Legislature(2023 - 2024)BUTROVICH 205
04/17/2023 03:30 PM Senate RESOURCES
Note: the audio ![]()
and video ![]()
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB92 | |
| SB69 | |
| HJR11 | |
| SB82 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | SB 69 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HJR 11 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | SB 82 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 92 | TELECONFERENCED | |
SB 69-GEOTHERMAL RESOURCES
3:37:05 PM
CO-CHAIR BISHOP reconvened the meeting and announced the
consideration of SENATE BILL NO. 69 "An Act relating to
geothermal resources; relating to the definition of 'geothermal
resources'; and providing for an effective date."
He noted that this was the second hearing and the intent was to
go through the sectional analysis and hear public testimony.
3:37:53 PM
JOHN CROWTHER, Deputy Commissioner, Department of Natural
Resources (DNR), Anchorage, Alaska, introduced himself.
3:38:05 PM
SEAN CLIFTON, Policy and Program Specialist, Division of Oil and
Gas, Department of Natural Resources (DNR), Anchorage, Alaska
provided an overview of SB 69 and presented the sectional
analysis. He began by reviewing the purpose of the legislation.
Modernize Alaska's geothermal exploration program
• Greater potential for providing affordable,
renewable energy to rural communities and remote
natural resource extraction projects
• Promote clean energy industry job creation
Align geothermal licensing with the oil and gas
exploration license program, thereby increasing
feasibility for companies to develop resources
• More time for a company to identify and prove
resource to convert to leases
• Conversion to leases based on completion of work
commitment and submission of exploration plan
instead of proving discovery of commercial
resource
• Doubles maximum acreage allowed for exploration
• Repeals rental/royalty modification after 20
years of production, providing stability and
predictability for investors in geothermal energy
projects
Reform definitions for geothermal resources to focus
on Commercial Use
• Explicitly excludes domestic, noncommercial, or
small-scale industrial use from the need for a
geothermal license or lease
3:40:48 PM
MR. CLIFTON advanced to slide 11, "DNR Geothermal
Leasing/Permitting History," and spoke to the following:
Present Mount Spurr Two prospecting permits in the
Mount Spurr area, issued in 2021 (expire in
2023).
Augustine Island One prospecting permit in
the southern part of the volcanic island,
issued in 2022 (expires in 2024).
2013 Augustine Island 26 tracts were offered.
Only one tract was leased to a private
individual and no exploration work was
conducted as a result of that lease sale.
2008 Mount Spurr 16 tracts were leased to Ormat
and one private individual. Ormat purchased
15 leases in the 2008 sale and drilled on
the southern flank of volcano. They didn't
find adequate temperatures in wells to
pursue the project. The State has the data
available on the Division of Oil & Gas
website.
1986 Mount Spurr On June 24, 1986, DNR offered
2,640 acres in two tracts. Both tracts
received bids. The lease for Tract 1 expired
in 1996, and the lease for Tract 2 was
terminated in 1990.
1983 Mount Spurr DNR held its first geothermal
lease sale in the Mount Spurr area on May
17, 1983. 10,240 acres in 16 tracts were
offered in Competitive Geothermal Lease Sale
1. One tract received a bid. The lease for
that tract was terminated in 1992.
MR. CLIFTON noted that without this legislation, the permitting
would have to be completely restarted for the two Mount Spurr
permits that are due to expire in 2023.
3:42:47 PM
CO-CHAIR BISHOP asked how much it would extend a prospect lease,
if the bill were to pass.
MR. CLIFTON replied that it would give a company about three
additional years.
3:43:24 PM
SENATOR CLAMAN asked where Augustine Island is located.
MR. CLIFTON replied that it's due west of Anchor Point in the
southern Cook Inlet.
SENATOR CLAMAN asked where the Unalaska project that Bernie Karl
talked about would fall in DNR's regulatory permitting process.
MR. CLIFTON replied that Bernie Karl is associated with the
development of the Makushin project, which is a private
resource. DNR is not involved, but the Alaska Oil and Gas
Commission and the Department of Environmental Conservation
(DEC) are involved in that project. He reiterated that the
purpose of SB 69 is to update DNR's program for permitting,
licensing, and leasing projects involving State of Alaska
resources.
CO-CHAIR BISHOP recalled that Mr. Karl said he had all his
permits.
SENATOR KAWASAKI asked about the permitting process when the
geothermal resource transitions through multiple layers of state
and private land.
