Legislature(2017 - 2018)BARNES 124
03/05/2018 01:00 PM House RESOURCES
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB355 | |
| Presentation(s): Food Security in Alaska | |
| Presentation(s): Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 355 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HB 355-FIRE;FOREST LAND; CRIMES;FIRE PREVENTION
1:05:22 PM
CO-CHAIR TARR announced that the first order of business would
be HOUSE BILL NO. 355, "An Act relating to the crime of
criminally negligent burning; relating to protection of and fire
management on forested land; relating to prohibited acts and
penalties for prohibited acts on forested land; and providing
for an effective date."
1:06:22 PM
REPRESENTATIVE DAVID GUTTENBERG, Alaska State Legislature, as
prime sponsor, presented HB 355. He explained that HB 355
addresses fire safety, suppression, and education. The bill
seeks to restructure the way fines are levied, called a bail,
which is whether a person receives a ticket, or goes to court,
or is pursued because of deliberately setting a fire that caused
considerable damage. The bill also includes a component
addressing fire safety, as well as clarifies the authority of
fire prevention officers to enter private property to
investigate fires. Currently, if it is post-fire and fire
prevention officers need to investigate, they must receive the
property owner's permission and without said permission, they
need to obtain a warrant for access.
1:07:36 PM
REPRESENTATIVE TUCK asked if a subpoena is required for access.
REPRESENTATIVE GUTTENBERG replied that if a [wildland] fire goes
through private property, fire prevention officers can access
the property to suppress, control, and put out the fire.
However, to further investigate after the fire, officers must
have the property owner's permission or obtain a warrant if
permission is denied.
1:09:10 PM
REPRESENTATIVE RAUSCHER moved to adopt Amendment 1, labeled 30-
LS1382\D.2, Radford, 3/1/18, which read:
Page 2, lines 10 - 11:
Delete "or a destructive agent"
Insert "[OR A DESTRUCTIVE AGENT]"
Page 2, line 12:
Delete "at any time"
Insert ", when responding to a wildland fire or
suspected fire, [AT ANY TIME]"
Page 2, lines 14 - 15:
Delete "or a destructive agent"
Insert "[OR A DESTRUCTIVE AGENT]"
CO-CHAIR JOSEPHSON objected for discussion purposes.
1:09:35 PM
REPRESENTATIVE RAUSCHER explained Amendment 1 limits the times
when forestry officials can enter private property by deleting
the words "at any time" and inserting "when responding to a
wildland fire or suspected fire," and deletes "or a destructive
agent." He said the amendment preserves the property rights and
the privacy of property owners. He acknowledged officials need
to investigate nearby properties during a fire and immediately
after, but [without the amendment] officials could enter private
properties at a much later time.
1:11:35 PM
REPRESENTATIVE JOSEPHSON questioned why Amendment 1 deletes and
inserts "or a destructive agent."
REPRESENTATIVE RAUSCHER said the definition of destructive agent
includes bugs, which is not a valid reason to access one's
private property at any time.
1:12:38 PM
ANNE NELSON, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Natural
Resources Section, Civil Division (Anchorage), Department of Law
(DOL), stated she was also confused by whether the intent of the
amendment was to remove "destructive agent".
The committee took a brief at-ease.
1:14:18 PM
DARRELL BREESE, Staff, Representative George Rauscher, Alaska
State Legislature, said the definition of destructive agent is
found in AS 41.15.170 as follows:
destructive agent means an insect, pathogen or other
environmental agent that causes damage to a forest
resource
MR. BREESE further explained that Division of Forestry
regulation 41 AAC 9595 places the onus for addressing insect
infestation wholly on the property owner with the division's
approval or disapproval of the method the property owner is
using. As written, the amendment would delete language from
both HB 355 and from existing statute by the bracketed language.
1:15:40 PM
CO-CHAIR TARR requested Mr. Chris Maisch to speak to why
"destructive agent" is in current statute and whether removing
that term would be a problem.
1:15:40 PM
CHRIS MAISCH, State Forester, Director, Division of Forestry,
Department of Natural Resources (DNR), stated that AS 41.15.020
gives the DNR commissioner the power to make regulations related
to fires and destructive agents and that this definition [of a
destructive agent] is used in numerous places in statute. For
example, in an emergency the commissioner can declare a zone of
infestation and then emergency regulations to address something
such as a bark beetle outbreak. He advised that in its history
the Division of Forestry has not needed to make use of this
statutory authority, but it exists for that reason.
1:17:13 PM
CO-CHAIR JOSEPHSON posited that the amendment would prevent a
fire officer right of entry to forested land to address a
destructive agent, and an officer would only have right of entry
when responding to a wildland fire or a suspected fire. He
surmised the amendment's goal of protecting the privacy of
private property owners reaches across public lands.
