Legislature(2011 - 2012)HOUSE FINANCE 519
03/14/2012 01:30 PM House FINANCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HCR24 | |
| HB170 | |
| HB250 | |
| HCR23 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | HCR 23 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 170 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HCR 24 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 250 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HOUSE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION NO. 23
Establishing and relating to the Alaska Arctic Policy
Commission.
2:48:10 PM
REPRESENTATIVE REGGIE JOULE, SPONSOR, explained HCR 23. The
Alaska Northern Waters Task Force (ANWTF) was established
in 2010 to identify the opportunities and challenges of a
changing Arctic. Arctic Nations are anticipating the
development of northern shipping routes, mineral
extraction, oil and gas exploration, commercial fisheries,
and tourism. Some of this change has already started to
occur. The ANWT completed its final report on January 30,
2012. The report includes recommendations in six Arctic
policy areas: Governance, Oil & Gas Development, Marine
Transportation, Fisheries, Infrastructure, and Research.
The report is by far the broadest and most detailed
statement of Alaska's Arctic policy to date, yet much work
remains to fully expound upon all the diverse issues that
the Task Force brought forward. While the United States has
an official written Arctic Policy (National Security
Presidential Directive (NSPD)-66), Alaska does not. Most of
the other Arctic Nations and the Northwest Territories
already have established Arctic policies. As the
jurisdiction that makes the United States an Arctic nation
and as the only U.S. state that is home to Arctic
residents, Alaska needs an Arctic policy of its own. Alaska
needs to position itself now regarding the nation's Arctic
policy - Alaska cannot take that leadership role without
understanding what its own priorities should be. This is
especially critical considering the United States will be
chairing the Arctic Council from 2015-2017. The Arctic
Policy Commission will provide the legislature an
opportunity to remain engaged in the ongoing Arctic
dialogue and to help shape future Alaskan Arctic policy.
2:54:04 PM
Representative Costello appreciated the work that had been
done on the issue, and believed it would become more
important as time went on. She asked about the makeup of
the commission. Representative Joule responded that the
Northern Waters Task Force had 11 members. He stated that
municipalities, regional corporations, and conservancies
were represented. He explained that there was some
discovery, over time, which some representation was missing
from the commission. He remarked that industry; university
and research; and native tribes were missing from the
commission. Currently, the membership was at 16 members. He
stated that there was some trouble keeping the membership
small, because of the desire to have all interests
represented.
Co-Chair Stoltze pointed to page 3, lines 14 and 15. He
wondered whether it would be more appropriate to broaden
the language to "university" instead of the "University of
Alaska."
CHRISTINE HESS, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE REGGIE JOULE, would
be open to the idea.
Representative Joule felt that language should be broad
enough to include not only the University of Alaska, but be
open enough to find people who would meet the proper level
of qualification.
Representative Guttenberg felt it was important for the
state to lead the charge in the nation, because Alaska was
on the forefront of Arctic waters management. He
recommended inserting language stating that the commission
can meet as soon as the majority members are appointed. He
remarked that sometimes full membership was not present, so
the commission would not meet.
Representative Joule thought it might be helpful to leave
the language open enough to meet the level of
qualification.
Co-Chair Thomas did not see an environmental person on the
commission. He asked whether the language "or designee"
could be included in the legislation in the event that a
member would not be present.
3:00:46 PM
AT EASE
3:07:03 PM
RECONVENED
Co-Chair Stoltze MOVED Amendment 1:
Page 3, delete language on lines 14-15.
Replace with new language
"One member representing an accredited university or
college in Alaska, who has a background in Arctic
science;"
Co-Chair Thomas OBJECTED for discussion.
Co-Chair Stoltze read the amendment aloud.
Co-Chair Thomas WITHDREW his objection. There being NO
further OBJECTION, Amendment 1 was ADOPTED.
Ms. Hess explained Amendment 2:
Page 3, line 20 add
(J) one member representing a statewide environmental
organization
(K) 4 alternates will be appointed
Co-Chair Stoltze asked whether it would be more appropriate
to say a member from the conservation community.
Ms. Hess adjusted Amendment 2 to read:
Page 3, line 20 add
(J) one member representing a statewide conservation
organization
(K) 4 alternates will be appointed
Representative Edgmon wondered if it would be more
appropriate to use the language "conservation community."
