Legislature(1999 - 2000)
02/16/1999 03:28 PM Senate STA
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SB 69-ADVISORY VOTE ON ELECTED AG
MARK HODGINS, legislative aide to Senator Ward, co-sponsor of SB
69, gave the following presentation. SB 69 authorizes an advisory
vote by the people on whether to elect the attorney general. Many
states elect their attorneys general, as opposed to having that
important position be determined by a political appointment. The
states of Alaska, Hawaii, New Hampshire, New Jersey, and Wyoming
have attorneys general appointed by their governors; Maine has an
attorney general elected by its Legislature; and the attorney
general of Tennessee is appointed by the judges of its Supreme
Court. Many believe an elected attorney general is likely to be
more loyal to the state's residents and its Constitution. Tam
Cook, Director of the Division of Legal Services, prepared a memo
which lists the arguments for and against the election of the
attorney general, included in committee packets. One argument for
election is that if the attorney general acts as the legal advisor
to the Governor and other state officials, he/she is compromised as
far as working for issues for the people of the State of Alaska.
SENATOR PHILLIPS questioned how the judges of the Tennessee Supreme
Court are selected.
MR. HODGINS did not know.
SENATOR ELTON asked about the fiscal note for SB 69.
MR. HODGINS replied the fiscal note was just delivered and contains
a cost of $1,500 to place the question on the ballot, except that
the cost will increase slightly if the ballot contains more than
six questions.
Number 239
JIM BALDWIN, Assistant Attorney General, Department of Law, stated
he has had the pleasure of serving under governors of three
parties, so his perspective is from the institution of the office
of the attorney general. The function of the Alaska attorney
general's office has been viewed as one of legal advisor to the
governor; not as legal advisor to the people. Alaska government was
constructed so that the Governor was to be the statewide officer
elected by the people and served by his appointees. One of the
reasons the state government was not designed to have a lot of
other elected officials was to ensure accountability. If the
government is not efficient, the people can hold one person
responsible. If a multitude of elected officers existed, one could
blame the other for the inefficiencies. During the Constitutional
Convention, the common practice electing people to official
positions to diffuse federal power was changed because Alaska would
no longer need to shield itself from federal power. A legal issue
that merits consideration is that under Article 12 of the Alaska
Constitution, a constitutional amendment is meant to be a specific
legislative proposal put before the people; an advisory vote asks
voters to vote on a concept.
Number 308
SENATOR PHILLIPS noted two advisory votes were voted on by Alaskans
in the past 20 years that were never acted upon by the Legislature:
the unicameral legislature and the annuity for the Longevity Bonus
Program. He stated an advisory vote is merely a check on the pulse
of the people at that moment in time and should not be feared.
MR. BALDWIN said in his view, the best way for the peoples' voice
to be heard is through the legislators they elected. He added the
problem with advisory votes is that they are difficult to put into
action.
SENATOR PHILLIPS replied an advisory vote is another tool for
legislators to use to determine how the public wants it to respond
to certain issues.
Number 348
SENATOR GREEN questioned what type of vote was considered in the
Governor's proposal to ask voters to determine the best way to
capture resources through various state accounts to cover the
budget shortfall.
MR. BALDWIN said that proposal called for an advisory vote, but it
had a very substantive effect because the Legislature would be
making appropriations that would take effect when a certain vote
was certified from that election. The reason it was called an
advisory vote was because of the lurking legal issue concerning
delegation of legislative functions. The theory is that the
Legislature is sent to Juneau to enact laws, and a legal question
arises when that function is transferred to someone else, such as
the people. In the Governor's bill, the people would not be
determining the law, they would be determining when it would take
effect.
There being no further testimony on SB 69, SENATOR GREEN moved SB
69 from committee with individual recommendations.
SENATOR ELTON objected and stated he believes Alaskans have been
well served by the attorneys general of the past and because the
same kind of information can be obtained by conducting a poll.
The motion carried with Senators Green, Phillips, Wilken, and Ward
voting "Yea," and Senator Elton voting "Nay."
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|