MR. MAISCH replied that his comments were narrowed to the
"destructive agent" piece, but that the aforementioned would be
a concern. He said the division has other authority to declare
a zone of infestation to address an issue of insects or disease,
although he would read the amendment narrowly as Co-Chair
Josephson described when it refers to wildland fire or suspected
fire and that there could be some potential conflicts between
the two.
CO-CHAIR JOSEPHSON stated he has some concerns about the
expansiveness of this section under the bill and under current
law. He said his understanding of criminal procedure is that a
person could still file motion practice and say notwithstanding
this statute or this bill, something should be suppressed
because someone's rights weren't read to them or a warrant
should have issued, although one would think that this might
support the state's argument that a warrant wasn't always
necessary. He said he is making the point that there could
still be an assortment of motion practice in criminal court
theoretically.
1:19:46 PM
REPRESENTATIVE BIRCH observed the term destructive agent appears
in multiple locations in the bill and the bill title relates
generally to burning, negligent burning, and everything related
to fire. He asked whether the division can quarantine property
due to issues such as dead standing trees on public or private
land, without consent of the property owner.
MR. MAISCH responded he could not envision a unilateral case in
which the division would enter property without first going
through forest practices statutory authority involving the
commissioner and a best interest finding to establish a zone of
infestation, which could be insects, diseases, or other
pathogens, and then enacting emergency regulations on how the
division would intend to deal with that, which could mean
treatments on private lands. There would be a more exhaustive
process for the division to go through besides just making a
unilateral decision that it would take action under this
statute. This statute is really focused on the fire piece.
REPRESENTATIVE BIRCH surmised this accommodation currently
exists.
MR. MAISCH answered correct.
MR. BREESE pointed out that the section that would be amended by
Amendment 1, AS 41.15.040, deals specifically with the right of
entry to control and to suppress fires. So, if this section is
amended, the Division of Forestry would still have a right to
enter for any other reasons, such as insect infestation. The
changes suggested by the amendment are to limit the entry when
[the division] is controlling and suppressing fires.
1:22:49 PM
REPRESENTATIVE PARISH expressed his concern about denying [state
fire officers] access to land to prevent a fire, to investigate
a negligent fire, or to investigate after a fire. He said
Amendment 1 is overly restrictive and he cannot support it.
REPRESENTATIVE DRUMMOND noted the state forester did not
indicate a destructive agent has been an issue for the division.
Furthermore, she said, if insects, diseases, or pathogens
contribute to fire danger by killing trees, the destructive
agent language must be part of the assessment in fire prevention
by the division, and there is no reason to remove it. She said
she therefore cannot support Amendment 1.
REPRESENTATIVE JOSEPHSON stated he opposes Amendment 1. The law
as written allows a fire officer to enter public and private
land to prevent prospective fires because of destructive agents
such as bug infestations, he said, and he doesn't have enough
knowledge to say that that should be prohibited. He further
cautioned against encumbering a fire official's ability to
access and inspect public land.
1:26:19 PM
REPRESENTATIVE TUCK asked whether a destructive agent could be
something that may be administered to prevent insect
infestation. He requested clarification on the intent of
existing statute regarding destructive agent.
MR. MAISCH responded that destructive agent is defined in
statute and means insect pathogen or environmental agent that
can cause damage to the forest resource. Whatever the cause,
standing dead timber is a more receptive and dangerous fuel
source to wildland fire than is a standing green forest.
Destructive agent is rather broad, but in the context of
forestry operations, it would primarily be for spruce bark
beetle infestations. He reminded members that the spruce bark
beetle infestation on the Kenai Peninsula was substantial and
crossed public and private ownership. He advised that prevent,
control, and suppress all have specific meanings in forestry.
1:28:43 PM
REPRESENTATIVE TUCK surmised the purpose of having this language
in this section is to allow the division to check whether a
property owner is applying flammable agents and/or whether
something needs to be applied to prevent the trees from drying
out and becoming a fire hazard.
MR. MAISCH answered the division would not be checking on what a
property owner is applying. He explained that if a property
owner has cut a lot of timber on his/her land and hasn't
properly treated the slash or disposed of the material it
becomes a breeding source for the insects and then the insects
can spread onto adjoining private or public lands. Therefore,
that would be the reason why forestry division staff would need
access to a piece of property.
1:29:41 PM
REPRESENTATIVE TUCK offered his understanding that there are
regulations which require downed trees be treated with a proper
destructive agent and the purpose of this is to be able to
inspect whether the downed trees have been treated with the
proper destructive agent.
MR. MAISCH replied correct, it would be a control method. He
explained there are numerous control methods for keeping an
insect infestation or potential infestation under control. It
is how the slash is treated - which could be chemical treatment
or physical treatment such as bucking, burning, or burial.
There are many ways to do that and those are addressed under the
separate Alaska Forest Resources and Practices Act statute.
