Legislature(2001 - 2002)
03/21/2002 03:35 PM Senate STA
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HJR 35-REPEAL ESTATE TAX
HEATH HILYARD, staff for Representative Jeannette James,
introduced HJR 35 and read the following into the record:
This resolution is similar in wording and intent to HJR
34 introduced by Rep. Coghill in the first session of
the twenty first Alaska Legislature. The major reason
we've chosen to revisit this issue is that in 2001,
President Bush signed into law a tax relief act that
included a temporary repeal of the Death tax and that
repeal sunsets in 2010.
To address some of the technical elements of the new
provisions I have included with my sponsor statement a
timeline, prepared by Deloitte & Touche LLP, which
demonstrates the graduated decline in tax rates and the
increasing exemption levels as a result of the 2001
law. Alaska currently has its own Estate tax (AS
43.31) and our rate, and thus the revenue generated, is
driven by the federal law. According to Brett Fried, a
tax economist with the Alaska Dept. of Revenue,
regardless of whether or not the federal repeal becomes
permanent, the temporary repeal will cause Alaska's
revenue stream from this tax will dry up by FY06.
In the same study cited in the sponsor statement, using
very sophisticated econometric models, analysts believe
that had the tax been repealed in 1996 the nation's
economy would have yielded an average of $11 billion in
additional output, created an average of 145,000 new
jobs, and personal income would have increased by an
average of $8 billion over the following nine years.
The overall increase in the national economy would have
created enough additional revenue to compensate for
that which had been generated by the tax.
In a statement of support from NFIB Alaska for HJR 35,
the NFIB states, "In addition to the tax itself,
thousands of small businesses are impacted each year by
expensive fees paid to attorneys, accountants, and life
insurers necessary to prepare for an eventual death tax
debt." Further, an article appearing in Farm Bureau
News published by the American Farm Bureau Federation
states "many farmers and ranchers feel compelled to
spend money for estate planning, an expense that is
drain on ongoing farm operations." In addition to the
NFIB, efforts to permanently repeal this tax enjoy
broad support from the National Black Chamber of
Commerce, the National Association of Women Business
Owners and the National Congress of American Indians
among others.
As indicated in the sponsor statement, not only does
the death tax disproportionately tax several specific
demographic groups, it also does not justify its own
existence from a fiscal perspective costing more to
collect than the revenue it generates.
Finally, I will leave with a quote from President Bush
in a speech given this week to the Women's
entrepreneurship summit, "We must make the repeal of
the death tax permanent. I call upon Congress to do
this immediately."
CHAIRMAN THERRIAULT asked whether the phone call that was
scheduled for the following day from Speaker Hastert was in
regard to the national effort to permanently repeal the estate
tax.
REPRESENTATIVE JEANNETTE JAMES, resolution sponsor, replied it
was for that purpose and she had already had one teleconference
meeting with the U.S House on the issue.
CHAIRMAN THERRIAULT stated that his office received a notice that
contained a copy of a suggested resolution for the Legislature to
consider. He asked whether HJR 35 contained the suggested
language.
MR. HILYARD replied that legislative legal had that basic
document when they drafted the resolution.
CHAIRMAN THERRIAULT noted there was a zero fiscal note. There
were no further questions or additional testimony.
CHAIRMAN THERRIAULT disclosed his wife is an attorney with a
master degree in tax issues.
REPRESENTATIVE JAMES announced she changed the name of the
resolution to "Repeal Estate Tax" from "Repeal Death Tax."
CHAIRMAN THERRIAULT said he appreciated the change.
There was no prepared CS and no proposed amendments.
He asked for the will of the committee.
Senator Davis made a motion to move HJR 35 am and zero fiscal
note from committee with individual recommendations.
There being no objection, HJR 35 am moved from committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|