Legislature(1999 - 2000)
05/17/1999 01:22 PM House JUD
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
CSSB 100(FIN) - REIMBURSEMENT FOR PUBLIC DEFENDER
CHAIRMAN KOTT announced the next order of business is CS FOR SENATE
BILL NO. 100(FIN), "An Act relating to the payment by indigent
persons for legal services and related costs."
CHAIRMAN KOTT noted that there is a House proposed committee
substitute and that the departments are onboard with the changes.
Number 0395
REPRESENTATIVE ROKEBERG moved to adopt the House proposed committee
substitute for CSSB 100(JUD), Version 1-LS0560\K, Luckhaupt,
5/16/99. There being no objection, it was so adopted.
Number 0419
CHAIRMAN KOTT noted that the House proposed committee substitute
restricts the application of the fees for the services provided in
the criminal side. It indicates that the court "may" enter into a
judgment by removing the word "shall." It also changes the word
"may" to "shall" in the area where the court may determine as to
whether or not there shall be a fee subject to a payment schedule,
and in the area where the court shall allow a person subject to a
judgment to petition at anytime for the remission, reduction, or
deferral of an unpaid portion.
Number 0513
REPRESENTATIVE GREEN made a motion to move the proposed House
committee substitute for CSSB 100(JUD) [1-LS0560\K, Luckhaupt,
5/16/99] from the committee with individual recommendations and the
attached fiscal note(s).
REPRESENTATIVE CROFT objected. It seems that taking out the
distinction of when convicting somebody and when they are found
innocent is inappropriate. In general, when the state accuses an
[indigent] person of committing a crime, it drags that person
through a lengthy court process when eventually a jury finds that
person "not guilty." He said, "And we're gonna say after all of
that, I accused you of a crime, you didn't have the money to defend
yourself, you were innocent. Now, I want all that money. And I
just think that's inappropriate public policy."
Number 0505
CHAIRMAN KOTT stated, hopefully, the courts will not place any
requirement on those who are wrongfully convicted to pay any fees
for services rendered.
CHAIRMAN KOTT called for a roll call vote. Representatives Green,
Rokeberg, James and Kott voted in favor of the motion.
Representatives Murkowski, Croft and Kerttula voted against the
motion. The motion passed with a vote of 4-3. The HCS CSSB
100(JUD) was so moved from the House Judiciary Standing Committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|