1:30:47 PM
REPRESENTATIVE DRUMMOND said any organization authorized to
prevent, control, or suppress a fire includes any one of the
volunteer or paid fire departments in the state's communities.
She noted the Anchorage fire department has been working for
years to remove excess dry timber on "the hillside" in Anchorage
because it is extremely difficult or impossible to get water to
that area given the size of the roads. Therefore, she said,
close attention must be paid to who would be prevented from
getting to the source of a fire or potential source of a fire.
1:31:48 PM
CO-CHAIR TARR held over HB 355 with Amendment 1 pending for
further discussion.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 355 Opposition-Squyres Graphic.pdf |
HRES 3/5/2018 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/9/2018 1:00:00 PM |
HB 355 |
| HB 355 Opposition-Squyres Testimony.pdf |
HRES 3/5/2018 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/9/2018 1:00:00 PM |
HB 355 |
| HB 355 Sectional Analysis 2.21.18.pdf |
HRES 2/28/2018 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/28/2018 6:00:00 PM HRES 3/5/2018 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/9/2018 1:00:00 PM |
HB 355 |
| HB 355 Sponsor Statement 2.21.18.pdf |
HRES 2/28/2018 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/28/2018 6:00:00 PM HRES 3/5/2018 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/9/2018 1:00:00 PM |
HB 355 |
| HB 355 Supporting Document- Expanded One Pager 2.21.18.pdf |
HRES 2/28/2018 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/28/2018 6:00:00 PM HRES 3/5/2018 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/9/2018 1:00:00 PM |
HB 355 |
| HB 355 Ver A 2.21.18.pdf |
HRES 2/28/2018 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/28/2018 6:00:00 PM HRES 3/5/2018 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/9/2018 1:00:00 PM |
HB 355 |
| DNR Fiscal Note, HB 355.pdf |
HRES 2/28/2018 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/28/2018 6:00:00 PM HRES 3/5/2018 1:00:00 PM |
HB 355 |
| Law Fiscal Note, HB 355.pdf |
HRES 2/28/2018 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/28/2018 6:00:00 PM HRES 3/5/2018 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/9/2018 1:00:00 PM |
HB 355 |
| HB 355 Supporting Document- Alaska Fire Chiefs Letter of Support 2.28.18.pdf |
HRES 2/28/2018 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/28/2018 6:00:00 PM HRES 3/5/2018 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/9/2018 1:00:00 PM |
HB 355 |
| HB 355 Amendment One - D.2 - Rep. Rauscher 3.1.18.pdf |
HRES 3/5/2018 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/9/2018 1:00:00 PM |
HB 355 |
| HB 355 Amendment Two - D.3 - Rep Rauscher 3.1.18.pdf |
HRES 3/5/2018 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/9/2018 1:00:00 PM |
HB 355 |
| HB 355 Amendment Three - D.4 - Rep. Rauscher 3.1.18.pdf |
HRES 3/5/2018 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/9/2018 1:00:00 PM |
HB 355 |
| HB 355 Amendment Four - D.6 - Rep. Rauscher 3.2.18.pdf |
HRES 3/5/2018 1:00:00 PM |
HB 355 |
| HB 355 Amendment Five - D.7 - 3.2.18.pdf |
HRES 3/5/2018 1:00:00 PM |
HB 355 |
| HRES AOGCC Presentation Notes - Protecting the state from P and A liability 3.5.18.pdf |
HRES 3/5/2018 1:00:00 PM |
AOGCC |
| HRES AOGCC Presentation - CHART_Workover_Activities_Statewide_(2003-2017)_20180228 3.5.18.pdf |
HRES 3/5/2018 1:00:00 PM |
AOGCC |
| HRES AOGCC Presentation - CHARTS_Avg_Daily_Oil_NGL_Production_Rates_Statewide_(1960-2017)_20180228 3.5.18.pdf |
HRES 3/5/2018 1:00:00 PM |
AOGCC |
| HRES AOGCC Presentation - CHARTS_Wells_Drilled_DEV-SER_Oil-Gas_State_(2003-2017)_Bar_Chart_20180301 3.5.18.pdf |
HRES 3/5/2018 1:00:00 PM |
AOGCC |
| HRES AOGCC Presentation - CHARTS_Wells_Drilled_EXP_Oil-Gas_Statewide_(2003-2017)_Bar_Chart 3.5.18.pdf |
HRES 3/5/2018 1:00:00 PM |
AOGCC |
| HRES Food Security Presentation_Meter 3.5.18.pdf |
HRES 3/5/2018 1:00:00 PM |
Food Security |
| HRES Food Is Medicine 2018 Alaska Legislature - Ferguson 3.5.18.pdf |
HRES 3/5/2018 1:00:00 PM |
food Food Security |
| HRES Food Is Medicine 2018 Alaska Legislature - Ferguson 3.5.18.pdf |
HRES 3/5/2018 1:00:00 PM |
Food |