Legislature(2003 - 2004)
03/02/2004 01:55 PM House FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HOUSE BILL NO. 344
An Act relating to annual rental fees for mining
claims, and providing for reduced royalties during the
first three years of production.
REPRESENTATIVE HUGH 'BUD' FATE noted that the bill was
designed to keep the small Alaska mining industry in
business. Since 1980's, Alaska has seen the small miner
disappear because of the costs associated with that
industry. There is a 'glitch' in the Alaska statutes. The
language causes a miner to automatically lose their claim if
the required paperwork was filed a day late.
HB 344 would "fix" that language, granting a deadline
extension. New language would allow a miner to keep claims
by filing the paperwork and paying a penalty equal to one
years rent. He pointed out that Alaska was founded on
mining before oil was important to the State's industry.
Small mines have brought cash to the local communities. HB
344 is an important first step in reviving an industry that
is good for local communities and the State as a whole.
JIM POUND, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE HUGH 'BUD' FATE, offered to
answer questions of the Committee.
BOB LOEFFLER, DIRECTOR, MINING, LAND AND WATER DIVISION,
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, pointed out that often
times the miners are late in their filings. He commented on
circumstances that affect the miners. HB 344 provides
flexibility and alternatives. It will help to save some
claims and will help small miners remain viable.
Representative Foster voiced his appreciation for the
legislation. He asked what would happen if a miner filed
late and another miner "staked" that claim. Mr. Loeffler
replied that had been extensively discussed with the Mining
Association. The bill could rectify the claim as long as no
one had staked intervening rights. If someone staked in the
interim, the language would not cure the problem. He
pointed out that this is part of a long tradition from the
1872 mining bill.
Representative Croft asked the penalty and if interest would
be calculated. Mr. Loeffler replied that the miner would be
required to pay whatever was owed and an additional one-year
rental.
Representative Croft inquired if the bill had originally
addressed royalties. Mr. Pound responded that it did and
after calculation, it was determined that would save only
about $20 to $60 dollars so it was decided not to be worth
the process. Representative Fate interjected that the
legislation started the same as HB 232, but that bill did
not "meaningfully help the small miner".
Representative Fate MOVED to report CS HB 344 (RES) out of
Committee with individual recommendations and with the
accompanying fiscal note. There being NO OBJECTION, it was
so ordered.
CS HB 344 (RES) was reported out of Committee with a "do
pass" recommendation and with a new note by Department of
Natural Resources.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|