Legislature(2015 - 2016)BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
03/05/2015 03:30 PM Senate COMMUNITY & REGIONAL AFFAIRS
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB19 | |
| SB43 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| *+ | SB 19 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 45 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 43 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
SB 19-BOUNDARIES OF ROAD SERVICE AREAS
CHAIR BISHOP announced the consideration of SB 19.
3:34:18 PM
RYNNIEVA MOSS, staff to Senator Coghill, sponsor of SB
19, Alaska State Legislature, Juneau, Alaska, said that
SB 19 was requested by the Fairbanks North Star Borough
to address boundary issues in service areas. A proposed
committee substitute (CS) would change language to more
narrowly define the Borough's powers. It basically says
if a tax lot parcel is split into two service areas
that the Borough Assembly, with a public hearing and a
vote, could consolidate that parcel into one service
area that would have one tax bill.
She explained that AS 29.35.450(c) addresses boundaries
of road service areas and there are now two exceptions
to having to hold elections for changing boundaries in
service areas. One is in subsection (c)(3) that says a
subdivision or parcel for which the only access is a
road maintained by an adjacent road service area. The
other exclusion is to remove a subdivision or a parcel
in an existing road service area that does not rely on
the use of road maintenance services for access. She
said this bill adds a third exception.
MS. MOSS said there seems to be a disagreement on what
(c)(3) actually does and the legislative attorney was
going to work with the borough attorney to see if this
interpretation is incorrect. If it is, it may have to
be changed before next week.
CHAIR BISHOP said he would hold SB 19 for further work.
SENATOR MACKINNON moved to adopt the CS for SB 19,
labeled 29-LS0326\W, as the working document.
CHAIR BISHOP objected for discussion purposes and asked
for public testimony. Finding none, he closed public
testimony.
3:38:11 PM
CHAIR BISHOP announced that without objection version W
is adopted and he would hold SB 19 in committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SB 19 - Example of the Problem.pdf |
SCRA 3/5/2015 3:30:00 PM |
SB 19 |
| SB 19 - Sponsor Statement 2 23 2015.pdf |
SCRA 3/5/2015 3:30:00 PM |
SB 19 |
| SB 19 - Version A.pdf |
SCRA 3/5/2015 3:30:00 PM |
SB 19 |
| SB 43 Letter of Support.pdf |
SCRA 3/5/2015 3:30:00 PM |
SB 43 |
| SB 19 Explanation.pdf |
SCRA 3/5/2015 3:30:00 PM |
SB 19 |
| SB 19 - Fiscal Note.pdf |
SCRA 3/5/2015 3:30:00 PM |
SB 19 |
| CSSB 43 version H.pdf |
SCRA 3/5/2015 3:30:00 PM |
SB 43 |
| SB 19 CRA CS Version W.pdf |
SCRA 3/5/2015 3:30:00 PM |
SB 19 |