement
starting in FY 2013 at $3,700,000.
9:40:42 AM
ANDREA STORY, JUNEAU SCHOOL BOARD, spoke in favor of the
bill on behalf of the Board. She reported that the bill has
been very successful in helping with major maintenance in
Juneau. She spoke of efforts of the school district to keep
up on building construction and maintenance needs. She
pointed out that Alaska Association of School Boards also
supports the legislation. She hoped to see both urban and
rural schools flourish because schools are the centers of
communities.
9:42:12 AM
EDDY JEANS, DIRECTOR, SCHOOL FINANCES AND FACILITIES,
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND EARLY DEVELOPMENT, offered to
answer questions. When asked by Co-Chair Stedman if the
department supported the bill, he reported that the
department is neutral on the bill.
Senator Olson asked what changes in construction are
expected as a result of the bill. Mr. Jeans related that
with the inclusion of the amendment, a request from the
administration would be forthcoming on an annual basis for
at least one school construction project. The legislature,
over the past ten years, has funded a number of
construction projects in rural Alaska. He thought
construction and major maintenance needs around the state
have been addressed fairly well the last ten years, much
better than the ten years prior.
Senator Olson inquired if the Kasayulie vs. Alaska case
would have an effect on the state's actions. Mr. Jeans said
that was difficult to answer because the case has been
dormant for a number of years, partly because the
legislature has provided funding for rural schools.
9:44:43 AM
Co-Chair Hoffman agreed that the legislature has addressed
rural school needs; however, the administration has not
supported rural school construction for the past ten years.
Every single year the administration has requested the
money needed to pay bond indebtedness and the legislature
has funded it.
Co-Chair Stedman requested information on what was spent in
rural and non-rural areas on school construction in the
past 20 years. Mr. Jeans offered to provide that
information.
SB 237 was heard and HELD in Committee for further
consideration.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| sb237 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SFIN 3/22/2010 9:00:00 AM |
SB 237 |
| sb237 Sectional Analysis.pdf |
SFIN 3/22/2010 9:00:00 AM |
SB 237 |
| sb237 Program Funding_Historical and Projected.pdf |
SFIN 3/22/2010 9:00:00 AM |
SB 237 |
| sb237 - DEED Capital Projects.PDF |
SFIN 3/22/2010 9:00:00 AM |
SB 237 |
| SB 237 Sponsor Statement.docx |
SFIN 3/22/2010 9:00:00 AM |
SB 237 |
| SB 237 Kasayulie Ruling.pdf |
SFIN 3/22/2010 9:00:00 AM |
SB 237 |
| SB 237 Proposed CS FIN Version S.pdf |
SFIN 3/22/2010 9:00:00 AM |
SB 237 |
| SB 237 Sectional SFIN.pdf |
SFIN 3/22/2010 9:00:00 AM |
SB 237 |
| SB 237 DEED Capital Projects.pdf |
SFIN 3/22/2010 9:00:00 AM |
SB 237 |
| SB 219 Proposed CS FIN Version S.pdf |
SFIN 3/22/2010 9:00:00 AM |
SB 219 |
| SB 219 Summary of Changes_S.pdf |
SFIN 3/22/2010 9:00:00 AM |
SB 219 |
| SB 144 Proposed CS FIN Version E.pdf |
SFIN 3/22/2010 9:00:00 AM |
SB 144 |
| SB 219 Amendment 1.pdf |
SFIN 3/22/2010 9:00:00 AM |
SB 219 |