Legislature(2017 - 2018)GRUENBERG 120
04/03/2018 03:15 PM House STATE AFFAIRS
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| Presentation(s): Overview of Permanent Fund Proposals | |
| HB407 | |
| SCR17 | |
| SB163 | |
| Approval of Introduction of Potential Committee Legislation | |
| HB83 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| *+ | HB 407 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SCR 17 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 163 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 83 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HB 407-APOC; CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS/REPORTING
4:40:57 PM
CHAIR KREISS-TOMKINS announced that the next order of business
would be HOUSE BILL NO. 407, "An Act relating to the duties of
the Alaska Public Offices Commission; clarifying the limits on
making, accepting, and reporting certain cash campaign
contributions; relating to campaign finance reporting by certain
groups; relating to the identification of certain campaign
communications; increasing the time the Alaska Public Offices
Commission has to respond to a request for an advisory opinion;
repealing a reporting requirement for certain contributions;
relating to propositions and initiative proposals; and providing
for an effective date."
4:40:30 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KREISS-TOMKINS related that this was a committee
bill that was previously discussed. He asked his staff to
present an overview of the bill. He reminded members that the
bill contained statute changes resulting from the House Finance
Subcommittee process.
4:40:44 PM
CATHY SCHLINGHEYDE, Staff, Representative Jonathan Kreiss-
Tomkins, Alaska State Legislature, reiterated that the bill
contained recommendations by the Department of Administration
Finance subcommittee.
MS. SCHLINGHEYDE paraphrased the sponsor statement for HB 407,
which read as follows [original punctuation provided]:
The Alaska Public Offices Commission (APOC) has seen a
42.4% reduction in UGF since the FY15 management plan,
resulting in the loss of six positions. HB 407 would
streamline reporting requirements to allow APOC to
operate more efficiently within the current budgetary
restraints.
HB 407 increases APOC efficiency by also easing the
auditing requirements, allowing APOC to exercise
discretion when reviewing reports and statements,
eliminating duplicative reporting, extending response
times for advisory opinions, and extending small
campaign reporting exemptions to groups.
In addition to the streamlining measures, HB 407
provides needed clarification by specifying the
requirements of "paid for" lines on campaign
communications and defining a calendar year for cash
contribution limits.
APOC provides an important public service ensuring the
enforcement of campaign finance ethics requirements.
HB 407 allows APOC to complete their mission more
efficiently and cost effectively.
4:40:58 PM
MS. SCHLINGHEYDE reviewed the section-by-section analysis for HB
407, titled "HB 407 - APOC; Campaign Contributions/Reporting,
Sectional Analysis, which read as follows [original punctuation
provided]:
Section 1: This section eases the report auditing
requirements by removing the word all. The change
allows APOC to strategically select reports and
statements to audit.
Section 2: This section inserts calendar to clarify
confusion on the definition of year in regards to
reporting contributions.
Section 3: This section extends the small campaign
reporting exemptions to groups in addition to
individuals. The minimum threshold for groups to
report would be raising or expending $2,500 in a
calendar year.
Section 4: This section renumbers the statute to
accommodate the changes in Section 3.
Section 5: This section inserts calendar to clarify
confusion on the definition of year in regards to the
cap on candidate's acceptance cash contributions.
Section 6: This section inserts calendar to clarify
confusion on the definition of year in regards to the
cap on donating cash contributions.
Section 7: This section provides standardized rules to
ensure the readability of paid for lines in campaign
communications.
Section 8: This section extends by three days the time
allowed for APOC to provide an advisory opinion.
Section 9: This section eliminates duplicative
reporting of contributions to ballot initiatives by
removing the requirement that donors self-report in
addition to the campaign's report.
Section 10: This section sets an effective date of
January 1, 2019, after the conclusion of the current
election cycle.
4:41:00 PM
MS. SCHLINGHEYDE said that Section 1 allowed the APOC to
have the discretion in report auditing to review specific
documents, not necessarily every document that is
submitted. Sections 2, 5, and 6 all insert the word
calendar to clarify the definition of year, which has been
disputed. Section 3, small campaigns for individuals, have
a minimum reporting threshold and this allows groups to
have a minimum reporting threshold as well. The minimum
threshold for groups to report would be raising or
expending $2,500 in a calendar year.
4:41:25 PM
MS. SCHLINGHEYDE related that Section 4 was statutory
cleanup to renumber based on Section 3. Section 7
specified the requirement for paid for lines in campaign
communications. Section 8 would extend by three days the
time allowed for APOC to issue an advisory opinion due to
their decreased staffing capacity.
MS. SCHLINGHEYDE related that Section 9 states that ballot
initiative donors do not have to submit duplicative reports
when the campaigns were already reporting those
contributions, which means APOC only needs to process them
once and not twice. Section 10 would set an effective date
of January 1, 2019, after the conclusion of the current
election cycle.
4:42:00 PM
REPRESENTATIVE TUCK asked for further clarification on Section
9.
MS. SCHLINGHEYDE responded that for ballot initiatives, the
campaign must report donors who contribute above $500; however,
the donors must also fill out a form, form 15-5, and if they do
not the donors are subject to fines. Concern has been expressed
that APOC must process the reporting twice and must "track down"
people who are not aware of the reporting requirement. She said
this tended to create excess paperwork with no additional
reports.
4:42:45 PM
REPRESENTATIVE TUCK expressed concern on how one would know
someone was reporting unless it was checked on both sides. He
also had the same concern that donors might not know the need to
do so. He suggested that perhaps there should be a disclosure
printed on the donation envelopes, so people would be informed.
MS. SCHLINGHEYDE clarified that this only applied to ballot
initiatives and not to other campaign donations.
