Legislature(2013 - 2014)SENATE FINANCE 532
03/04/2014 09:00 AM Senate FINANCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB138 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | SB 138 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
SENATE BILL NO. 138
"An Act relating to the purposes of the Alaska Gasline
Development Corporation to advance to develop a large-
diameter natural gas pipeline project, including
treatment and liquefaction facilities; establishing
the large-diameter natural gas pipeline project fund;
creating a subsidiary related to a large-diameter
natural gas pipeline project, including treatment and
liquefaction facilities; relating to the authority of
the commissioner of natural resources to negotiate
contracts related to North Slope natural gas projects,
to enter into confidentiality agreements in support of
contract negotiations and implementation, and to take
custody of gas delivered to the state under an
election to pay the oil and gas production tax in
kind; relating to the sale, exchange, or disposal of
gas delivered to the state under an election to pay
the oil and gas production tax in kind; relating to
the duties of the commissioner of revenue to direct
the disposition of revenues received from gas
delivered to the state in kind and to consult with the
commissioner of natural resources on the custody and
disposition of gas delivered to the state in kind;
relating to the authority of the commissioner of
natural resources to propose modifications to existing
state oil and gas leases; making certain information
provided to the Department of Natural Resources and
the Department of Revenue exempt from inspection as a
public record; making certain tax information related
to an election to pay the oil and gas production tax
in kind exempt from tax confidentiality provisions;
relating to establishing under the oil and gas
production tax a gross tax rate for gas after 2021;
making the alternate minimum tax on oil and gas
produced north of 68 degrees North latitude after 2021
apply only to oil; relating to apportionment factors
of the Alaska Net Income Tax Act; authorizing a
producer's election to pay the oil and gas production
tax in kind for certain gas and relating to the
authorization; relating to monthly installment
payments of the oil and gas production tax; relating
to interest payments on monthly installment payments
of the oil and gas production tax; relating to
settlements between producers and royalty owners for
oil and gas production tax; relating to annual
statements by producers and explorers; relating to
annual production tax values; relating to lease
expenditures; amending the definition of gross value
at the 'point of production' for gas for purposes of
the oil and gas production tax; adding definitions
related to natural gas terms; clarifying that credit
may not be taken against the in-kind levy of the oil
and gas production tax for gas for purposes of the
exploration incentive credit, the oil or gas producer
education credit, and the film production tax credit;
making conforming amendments; and providing for an
effective date."
9:08:08 AM
Co-Chair Kelly announced that amendments to SB138 should be
submitted to the chair by Friday March 7, 2014.
9:08:32 AM
Senator Hoffman stated that he had some amendments to offer
but that the drafting was moving slowly; as a result, the
amendments might not be ready by Friday.
Co-Chair Kelly stated that he would communicate with the
drafters.
9:08:55 AM
Co-Chair Kelly OPENED public testimony.
9:09:07 AM
BILL WARREN, SELF, KENAI (via teleconference), expressed
reservations with SB 138. He thought the way that the
project was structured would result waiting upwards of 20
years more for in-state gas, if the project moved forward
at all. He shared that he did not like that AGDC would have
to face an open season in 2015 with the 500 mcf
restriction. He stated that the project would leave the
state with interim gas for 20 years, but that Alaska had an
immediate need for gas. He asserted that trucking LNG to
Fairbanks was a bad idea and preferred that AGDC build
something similar to the Sweet Sixteen Express. He wanted
AGDC to live up to its promise to get gas to Alaskans
first.
9:13:57 AM
BARBARA HUFF TUCKNESS, DIRECTOR, LEGISLATIVE AND
GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS, ALASKA TEAMSTERS LOCAL 959, JUNEAU,
testified that her organization supported the legislation.
She noted that the discussion of an in-state gasline had
been under discussion for approximately the last 40 years.
She stated that while the HOA and intent language that had
been incorporated into the bill did not have the force of
law, the teamsters were comfortable with the recognition
and believed that it reinforced the commitment between
industry and the administration moving forward. She stated
that the project would affect many aspects of the state
from employment to gas delivery. She hoped that there would
be a large pool of trained Alaskans to draw from during the
hiring process. She believed that the state should invest
in training residents.
9:18:27 AM
MERRICK PIERCE, BOARD MEMBER, ALASKA GASLINE PORT
AUTHORITY, FAIRBANKS (via teleconference), testified in
opposition of SB 138. He believed that the international
market should be examined more closely. He noted that
Alaska offered more stability on many levels than Russia.
He opined that Alaska faced a lot of competition in the
market. He said that ExxonMobil ignored the markets while
under AGIA, which he believed sabotaged projects.. He spoke
to fraudulent tariffs employed by Alyeska on the Trans-
Alaska Pipeline System (TAPS) in an effort to keep
competition off of the North Slope. He queried why the
state would want to build a gasline with companies that
engaged in unsavory practices. He wondered about the route
that the project would take and highlighted some of the
challenges that the project would face.