MR. CLIFTON responded that unitization provides a framework for
different resource owners to come to agreement on how they're
going to develop the resource. This will be addressed further
along in the presentation, but Pilgrim Hot Springs near Nome is
a good example of multiple resource owners.
MR. CLIFTON advanced to slide 12, "Leasing and Permitting
Process," and discussed the following:
Application and call for competing proposals
• If competing proposals ? competitive lease sale
• If no competing interest ? issue prospecting
permit with two-year time limit
o This bill replaces two-year permits with five-
year licenses modelled after our modern oil and
gas exploration licensing program.
o Conversion to lease
• Permit (current): "showing of a discovery
of geothermal resources in commercial
quantities"
• License (bill): after work commitment is
met Both processes require Best Interest
Finding prior to award of permit, license,
or lease
3:48:40 PM
CO-CHAIR BISHOP asked whether DNR was hard and fast on five
years.
MR. CROWTHER replied that DNR's belief is that five years
maintains the competitive balance and allows the time for a
company to do several field-seasons of work and prove a
potential resource. He added that the department would be happy
to provide its perspective on other timeframes if the committee
suggested alternatives.
CO-CHAIR BISHOP said he was thinking about the logistics
required to get to some remote locations.
MR. CLIFTON conveyed that the sectional summary on slide 13 was
for reference as members review the legislation.
3:49:55 PM
MR. CLIFTON advanced to the detailed sectional summary starting
on slide 15. He spoke to the following:
SECTION 1: CLASS V WELLS PRIMACY
• Grants AOGCC authority to pursue primacy for
permitting Class V injection wells for geothermal
developments
• State agencies are quicker and have more expertise
with permitting within their jurisdiction than US
EPA
• Reduces project costs and permitting timelines
• AOGCC already has primacy for Class II injection
wells used for enhanced oil recovery injection
programs
MR. CLIFTON deferred further explanation of Class V primacy to
the representative from AOGCC.
CO-CHAIR BISHOP asked Commissioner Wilson if he had anything to
add.
GREG WILSON, Commissioner, Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation
Commission (AOGCC), Department of Commerce, Community and
Economic Development (DCCED), Anchorage, Alaska, stated that he
had nothing to add at this time.
3:51:34 PM
SENATOR CLAMAN asked for the timeline when DNR might apply for
Class V primacy.
MR. CROWTHER deferred the question to the AOGCC representative.
He added that DNR's thinking was that it was prudent to put all
the geothermal updates in one bill, even though Class V
authority may not be needed immediately.
COMMISSIONER WILSON deferred the question to Dave Roby.
3:52:20 PM
DAVE ROBY, Senior Reservoir Engineer, Alaska Oil and Gas
Conservation Commission (AOGCC), Department of Commerce,
Community and Economic Development (DCCED), Anchorage, Alaska,
stated that the purpose of including Class V is to provide
authority to regulate the injection activities instead of just
the permitting of the well. It would be similar to what's done
currently for water and gas injection for enhanced oil recovery.
He noted that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
currently was the permitting authority and he wasn't sure the
agency would authorize the state to assume Class V primacy.
SENATOR CLAMAN asked for DNR's timeline for pursuing Class V
primacy and what it might cost.
MR. ROBY said he believes DNR would start pursuing primacy right
away if the bill were to pass, although preliminary discussions
with the EPA indicate that it would be unlikely that the agency
would grant primacy on just geothermal. He said it may be a dead
end but it costs nothing to pursue. Beyond that, he didn't know
how long the process might take.
CO-CHAIR BISHOP advised that the DCCED fiscal note says that
AOGCC does not anticipate any fiscal impact from the
legislation.
3:54:20 PM
MR. CROWTHER suggested that the committee may be thinking about
and referencing the Class VI program that does have a fiscal
note impact. That primacy is more complex to pursue and the EPA
has signaled it wants applicants to go through the entire
process, which will take time. The cost of that primacy is
distinct from this pursuit.
CO-CHAIR BISHOP asked Mr. Clifton to continue.
