Legislature(1999 - 2000)
01/26/1999 09:03 AM Senate FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SENATE BILL NO. 28
"An Act relating to the increase of an appropriation
item based on additional federal or other program
receipts."
Co-chair Torgerson advised the committee that a new CS for
SB 28 had been received and he proceeded to review it
briefly for the committee.
Senator Parnell MOVED the adoption of CSSB 28(FIN), 1-
LS0236\D, Cook, 1/26/99 as a working draft for the
committee. Senator Adams OBJECTED. He asked about possible
changes on page two, lines one and two. (There followed a
brief pause.) Co-chair Torgerson noted that section had
been re-written.
Senator Adams asked if this was just for clarification
purposes. Co-chair Torgerson asked Mr. Teal from
Legislative Finance to respond.
Mr. David Teal, Director, Legislative Finance said he had
just received the new CS and had not looked at the changes
yet. Co-chair Torgerson said it appeared some changes had
been made.
Mr. Teal said in looking at it briefly that it was a similar
change for clarification purposes.
Senator Adams requested that Mr. Teal come before the
committee to respond to any possible questions.
David Teal was invited to join the committee. He said that
the change on page two was for clarification of obligations.
Senator Adams WITHDREW his objection. Therefore, WITHOUT
OBJECTION the CS for SB 28 was ADOPTED as a working draft.
Senator Phillips MOVED CSSB 28(FIN) from committee. Senator
Adams OBJECTED. He said his objection was to the procedural
change of the 45-day rule. He felt this legislation was
unnecessary.
For reference, Senator Adams cited the Homer Land Purchase
using custodial receipts. He explained that this went
through the public format and EVOS, however was rejected by
Legislative Budget and Audit. He also cited Kodiak
Aerospace Launch Facility. This also went through the
proper process but was also rejected by Legislative Budget
and Audit. He further advised the committee that there was
a pending court action.
For these reasons, he said the bill should be held in
committee. He suggested that each RPL should be negotiated
before being put on the agenda. The full committee should
be involved in the process. Senator Adams maintained his
objection.
Senator Parnell explained the bill retained the full power
of the Legislature and provided a proper operating
mechanism.
Senator Adams further commented to his objection,
specifically regarding disasters.
Co-chair Torgerson noted the objection by Senator Adams and
asked the secretary for a roll call vote. By a roll call
vote of 8 yeas (Torgerson, Parnell, Donley, Leman, Wilken,
P. Kelly, Green, Phillips) and 1 nay (Adams) the bill was
REPORTED OUT with individual recommendations and
accompanying zero fiscal note from Division of Legislative
Finance, Budget and Audit Committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|