9:24:57 AM
Co-Chair Kelly requested that the testifier submit his
comments in writing.
9:25:15 AM
Vice-Chair Fairclough inquired if the Mr. Merrick was in
favor or in opposition of the legislation.
Mr. Pierce responded that he was in opposition to the
entire bill. He reiterated that the market needed to be
watched closely in order for the project to be a success.
He added that if the project wasn't going to deliver gas
until 2022 it would not be a success. He opined that, given
the deficits that the state faced right now, not building a
pipeline now would be lethal to the future.
9:26:07 AM
Vice-Chair Fairclough queried if Mr. Pierce would support
the project if the final destination were Valdez.
Mr. Pierce reiterated that paying close attention to the
market was critical to the success of the project.
9:27:14 AM
JIM PLAQUET, OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL 302, FAIRBANKS (via
teleconference), supported SB 138. He related that he had
worked on TAPS and had seen the economic development that
it had provided to the state. He recalled that around the
year 2000, Alaskans had wanted to move arctic gas to the
Lower-48 but that fracking had made it uneconomical. He
believed that the project would create jobs for Alaskans
during construction and into the future.
9:29:30 AM
RICK ROGERS, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT
COUNCIL (RDC), ANCHORAGE (via teleconference), testified in
support of SB 138. He offered a brief history of RDC. He
believed that alignment and durability were critical to the
success of the HOA agreement. He stated that unlike oil,
LNG was sold on long-term contracts, which required
durability, including fiscal terms. He thought that the
legislation required further analysis and encouraged due
diligence in fully vetting the project. He said that the
most beneficial line for Alaskans would be a large capacity
line sanctioned by the producers in partnership with the
state. He stated that fundamental project economics,
largely out of the state's control, would dictate whether
the project was ever sanctioned and constructed. He felt
that a robust oil industry must be maintained on the North
Slope in order for the project to succeed because oil
provided the funding and supported the complex
infrastructure needed to produce gas. He encouraged
continuing deliberation and passage of enabling
legislation.
9:33:29 AM
RACHAEL PETRO, PRESIDENT & CEO, ALASKA CHAMBER, ANCHORAGE
(via teleconference), stated that the Alaska Chamber was
still evaluating the current version of the bill, but
supported the underline principles found in the HOA and the
legislation. She said the chamber supported state
participation in and Alaska gas project, the state taking a
percentage gas share, and the establishment of a clear
process to move the project forward. She explained that the
process must include the necessary tools to confidentially
develop the various project enabling arrangements in
contracts and establish a clear public process that
provided for legislative oversight, review and approval.
The chamber believed that the best way for the state to
develop its resources was to have the state participate as
a business partner in an Alaska gas project.
9:36:13 AM
AT EASE
9:36:43 AM
RECONVENED
9:36:47 AM
JASON HOKE, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, COPPER RIVER VALLEY
DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION, GLENNALLEN (via teleconference),
spoke in support of SB 138. He expressed indifference
concerning the size of the pipeline or where it was
located. He thought that the first and foremost the gas
should be used to help with the energy crisis in rural
Alaska, any additional gas could then be shipped and sold
in the Lower 48.
9:38:06 AM
LYNN WILLIS, SELF, EAGLE RIVER (via teleconference),
testified in opposition to SB 138. He said that is primary
concern was how the state would pay for the project.
9:39:10 AM
LAKE WILLIAMS, PRESIDENT, FAIRBANKS BUILDING AND
CONSTRUCTION TRADES, FAIRBANKS (via teleconference),
testified in support of the basic outline of SB 138. He
believed that a large diameter pipeline would be most
beneficial to the state and thought that the state should
be at the table as a partner. He stressed the importance of
local hire and the involvement of local governments.
9:41:32 AM
DOUG TANSY, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS
LOCAL 1547, FAIRBANKS (via teleconference), testified in
support of SB 138. He expressed support for the use of
Alaskan contractors and workforce on the project. He said
that there were many qualified and skilled Alaskan
contractors, as well as a skilled and trained Alaska
workforce, available to work on the project.
9:43:10 AM
LISA WEISSLER, SELF, JUNEAU, testified against SB 138. She
expressed concern the administration was making policy
decisions that were being ratified by the legislature after
the fact. She thought that the administrative decision
concerning state ownership in the pipeline was a major
policy decision that warranted more public participation.
She offered that the decision for state ownership was what
was directing all of the other discussion on the bill, such
as the HOA and the MOU. She said that if it was proven that
equity participation was the best way for the state to
proceed, the principals that would guide the state's equity
participation should be set into law. She likened her idea
to the Stranded Gas Act and believed that an act would
strengthen the state's position when negotiating.
9:46:19 AM
Vice-Chair Fairclough noted that Lisa had referenced past
studies and requested an explanation of the studies.