3:55:01 PM
MR. CLIFTON advanced to slide 16 and discussed the following:
SECTIONS 2, 10, & 15: DNR MANAGES GEOTHERMAL UNITS ON
STATE LAND
DNR manages Alaska's geothermal resources under
unitization and operations provisions in AS 38.05.181
Section 2: Removes redundant reference to AS 41.06
from AS 31.05.030(m)
Section 10: Related amendment to AS 41.06.020(e)
Section 15: Repeals AS 41.06.005(b) and AS 41.06.030
since geothermal units are managed by DNR
3:55:52 PM
MR. CLIFTON advanced to slide 17 and discussed the following:
SECTIONS 36: PERMITS TO LICENSES
• Provisions in these sections replace "permit" with
"license."
• Within DOG, "permits" are for surface use
authorizations. For subsurface, "licenses" and
"leases" are issued.
• Adopting the exploration licensing program for
geothermal resource management conforms with
existing processes for oil and gas.
• Section 17 allows for conversion of existing
permits to licenses.
3:57:00 PM
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI joined the committee.
MR. CLIFTON advanced to slide 18 and discussed the following:
SECTION 3: PRIVATE USE EXEMPTION
• New language added:
A prospecting license or lease is not required under
this section to explore for, develop, or use
geothermal resources if the geothermal resource is
intended for domestic, noncommercial, or small-scale
industrial use.
• This explicitly excludes private geothermal users
from a requirement to apply for a license or lease.
He noted that later in the presentation he'd talk about changing
the definition of "geothermal resources" by removing the very
high-temperature requirement.
CO-CHAIR BISHOP asked if it would exclude somebody who
circulates naturally occurring hot water throughout their home.
MR. CLIFTON said slide 19 addresses the question. The graphic on
the bottom right provides examples of a typical home or small
business use of different types of ground source heat pumps.
They use heat exchange to pull heat from the earth to heat
water. This is not a model for producing power. The graphic on
the left illustrates a commercial development of geothermal
resources to produce power. He noted that Bernie Karl is
producing power with geothermal resources, but he is not selling
that power so DNR does not view it as commercial use of the
resource. He acknowledged that the language was open so a future
commissioner could take a different approach.
CO-CHAIR BISHOP asked Dr. LePain if the boreholes for non-
commercial systems illustrated on slide 19 would use the same
drill and case as a conventional well.
DR. DAVID LEPAIN, State Geologist and Director, Division of
Geological and Geophysical Surveys, Department of Natural
Resources (DNR), Fairbanks, Alaska, said that's correct; ground
source heat pump technology would be used in such non-commercial
systems.
CO-CHAIR BISHOP observed that it might be beneficial to identify
the depth or length of the boreholes as a range in feet.
4:01:44 PM
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI agreed and asked whether there was a
definition for domestic or small-scale industrial use.
MR. CLIFTON replied that the bill does not propose adding
specific definitions under Title 38 for domestic, small-scale
industrial use. He opined that those would be interpreted
according to the common meanings.
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI asked how he would define domestic and
small-scale industrial use.
4:02:42 PM
MR. CROWTHER responded that the core intent is commerciality.
Power somebody generates from a geothermal resource for their
home or a business operation on their property would not be
subject to this lease requirement if the power isn't sold.
Somebody who develops a large-scale project that requires
central power generation and has commodity sales of manufactured
products would start to be a non-small-scale industrial use.
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI asked if geothermal is considered part of
the subsurface resource the state continues to own.
MR. CROWTHER said yes; DNR views it as a mineral resource of the
state.
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI asked if it runs afoul of the constitution
if no royalty is collected.
MR. CROWTHER replied that DNR understands commercial projects to
be those seeking resources from significant depths of hundreds
or thousands of feet, which is clearly a character of the
mineral estate. He acknowledged that the court had not settled
whether the migration of the heat to the surface at the level
that's functionally useful for purposes of home or small
business use is a sufficiently mineral and whether the state
could assert authority at the surface level if the state is not
the surface owner. The legislature carves out the private right,
but it does not attempt to draw a distinct line.
4:05:45 PM
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI asked whether Section 3 should have a
provision that limits depth to no more than 300 feet.
MR. CLIFTON said it's different than selling a barrel of oil;
it's based on a percentage of gross revenue under AS
38.05.181(g). Subsection (g) sets the royalty rate at 1.75
percent of gross revenue for the first 10 years of production
and 3.5 percent of production in subsequent years. SB 69 does
not propose to change that statute.
4:06:56 PM
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI asked if somebody could drill a 100-foot-
deep oil well and pump 25 gallons per day for personal use.
MR. CROWTHER said he didn't know how Alaska law treats surface
expressions of hydrocarbons or other mineral resource. He
offered to do some research and follow up with the information.
