Legislature(2009 - 2010)BARNES 124
03/09/2010 10:15 AM House FISHERIES
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB46 | |
| HB365 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HCR 15 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 46 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 365 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HB 365-FISH PROCESSOR FEES, LICENSES, RECORDS
11:05:44 AM
CHAIR EDGMON announced that the final order of business would be
HOUSE BILL NO. 365, "An Act relating to sharing records
regarding fish purchased by fish processors with certain federal
agencies, to requirements to obtain and maintain a fisheries
business license, and to payment of industry fees required of
fish processors; and providing for an effective date."
11:05:44 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MILLETT informed the committee HB 365 is a
continuation of a fishery capacity reduction program enacted by
the legislature in 2002, commonly known as the "buyback"
program. She read from a letter submitted by the Commercial
Fisheries Entry Commission (CFEC) dated 3/2/10, a copy of which
was provided in the committee packet [original punctuation
provided]:
HB 365 is simply an accounting procedure modification
to make the program operate more efficiently and allow
the lender to monitor the capacity of the reduction
loan repayment. It does not change the program
established in 2002 in any way....
HB 365 will allow the National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS) access to confidential state records
and reports through an exception to AS 16.05.815(a).
This is not an unusual request since a dozen other
exceptions have been granted in statute, including
NMFS but for purposes of fishery management and
enforcement. This legislation is necessary since it
is the State of Alaska that maintains the fish ticket
harvest data and fish processor annual reports. This
exception will provide assurance to NMFS that they are
receiving the proper repayment of their loan....
The original legislation in 2002 was supported by the
Alaska fishing community and had overwhelming
legislative support in both the House and Senate, as
did the 2006 modification. This support stemmed from
the fact that the program was initiated by fishermen
for fishermen, it is a voluntary program (no one will
be forced to sell their limited entry permit), the
program requires a majority vote of all the fishermen
to implement the loan agreement, the fishery
association will have access to federal funds of $21
million through the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act, there is little State
expense or administration, the State maintains all its
responsibility to manage its fisheries in the future
should conservation or economic conditions change, and
the program has had a history of legislative support.
REPRESENTATIVE MILLETT asked the committee to consider the bill
in order to continue to sustain a healthy and vibrant fishery in
Southeast.
11:08:02 AM
FRANK HOMAN, Chairman/Commissioner, Commercial Fisheries Entry
Commission (CFEC), Alaska Department of Fish & Game (ADF&G),
explained the program is available to any fishery throughout the
state; thus, Southeast seiners developed an association to seek
federal funding for a buyback loan that will be repaid by the
fishermen. He stressed that this is a voluntary program, and
only works in regions where the fishermen "come together and
want to do this." In the last decade, the seiners in Southeast
have only been fishing about one-half of their permits because
of high costs and low prices for fish. He opined the program
gives the remaining fishermen an opportunity to "take the chance
with the future and to buy out the permits not fished which
would enable them, those remaining, to improve their economic
condition in the future."
11:10:54 AM
REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON asked about the permanence of the
program, given market changes and state constitutional issues.
11:11:40 AM
MR. HOMAN advised that one of the features allows the state to
maintain its responsibility to the fishery; in fact, the Limited
Entry Act states that if changes occur, the state has the
opportunity to analyze a fishery through an "optimum number
study." Furthermore, if a fishery becomes too exclusive, the
state may issue more permits into that fishery. As a protection
for the fishermen, modification legislation enacted in 2006
directed that the proceeds from the new permits would be used to
pay off any loan balance.
11:13:51 AM
REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON pointed out that the 2006 legislation
does not "trump the constitution, which says that ... we have
rights to the resources that are owned by the people..."
Although in support of the buyback program, he cautioned that
only a state constitutional amendment will guarantee the
permanence of the program. However, passage of a constitutional
amendment may create "privileged groups," in fact, some
fisheries are close to this situation already, and opening the
fishery may cause a "false economy," subject to lawsuits.
Representative Johnson warned that the state may be caught in
the middle, and he asked that the record reflect his intention
to protect the resource by the guarantee of limited entry,
although "the courts are going to end up deciding, probably."
11:15:36 AM
MR. HOMAN agreed that issues over limited entry may be
determined by the courts; however, he did not anticipate that
the changes in the fishery that would cause this to happen are
coming. He opined that if the statutes were changed, and new
permits were not allowed, the court would "see that as an
overreaching limitation."
11:16:49 AM
REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON applauded the association in Southeast
that has brought this legislation forward; however, a law must
work throughout the state, and he asked, "If you took this model
and put it in Bristol Bay, or ... put it in Cook Inlet, what
would it look like?"
11:17:46 AM
MR. HOMAN explained that the program is available to other
regions if they form a fishery association, under state statute,
and seek a comprehensive group of fishermen to work with the
federal government. In addition, there are other methods
available, such as assessing themselves upfront and collecting
money to buy permits back. He assured the committee the program
is available now to other regions, if there are unused permits,
as an opportunity to reduce the fleet.
11:19:19 AM
REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON restated his support of the program;
however, he would like to see further assurance of permanence.
