Legislature(1997 - 1998)
01/20/1998 03:30 PM Senate STA
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SB 209 - TASK FORCE ON PRIVATIZATION
SENATOR WARD, prime sponsor of SB 209, explained that this was the
exact same bill that appeared before the legislature last year,
just with the time frame reduced by one year. He said the Governor
had vetoed the bill and everyone had heard the same sponsor
statement and bill last year.
MR. MIKE MCMULLEN, representing the Department of Administration,
Division of Personnel, agreed that the concept of the new bill was
the same and so was the position of the division. They still have
concerns regarding the requirements of the state collective
bargaining agreements. He said the agreements contain requirements
for formal feasibility studies before any layoffs of bargaining
unit members. He quoted a projected cost of $20,000 - $50,000 per
study and said they take some time to conduct. He said the bill's
time line would make the affected agencies lag behind legislative
changes. He said the task force findings and the feasibility
studies might not agree and it would be particularly problematic if
the legislative changes precede the findings of the feasibility
studies. He hoped the committee would perhaps take another approach
and quoted the Governor's veto message saying, "the Administration
stands ready to cooperate and provide available information to any
committee or task force legislative leadership may appoint to
review possible privatization opportunities."
PAM LABOLLE, President of the Alaska State Chamber of Commerce said
the Chamber supports the bill as one of their top priorities. She
feels business supports the state and the state should support
business. She said they believe there are many opportunities within
government for many new ways of doing business. She informed the
committee that Mr. Craig Holt, nationally recognized speaker on
"right sizing" government was going to be available later in the
week. She said the Chamber has worked with Mr. Holt in the past and
he educated them about privatization opportunities. She listed some
advantages of competition, including reduced cost and high quality
goods and services.
SENATOR DUNCAN asked if after the seminars and training the State
Chamber had, she thought it would be an easy job to determine which
areas might be privatized.
MS. LABOLLE responded that it would not be easy but some difficult
jobs are the ones worth doing. She said it is a good piece of
legislation which identifies a few departments in order to take an
initial look at the possible opportunities.
SENATOR DUNCAN asked if she had looked at this year's bill.
MS. LABOLLE admitted she had not.
SENATOR DUNCAN explained he asked because he believes this to be a
complex issue where it will be difficult to determine which
departments might lend themselves to privatization and review the
procedures involved. He said this bill does not look at a few
departments, this bill indicates all departments will be reviewed
and they will be reviewed by November 15th, 1998. He said he is not
speaking against the legislation but, in his opinion, this seems to
be too much too soon. He asked Ms. LaBolle if it seemed possible to
meet this deadline and do a good job.
MS. LABOLLE replied that the task force could identify objectives,
much like was done by the Long Range Financial Planning Task Force
in three or four months.
TAPE 98-2 SIDE A
Number 001
SENATOR DUNCAN asked how much of that was adopted. He went on to
say he thinks this may be more complex than what was tackled by the
Long Range Planning Task Force. He believes there may be legal
constraints due to contractual agreements with unions and
competitive bidding. He asked her opinion on whether it could be
done in a four month period.
MS. LABOLLE said it was unfortunate that the bill was vetoed last
year or they would have had an additional year to do this. She said
it must start somewhere as it is so important. She said state
government is growing while the private sector shrinks and business
supports the state and must increase.
SENATOR DUNCAN did not disagree with supporting the private sector
but took exception to the statement that the government has grown
while the private sector has been shrinking. He said the government
has also been shrinking and there were figures to back that up. He
added he did not think Senator Miller and others with their five
year plan would be happy with her saying government has grown
during their leadership. He stated perhaps the legislation should
be pared down so it could be done right. He thinks this may be
biting off more than anyone can chew and perhaps it was meant for
failure. He said if the sponsor really wanted to get something
done, maybe a smaller start would be better.
SENATOR WARD moved the bill out of committee with individual
recommendations and accompanying fiscal notes.
SENATOR DUNCAN objected. Roll was called and the bill passed out
with a three to one vote.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|