4:07:50 PM
SENATOR CLAMAN asked if Bernie Karl had to apply for any permits
initially and whether there was any regulatory oversight of his
geothermal operation at Chena Hot Springs outside of Fairbanks.
MR. CROWTHER offered his understanding that, similar to the
Makushin project, the resource is private, so Mr. Karl didn't
have to get a permit from DNR to access and use that resource.
He didn't know what permits or authorizations from other uses
that Mr. Karl may hold.
SENATOR CLAMAN summarized that DNR's understanding is that Mr.
Karl's operation uses surface geothermal because using the
subsurface estate requires authorization from DNR.
MR. CROWTHER said he'd follow up with a definitive response but
his understanding in that case is that the mineral and
subsurface estate is private.
SENATOR CLAMAN continued that the state sold the subsurface
estate to some depth.
MR. CROWTHER said the state typically cannot alienate its
mineral estate in transactions, but Alaska has instances where
there is a private mineral estate that passed to private owners
pre-statehood or in other situations.
4:10:03 PM
SENATOR CLAMAN said he wasn't questioning what Mr. Karl was
doing but it seemed relevant to the questions that were arising.
CO-CHAIR BISHOP commented that from a safety standpoint it makes
sense to set a range for private use.
4:10:44 PM
SENATOR KAUFMAN noted the reference to "small-scale industrial"
and asked whether there was intent to differentiate between
commercial and industrial.
MR. CLIFTON said small-scale industrial envisions something like
a seafood processing plant that is adjacent to a resource that
can be used to power the plant instead of using diesel
generation. DNR doesn't need to get involved in the permitting
or licensing or leasing processes for the mineral estate. The
bill does provide flexibility for situations where the facility
changes and is exporting power.
SENATOR KAUFMAN said he'd follow up offline.
MR. CLIFTON responded to Senator Claman's question. He conveyed
that the area around Chena Hot Springs is a private mineral
estate that was granted prior to statehood. It is not a unique
situation. He agreed with Mr. Crowther that if the mineral
estate had been given to the state, it would not have been
ceded.
4:14:07 PM
MR. CLIFTON advanced to slide 20 and discussed the following:
SECTION 3: PREFERENTIAL RIGHTS
• Current statute grants preferential rights to a
surface owner to apply for a geothermal prospecting
permit once notice is received of an existing
application
• Inappropriate for a surface owner to have a
preferential right to the State's mineral
estate
• Potentially discouraging to commercial
development
• Private landowners usually don't have financial
resources to develop a commercially-viable
geothermal resource
• Surface owners may still pursue domestic geothermal
developments for their own uses
• Need well permits from AOGCC
• Need environmental review or permits from other
agencies such as Department of Environmental
Conservation, Department of Fish & Game, DNR
Division of Mining Land & Water, possibly
federal agencies
• Examples of permitting requirements are
detailed in a supplemental slide
• Rights to access the mineral estate are reserved
under AS 38.05.125, while surface owner rights are
protected under AS 38.05.130
• Surface owners must provide reasonable access
to resource developers
• The same condition exists for oil & gas or
mining
• If conflict arises, DNR ensures private
landowners would not be left without heat or
power, or otherwise damaged by commercial
development
• If a surface use agreement can't be reached,
resolution process is in 11 AAC 86.145
• DNR holds a hearing wherein the developer must
prove there is no other alternative location
for the well or data acquisition
• If the Commissioner concurs, a developer posts
a bond to compensate landowner for any impacts
and work progresses
• Geothermal licenses and leases are not surface use
authorizations
• They only provide the exclusive right to
explore for and develop the subsurface
resources
• Public notice is a part of the license issuance
process and surface owners can participate
• Surface use authorizations require public
notice and direct notice to any affected
surface owners
4:15:53 PM
MR. CLIFTON advanced to slide 21 and discussed the following:
SECTIONS 4 & 7: TERMS AND WORK COMMITMENT
• Changes prospecting permit to license and increases
term from 2 to 5 years
• Creates greater opportunity for success of
noncompetitive geothermal program
• Conversion to noncompetitive lease through
completion of agreed upon work commitment
• Current process for oil and gas exploration
license
• Commitment expressed in dollar figure
• Annual reporting and performance
objectives
• Amends AS 38.05.181(f) for geothermal leases
• Geothermal leases last for 10 years, with
opportunity for a five-year extension, and
standard indefinite extension by production
• Repeals opportunity for DNR commissioner to
