Legislature(2021 - 2022)BUTROVICH 205
05/07/2021 01:30 PM Senate JUDICIARY
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB109 | |
| SJR7 | |
| SJR5 | |
| SB39 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 109 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SJR 6 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SJR 5 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SJR 7 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 39 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
SB 39-BALLOT CUSTODY/TAMPERING; VOTER REG; MAIL
3:46:37 PM
CHAIR HOLLAND announced the consideration of CS FOR SENATE BILL
NO. 39(STA), "An Act relating to voting and elections; relating
to voter registration; relating to ballots and a system of
tracking and accounting for ballots; relating to retention of
election data; designating as a class A misdemeanor the
collection of ballots from other voters; designating as a class
C felony intentionally opening or tampering with a sealed
ballot, certificate, or package of ballots without authorization
from the director of the division of elections; designating as a
class C felony breaching, hacking, altering, or tampering with
election data or ballots; designating as a class B felony
election fraud; designating as a class C felony sharing election
data results before the close of the polls on election day; and
providing for an effective date."
[CSSB 39(STA) was before the committee.]
3:47:23 PM
SENATOR SHOWER, speaking as sponsor, paraphrased the sponsor
statement [Original punctuation provided]:
Senate Bill 39, updates Alaska's decades-old election
statutes, strengthening voter access and improving
integrity so Alaskans may regain confidence in our
election system. We sometimes disagree with election
results, but rarely in our history have we refused to
accept them. A troubling trend has emerged where
entire segments of our nation not only disagree with
election results but refuse to acknowledge them as
legitimate. It happened in 2016, and again in 2020.
Whether these concerns are real or perceived, we must
find a way to restore all people's faith in our
election system as it is a cornerstone to our
Constitutional Republic.
"I began working on election issues in 2018, involving
the accuracy of Alaska's election data and our voter
rolls. Problematic areas within our system created
integrity concerns and irreconcilable errors which
limited citizens from qualifying their ballots when
the Division of Elections questioned or rejected
them."
Alaska's current election model is built on a
foundation of disqualification and rejection of
ballots. A significant aspect of SB 39 is to shift
toward greater voter inclusion with the qualification
of ballots. "Voters should know when their ballots are
questioned or rejected and be informed of it
immediately. Ballot curing is a two-part process that
includes immediate voter notification and then
providing voters reasonable time and opportunity to
correct identified technical deficiencies. Once
notified, the voter should have an opportunity to
correct technical issues rather than the Division
disqualifying the ballot and not counting their vote.
Curing of ballots is an essential component of SB 39."
Improvements to voter access required extensive
additional work on existing statutes that have
contributed to limiting all voters. Before the 2020
elections, only two states had clear regulations and
policies for vote-by-mail procedures. A new measure of
inclusion is amending the current statute to accept
additional types of qualifying identification such as
Tribal identification as one example. Alaska is a
diverse state, and our Indigenous First Alaskans are
an essential segment with unique needs not experienced
in urban communities. "My goal is to include
additional provisions for increased Tribal
participation and for more opportunities for
communities to take a greater role in their local
voting systems, just as some larger communities
already practice across Alaska."
3:51:38 PM
Consistency and standardization of protocols is an
overarching objective, and communities that already
practice vote-by-mail are enhanced by improved
security and authentication. Additionally, absentee
voting improvements expand the option to voters where
they may request an automatic absentee ballot.
Alaskans should be able to vote in the manner which
suits them and feel confident that their vote is
secure and counted. If we shift to one type of voting
or another, we risk alienating a significant portion
of the population and inadvertently suppressing votes.
This is not a bill to suggest one method of voting
over another. SB 39 addresses the quality of the voter
data, security standards, and chain of custody.
Another major area SB39 improves is voter registration
roll accuracy. Alaska checks only a few databases
against eligible voter lists; SB39 enables the state
to clean the voter rolls more often and cross-
reference a broader segment of other available
databases. It requires third-party supervised bi-
annual audits of our voter rolls. Municipalities such
as Anchorage use state data for their vote-by-mail
system. It is self-evident that when the state's data
is not accurate, neither is their vote-by-mail system
based upon the over mailing of ballots. There are
thousands more people on our voter rolls than are
eligible to vote in Alaska. For example, the Division
of Elections checks our voter data with 31 other
states in ERIC. Those other 19 states equal over 135
million people. Data is also not checked with many
local and national sources which would certainly
improve the accuracy of our voter rolls. Do we want a
60% solution or a 100% solution? Alaska voters deserve
better.
3:54:32 PM
A cornerstone to how SB 39 mitigates chain of custody
concerns, and vulnerable or compromised voter data, is
through a well-established methodology, Multi-Factor
Authentication (MFA), and best practice data security
protocols, which many of the most secure institutions
utilize. 21st century solutions have been around for a
long time and are used worldwide in many ways. A
recent Biden Administration report and an independent
Harvard Journal of Law and Technology study recommend
states implement Multi-Factor Authentication and chain
of custody protocols to strengthen election integrity
and ensure one voter equals one vote.
3:56:22 PM
In addition to Multi-Factor Authentication, this bill
requires the Division of Elections to adhere to the US
Postal Service's best practice recommendation for a
vote by mail ballot chain of custody system. By
utilizing the USPS's existing ballot envelope barcode
procedure, voters can account for their ballot
anywhere it is in transit. Citizens should be able to
track their ballot from the time it is shipped from
the Division until received by the voter and until it
is returned to the Division. These systems also notify
a voter if their ballot has been questioned, rejected
and may even include ballot curing procedures. Nearly
everyone orders products online today. Most things can
be tracked, down to the minute, and a precise
location; we can also do so with ballots using
election-specific software readily available and
already in use in many states for ballot tracking.
The platform for elections security requires 3
critical pieces; data security, accurate voter rolls,
and a qualitative, secure chain of custody. In October
of 2020, a data breach resulted in 113,000 Alaskans
having their personal data exposed. The Division
confirmed on the record that the stolen data could be
used to apply for and submit ill-cast ballots and
identity theft. SB 39 addresses these, and many other
concerns, by bringing Alaska into the 21st century
3:58:27 PM
SENATOR SHOWER said he is working with all parties in the other
body to address any concerns.
3:59:06 PM
SENATOR HUGHES stated she appreciated all the work done on SB
39. She acknowledged that the public sometimes makes comments on
an earlier version of a bill. She offered her view that the
sponsor's intentions were good. She said she hoped Alaskans will
be open minded about the bill.
SENATOR SHOWER stated that the comments about the bill were
initially negative but are more balanced now.
[SB 39 was held in committee.]
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SJR7_A.2.pdf |
SJUD 5/7/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SJR 7 |
| SJR7_A.1.pdf |
SJUD 5/7/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SJR 7 |
| SJR 5 Amendment Package (SJUD).pdf |
SJUD 5/7/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SJR 5 |
| SJR 5 Legal memo.pdf |
SJUD 5/7/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SJR 5 |
| SJR 7 Attorney General Opinion.pdf |
SJUD 5/7/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SJR 7 |
| SJR 5 Amendment 7.pdf |
SJUD 5/7/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SJR 5 |
| SJR 7 legal opinion.pdf |
SJUD 5/7/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SJR 7 |
| SJR 5 Legal Memo 2.pdf |
SJUD 5/7/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SJR 5 |