11:20:35 AM
CHAIR EDGMON opened public testimony.
11:20:49 AM
BRAD HANES, commercial fisherman, informed the committee he was
a fourth generation purse seiner, beginning his fishing career
when he was 18 years old. He spoke in support of the bill, even
though it meant "putting a tax on myself."
11:21:59 AM
BRYAN BENKMAN, commercial fisherman; member, Southeast Alaska
Seiners Association (SEAS), informed the committee he has been
fishing in Southeast since 1973. He recalled that the fishery
was overcapitalized in the '80s and '90s, but in the last decade
the number of fisherman has dropped, making this a good time to
pursue the buyback. He supported the opportunity to stabilize
the fishery.
11:23:44 AM
SETH WYMAN, commercial fisherman; board member, SEAS, stated he
and his organization support HB 365, and that members of the
association are willing to tax themselves to make the fishery
stable and more beneficial to the industry.
11:24:56 AM
SVEN STROUSE(ph), commercial fisherman; board member, SEAS, also
stated support for HB 365 on behalf of the association, saying
that the legislation will maintain the economic viability of the
fishery for the future.
11:25:53 AM
RANDY STEWART, Vice President, SEAS, said he was representing
himself and the association. He assured the committee that the
bill will not cause the cost of permits to rise, or restrict
access to the fishery; in fact, in 1977, when he began fishing,
a newcomer still needed help with financing to enter the
fishery. Mr. Stewart recalled that the implementation of
limited entry provided stability to the fishery. The value of
the permit is a small portion of the cost to enter a fishery, as
the cost of becoming a commercial fisherman is too high for any
young person on his/her own. Potential investors will look at
the stability of the industry prior to making an investment or
loan, and the possibility of 170-200 returning permits is a
destabilizing factor. Mr. Stewart expressed his personal
interest in an industry that is not exclusive, but is profitable
and would attract buyers to purchase permits that come on the
market. He concluded that the bill will provide a stabilizing
influence.
11:29:12 AM
DAN CASTLE, President, SEAS; board member, Southeast
Revitalization Association (SRA), stated he was representing
himself, SEAS, and SRA. He related that SRA was tasked with
building this program 10 years ago by securing money and
extinguishing latent permits. He described the development of
the program, and opined HB 365 simply provides a collection
vehicle to collect the money from the fishermen and repay the
loan. Mr. Castle urged the committee to move the bill.
11:31:36 AM
BOB THORSTENSON, Executive Director, SEAS, stated that he was
speaking on behalf of himself and his constituents. He stressed
the importance of the bill and that it was written over an
entire decade. Regarding the permanence issue, he cautioned
that the bill addresses this in the best way possible without "a
series of optimum number studies." He shared Representative
Johnson's desire to deal with the optimum number of permits in a
different manner; however, this risk will be taken by the
fishermen, as the language in the 2006 legislation says the
state "may" use the resulting funds from reissued permits to
reimburse the association. Mr. Thorstenson recalled that the
first round to purchase permits retired 35 permits with a
percentage of non-resident permit holders at about 80 percent.
He predicted that after consolidation, Petersburg will hold
about 22 percent of the permits. He pointed out the state
legislature began this process in 2002, and the association has
worked for eight and one-half years to secure the twenty-one
million dollar loan.
11:34:34 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MUNOZ asked whether the processors supported the
buyback program in 2002.
11:34:42 AM
MR. THORSTENSON said yes. In fact, in 2003, letters of support
were received from every major processor. He understood the
concern of the processing sector about the recent price
fluctuations; however, those are cyclical swings. He expressed
his belief that a larger fleet does not mean more fish will be
caught. He advised that there was full support to pursue this
program recently.
11:36:38 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MUNOZ further asked whether the buyback program
will have any effect on existing active permits.
MR. THORSTENSON said no active permits will be removed in
Southeast unless they are offered for sale. The legislation
also pertains to other regions.
11:38:10 AM
NIK NEBL, commercial fisherman; member, SEAS, said he was
representing himself and the association. He observed that the
state, through the commercial fishing loan fund, provided access
to the fishing industry for those with a desire to be fishermen.
Mr. Nebl obtained a commercial loan from 1984-1994, through the
"ups and downs" of the industry, until he became a permit
holder. He expressed his hope that this legislation will
stabilize the industry for newcomers, and help families keep
fishing.
11:39:54 AM
BRUCE WALLACE, commercial fisherman, stated he has been a
fisherman since 1970, and he purchased a limited entry permit at
the inception of the program in 1976. His experience in the
industry is broad, and he has found that most aspects of a
fishery cannot have certainty. Fish products can be enhanced
and well-managed, but these factors do not control the biology
of a fishery. On the other hand, there is some ability to
control the market. Mr. Wallace advised that the bill closes a
promise that was made in the limited entry law over a decade
ago, before the target goal of 300 permits in Southeast was
artificially inflated by legal action. After a decade of
effort, the fleet "stayed with it" and has reached closure. He
asked for the committee's support of the bill.
