Legislature(2003 - 2004)
03/18/2003 03:31 PM Senate STA
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SB 24-SPECIAL ABSENTEE BALLOTS
SENATOR GEORGIANNA LINCOLN, prime sponsor, advised Ms. Boario
would introduce the bill and Ms. Breeze was available to answer
questions.
MS. SARA BOARIO, chief of staff to Senator Georgianna Lincoln,
summarized the purpose of SB 24.
SB 24 offers a voter living in a remote location the
opportunity to vote using the 60-day special advance
absentee ballot. In current statute, only voters
living, working or traveling outside of the United
States are eligible for this special ballot. However,
distance, terrain and natural conditions have
prevented voters in remote areas from reaching a
community with a polling place or from receiving by
mail ballots. The current absentee ballot is mailed
out 14 to 15 days in advance.
The Division of Elections supports this bill as they
already distribute the 60-day special advance absentee
ballot and this legislation will not impose any
administrative difficulties. This bill also has a zero
fiscal note.
Last session there were a couple of questions regarding the
interpretation of the words "remote" and "reasonable."
Legislative legal advised them to review how the Division of
Elections applies their current regulations to determine who is
a permanent absentee voter. This should provide information
regarding how the division would apply SB 24 in determining
eligible remote voters. One of the criteria the division uses to
identify permanent absentee voters is if the voter resides in a
remote area in Alaska where distance, terrain, or other natural
conditions deny a voter reasonable access to a voting place.
Because the definition of "remote" is inherent in the
regulations, for SB 24 a remote area is one in which reasonable
access to a polling place is denied by the conditions outlined.
The key phrase is reasonable access; legislative legal found
that courts have interpreted "reasonable" as a matter of degree
dependent upon the specific facts of the case and is usually
determined by the agency. The Division of Elections does review
the specific conditions of all permanent absentee voters and the
voters that would benefit from SB 24 are already identified in
the division's voter registration system.
SENATOR GUESS asked her to confirm that the words "remote" and
"reasonable" are established in regulation and that individuals
would have to apply for the special ballot just as they must
apply for any other absentee ballot.
MS. BOARIO agreed.
SENATOR GUESS then asked whether eligible voters would be
notified that this option is available.
MS. VIRGINIA BREEZE, legislative liaison for the Division of
Elections, affirmed that voters would have to apply for the
special ballot. Because this would be a new option, there would
be a method to inform voters.
CHAIR GARY STEVENS asked Ms. Breeze about the letter dated May
9, 2002 and signed by Election Administrative Supervisor, Gail
Fenumiai where she stated, "The division believes it would be an
unnecessary expense to expand the use of the 60-day special
advance ballot to all Alaskan voters." He was confused because
all other correspondence from the division indicates this would
be a good idea.
MS. BREEZE agreed the letter did cause some confusion, but she
thought the answer lay in the last paragraph. It stated, "The
only way for a permanent absentee voter to vote is by mail. They
do not have access to any other options to exercise their right
to vote. The division feels it is in the best interest of these
voters that they be extended another alternative for voting,
such as is the case with voters in urban Alaska." She
interpreted this to mean the division does not intend to do this
for every voter in the State of Alaska. Just voters living in
remote locations would be eligible.
There were no further questions.
CHAIR GARY STEVENS asked for a motion.
SENATOR GUESS made a motion to move SB 24 from committee with
individual recommendations and zero fiscal note. There being no
objection, it was so ordered.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|