Legislature(2019 - 2020)BUTROVICH 205
02/21/2019 03:30 PM Senate STATE AFFAIRS
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB33 | |
| SB34 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | SB 34 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 33 | TELECONFERENCED | |
SB 33-ARREST;RELEASE;SENTENCING;PROBATION
3:36:27 PM
CHAIR SHOWER announced the consideration of SENATE BILL 33 "An
Act relating to pretrial release; relating to sentencing;
relating to treatment program credit toward service of a
sentence of imprisonment; relating to electronic monitoring;
amending Rules 38.2 and 45(d), Alaska Rules of Criminal
Procedure; and providing for an effective date."
He welcomed Ms. Winkelman and Ms. Goode from the Department of
Corrections to respond to questions that came up in the previous
hearing, primarily about ankle monitors.
3:37:01 PM
JEN WINKELMAN, Director, Division of Probation and Parole,
Department of Corrections (DOC), responded to the committee's
request for information about the daily cost of the monitoring
equipment DOC uses. She explained that the individual cost
varies depending on the particular equipment that's required but
the average cost to rent the equipment is $6.75 per day. The
next question was whether there were consequences if an
individual failed to keep their monitoring equipment in
operating order. She checked with staff and learned that a
defendant in pretrial status who does not maintain their
equipment is charged with a misdemeanor for violating their
conditions of release.
CHAIR SHOWER clarified that maintaining equipment is primarily
keeping the battery charged.
MS. WINKELMAN agreed.
SENATOR MICCICHE asked if DOC or the monitoring company knows
when a battery dies.
MS. WINKELMAN explained that when the battery gets low it sends
a warning alert to both the probation officer and the defendant.
If the device stops working, the officer responds to determine
the reason for the failure. She noted that equipment does
malfunction from time to time; failure is not always the result
of a dead battery.
SENATOR KAWASAKI asked how she calculated the average cost of
$6.75.
MS. WINKELMAN explained that she broke the total annual cost
into an average daily cost and divided by the number of
individuals on the program. She noted that the cost of the
various types of monitoring equipment ranges from $3 to $8. If
the circumstances of the arrest relate to alcohol, for example,
the monitoring equipment that's ordered would be very different
than for a defendant whose arrest has no nexus to alcohol.
She advised that to answer the question about what the best
monitor is, she reviewed a list of the things DOC looks for.
These include the capability to attach to the ankle,
notification if the device is tampered with or removed, and a
device that is sealed and shock resistant. She noted that not
all equipment works in all areas of Alaska and that has to be
taken into consideration when contracting with different
companies. For example, DOC has experienced difficulty getting
equipment to work in Bethel and just one type works in Barrow.
3:43:11 PM
KELLY GOODE, Deputy Commissioner, Department of Corrections
(DOC), Anchorage, said DOC is aware of just four or five
companies that manufacture electronic monitoring (EM) equipment.
She offered to follow up with information on which features each
company offers.
CHAIR SHOWER said the primary question now is if the state is
getting the features it needs.
SENATOR MICCICHE said he continues to believe that the private
sector should provide this service, but the specifications and
DOC's requirements need to be clear. He asked if DOC's
requirements and expectations are clear.
MS. GOODE said she reached out to a couple of the providers and
they raised no issues regarding meeting the state's requirements
and expectations. She noted that the committee also expressed
interest in knowing whether these companies could mobilize
quickly should the bill pass. The providers she spoke with said
it would take a little time to ramp up, but they could meet the
need as private contractors.