11:43:02 AM
GARY HAYNES, commercial fisherman, said that he is a lifelong
resident of Ketchikan. Mr. Haynes recalled lobbying for the
Limited Entry Act in 1974, which he thought was a stabilizing
measure for the industry then. He has been running his boat
since 1976, and feels strongly that HB 365 is another great tool
for stabilization, as was limited entry.
11:44:18 AM
SCOTT MCALLISTER, commercial fishermen, agreed with Mr. Wallace
that this legislation "closes a deal that was kind of, was
implied in the original Limited Entry Act." His understanding
was that the act provided for optimum and maximum numbers of
permits. This left open the possibility for buyback; however,
the bill preserves the commerce in commercial fishing, which is
in competition with all of the other elements and aspects of
fishing in the state. He concluded that the bill ensures the
balance and stability of commercial fishing in the future, with
the possibility of achieving the optimum number of permits
within a fishery "and hav[ing] a future, stable, commercial
future for the participants in that fishery."
11:46:35 AM
JERRY MCCUNE, representative, United Fisherman of Alaska (UFA),
stated UFA supports the bill. In his role on the restructuring
panel on the Board of Fisheries, and working on the legislation
in 2000, he heard from fishermen that they supported the bill
because it is voluntary. No one can be forced out of the
fishery; therefore, UFA supports the action by SEAS and the vote
of the fishermen. He expressed his hope that the program is
successful.
REPRESENTATIVE MUNOZ asked what length of time is used to
determine that a permit is latent.
MR. MCCUNE advised that a permit must be renewed every two
years, and a permit holder who has not fished in four years
would be considered latent.
CHAIR EDGMON observed the chairman of the CFEC is indicating his
agreement with Mr. McCune's answer.
11:49:23 AM
MITCH EIDE, commercial fisherman; board member, SEAS, said he
was a lifelong Petersburg resident representing himself and the
association. He stated that the younger fishermen are willing
to pay a tax for 25 years because this legislation is important
for the future stability of the fishery. Mr. Eide urged the
committee to pass the bill.
11:50:12 AM
CHAIR EDGMON closed public testimony, and stated that the bill
would be held [HB 365 was held over.]
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HCR 15 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HFSH 3/9/2010 10:15:00 AM |
HCR 15 |
| HCR 15--AK Miners Assc Ltr 2.15.2010.PDF |
HFSH 3/9/2010 10:15:00 AM |
HCR 15 |
| HB 365--Sponsor Statement.PDF |
HFSH 3/9/2010 10:15:00 AM |
HB 365 |
| HB 365--UFA Ltr..PDF |
HFSH 3/9/2010 10:15:00 AM |
HB 365 |
| HB 365--SE AK Seiners Assoc Ltr..PDF |
HFSH 3/9/2010 10:15:00 AM |
HB 365 |
| HB365--CFEC Info on SE Seiners.PDF |
HFSH 3/9/2010 10:15:00 AM |
HB 365 |
| HB 365--AS 16.40.250.PDF |
HFSH 3/9/2010 10:15:00 AM |
HB 365 |
| HB 365--Capacity Reduction Summary-SE Revitalization Assn.PDF |
HFSH 3/9/2010 10:15:00 AM |
HB 365 |
| HB 365--Sec. 121 US Public Law 109-479 2007.PDF |
HFSH 3/9/2010 10:15:00 AM |
HB 365 |
| HB 46--Munoz, Johnson, et al to AG.PDF |
HFSH 3/9/2010 10:15:00 AM |
HB 46 |
| HB 46--AG to Munoz, Johnson, et al.PDF |
HFSH 3/9/2010 10:15:00 AM |
HB 46 |
| HB365-DFG-CFEC-03-05-10 Fiscal Note.pdf |
HFSH 3/9/2010 10:15:00 AM |
HB 365 |
| HB 365--SE Fishermen's Alliance Ltr.pdf |
HFSH 3/9/2010 10:15:00 AM |
HB 365 |
| HB 365--CFEC Ltr..PDF |
HFSH 3/9/2010 10:15:00 AM |
HB 365 |
| HB 365--Sectional Analysis.PDF |
HFSH 3/9/2010 10:15:00 AM |
HB 365 |
| HCR15-LEG-COU-3-8-2010 Fiscal Note.pdf |
HFSH 3/9/2010 10:15:00 AM |
HCR 15 |
| HCR 15--United Fishermen of Alaska Letter.PDF |
HFSH 3/9/2010 10:15:00 AM |
HCR 15 |
| HCR 15--BBEDC Letter of Support.pdf |
HFSH 3/9/2010 10:15:00 AM |
HCR 15 |
| HCR 15--Trident Seafoods Ltr..pdf |
HFSH 3/9/2010 10:15:00 AM |
HCR 15 |
| HCR 15--BBNC Ltr.pdf |
HFSH 3/9/2010 10:15:00 AM |
HCR 15 |
| HB365-REV-TAX-03-08-10 Fiscal Note.pdf |
HFSH 3/9/2010 10:15:00 AM |
HB 365 |
| HCR 15--Peter Pan Ltr.pdf |
HFSH 3/9/2010 10:15:00 AM |
HCR 15 |
| HCR 15--BBNA Ltr.PDF |
HFSH 3/9/2010 10:15:00 AM |
HCR 15 |