Legislature(2021 - 2022)BUTROVICH 205
04/26/2021 01:30 PM Senate JUDICIARY
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB122 | |
| SJR6 | |
| SB53 | |
| SB82 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | SB 122 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 82 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SJR 6 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 53 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
SB 53-PERM FUND; ADVISORY VOTE
1:55:32 PM
CHAIR HOLLAND announced the consideration of SENATE BILL NO. 53,
"An Act relating to use of income of the Alaska permanent fund;
relating to the amount of the permanent fund dividend; relating
to the duties of the commissioner of revenue; relating to an
advisory vote on the permanent fund; providing for an effective
date by repealing the effective date of sec. 8, ch. 16, SLA
2018; and providing for an effective date."
[SB 53 was heard on 4/21/21.]
1:55:34 PM
CHAIR HOLLAND opened public testimony on SB 53.
1:55:57 PM
BERT HOUGHTALING, representing self, Big Lake, Alaska, stated
his opposition to SB 53. The bill will take the permanent fund
earnings and divide it in half. The legislature may or may not
pay a permanent fund dividend (PFD) under the bill. He
characterized SB 53 as similar to another bill before the
legislature, SB 75. He said it would provide a spending cap but
would fund the capital budget and operating budget first. He
said he opposes any PFD bill that does not follow the PFD
statutory formula.
1:57:40 PM
CHAIR HOLLAND closed public testimony on SB 53.
1:57:50 PM
At ease
1:59:36 PM
CHAIR HOLLAND reconvened the meeting
2:00:04 PM
CHAIR HOLLAND reopened public testimony on SB 53.
2:00:28 PM
ED MARTIN, representing self, Sterling, Alaska, stated that if
SB 53 does not go back to the original statutory formula based
on a five-year average of the permanent fund and pay out 50
percent in PFDs, it would not meet the advisory vote criteria.
He offered his view that during the original advisory vote to
establish the PFDs several issues arose, including the sentiment
that the legislature should not touch the PFD or create a
percent-of-market-value (POMV). However, the legislature has
done this. Therefore, he has reservations about using a
different formula. He suggested that using the POMV may be
unconstitutional. He said he favors enshrining the original
statutory formula for the PFD in the Alaska Constitution.
2:02:53 PM
JEAN HOLT, representing self, Palmer, Alaska, spoke in
opposition to SB 53. She echoed the comments of Mr. Houghtaling
by speaking in support of maintaining PFDs and placing language
in the Alaska Constitution to require it, if necessary.
[SB 53 was held in committee.]
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| CSSB82 version B.pdf |
SJUD 4/26/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 82 |
| SB53 and SJR6 Written Testimony.pdf |
SJUD 4/26/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 53 SJR 6 |
| Kroll_SB53_SJUD_042621.pdf |
SJUD 4/26/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 53 |