4:43:32 PM
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX recalled that years ago both candidates
and donors had to report; however, most donors did not know they
needed to report these donations, so it was ultimately changed.
She offered her belief that this was in keeping with regular
political campaigns. In fact, she was surprised it had not been
changed already. In response to Representative Tuck's earlier
concern, she stated that the same logic would apply to regular
political campaigns.
REPRESENTATIVE TUCK agreed but otherwise it was by faith. He
offered his belief that the reason for a public process was to
provide transparency.
4:44:46 PM
REPRESENTATIVE BIRCH offered he had personal experience with a
contributor to a campaign in which the donation was reported and
the contributor did not report separately. The information was
complete, but it was not reported in duplicate, he said. He
offered his belief that it was reasonable to update this.
4:45:12 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KNOPP referred to Section 8. He said it would
not necessarily extend by three days the advisory opinion. He
offered his belief that it would double the time by changing the
language from 7 days to 10 business days would actually amount
to 14 total days. He asked for further clarification as to the
reasonableness of the length of time and how time sensitive the
opinion would be.
4:46:05 PM
HEATHER HEBDON, Executive Director, Alaska Public Offices
Commission (APOC), Department of Administration, responded that
was correct. She said this would extend the requirement for
issuing draft advisory opinions by allowing an additional five
days. While the APOC understood it could be critical to the
requestor, it would reduce unnecessary overtime at the APOC
office. She pointed out that the APOC drafts were also reviewed
by the Department of Law (DOL) prior to issuance. She said this
change would allow APOC to reduce overtime costs.
4:46:56 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KNOPP asked for further clarification on whether
it would be critical from the individual or organization's
perspective that requests an advisory opinion and if any of the
advisory opinions would be time-sensitive.
MS. HEBDON answered that it was difficult to answer without
specific facts. She said that APOC receives simple and
straight-forward questions. The majority of times, the
requestor has already contacted staff and has a general idea of
which direction the agency was going. This would formalize it
and get APOC's approval.
4:47:56 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KNOPP asked whether it was fair to say that if
APOC realized some urgency in the advisory opinion, it would be
prioritized.
MS. HEBDON answered absolutely; that just because the bill
extended the time to 10 days would not mean the commission could
not complete the advisory opinion and have it reviewed by DOL
sooner.
4:48:43 PM
REPRESENTATIVE TUCK referred to Section 3 but decided he did not
have a question.
4:49:00 PM
CHAIR KREISS-TOMKINS announced HB 407 would be held over.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB407 Sponsor Statement 4.2.18.pdf |
HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 407 |
| HB 407 Sectional Analysis 4.2.18.pdf |
HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 407 |
| HB407 ver D 4.2.18.pdf |
HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 407 |
| HB407 Fiscal Note 4.2.18.pdf |
HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 407 |
| SCR 17 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HSTA 3/22/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM |
SCR 17 |
| SCR017A.PDF |
HSTA 3/22/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM |
SCR 17 |
| SCR 17 Fiscal Note.pdf |
HSTA 3/22/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM |
SCR 17 |
| SCR 17 Support CDVSA 2015 Victimization Survey.pdf |
HSTA 3/22/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM |
SCR 17 |
| SCR 17 Support Ltr Women.pdf |
HSTA 3/22/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM |
SCR 17 |
| SCR 17 Support Materials 2018 Theme.pdf |
HSTA 3/22/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM |
SCR 17 |
| SCR 17 Support Materials CDC National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey.pdf |
HSTA 3/22/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM |
SCR 17 |
| SCR 17 Support Materials News Article 11.20.2016.pdf |
HSTA 3/22/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM |
SCR 17 |
| SB163 Sponsor Statement 3.28.18.pdf |
HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM |
SB 163 |
| SB163 ver D 3.28.18.pdf |
HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM |
SB 163 |
| SB163 Fiscal Note DOT-MSCVE 3.28.18.pdf |
HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM |
SB 163 |
| HB083 Sponsor Statement 2.28.17.pdf |
HSTA 3/20/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/22/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 83 |
| HB083 Sectional Analysis 2.28.18.pdf |
HSTA 3/20/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/22/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 83 |
| HB083 ver N 2.20.18.pdf |
HSTA 3/20/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/22/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 83 |
| HB083 Fiscal Note DOA-COM 2.9.18.pdf |
HSTA 3/20/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/22/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 83 |
| HB083 Fiscal Note DOA-DRB 2.9.18.pdf |
HSTA 3/20/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/22/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 83 |
| HB083 Supporting Document - 401k retirement readiness 4.18.17.pdf |
HSTA 3/20/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/22/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 83 |
| HB083 Supporting Document - Alaska Comparable Plans 4.18.17.pdf |
HSTA 3/20/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/22/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 83 |
| HB083 Supporting Document - Compare DB to DC access 4.18.17.pdf |
HSTA 3/20/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/22/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 83 |
| HB083 Oakley Presentation.pdf |
HSTA 3/20/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/22/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 83 |
| HB083 Letters of Support 2.28.18.pdf |
HSTA 3/20/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/22/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 83 |
| HB 83 ver T 4.2.18.pdf |
HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 83 |
| HB83 Explanation of changes from ver N to ver T 4.3.18.pdf |
HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 83 |
| HB83 Legal Memorandum on ver T 4.2.18.pdf |
HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 83 |
| Work Draft 30-LS1526 ver D 4.2.18.pdf |
HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM |
|
| Work Draft 30-LS1526 ver D Sectional Analysis 4.2.18.pdf |
HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM |
|
| Overview of Permanent Fund Proposals Presentation 3.29.18.pdf |
HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM |