Legislature(2005 - 2006)BUTROVICH 205
01/26/2005 03:30 PM Senate RESOURCES
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB32 | |
| SJR2 | |
| SB69 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| *+ | SJR 2 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | SB 32 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | SB 69 | TELECONFERENCED | |
SB 69-APPROP: GRANT TO ARCTIC POWER FOR ANWR
CHAIR WAGONER announced SB 69 to be up for consideration.
MS. MARY JACKSON, staff to Senator Wagoner, sponsor of SB 69,
said that the House has a similar bill, HB 101, but the funding
was for $1.3 million. Funding in SB 69 is for $1.2 million; $1.1
million of which goes to Arctic Power. The remaining $100,000
goes to the Native Village of Kaktovik.
MS. JACKSON explained that Arctic Power is a private non-profit
entity that has been coordinating the effort on ANWR for many
years. Historically, the funding for promoting the opening of
ANWR is in the supplemental budget.
4:45:36 PM
MR. MIKE NAVARRE, Executive Board member, Arctic Power, urged
quick passage of SB 69. He said the opposition has tremendous
resources that it applies in many ways, like taking things out
of context and leaving out important information. Arctic Power
has done an extraordinary job of putting educational materials
together to help educate Congress, editorial boards, interest
groups and the general public.
4:46:56 PM
MR. NAVARRE said Arctic Power would like to coordinate with the
congressional delegation since they are the experts on the
ground regarding the efforts to be made. He said this can be
considered a long-term investment for the state and that some of
the members of Arctic Power have dropped out for a variety of
reasons, but not because they don't support it.
4:48:12 PM
He gave examples of the misinformation that has been propagated
- like the six months supply of gas.
It's ludicrous, but it continues to be used. In all of
their testimony, there is a failure to acknowledge the
Inupiat's from the village of Kaktovik that live
within the Refuge. They talk about the Gwichens who
live outside the Refuge, but not about the indigenous
people who live within the Refuge.... I believe that
we do oil development in Alaska better than any place
in the world and we need to carry that message to the
United States and to Congress....
He noted that regulations would be passed this year that would
need to be bird-dogged over the course; so, the lapse date is
appropriate.
4:49:59 PM
MR. JOE MATHIS, Montana Creek Campground in Anchorage, said he
is on the Arctic Power Board. He has personally traveled to ANWR
and agreed totally with Mr. Navarre's comments that SJR 2 needs
to have a speedy passage. He said that the Legislature should
look at its investment in Arctic Power as part of Alaska's long-
term fiscal plan.
4:51:49 PM
MR. MATT FAGNANI, NANA Development Corporation, said he has been
an active member of the Arctic Power Board of Directors since it
began. Each year it gets closer to meeting the goal of opening
the Coastal Plain to responsible oil and gas exploration. On the
expected lease sale, the state could earn $2 billion according
to a U.S. Department of Interior forecast. That represents a
222% return on investment, which would occur within 22 months
after signing of the bill. He said that Arctic Power's webpage
is receiving over 1 million hits a month. He thought it was
happening because of two constants - one is because President
Bush continues to make the opening of ANWR part of the solution
in addressing the nation's decline in oil. The second is Arctic
Power educating Congress and the public at large.
4:55:08 PM
MS. DEBBIE MILLER, testified again noting that all the people
who have testified in favor of Arctic Power are on its Board or
affiliated with it. She is a private citizen and thinks funding
Arctic Power is a misappropriation of state money and reiterated
that she would rather see alternative sources of energy
promoted.
4:57:54 PM
MR. FRAN MAUER opposed funding Arctic Power. Many other people
do not support Arctic Power. He said two of the major oil
companies that are active on the North Slope no longer support
Arctic Power and perhaps they know something that the state does
not. He thought Arctic Power funds would be better used by
investing them in alternative energy projects like wind
generators for remote villages.
4:59:10 PM
MS. LUCI BEACH, Executive Director, Gwichen Steering Committee,
also opposed SB 69. The Gwichen Nation has never opposed all
oil development, just some. Her suggestions for using Arctic
Power money to fund other worthwhile programs included
assistance to senior citizens who were adversely effected by
elimination of the Longevity Bonus Program, Village
Contamination Cleanup Fund, funding for Alaska Scholars Program
and funding to the University to enhance distance education so
remote site students can have better access.
5:02:07 PM
CHAIR WAGONER thanked her for her testimony and said that SB 69
would not be passed out of committee today.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|