Legislature(2013 - 2014)HOUSE FINANCE 519
04/16/2014 08:30 AM House FINANCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB178 | |
| SB169 | |
| SB138 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | SB 178 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 169 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 138 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | SB 191 | TELECONFERENCED | |
CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 169(FIN)
"An Act establishing in the Department of Health and
Social Services a statewide immunization program and
the State Vaccine Assessment Council; creating a
vaccine assessment account; requiring a vaccine
assessment from assessable entities and other program
participants for statewide immunization purchases;
repealing the temporary child and adult immunization
program; and providing for an effective date."
9:40:13 AM
SENATOR CATHY GEISSEL, SPONSOR, spoke to the graphic, "SB
169 Vaccine Assessment Program" (copy on file). The graphic
charted the various fund transfers that would occur as a
result of the vaccine assessment program. She turned
committee attention to another graphic, "SB 169 Statewide
Immunization Program"(copy on file), which emphasized that
the program was optional for all providers, with an
additional provision to opt out of the program within the
first 3 years. She said that one of the goals of the Alaska
Healthcare Commission was to purchase healthcare services
with public funds and the bill was a representation of that
goal. She stated that homeless teens and young adults would
benefit from the legislation. She added that community
healthcare clinics in rural Alaska would also benefit from
the bill.
9:45:41 AM
Senator Geissel discussed her response memo to
Representative Wilson's question in the last hearing (copy
on file):
Dear Finance Committee Members:
I was asked by Representative Tammy Wilson's aide how
many Alaskans would be affected of SB 169 fails and
received the below information from the Division of
Public Health. The impact would be huge:
Without SB169 and once HB310 funds fun out, providers
will have to purchase vaccine for 50 percent of the
children and 100 percent of the adults. That is
estimated to be about 310,000 individuals of which
80,000 are children and 230,000 are adults. This is
based on current population and immunization rates.
Only the 50 percent of children covered by federal
Vaccines for Children and a small number of high-risk
children and adults covered with other state and
federal funds will continue to receive state-supplied
vaccine.
In terms of dollars, without SB169, the providers'
share of vaccine spending will increase from about 50
percent currently to about 75 percent, or an extra $12
million, increasing from $23 million to $35 million.
This assumes immunization rates stay steady and that
providers continue to purchase vaccine for the insured
and uninsured.
Senator Giessel spoke to the cost of vaccinations. She
stated that the measles, mumps, rubella (MMR) vaccination
for children, under the Center for Disease Control (CDC)
purchasing plan, costs $20 per dose. She shared that
individual providers purchasing the same dosage on the open
market paid $56 per dose. She said that one adult vaccine
dose for pneumonia purchased through the CDC purchasing
would be $23; individual providers would pay $68. She
discussed the cost discrepancies for various vaccinations.
9:49:39 AM
Representative Wilson asked whether the current bill
version required mandatory participation after 3 years.
Senator Giessel replied that no one would be mandated to be
part of the program.
Representative Wilson understood that private insurance
companies would also have the ability to opt in, but that
the state was exempt.
Senator Giessel replied requests for the program from
insurance companies had led to the legislation.
9:51:22 AM
Representative Munoz asked if all providers would be
charged the same rate per vaccine.
Senator Giessel replied yes.
9:52:14 AM
Representative Holmes discussed the 5 fiscal notes attached
to the bill.
9:55:07 AM
JILL LEWIS, DEPUTY DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF PUBLIC HEALTH,
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL SERVICES, stated that the
fiscal notes netted to zero because for every dollar that
was spent, there was a new dollar coming in of new
assessment fees. She directed committee attention to the
hand out, "SB 169 Vaccine Assessment Program." She
recommended comparing the first two fiscal notes side-by-
side. She said that the money would flow between the two
notes and net to zero. She stated that the first note was
for informational purposes only and likened to a deposit
slip from the bank, the "checking account" being the fiscal
note for epidemiology. She relayed that the $4 million from
note 2 would be subtracted under the fund source and would
be moved into an account outside of the department's
budget. She furthered that assessments would be collected
in advance from the assessable entities and the money would
be used to purchase additional vaccine.
9:59:57 AM
Representative Wilson surmised that there was no request
being made for new revenue.
Ms. Lewis replied in the affirmative.
10:01:32 AM
Representative Wilson said that the other figures in the
notes appeared in anticipation of the best mathematical
estimates.
Ms. Lewis said that there was a lot of math involved in
calculating and estimating the costs involved in the
program. She stated that entities would phase in during the
first 3 years and that some could opt out. She added that
there could be providers that might want to opt in for
vaccine that they would otherwise have to purchase on their
own.
Representative Wilson asked whether the change could have
negative impact on the department.
Ms. Lewis replied no. She acknowledged that federally
funded entities had additional obstacles, which had been
accounted for by allowing the 3 year phase in option.
Representative Holmes MOVED to REPORT HCS CSSB 169(HSS) out
of committee with individual recommendations and the
accompanying fiscal notes. There being NO OBJECTION, it was
so ordered.
HCS CSSB 169(HSS) was REPORTED out of committee with a "do
pass" recommendation and with one new fiscal note from Fund
Transfers for the Department of Health and Social Services,
one new fiscal note from the Department of Health and
Social Services, one new indeterminate fiscal note from the
Department of Health and Social Services, one previously
published zero fiscal note: FN4 (CED), and one previously
published indeterminate fiscal note: FN5 (ADM).
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SB 178 Amendment #1 Gara.pdf |
HFIN 4/16/2014 8:30:00 AM |
SB 178 |
| SB169 Vax Assess Fund diagram.pdf |
HFIN 4/16/2014 8:30:00 AM |
SB 169 |
| SB169PayerPyramid_15Apr2014.pdf |
HFIN 4/16/2014 8:30:00 AM |
SB 169 |
| SB169 without it.pdf |
HFIN 4/16/2014 8:30:00 AM |
SB 169 |
| Marks SB 138 Gara Response 041514.pdf |
HFIN 4/16/2014 8:30:00 AM |
SB 138 |
| SB 138 4.16.14 Presentation HFIN Edgmon Question.pdf |
HFIN 4/16/2014 8:30:00 AM |
SB 138 |
| SB 138 4.16.14 Resource Reports Required by Appendix A to Part 380 of FERC Regulations.pdf |
HFIN 4/16/2014 8:30:00 AM |
SB 138 |
| SB 138 enalytica - response to Rep Gara.pdf |
HFIN 4/16/2014 8:30:00 AM |
SB 138 |