Legislature(2017 - 2018)BUTROVICH 205
04/18/2018 03:30 PM Senate RESOURCES
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB315 | |
| SB135 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| *+ | SB 135 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 315 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HB 315-CONFIDENTIALITY OF ANIMAL & CROP RECORDS
3:31:41 PM
CHAIR GIESSEL announced consideration of HB 315. [CSHB 315
(RES), version 30-GH2584\D was before the committee.] She said
the committee first heard this as SB 164 on February 19. There
have been some changes to it and she invited Ms. Carpenter,
Director of the Division of Environmental Health, to explain
them.
CHRISTINA CARPENTER, Director, Division of Environmental Health,
Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC), Anchorage,
Alaska, said that the House Resources Committee introduced two
amendments at the request of the administration.
3:33:55 PM
SENATOR VON IMHOF joined the committee.
MS. CARPENTER said the first amendment added language that
explicitly allows DEC to share animal importation records with
the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) to support the
Division of Agriculture's efforts to enforce the Alaska-grown
program for Alaska meat producers.
The second amendment struck the language that was specific to
business and proprietary information and expanded language in
section (b) (1) to clearly outline that in the event of a public
health threat, the department would release information from
records in its possession and not the records themselves.
SENATOR VON IMHOF asked about the definition of "varietal."
3:34:36 PM
BOB GERLACH, State Veterinarian, Department of Environmental
Conservation (DEC), Anchorage, Alaska, answered that the
definition of "varietal" specifically addresses different
varieties of seeds for vegetable production.
3:35:29 PM
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI joined the committee.
3:35:40 PM
At ease
3:37:00 PM
CHAIR GIESSEL opened public testimony on HB 315.
THOR STACEY, lobbyist, Alaska Wild Sheep Foundation, Juneau,
Alaska, said he would reference an economic report that was
commissioned by Safari Club International and the Alaska
Professional Hunters Association. He said the Alaska Wild Sheep
Foundation is the Alaska chapter of a national conservation
organization whose mission involves conservation of Alaska's
wild sheep, mountain goats and muskox.
MR. STACEY said his comments were narrowly confined to this
measure and HB 315 is broader than their specific concern. Their
concerns focus specifically on domestic sheep and goat
information but recognize that the agriculture community is much
larger than that. There are about 1,500 of those animals in the
state. Their stake in the discussion equals approximately
$27,000 of economic value to the private sector that comes from
one guided sheep hunt. That's about 400 annual hunts for a $10.7
million value.
He said the state take is high; state non-resident hunting
license and tags with federal match just for sheep opportunities
bring in $1.75 million. These non-residents share 13,000 pounds
of wild sheep with Alaskans. About 67,000 pounds of wild sheep
meat is harvested in Alaska annually. These numbers are
significant because they relate to the food value of these
animals.
From the foundation's perspective, if they were to try to ensure
Alaska's wild sheep, because ultimately, they bear the cost of a
disease outbreak to wild animals, they asked Lloyds of London
what it would cost to buy a policy on Alaska's wild sheep
insuring them against disease transmission. The relevant factors
are:
-The state at this time allows the importation of
Micoplasma Ovipneumoniae-positive (M.Ovi) animals to
the state.
-It's legal to own M.Ovi-positive animals in any
location in the state regardless of their proximity to
wild animals.
-There are no testing requirements for M.Ovi in Alaska
at this time.
-There is no disease-free certification or any
certification similar to "Alaska Grown" or other types
of organic certifications.
-There are no laws for domestic owners to indemnify
the public at large if there is negligence from a
disease outbreak. So, if you are negligent and proven
to be so, there is no law that says that you have some
kind of skin in the game that you should work towards
in paying that cost back.
MR. STACEY Lloyds of London would address other factors like the
remote nature of Alaska and the costs associated with fixing the
problem. On the positive side, the Division of Wildlife is well-
funded, the science is very well understood, their testing is
highly reliable, and they understand how to identify, find, and
quantify what M.Ovi is or the specific strain in question.
Another positive is that there are only 1,500 domestic sheep in
the state and only about 75-100 of them are positive for M.Ovi.
Lloyds of London would look at all those factors. But state
policy at this time is very wide open.
MR. STACEY said language on page 2, lines 8-12, deals with
disclosure. So, if disease tests have identified animals, there
is a need to disclose this information. It says that DEC "may"
disclose information and "based on the identified threat" of
that information to the public or other animals. From prior
comments from DEC's veterinarian, it appears that he does not
view domestic animals infected M.Ovi to be a threat; therefore,
no disclosure would occur. Not taking the broader agriculture
community into this, but very specific to domestic sheep and
goats, he posited what if HB 315 would result in a lower policy
premium or a higher premium by Lloyds of London. He would argue
that non-disclosure and the fact that these tests would no
longer be accessible by the broader public would raise the
premium and the cost to insure the animal, especially given lack
of other policies the state has at this time.
3:44:26 PM
In summary, Mr. Stacey said the foundation isn't interested in
upsetting the discussion on HB 315, because they recognize there
are more interests involved in the agricultural community than
just domestic sheep and goat owners. With that in mind, it is
irresponsible to come in to a sweeping piece of legislation and
work to upset the apple cart. However, these questions and the
concerns are real. A working group had been convened to work on
this very issue, but this concept was not brought to it even
though the state veterinarian knew that there were ongoing
discussions between wild sheep advocates and domestic sheep and
goat owners. How this bill relates to the issue of disease
transmission and the risk posed to wild animals was not part of
that discussion.
MR. STACEY said from his narrow perspective, there is a concern
about how this works and they think that it raises perils and
closes down access to information related to disease
transmission. He summarized that the foundation is obliged to
support the concept, because the idea is to provide
confidentiality to encourage testing, but if that is the
ultimate goal, why not include confidentiality of testing in
statute?
3:46:23 PM
SENATOR BISHOP asked for an example of a comfortable level of
testing confidentiality.
MR. STACEY answered that while he has not performed these tests,
he has heard second hand that up-to-date testing consists of a
nasal swab procedure to identify live bacteria (M.Ovi) is a
pathogen) and a blood serology test that identifies antibodies.
In other words, one identifies live bacteria in the nasal cavity
and the other identifies the presence of anti-bodies or past
exposure or infection.
3:47:38 PM
CHAIR GIESSEL, finding nor further questions, closed public
testimony and held HB 315 in committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| Senate Resources Hearing Agenda - 4 - 18 - 2018.pdf |
SRES 4/18/2018 3:30:00 PM |
|
| HB315 - Version D.PDF |
SRES 4/18/2018 3:30:00 PM |
HB 315 |
| HB315 Explanation of Changes ver A to D.pdf |
SRES 4/18/2018 3:30:00 PM |
HB 315 |
| HB315 - Fiscal Note - DEC - 1 - 25 - 18.PDF |
SRES 4/18/2018 3:30:00 PM |
HB 315 |
| SB135 - Version D.pdf |
SRES 4/18/2018 3:30:00 PM |
SB 135 |
| SB135 - Sectional Summary - Version D.pdf |
SRES 4/18/2018 3:30:00 PM |
SB 135 |
| SB135 - Supporting document - Eastside Setnet Area Map - 4 - 18 - 18.pdf |
SRES 4/18/2018 3:30:00 PM |
SB 135 |
| SB135 Summary of changes ver A to ver D.PDF |
SRES 4/18/2018 3:30:00 PM |
SB 135 |