Legislature(2013 - 2014)BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
03/03/2014 01:30 PM Senate JUDICIARY
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB108 | |
| SB128 | |
| SB176 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | SB 128 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | SB 176 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 171 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| = | SB 108 | ||
SB 108-LIMIT PUBLIC ACCESS TO CRIMINAL RECORDS
1:39:12 PM
CHAIR COGHILL announced that the first order of business would
be SB 108."An Act relating to the confidentiality of certain
records of criminal cases; and providing for an effective date."
SENATOR DYSON related that he had hoped the committee substitute
(CS) would be ready. He said Mr. Kopp would report on the
progress of the CS thus far.
CHUCK KOPP, Staff, Senator Fred Dyson, Alaska State Legislature,
Juneau, Alaska, presented the proposed changes to SB 108.
1. Consider language to treat as confidential the records of
criminal cases disposed of before the effective date of the
Act by acquittal of all charges, dismissal of all charges,
or a combination thereof, and applying to those who
appeared on CourtView.
2. Extend the time limit for a record to become confidential
from 90 days from the date of acquittal, dismissal, or a
combination thereof, to 120 days. This is at the request of
the Department of Law (DOL) in order to match the 120-day
rule.
3. Change the effective date of the Act from July 1, 2014 to
October 1, 2014 to give the court more time to comply.
4. Designate as confidential only those cases that were
dismissed by the prosecuting authority, not by the court in
the furtherance of justice, or for other reasons. He noted
that DOL requested this change, but it's yet to be
resolved. He requested Ms. Meade discuss that issue and
whether or not there can be a confidential carve-out for
state agencies on the database that is otherwise
confidential to the public.
CHAIR COGHILL announced the arrival of Senator McGuire.
NANCY MEADE, General Counsel, Administrative Staff, Alaska Court
System, Anchorage, Alaska, noted that the Court System is
neutral on the bill. She responded to a request to address other
reasons for dismissal, aside from dismissals by the prosecution.
She began by describing reasons a court will dismiss a criminal
case. She said it is not the case that the court dismisses old
criminal cases, except if there is a violation in the speedy
trial rule. The court does dismiss some criminal actions for
reasons that are listed in Rule of Criminal Procedure 43, in
furtherance of justice, mistaken identity, or if probable cause
is not found under Criminal Rule 5.1. Those reasons would be
discussed with the prosecutor and be known by the parties. When
cases are dismissed, the court signs an order making it
official. It would be confusing if cases dismissed by the
prosecution were treated differently than those dismissed by the
court.
MS. MEADE addressed whether a state agency, such as DHSS, can
have access to confidential files on CourtView. She understood
that the request is for public safety reasons. She said there is
not currently a means for doing so. There is a public version of
CourtView and an internal court version. She did not know if it
was possible to allow access to the internal system. It would
take a vast change and would have a cost. She pointed out that
there is a way that prosecutors access confidential cases - by
being cleared through the Alaska Public Safety Information
Network (APSIN.)
1:45:22 PM
CHAIR COGHILL advised that those issues will be dealt with in
the next CS.
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI asked how hung juries and moving violations
are treated in the bill.
MS. MEADE explained that minor traffic offenses would not be
covered because the bill addresses criminal cases. She
understood that hung juries have 120 days to be retried, and if
the case is retried and it is again a hung jury, the person is
not found guilty. That situation would be covered under the
bill.
CHAIR COGHILL said it is a balance between the right of people
to know for public safety reasons and the right of people to be
protected from a bad reputation.
1:46:55 PM
SENATOR MCGUIRE asked how the bill could be changed to address
the case where a person was arrested on suspicion of
intoxication.
SENATOR DYSON said that discussion would be held later.
CHAIR COGHILL said SB 108 would be revisited on Wednesday.
SENATOR MCGUIRE asked if it would be included in the new CS.
SENATOR DYSON said he believes that Ms. Meade addressed what was
contained in the CS so far.
SENATOR MCGUIRE said she understood that the topic was not
covered in the CS for SB 108, which allows for arrest and
charging documents, but only if they have had a dismissal or an
acquittal. In the case she was concerned with, there was no
charge but the arrest remains on record.
CHAIR COGHILL noted there was a lengthy discussion on this topic
at the last committee meeting.
MR. KOPP pointed out that the court is addressing that situation
currently, so that charges that are not filed by the prosecutor
will be addressed. Therefore, it is not in the bill.
CHAIR COGHILL held SB 108 in committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| Legislative Legal Opinion.pdf |
SJUD 3/3/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 176 |
| Sectional Analysis.pdf |
SJUD 3/3/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 176 |
| Written Testimony .zip |
SJUD 3/3/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 176 |
| Supporting Documents.zip |
SJUD 3/3/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 176 |
| Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SJUD 3/3/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 176 |
| SB 128 CS Version O Summary of Changes.pdf |
SJUD 3/3/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 128 |