3:45:54 PM
CHAIR SHOWER stated he would hold SB 33 in committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SSTA OFFICIAL AGENDA .pdf |
SSTA 2/21/2019 3:30:00 PM |
Agenda |
| SB 34 Transmittal Letter.pdf |
SSTA 2/21/2019 3:30:00 PM |
SB 34 |
| SB0034A.PDF |
SSTA 2/21/2019 3:30:00 PM |
SB 34 |
| SB 34 Highlights.pdf |
SSTA 2/21/2019 3:30:00 PM SSTA 2/28/2019 3:30:00 PM |
SB 34 |
| SB 34 - Probation and Parole Sectional.pdf |
SSTA 2/21/2019 3:30:00 PM |
SB 34 |
| SB0034-1-2-012319-LAW-N.PDF |
SSTA 2/21/2019 3:30:00 PM SSTA 2/26/2019 3:30:00 PM SSTA 2/28/2019 3:30:00 PM |
SB 34 |
| SB0034-2-2-012319-COR-Y.PDF |
SSTA 2/21/2019 3:30:00 PM SSTA 2/26/2019 3:30:00 PM SSTA 2/28/2019 3:30:00 PM |
SB 34 |
| SB0034-3-2-012319-COR-Y.PDF |
SSTA 2/21/2019 3:30:00 PM SSTA 2/26/2019 3:30:00 PM SSTA 2/28/2019 3:30:00 PM |
SB 34 |
| Court System Fiscal Note.pdf |
SSTA 2/21/2019 3:30:00 PM |
Court System FN |
| SB 33 Transmittal Letter.pdf |
SSTA 2/21/2019 3:30:00 PM SSTA 3/12/2019 3:30:00 PM SSTA 3/14/2019 3:30:00 PM SSTA 3/19/2019 3:30:00 PM |
SB 33 |
| SB0033A.PDF |
SSTA 2/21/2019 3:30:00 PM SSTA 3/12/2019 3:30:00 PM SSTA 3/14/2019 3:30:00 PM |
SB 33 |
| SB 33 - Pretrial Highilghts.pdf |
SSTA 2/21/2019 3:30:00 PM SSTA 3/12/2019 3:30:00 PM SSTA 3/14/2019 3:30:00 PM SSTA 3/19/2019 3:30:00 PM |
SB 33 |
| SB 33 - Pretrial Sectional.pdf |
SSTA 2/21/2019 3:30:00 PM SSTA 3/12/2019 3:30:00 PM SSTA 3/14/2019 3:30:00 PM SSTA 3/19/2019 3:30:00 PM |
SB 33 |
| SB33-DOL-FN#1.pdf |
SSTA 2/21/2019 3:30:00 PM SSTA 3/12/2019 3:30:00 PM SSTA 3/14/2019 3:30:00 PM |
SB 33 |
| SB33-DPS-FN#2.pdf |
SSTA 2/21/2019 3:30:00 PM SSTA 3/12/2019 3:30:00 PM SSTA 3/14/2019 3:30:00 PM |
SB 33 |
| SB33-DOA-FN#3.pdf |
SSTA 2/21/2019 3:30:00 PM SSTA 3/12/2019 3:30:00 PM SSTA 3/14/2019 3:30:00 PM |
SB 33 |
| SB33-DOA-FN#4.pdf |
SSTA 2/21/2019 3:30:00 PM SSTA 3/12/2019 3:30:00 PM SSTA 3/14/2019 3:30:00 PM |
SB 33 |
| SB33-DOC-FN#5.pdf |
SSTA 2/21/2019 3:30:00 PM SSTA 3/12/2019 3:30:00 PM SSTA 3/14/2019 3:30:00 PM |
SB 33 |
| SB33-DOC-FN#6.pdf |
SSTA 2/21/2019 3:30:00 PM SSTA 3/12/2019 3:30:00 PM SSTA 3/14/2019 3:30:00 PM |
SB 33 |
| SB33-Court System-FN.pdf |
SSTA 2/21/2019 3:30:00 PM SSTA 3/12/2019 3:30:00 PM SSTA 3/14/2019 3:30:00 PM |
SB 33 |
| SB33&34-GOA Bills Matrix 1-30-19.pdf |
SSTA 2/21/2019 3:30:00 PM |
|
| M.pdf |
SSTA 2/21/2019 3:30:00 PM |
proposed new working draft version m |