Ms. Weissler provided the following studies:
1979 - Financing the Alaska Highway Gas Pipeline-What
is to be Done
Arlon Tussing & Connie Barlow
http://www.arlis.org/docs/vol1/AlaskaGas/Report2/Report_ISE
R_1979_FinancingAkHwyGasPipeline.pdf
1982 - Kidder Peabody Report
http://www.arlis.org/docs/vol1/AlaskaGas/Report/Report_KPCI
_1982_ParticipationFinancingAKSegment.pdf
1997 - JP Morgan Report
Referenced on page 2-10 in the 2002 State Financial
Participation report
2001 - Alaska Highway Natural Gas Policy Council
Committee Report
http://www.arlis.org/docs/vol1/AlaskaGas/Report/Report_GasP
olicy ouncil_2001_RptGov_v1.pdf
State Financial Participation in an Alaska Natural Gas
Pipeline
Petrie Parkman & Co. CH2M Hill
http://www.arlis.org/docs/vol1/AlaskaGas/Report/Report_ADR_
2002_StateFinancialParticipation.pdf
9:47:37 AM
DON ETHERIDGE, ALASKA STATE AMERICAN FEDERATION OF LABOR
AND CONGRESS OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATIONS AND ALASKA
BUILDING TRADES, JUNEAU, testified in support of the
legislation in its current form. He stressed that the jobs
generated by the project should go to Alaskans and benefit
Alaskan companies. He said that Alaskans were currently
being trained to work on the gasline. He hoped that the gas
would reach the Alaskans who were most in need.
9:50:11 AM
PAUL GROSSI, ALASKA PIPE TRADES AND IRONWORKERS OF ALASKA,
JUNEAU, testified in support of SB 138. He noted that the
bill was complicated and that it was important that the
committee take the time to get it right, particularly in
the area of Alaska hire.
9:51:56 AM
JULIE DUQUETTE, ASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND CONSTRUCTORS OF
ALASKA, JUNEAU, spoke in strong support of SB 138.
9:52:52 AM
CHUCK WIEGERS, SELF, JUNEAU, testified in support of SB
138.
9:54:09 AM
Co-Chair Kelly CLOSED public testimony.
9:54:22 AM
AT EASE
9:56:56 AM
RECONVENED
9:57:03 AM
Co-Chair Kelly reminded the committee to try to get
amendments to the bill to his office by Friday.
SB 138 was HEARD and HELD in committee for further
consideration.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| Fineberg Testimony on SB 138 140304.doc |
SFIN 3/4/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 138 |
| SB 138 Weissler Comments SFIN.pdf |
SFIN 3/4/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 138 |
| SB138 Kirstein support.msg |
SFIN 3/4/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 138 |
| FW SB138 testimony today....msg |
SFIN 3/4/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 138 |
| CS (RES) SB 138 Public Testimony - Matthews.msg |
SFIN 3/4/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 138 |
| SB 138 PLA support - Wilbur.msg |
SFIN 3/4/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 138 |
| SB138 NSB Testimony Brower.docx |
SFIN 3/4/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 138 |
| SB138 PLA suppoer - Hudson.msg |
SFIN 3/4/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 138 |
| SB138 PLA support - Burke.msg |
SFIN 3/4/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 138 |
| SB138 PLA support - Cassity.msg |
SFIN 3/4/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 138 |
| SB138 PLA support - Dobbs.msg |
SFIN 3/4/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 138 |
| SB138 PLA support - Doyle.msg |
SFIN 3/4/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 138 |
| SB138 PLA support - Hoedeshell.msg |
SFIN 3/4/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 138 |
| SB138 PLA support - Imus.msg |
SFIN 3/4/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 138 |
| SB138 PLA support - Keane.msg |
SFIN 3/4/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 138 |
| SB138 PLA support - Osberg.msg |
SFIN 3/4/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 138 |
| SB138 PLA support - Saunders.msg |
SFIN 3/4/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 138 |
| SB138 PLA support - Stidd.msg |
SFIN 3/4/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 138 |
| SB138 PLA support - Whill.msg |
SFIN 3/4/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 138 |
| SB138 PLA support - Williams.msg |
SFIN 3/4/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 138 |
| SB138 support PLA - Baseden.msg |
SFIN 3/4/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 138 |
| SB138 opposition - Merrick.msg |
SFIN 3/4/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 138 |
| SB138 PLA support - Martino.msg |
SFIN 3/4/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 138 |
| SB138 PLA support - Phipps.msg |
SFIN 3/4/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 138 |
| SB138 PLA support - Venechuk.msg |
SFIN 3/4/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 138 |
| SB138 PLA support AFL-CIO.pdf |
SFIN 3/4/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 138 |
| SB 138 Weissler Comments Followup-Past Studies.pdf |
SFIN 3/4/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 138 |