Legislature(1997 - 1998)
04/22/1998 09:22 AM Senate FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SENATE BILL NO. 219
"An Act relating to establishing an office of crime
victims' advocacy; and amending Rule 16, Alaska Rules
of Criminal Procedure, Rule 9, Alaska Delinquency
Rules, and Rule 501, Alaska Rules of Evidence."
CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 219(JUD)
"An Act relating to establishing an office of crime
victims' rights; and amending Rule 16, Alaska Rules of
Criminal Procedure, Rule 9, Alaska Delinquency Rules,
and Rule 501, Alaska Rules of Evidence."
Co-chair Sharp called SB 219 and noted that there had been
a previous hearing. He said at that meeting it was noted
that some members might be bringing forth some amendments
and they also wanted a chance to discuss the matter with
the sponsor of the bill.
BRETT HUBER, staff to Senator Rick Halford was invited to
join the committee. He said there was one technical
correction to the amendment marked "F.2", on line 16. It
was to delete the word "crime". He said even though the
title of the bill was the Office of Crime Victims Rights,
the actual implementing statute in the bill describes the
Office of Victims Rights. Co-chair Sharp advised the
committee that was marked as amendment #3.
Senator Donley MOVED amendment #1 and WITHOUT OBJECTION it
was ADOPTED.
Senator Donley MOVED amendment #2 and WITHOUT OBJECTION it
was ADOPTED.
Senator Donley MOVED amendment #3 and WITHOUT OBJECTION it
was ADOPTED.
Senator Adams said he felt it was a great piece of
legislation however it needed backbone behind it, and that
was the fiscal note. He said he hoped they would support
this fiscal note.
Co-chair Sharp said they would request a new fiscal note to
represent the amendments. However, Senator Adams said that
the way the bill read today and when the Office of Crime
Victims Rights was established there was a cost to doing
that. He felt support was needed.
Senator Donley said there was a funding source available in
the approximate amount of $4 million. Senator Adams said
the committee should pass along the fiscal notes in case
something happens. He said it was a big if pending the
passage of other legislation.
Co-chair Sharp said it was his intention that the
accompanying fiscal note would not be built into the budget
unless Senator Ward's other bill passes. Senator Donley
said they could also put the second year PFD provision into
the bill and then it would be totally self-contained.
Everything is in the bill at present except for that one
provision. He offered a technical amendment to have a new
CS drawn up for SB 274 containing the same language.
Co-chair Sharp indicated that was the only fail-safe way to
accomplish that. Senator Donley concurred and said it
would then be a total package.
Senator Donley MOVED conceptual amendment #4 to add the
provisions in SB 274 which extends the eligibility time for
convicted felons and multiple misdemeanants from one to two
years in a new Finance CS for SB 219. The intent would be
to then get new fiscal notes based on that CS. Mr. Huber
said the sponsor would have no objection to amendment #4.
He noted that SB 274 was on the Senate Floor today. The
only concern was to move SB 219 along as quickly as
possible.
Senator Pearce advised the committee that if the bill
passed both bodies they would be dealing with the fiscal
notes in conference committee anyway. She wanted it clear
for the record that it was not the intention of the sponsor
of the bill that the entire four million that would be
raised would go to an office of victims' advocates.
Instead, they were just talking about just the half-million
dollar fiscal note, which realistically would be an
increase of that amount to the Legislature's budget.
Senator Donley explained that if the second year of PFD
eligibility was taken away and the conference committee was
presented with a positive four million dollar fiscal note
it would then be up to the conference committee to figure
out what to do with the money. There would be an
accompanying fiscal note with this bill that half a million
dollars of it would be going to the office of victims'
advocacy and it would also be a GF increase of three and a
half million dollars beyond that which could then be used
for other purposes. Co-chair Sharp asked if those purposes
were as stated in SB 274? Senator Donley indicated that
was correct. He said this would give the conference
committee some flexibility with the GF. Senator Pearce
indicated that would be fine.
Senator Phillips asked if that was half a million dollars
to the Legislature's budget? Senator Pearce explained the
office was in the Legislature. It would increase the
Legislature's budget by half a million dollars; $508,600.
Co-chair Sharp said he and Senator Donley would work with
his staff to get this rolled into the bill properly and
then get it back before the committee in the afternoon if
possible. He said it would remain at the top of the list
before all other bills. Co-chair Sharp said it was his
intention to move the bill from committee today if
possible.
Senator Adams said he agreed with the conceptual amendment
the members. Senator Donley indicated that it was going to
be incorporated into a new CS and then brought back before
the committee.
Co-chair Sharp said with that understanding then he would
HOLD the bill in committee until the afternoon.
The next bill Co-chair Sharp called before the committee
was HB 334.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|