renegotiate rental and royalty rates for
geothermal leases after 20 years of production
MR. CLIFTON continued to slide 22 and discussed the following:
SECTION 6: ACREAGE LIMIT & RENT
• Maximum acreage a lessee may hold increases from
51,200 to 100,000 acres
• Geothermal systems can underlie very large
areas
• Enables explorers to more effectively delineate
resource
• Rental fees to be set by regulation instead of
statute
• Enables DOG to be nimbler in response to market
changes
4:18:38 PM
MR. CLIFTON advanced to slide 23 and discussed the following:
SECTION 8: UNITIZATION
• Adds three new subsections AS 38.05.181(ik) to
modernize unitization statute for geothermal leases
to match the model used for oil & gas
(i)DNR commissioner may compel unitization
(j)Commissioner may establish, change, or revoke
drilling, producing, and royalty requirements of
leases as part of the unit agreement
(k)Leases and unit agreement are subject to current
and future statutes and regulations
4:20:36 PM
MR. CLIFTON advanced to slide 24 and discussed the following:
SECTIONS 9 & 14: GEOTHERMAL RESOURCES DEFINITION
"Geothermal resources" means the natural heat of the
earth; the energy, in whatever form, below the surface
of the earth present in, resulting from, or created
by, or which may be extracted from, such natural heat;
and all minerals in solution or other products
obtained from naturally heated fluids, brines,
associated gases, and steam, in whatever form, found
below the surface of the earth; but excluding oil,
hydrocarbon gases, or other hydrocarbon substances.
• Modern definition for geothermal resources
• Not limited by temperature because current
technology enables development of cooler geothermal
systems
• Ensures all the State's mineral estate resources
are captured in definition
• Same definition being applied to both DNR & AOGCC
statutes
CO-CHAIR BISHOP commented that it might fall under a different
safety jurisdiction.
4:22:22 PM
MR. CLIFTON advanced to slide 25 and discussed the following:
SECTION 13: GEOTHERMAL FLUIDS
AS 41.06.060(4) is amended to read:
(4) "geothermal fluid" means liquids, brines, water,
gases, or steam naturally or artificially present
in a geothermal system; "geothermal fluid" does
not include oil, hydrocarbon gases, or other
hydrocarbon substances;"
• Aligns with modernized definition for geothermal
resources
• Not limited by temperature because current
technology enables development of cooler
geothermal systems
• Distinguishes geothermal fluids from hydrocarbon
resources
MR. CLIFTON advanced to slide 26 and discussed the following:
SECTION 12: PENALTIES
• Conforming language to AOGCC authority over gas and
oil operations (AS 31.05.150)
• Without this provision, AOGCC may not have
authority to assess penalties for violations related
to operation of geothermal wells
4:23:26 PM
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI noted that the temperature requirement was
removed from Section 13. He asked if that would allow a company
to pump large quantities of drinking water from the ground.
MR. CLIFTON responded that geothermal fluids typically are not
potable.
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI pointed out that the definition includes
water and the temperature requirement is removed. He restated
his question and asked for a yes or no answer.
4:24:17 PM
MR. CROWTHER said they'd follow up with a definitive response,
but he believes that the beneficial use of water may have to be
approved by DNR through the water authorization.
CO-CHAIR BISHOP commented that geothermal typically runs in a
loop.
MR. CROWTHER said that's correct, but if somebody wanted to
extract and make beneficial use of the water instead of
reinjecting, they may need an additional authorization.
MR. CLIFTON deferred to Dr. LePain to review the DGGS fiscal
note.
4:25:27 PM
DR. DAVID LEPAIN, Director, Division of Geological and
Geophysical Surveys, advanced to slide 27 and spoke to the DGGS
fiscal note:
FISCAL NOTE: NEW DGGS GEOLOGIST 4
• Enables DGGS to restart its geothermal program. The
new geologist would:
• Coordinate with agencies and industry to
publish new geologic data to further
development of Alaska's geothermal energy
resources
• Maintain and update geologic data on Alaska's
geothermal systems in a geothermal database
• Attract federal funds to characterize Alaska's
geothermal systems and resources
• Monitor developments in geothermal systems
technology
• Conduct geologic investigations of Alaska's
geothermal systems
• Publish geologic maps, reports and data on
Alaska geothermal systems
• Advise DNR and other state agencies on the
state's geothermal resources
• Support DNR's geothermal leasing program
• Support and supply information to explorers and
developers of Alaska's geothermal resources
• Support and advise DNR Commissioner's Office
and Governor's Office on geothermal policy
4:26:32 PM
CO-CHAIR BISHOP opened public testimony on SB 69.