Representative Edgmon MOVED to AMEND Amendment 2. He
explained that the amendment would change the wording in
subsection (J) to read:
"one member representing the conservation community."
There being NO OBJECTION Amendment 2 was ADOPTED as
AMENDED.
CHRIS HLADICK, CITY MANAGER, CITY OF UNALASKA, testified in
support of HCR 23. He stated that there had been a great
reception at the Coast Guard briefing on the Northern
Waters Task Force. He believed the commission would work
well with the governor's office and the federal government.
He expressed that all Alaskans would be impacted by events
in the future related to shipping over the North Pole and
other Arctic areas. He believed the policy commission could
help work through the mountain of information regarding the
Arctic waters, and he appreciated the opportunity to
testify.
3:13:34 PM
Representative Edgmon explained that when he was chair of
the Fisheries Committee in 2009 built around Mr. Hladick's
contributions about this subject. He stated that there was
not a central point of contact for Arctic issues, and was
grateful that there was a continuation of multi-
disciplinary information.
Co-Chair Thomas CLOSED public testimony.
Representative Neuman supported the legislation. He had
been involved in two caucuses regarding Arctic issues. He
stated that there had been a move by President Obama to
create council that would have oversight or management on
all federal waters, and he believed it would subvert the
current public process. He declared that the ability for
Alaska to have a say would be critical to the state. He
stated that Commissioner Cora Campbell had sent two letters
to the federal government on the issue. The legislation
would give Alaska a voice in a big way. He felt that former
Attorney General Burns was correct in that the issue was
one of the largest that would impact Alaska in the upcoming
10 years.
Representative Doogan communicated that what was happening
in the Arctic was a very significant issue. He thanked
Representative Joule for his work.
Co-Chair Stoltze believed the process had been very
inclusive. He recognized the hard work that went into the
legislation.
Representative Gara commended Representative Joule for his
patience on the issue. He agreed that the issue was one of
the most important unaddressed issues. He could not say
that he agreed with various republican and democratic
presidents over the years.
3:23:49 PM
Vice-chair Fairclough stated that she and Representative
Joule met with individuals who had been assigned to start
implementing the Federal Ocean Counsel Policy. She stressed
that the Ocean Policy Counsel was a much different, and
critical issue in Alaska.
Representative Joule stated that the policy commission was
timely because the U.S. and Canada would be working very
closely over the upcoming four years. He opined that it was
amazing what outside people did not know about Alaska, and
the way that budget decisions were made. The legislature
was engaged and should remain engaged in the process.
Co-Chair Thomas noted that Southeast was part of Alaska.
Vice-chair Fairclough discussed the fiscal note 1 was
changed to make the committee a 17 member commission
instead of a 16 member commission.
Vice-chair Fairclough MOVED to report CSHCR 23(FIN) out of
committee with individual recommendations and the
accompanying fiscal note. There being NO OBJECTION, it was
so ordered.
CSHCR 23(FIN) was REPORTED out of committee with a "do
pass" recommendation and with one new fiscal note by the
House Finance Committee for the Legislature.
Co-Chair Stoltze discussed the schedule for the following
day.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| Letters of Support HCR23.pdf |
HFIN 3/14/2012 1:30:00 PM |
HCR 23 |
| HCR23 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HFIN 3/14/2012 1:30:00 PM |
HCR 23 |
| HCR23 National Security Arctic Directive.PDF |
HFIN 3/14/2012 1:30:00 PM |
HCR 23 |
| HCR23 CAFP_brochure_PECA-eng.pdf |
HFIN 3/14/2012 1:30:00 PM |
HCR 23 |
| HCR23 ASRC, NANA Letter.PDF |
HFIN 3/14/2012 1:30:00 PM |
HCR 23 |
| HCR 23 LINKS to Backup Documents.pdf |
HFIN 3/14/2012 1:30:00 PM |
HCR 23 |
| Letter of Support Re State of Alaska HCR 23.pdf |
HFIN 3/14/2012 1:30:00 PM |
HCR 23 |
| HB250 DCCED-AEA- 031412-NEW Fiscal Note.pdf |
HFIN 3/14/2012 1:30:00 PM |
HB 250 |
| Letter to Rep.Doogan.pdf |
HFIN 3/14/2012 1:30:00 PM |
SB 171 |