4:26:50 PM
PAUL CRAIG, Founder and CEO, GeoAlaska LLC., Anchorage, Alaska,
stated that his company has geothermal exploration permits for
Mount Spur and Augustine Island and they fully support SB 69 as
currently written. This bill is critical for the corporation to
survive. He stressed that two years is not enough time to make a
discovery and obtain a lease; five years is a more realistic
timeframe. He said companies are ready and willing to spend
millions of dollars in Alaska that will help secure energy
security for the Railbelt and diversify the economy but the
legislation is needed for that to happen.
4:29:18 PM
GEOFFREY SIMPSON, Land Manager, Cyrq Energy LLC, Boulder
Colorado, testified in support of SB 69. He stated that Cyrq has
six operating plants in the western US; they produce energy for
up to 100,000 homes. Cyrq is also working on a project on Mount
Spurr. He echoed Mr. Craig in support of DNR's new licensing
proposal; they look forward to it going into effect this year.
They have plans to move their exploration activity for Mount
Spurr onto the ground next year.
4:30:26 PM
CO-CHAIR BISHOP held SB 69 in committee with public testimony
open.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SB 82 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SFIN 2/19/2024 1:30:00 PM SRES 4/17/2023 3:30:00 PM |
SB 82 |
| SB 82 ver A.pdf |
SRES 4/17/2023 3:30:00 PM |
SB 82 |
| SB 82 Sectional Analysis ver A.pdf |
SFIN 2/19/2024 1:30:00 PM SRES 4/17/2023 3:30:00 PM |
SB 82 |
| SB 82 Fiscal Note ADFG - Central Region Fisheries Management.pdf |
SRES 4/17/2023 3:30:00 PM |
SB 82 |
| SB 82 Supporting Documents-DNR Shore Fishery Leasing Fact Sheet 10.1.2010.pdf |
SFIN 2/19/2024 1:30:00 PM SRES 4/17/2023 3:30:00 PM |
SB 82 |
| SB 82 Supporting Documents-DNR Shore Lease Fishery Sites Map 01.18.18.pdf |
SFIN 2/19/2024 1:30:00 PM SRES 4/17/2023 3:30:00 PM |
SB 82 |
| SB 82 Supporting Documents-Eastside Setnet Area Map.pdf |
SFIN 2/19/2024 1:30:00 PM SRES 4/17/2023 3:30:00 PM |
SB 82 |
| SB 82 Supporting Documents-News Article ADN 8.12.21.pdf |
SFIN 2/19/2024 1:30:00 PM SRES 4/17/2023 3:30:00 PM |
SB 82 |
| SB 82 Supporting Documents-News Article KDLL Radio 03.02.23.pdf |
SFIN 2/19/2024 1:30:00 PM SRES 4/17/2023 3:30:00 PM |
SB 82 |
| SB 82 Supporting Documents-News Article Peninsula Clarion 03.24.23.pdf |
SFIN 2/19/2024 1:30:00 PM SRES 4/17/2023 3:30:00 PM |
SB 82 |
| SB 82 Supporting Documents-Upper Cook Inlet Management Area Statistical Areas.pdf |
SFIN 2/19/2024 1:30:00 PM SRES 4/17/2023 3:30:00 PM |
SB 82 |
| HJR 11 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SRES 4/17/2023 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 11 |
| HJR011 Ver. A.PDF |
SRES 4/17/2023 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 11 |
| HJR 11 Fiscal Note HRES.pdf |
SRES 4/17/2023 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 11 |
| HJR 11 Letters of Support through 04.15.23.pdf |
SRES 4/17/2023 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 11 |
| SB 82 Fiscal Note DNR.pdf |
SRES 4/17/2023 3:30:00 PM |
SB 82 |
| SB 92 Amendment #1.pdf |
SRES 4/17/2023 3:30:00 PM |
SB 92 |
| SB 69 SRES DNR Answers to Committee Questions 04.17.23.pdf |
SRES 4/17/2023 3:30:00 PM |
SB 69 |